Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA228631 | Other Grant/Funding Number | National Cancer Institute |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
study design changed due to COVID-19
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective, qualitative study consisting of observation and audio recording of the initial physician-patient consultations in newly diagnosed cancer patients occurring at the Duke University Medical Center (DUMC). Semi-structured debriefing interviews with participating oncologists and patients will follow the initial encounter.
The purpose of this research study is to examine oncologist and patients communication and how patient participation in shared decision-making may impact cancer treatment. Patients who are HIV positive and newly diagnosed with cancer and their treating oncologist may voluntarily participate in this study. The study team will record and observe the initial consultation visit between the patient and treating oncologist. Typically, at this visit, specific treatment options for a new cancer are reviewed in detail. Semi-structured debriefing interviews with participating oncologists and patients will follow the initial encounter.
Patient interviews will occur in person or by telephone within 72 hours of the initial consultation. Oncologists will be interviewed in person within one week following the clinical interaction. Clinical interactions at the initial consultation visit and interviews with oncologists will be audio recorded and transcribed. Interviews will be conducted over 45-60 minutes and will be semi-structured with open-ended questions to allow the interviewee to direct the flow of the conversation. A research assistant trained in qualitative research methods will administer interviews.
There are two to three visits: one visit to complete the informed consent process, the recording of the initial consultation visit, and lastly a debriefing interview visit. The debriefing interview may be conducted in person or over the phone.
The following instruments and question probes will assess three main areas of decision-making:
Patient treatment choice will be determined via chart review 6 months after the initial recorded appointment. We will measure concordance between physician recommendation, strength of the physician recommendation (PhyReCS), and patient treatment choice.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 Physician/APP | Surgical, medical, and radiation oncologists and/or Advanced Practice Provider (APP) |
| |
| Arm 2 Patients | For each participating oncologist, we will may enroll up to three adult cancer patients presenting for consultation, since certain disease sites have a higher incidence in the HIV population. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audio recording of initial consultation and debriefing interviews. | Other | Semi-structured debriefing interviews with participating oncologists and HIV-infected newly diagnosed cancer patients will follow the initial encounter. Interviews will be conducted over 45-60 minutes and will be semi-structured with open-ended questions to allow the interviewee to direct the flow of the conversation. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of concordance between physician recommendation and patient treatment decision using the The Physician Recommendation Coding System ( PhyReCS) tool. | The Physician Recommendation Coding System (PhyReCS) is a validated tool to measure the strength of physician recommendations using direct observation of clinical encounters. It is a global, 5-point scale ranging from -2 (strong recommendation against treatment) to +2 (strong recommendation for treatment) that captures how physicians portrayed treatment options during the entirety of the clinical appointment. The PhyReCS addresses major limitations with prior physician decision-making research by having the flexibility to capture multiple nuanced recommendations, for example, patients with early stage breast cancer choosing whether to receive breast-conserving therapy (lumpectomy plus radiation) or mastectomy. | 3 years |
Not provided
Not provided
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
Physician Inclusion Criteria:
Patient Exclusion Criteria:
Physician/APP Exclusion Criteria:
-None applicable
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Oncologists Newly diagnosed cancer patients
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gita Suneja, MD PhD | Duke University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duke Cancer Center | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 36724857 | Result | Henry V, Stephens MJ, Galyean P, Young J, Zickmund S, Knettel BA, Bartlett J, Watt MH, Pollak KI, Ubel PA, Fagerlin A, Suneja G. Improving Cancer Care for People Living With HIV: A Qualitative Study of Provider Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2023 May 1;116(1):60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.01.045. Epub 2023 Jan 29. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|