Comparison of Two Steroid Nasal Implants Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis
Comparison of Two Steroid Nasal Implants Following Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis
The purpose of this study is to learn whether there is a difference in postoperative (after surgery) endoscopic appearance of the sinus cavities (the way that the sinuses look through a camera) between sinuses that receive one of two types of resorbable steroid eluting sinus packing (a sponge-like material which dissolves within several days while releasing a steroid): 1) Propel Implant or 2) Nasopore soaked with triamcinolone at the time of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) for chronic rhinosinusitis.
Both of these procedures are currently used regularly by Dr. Pearlman in practice at the conclusion of ESS for treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. As standard of care, treatment is determined intraoperatively (during surgery), at the discretion of the surgeon. In this study, each subject will have both treatments (one in each cavity). The 'experimental' aspect relates to directly comparing the two procedures.
This research study is being done because there is currently a lack of consensus regarding the optimal nasal packing regimen. There have been no comparison studies and practice patterns vary widely. Our study looks to compare the Propel implant to Nasopore packing soaked in Triamcinolone.
Inclusion Criteria:
-Adult patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis refractory to medical management
Exclusion Criteria: