Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Principal Investigator (Prof) | Other Identifier | TelAvivU | |
| Principal Investigator | Other Identifier | TelAvivU |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Laszlo Tauber Family Foundation | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
the objectives of the study is to Evaluate the effectiveness of "The Interfaces Program" to promote person's components, performance and improving the work environment of people with disabilities.
People with disabilities experience many barriers in trying to integrate into the competitive market. The barriers may be result of the unique characteristics of the individual (characteristics of the disability, occupational history, work self-efficacy, etc.), the characteristics of the occupation and occupational performance (characteristics of the job and the job demands) and environmental barriers (accessibility, discrimination, stigma and lack of opportunities, etc.). The main response to the integration problems of people with disabilities in the world of work is supported employment service. Supported employment focuses primarily on placement of the individual and do not relate to barriers relating to the individual's ability to develop a career.
The present study examines the effectiveness of a new intervention program "The interfaces program " aiming to promote career development process among people with disabilities working in the competitive market. The program presents an integration of the Person-Environment-Occupation-Performance (PEOP) model and lead career development theories. The ultimate goal of this study is to examine the effectiveness of the "interfaces program" by examining its impact on the promotion of objective and subjective measures among people with disabilities who work and receive supported employment services.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| experimental | Experimental | The "interfaces Program" |
|
| control group | Active Comparator | supported employment using the individual placement and support (IPS) model |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Interfaces Program | Behavioral | career development program |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| proactive behavior Questionnaire (developed for this study) | proactive behavior during the last week | A change in proactive behavior measure will appear after 9 sessions over 3 month (4 first meeting will be done once a week, and 5 meetings once in two weeks) of intervention, and after 3 month form the end of the intervention |
| Adult subjective assessment of participation (ASAP) | subjective experience of participation in meaningful occupations | A change in subjective experience of participation measure will appear after 9 sessions over 3 month (4 first meeting will be done once a week, and 5 meetings once in two weeks) of intervention, and after 3 month form the end of the intervention |
| Work Behavior Inventory (WBI) | employer assessment of work behavior and work performance | A change in work behavior measure will appear after 9 sessions over 3 month (4 first meeting will be done once a week, and 5 meetings once in two weeks) of intervention, and after 3 month form the end of the intervention |
| work self efficacy Questionnaire (WSS-37) | subjective report of work self efficacy | A change in work self efficacy measure will appear after 9 sessions over 3 month (4 first meeting will be done once a week, and 5 meetings once in two weeks) of intervention, and after 3 month form the end of the intervention |
| health perception sf 12 Questionnaire Health Perception | subjective report of health perception | A change in health perception measure will appear after 9 sessions over 3 month (4 first meeting will be done once a week, and 5 meetings once in two weeks) of intervention, and after 3 month form the end of the intervention |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| navah ratzon, prof | Tel Aviv University | Principal Investigator |
| Rachel Gali cinamonp, prof | Tel Aviv University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maya Huber | Tel Aviv | Isarel | 6936468 | Israel |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| IPS |
| Behavioral |
supported employment using the individual placement and support (IPS) model |
|
| career self management - subjective self management perception Questionnaire - developed for this study | subjective report of career self management | A change in career self management measure will appear after 9 sessions over 3 month (4 first meeting will be done once a week, and 5 meetings once in two weeks) of intervention, and after 3 month form the end of the intervention |
| perception of environmental work barriers - subjective work barriers perception Questionnaire - developed for this study | subjective perception of environmental work barriers | A change in perception of environmental barriers will appear after 9 sessions over 3 month (4 first meeting will be done once a week, and 5 meetings once in two weeks) of intervention, and after 3 month form the end of the intervention |