Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| U01DE025633 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Low enrollment
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In this study, this team of researchers will investigate the impact of chronic temporomandibular disorder suffering on the endogenous μ-opioid system in vivo, arguably one of the principal endogenous pain modulatory systems in the brain, and its modulation by 10 daily sessions of primary motor cortex stimulation using high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS).
Approximately 10% of TMD patients will not experience an improvement of their symptoms and around 75% of patients who fail to respond to conservative treatments are also not suitable for TM joint surgery. Initial studies from NIH-NIDCR R56 project using positron emission tomography (PET) with [11C] Carfentanil, a selective radiotracer for μ-opioid receptor (μOR), have demonstrated that there is a decrease in thalamic μOR availability (non displaceable binding potential BPND) in the brains of TMD patients during masseteric pain compared to healthy controls. μ-opioid neurotransmission is arguably one of the mechanisms most centrally involved in pain regulation and experience. Moreover, the thalamus is the major relay structure in the forebrain for (non)-noxious inputs, which will be distributed subsequently to multiple cortical areas for discriminative, cognitive and affective processing. MRI-based reports have found that those findings co-localize with neuroplastic changes in trigeminal pain patients. Conventional therapies are unable to selectively target the thalamus and associated regions, and there is a paucity of data on how to reverse neuroplastic molecular mechanisms when available medications fail. Interestingly, several studies with motor cortex stimulation (MCS) have shown that epidural electrodes in the primary motor cortex (M1) are effective in providing analgesia in patients with central pain and that it occurs via indirect modulation of thalamic activity. Evidently, the invasive nature of such a procedure limits its indication to highly severe pain disorders. New non-invasive neuromodulatory methods for M1, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), can now safely modulate the μOR system, providing relatively lasting pain relief in pain patients. Recently, a novel high-definition tDCS (HD-tDCS) montage created by this research group was able to reduce exclusively "contralateral" sensory-discrimative clinical pain measures (intensity/area) in TMD patients by targeting precisely the M1 region. Therefore, the main goals of this study are: First, to exploit the μ-opioidergic dysfunction in vivo in TMD patients compared to healthy controls; Second, to determine whether 10 daily sessions of noninvasive and precise M1 HD-tDCS have a modulatory effect on clinical and experimental pain measures in TMD patients; and Third, to investigate whether repetitive active M1 HD-tDCS induces/reverts μOR BPND changes in the thalamus and other pain-related regions, and whether those changes are correlated with TMD pain measures. The studies above represent a change in paradigm in TMD research, as this research group directly investigates and modulates in vivo one of the most important endogenous analgesic mechanisms in the brain.
The IRB approved study protocol also includes secondary data sets to be used for analysis in study objective #6 only. The data sets are not part of the clinical trial as they were collected during a previous study (NIDCR-R56-DE022637 project [IRBMED #HUM00080911; Dr. Alexandre DaSilva, Principal Investigator]). Participants in HUM00080911 (both Healthy and TMD patients) received no intervention, but underwent the same Baseline, MRI and PET protocol. This secondary data will not be represented in the Adverse Event or final enrollment total for this clinical trial. However, the data will be analyzed in a meta-analysis addressing secondary objective #6 only. These data sets will not be used to analyze any primary study objectives, nor change the terms of the clinical trial. Manuscripts that include these secondary data sets will clearly indicate the use of this data and clarify that the data was collected separate from the clinical trial data.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TMD Patients Active Group: Active Comparator | Active Comparator | 30 TMD patients will be randomized (Taves method) to receive high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS*) as 20 minute sessions, once daily for 10 days (M-F for 2 weeks). |
|
| TMD Patients Sham Group: Sham Comparator | Sham Comparator | 30 TMD patients will be randomized (Taves method) to receive high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS*) as 30-second administrations at the beginning and end of each 20 minute session, once daily for 10 days (M-F for 2 weeks). |
|
| Healthy Control Group | No Intervention | 20 Healthy Volunteers will be asked to undergo baseline assessments only (including imaging, but no brain stimulation). Healthy volunteer data (n \ |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HD-tDCS* | Device | Non-invasive brain stimulation (active protocol) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Clinical Visual Analog Scale Pain Score From Baseline (Screening Day) to 4 Weeks After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions (Follow Up #2). | Change in clinical Visual Analog Scale pain score from baseline (Screening Day) to 4 weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions (Follow Up #2). Pain is measured on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the worst. | Screening (Baseline), 4 Weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Clinical Visual Analog Scale Pain Score During Sustained Masseteric Pain Stress Challenge From Baseline PET (#1) Session to Follow-up PET (#2) Session, 1 Week After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions. | Change in clinical Visual Analog Scale pain score during sustained masseteric pain stress challenge from baseline PET (#1) session to follow-up PET (#2) session, 1 week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
In addition, TMD subjects must qualify as:
• Diagnosed with chronic TMD as defined by the Diagnostic Criteria (DC) for TMD and the American Academy of Orofacial Pain (DC/TMD): "Chronic TMD pain and dysfunction for at least one year from the clinical exam session (DC/TMD: Masticatory myofacial pain with/without referral) not adequately controlled by previous therapies (eg, NSAIDs, muscle relaxants)"
Emphasis is therefore placed on generalizability and chronicity of symptoms.
OR
To qualify as a Healthy Volunteer, subjects must be:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alexandre F DaSilva, DDS, DMedSc | University of Michigan | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Michigan School of Dentistry | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37956741 | Derived | Kim DJ, Nascimento TD, Lim M, Danciu T, Zubieta JK, Scott PJH, Koeppe R, Kaciroti N, DaSilva AF. Exploring HD-tDCS Effect on mu-opioid Receptor and Pain Sensitivity in Temporomandibular Disorder: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial Study. J Pain. 2024 Apr;25(4):1070-1081. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2023.11.001. Epub 2023 Nov 11. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
After consent to participate, subjects underwent evaluation to ensure eligibility into the study. Several patients screen failed at this stage of the study. Additional inclusion/exclusion criteria required by the sponsor were highly strict for our patient community and excluded the majority of volunteers who were pre-screened (490 total pre-screened).
The study enrolled a total of 15 participants into the protocol. Secondary data from an additional 12 participants who participated in a prior study were also incorporated into the analysis for some secondary outcome measures as noted in the protocol section.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | TMD Patients Active Group: Active Comparator | 30 TMD patients will be randomized (Taves method) to receive high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS*) as 20 minute sessions, once daily for 10 days (M-F for 2 weeks). HD-tDCS*: Non-invasive brain stimulation (active protocol) |
| FG001 | TMD Patients Sham Group: Sham Comparator | 30 TMD patients will be randomized (Taves method) to receive high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS*) as 30-second administrations at the beginning and end of each 20 minute session, once daily for 10 days (M-F for 2 weeks). Sham HD-tDCS*: Non-invasive brain stimulation (sham protocol) |
| FG002 | Healthy Control Group | 20 Healthy Volunteers will be asked to undergo baseline assessments only (including imaging, but no brain stimulation). Healthy volunteer data (n \ |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Please note that the healthy control group incorporates secondary data from 12 participants who did not enroll in the study protocol. These 12 participants are not reflected in the enrollment total, though they are reflected in the Participant flow and baseline analysis population total for analysis purposes.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | TMD Patients Active Group: Active Comparator | 30 TMD patients will be randomized (Taves method) to receive high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS*) as 20 minute sessions, once daily for 10 days (M-F for 2 weeks). HD-tDCS*: Non-invasive brain stimulation (active protocol) |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Clinical Visual Analog Scale Pain Score From Baseline (Screening Day) to 4 Weeks After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions (Follow Up #2). | Change in clinical Visual Analog Scale pain score from baseline (Screening Day) to 4 weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions (Follow Up #2). Pain is measured on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the worst. | 2 subjects were excluded from analysis due to IRB requirements related to one pain measure threshold. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Screening (Baseline), 4 Weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions |
|
During the 2-weeks of HD-tDCS treatment
Adverse Events were collected using a questionnaire that reflects common side effects of tDCS treatment. The questionnaire was administered before and after each of 10 tDCS treatment sessions. All of the adverse events reported were expected and mild in severity.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Active TMD Patients | TMD patients who received active HD-tDCS treatment for 10 days |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headache | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacqueline Dobson | University of Michigan | 734-763-8469 | contactHOPE@umich.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 10, 2022 | Jan 12, 2023 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jul 22, 2021 | Jan 12, 2023 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013705 | Temporomandibular Joint Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017271 | Craniomandibular Disorders |
| D008336 | Mandibular Diseases |
| D007571 | Jaw Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sham HD-tDCS* | Device | Non-invasive brain stimulation (sham protocol) |
|
|
| Baseline, 1 Week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions |
| Changes in GeoPain Measures (PAINS - Summation of Area and Intensity) From Baseline Daily Over the Treatment Period and Through Follow-up (4 Weeks After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions). | Short- and long-term changes in GeoPain measures (percentage of pain area extension in the head region, average of pain intensity in the affected region, and their summation, meaning percentage of combined pain area and intensity in the affected region) from baseline daily over the treatment period and through follow-up at 4 weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions). | Baseline to 4 weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions |
| Difference in µOR BPND Levels of Thalamus From Baseline PET (#1) Session to Follow-up PET (#2) Session, 1 Week After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions. | The difference in µOR BPND levels (a measure of receptor availability) between Baseline PET #1 and PET (#2) in TMD patients (active vs sham treatment groups). The values indicate changes in the availability of mu-opioid receptors (µOR), referred to as the non-displaceable binding potential (BPND), which reflects the density or concentration of available µORs in a particular region of interest in the brain, specifically the left thalamus. These changes are assessed by conducting baseline positron emission tomography (PET) scans prior to treatment and follow-up PET scans one week after the completion of HD-tDCS sessions. During each PET scan, µOR measurements are taken during an early resting phase. A positive value indicates increased µOR availability following treatment, while a negative value indicates decreased availability after treatment. | Baseline to 1 Week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions. |
| Change in Clinical Visual Analog Scale Pain Score at Rest From Baseline PET (#1) Session to Follow-up PET (#2) Session, 1 Week After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions. | Change in clinical Visual Analog Scale pain score at rest from baseline PET (#1) session to follow-up PET (#2) session, 1 week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions. | Baseline, 1 Week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions. |
| Difference in µOR BPND Levels at Rest During PET (#1) in Chronic TMD Patients as Compared to Healthy Subjects. | The difference in µOR BPND levels (a measure of receptor availability) at rest (5-40 mins after radiotracer injection) during baseline PET in TMD patients as compared to healthy subjects. The values for each group the availability of mu-opioid receptors (µOR), referred to as the non-displaceable binding potential (BPND), which reflects the density or concentration of available µORs in a particular region of interest in the brain, specifically the left thalamus. It was assessed by conducting baseline positron emission tomography (PET) scans. The outcome measure 6 was taken during an early-resting (outcome 6) | During PET #1, at rest (5-40 mins after radiotracer injection) |
| Difference in µOR BPND Levels During Experimental Sustained Masseteric Pain Stress Challenge During PET (#1) in Chronic TMD Patients as Compared to Healthy Subjects | Difference in µOR BPND levels (a measure of receptor availability) at experimental sustained masseteric pain stress challenge (45-90 mins after radiotracer injection) during baseline PET in TMD patients as compared to healthy subjects. The values for each group the availability of mu-opioid receptors (µOR), referred to as the non-displaceable binding potential (BPND), which reflects the density or concentration of available µORs in a particular region of interest in the brain, specifically the left thalamus. It was assessed by conducting baseline positron emission tomography (PET) scans. The outcome measure 7 was taken during a late pain stimulus (hypertonic saline infusion) phase. | PET (#1) during experimental sustained masseteric pain stress challenge (45-90 mins after radiotracer injection) |
| TMD Patients Sham Group: Sham Comparator |
30 TMD patients will be randomized (Taves method) to receive high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS*) as 30-second administrations at the beginning and end of each 20 minute session, once daily for 10 days (M-F for 2 weeks). Sham HD-tDCS*: Non-invasive brain stimulation (sham protocol) |
| BG002 | Healthy Control Group | 20 Healthy Volunteers will be asked to undergo baseline assessments only (including imaging, but no brain stimulation). Healthy volunteer data (n \ |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG001 | TMD Patients Sham Group: Sham Comparator | 30 TMD patients will be randomized (Taves method) to receive high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS*) as 30-second administrations at the beginning and end of each 20 minute session, once daily for 10 days (M-F for 2 weeks). Sham HD-tDCS*: Non-invasive brain stimulation (sham protocol) |
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Clinical Visual Analog Scale Pain Score During Sustained Masseteric Pain Stress Challenge From Baseline PET (#1) Session to Follow-up PET (#2) Session, 1 Week After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions. | Change in clinical Visual Analog Scale pain score during sustained masseteric pain stress challenge from baseline PET (#1) session to follow-up PET (#2) session, 1 week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, 1 Week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Changes in GeoPain Measures (PAINS - Summation of Area and Intensity) From Baseline Daily Over the Treatment Period and Through Follow-up (4 Weeks After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions). | Short- and long-term changes in GeoPain measures (percentage of pain area extension in the head region, average of pain intensity in the affected region, and their summation, meaning percentage of combined pain area and intensity in the affected region) from baseline daily over the treatment period and through follow-up at 4 weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions). | 2 subjects were excluded from analysis due to IRB requirements related to one pain measure threshold. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage | Baseline to 4 weeks after completion of HD-tDCS sessions |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Difference in µOR BPND Levels of Thalamus From Baseline PET (#1) Session to Follow-up PET (#2) Session, 1 Week After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions. | The difference in µOR BPND levels (a measure of receptor availability) between Baseline PET #1 and PET (#2) in TMD patients (active vs sham treatment groups). The values indicate changes in the availability of mu-opioid receptors (µOR), referred to as the non-displaceable binding potential (BPND), which reflects the density or concentration of available µORs in a particular region of interest in the brain, specifically the left thalamus. These changes are assessed by conducting baseline positron emission tomography (PET) scans prior to treatment and follow-up PET scans one week after the completion of HD-tDCS sessions. During each PET scan, µOR measurements are taken during an early resting phase. A positive value indicates increased µOR availability following treatment, while a negative value indicates decreased availability after treatment. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | arbitrary units | Baseline to 1 Week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Clinical Visual Analog Scale Pain Score at Rest From Baseline PET (#1) Session to Follow-up PET (#2) Session, 1 Week After Completion of HD-tDCS Sessions. | Change in clinical Visual Analog Scale pain score at rest from baseline PET (#1) session to follow-up PET (#2) session, 1 week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Baseline, 1 Week after completion of HD-tDCS sessions. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Difference in µOR BPND Levels at Rest During PET (#1) in Chronic TMD Patients as Compared to Healthy Subjects. | The difference in µOR BPND levels (a measure of receptor availability) at rest (5-40 mins after radiotracer injection) during baseline PET in TMD patients as compared to healthy subjects. The values for each group the availability of mu-opioid receptors (µOR), referred to as the non-displaceable binding potential (BPND), which reflects the density or concentration of available µORs in a particular region of interest in the brain, specifically the left thalamus. It was assessed by conducting baseline positron emission tomography (PET) scans. The outcome measure 6 was taken during an early-resting (outcome 6) | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | arbitrary units | During PET #1, at rest (5-40 mins after radiotracer injection) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Difference in µOR BPND Levels During Experimental Sustained Masseteric Pain Stress Challenge During PET (#1) in Chronic TMD Patients as Compared to Healthy Subjects | Difference in µOR BPND levels (a measure of receptor availability) at experimental sustained masseteric pain stress challenge (45-90 mins after radiotracer injection) during baseline PET in TMD patients as compared to healthy subjects. The values for each group the availability of mu-opioid receptors (µOR), referred to as the non-displaceable binding potential (BPND), which reflects the density or concentration of available µORs in a particular region of interest in the brain, specifically the left thalamus. It was assessed by conducting baseline positron emission tomography (PET) scans. The outcome measure 7 was taken during a late pain stimulus (hypertonic saline infusion) phase. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | arbitrary units | PET (#1) during experimental sustained masseteric pain stress challenge (45-90 mins after radiotracer injection) |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 4 |
| 0 |
| 4 |
| 4 |
| 4 |
| EG001 | Sham TMD Patients | TMD patients who complete 10 sham treatments | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| EG002 | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Volunteers did not receive treatment. | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Scalp Pain | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Scalp Burn sensation (mild) | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tingling | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| sleepiness | Investigations | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D007592 |
| Joint Diseases |
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |