Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The current study is a randomized intervention trial that tests the efficacy of a family-focused sibling relationship promotion program. The study includes a treatment group and a contact-equivalent attention control condition with 288 sibling dyads and data collection with target parents, target sibling dyads, and teachers at three time points (pre-test, post-test, and 18-month follow-up). Data will be collected using a three-cohort design with 96 families in each of the three cohorts.
The proposed project tests the efficacy of a family-focused program. This innovative program is focused on sibling relationships and parenting of siblings as synergistic targets of change to promote positive interpersonal family dynamics and parent and youth psychosocial and behavioral health and well-being. This translational effort builds on strong theoretical and empirical premises including a successful pilot study (ASU SIBS Program). Using a rigorous design and measurement, aims are to: (a) test the efficacy of SIBS, delivered via 12 weekly afterschool sibling sessions and 3 family nights in the familiar elementary school setting, versus a contact-equivalent attention control condition. Mexican-origin sibling dyads (5th graders and younger siblings; N = 288 dyads) and their parents will be recruited from economically disadvantaged elementary schools and randomly assigned within school to intervention or contact-equivalent attention control conditions. Assessments will be conducted at pre-test, post-test, and 18-month follow-up. Program effects will be tested on primary and secondary outcomes, including sibling relationship quality (i.e., warmth and negativity), sibling relationship skills, children's efficacy (social, emotional), children's internalizing symptoms, parents' stress and depressive symptoms, parent-child warmth and conflict, and family cohesion. Findings will advance prevention science by identifying an efficacious program that capitalizes on cultural assets to promote positive family dynamics and psychosocial well-being among Latinos, including by incorporating daily measurements of intervention targets (sibling relationship skills) to identify mechanisms underlying program effects.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIBS Program | Experimental | The program condition includes 12 weekly 90-minute afterschool group sessions for siblings. Sessions are structured as psycho-educational groups and include social interactional activities, role-playing, discussion, and didactic presentation. The focus is on sibling relationship skills, cognitions, and activities. During a total of 3 family nights, parents attend with their children. Part of the family night session involves parents and children together. Another part of the session involves parents being separated from children. Family Nights promote parents' understanding of sibling relationships, review concepts, provide strategies for parental support of siblings, and teach parents skills for dealing with sibling problems. Family Nights include dinner and last 2 hours. |
|
| Contact-Equivalent Attention Control | Placebo Comparator | The Contact-Equivalent Attention Control condition includes 12 weekly 90-minute afterschool group sessions for siblings led by two co-leaders. Students work on educational games and activities. Groups begin with an icebreaker and continue with games and projects. This condition also includes 3 family nights, where parents attend with their children. Activities of the Family Nights include children showing their parents the activities they have been engaging in during the sessions. Family Nights include dinner and last 2 hours. Part of the family night session involves parents and children together. Another part of the session involves parents being separated from children; during this part, parents will break out with one group leader, and siblings will work with the other group leader. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SIBS Program | Behavioral | Universal prevention program promoting positive sibling and family relationships conducted in an afterschool setting |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Parenting of Siblings Measure | The measure assesses parents' perceptions of three constructs: Parents' positive guidance, authoritarian control, and involvement (McHale et al., 2000; Updegraff et al., 2016). For each subscale, scores range from 1 to 5. Higher subscale scores indicate more positive guidance (i.e., better outcome), higher involvement (i.e., better outcome), and higher authoritarian control (i.e., worse outcome). Subscales are not combined into a total score. | 16 weeks |
| Sibling Prosocial Behavior | The measure assesses parents' perceptions of one construct: Parents' ratings of children's supportive and prosocial behaviors (Stormshak, Bellanti, & Bierman, 1996; Updegraff et al., 2016). Scores range from 1 to 6. Higher scores indicate parents' perceptions of target child's more prosocial behaviors toward their sibling (i.e., better outcome). | 16 weeks |
| Sibling Intimacy | The measure assesses siblings' ratings of intimacy/emotional support (Blyth & Foster-Clark, 1987). Scores range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate target child's perceptions of higher sibling intimacy and closeness (i.e., better outcome). | 16 weeks |
| Sibling Relationship Inventory: Negativity Subscale | The measure assesses parents' ratings of sibling conflict and negativity (Stocker & McHale, 1992). Scores range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate parents' perceptions of target child's greater negativity toward their sibling (i.e., worse outcome). | 16 weeks |
| Sibling Relationship Inventory: Negativity Subscale | The measure assesses children's ratings of sibling conflict and negativity (Furman & Buhrmester, 1985). Scores range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate target child's perceptions of higher sibling conflict and negativity (i.e., worse outcome). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Self-efficacy Measure | This measure assesses children's ratings of two constructs: social self-efficacy and emotional self-efficacy (Muris, 2001). For each subscale, scores range from 1 to 5. Higher subscale scores indicate greater social self-efficacy (i.e., better outcome) and greater emotional self-efficacy (i.e., better outcome). Subscales are not combined into a total score. | 16 weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
- Enrollment in a self-contained special education setting
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Adriana J Umana-Taylor, PhD | Harvard University | Principal Investigator |
| Kimberly A Updegraff, PhD | Arizona State University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arizona State University | Tempe | Arizona | 85287 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27077238 | Background | Updegraff KA, Umana-Taylor AJ, Rodriguez De Jesus SA, McHale SM, Feinberg MF, Kuo SI. Family-focused prevention with Latinos: What about sisters and brothers? J Fam Psychol. 2016 Aug;30(5):633-40. doi: 10.1037/fam0000200. Epub 2016 Apr 14. | |
| 23298985 | Background | Feinberg ME, Solmeyer AR, Hostetler ML, Sakuma KL, Jones D, McHale SM. Siblings are special: initial test of a new approach for preventing youth behavior problems. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Aug;53(2):166-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.10.004. Epub 2012 Nov 20. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Jan 2, 2026 | |
| Reset | Jan 30, 2026 | |
| Release | Feb 21, 2026 | |
| Reset | Mar 16, 2026 |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_ICF | Yes | No | Yes | Study Protocol and Informed Consent Form | Mar 23, 2021 | Mar 22, 2021 | Prot_ICF_002.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 10, 2018 | Oct 10, 2018 | SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2026 | Jan 30, 2026 | |||
| Feb 21, 2026 |
Randomized Controlled Trial involving a contact-equivalent control group
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Control | Behavioral | Contact-equivalent attention control program in which students play educational games |
|
| 16 weeks |
| Children's Depression Inventory | This measure assesses children's ratings of their depressive symptoms (Kovacs, 1985). Items are scored on a scale from 0 to 2, and higher scores indicate greater depressive symptoms (i.e., worse outcome). If mean scores are used, scores range from 0 to 2. If sum scores are used, scores range from 0 to 52. | 16 weeks |
| Behavior Problem Index | This measure assesses parents' perceptions of children's social emotional functioning in 6 domains (i.e., antisocial, anxious/depressed, headstrong, hyperactive, dependency, peer conflict; Peterson & Zill, 1986). For all scales, items are scored on a scale from 1 to 3. For each subcale, higher scores indicate higher problem behavior in the domain (i.e., worse outcome). Mean scores are created for each subscale, and a total mean score is created across all domains - in all cases, higher scores indicate worse outcomes. | 16 weeks |
| Center for Epidemiological Depression Scale | The CES-D (Radloff, 1977) assesses parents' depressive symptoms. Items are scored on a scale from 0 to 3, and higher scores indicate greater depressive symptoms (i.e., worse outcome). No subscales are created. If mean scores are used, scores range from 0 to 3. If sum scores are used, scores range from 0 to 60. | 16 weeks |
| Parenting Stress Index | This measure assesses parents' perceptions of parental stress and includes two subscales: parental distress and dysfunctional interaction (Abidin, 1995). Items for each subscale are scored on a scale from 1 to 5. Mean scores can be created for each subscale, and higher scores indicate higher levels of distress (i.e., worse outcome) and higher dysfunctional interaction (i.e., worse outcome). A total scale score can be created across all items and higher scores indicate higher parenting stress (i.e., worse outcome). | 16 weeks |
| Children's Reports of Parental Behavior Inventory - Parent-Child Warmth | This measure assesses parent and child's report of parent-child warmth (Schaefer, 1965). Items are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Items are average and higher scores indicate greater perceptions of parent-child warmth (i.e., better outcome). | 16 weeks |
| Children's Reports of Parental Behavior Inventory - Harsh Discipline | This measure assesses parent's reports of harsh discipline (Schaefer, 1965). Items are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Items are average and higher scores indicate greater perceptions of harsh discipline (i.e., worse outcome). | 16 weeks |
| Parent-Child Conflict measure | This measure assesses parents' perceptions of parent-child conflict (Smetana, 1988). Items are scored on a scale from 1 to 6. Average scores are created and higher values indicate greater parent-child conflict (i.e., worse outcome). | 16 weeks |
| Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales II | This measure assesses parents' perceptions of family cohesion (Olson, Portner, & Bell, 1982). Items are scored on a scale from 1 to 5. An average score is created and higher scores indicate greater family cohesion (i.e., better outcome). | 16 weeks |
| 42423725 | Derived | Duran JG, Updegraff KA, Son D, Gallagher A, Umana-Taylor AJ, Feinberg ME. Trajectories and correlates of Latino/a children's sibling relationships. Dev Psychol. 2026 Jul 9. doi: 10.1037/dev0002227. Online ahead of print. |
| 41954835 | Derived | Cahill KM, Updegraff KA, Umana-Taylor AJ, Feinberg ME. Engaging Latino Families in a Sibling-Focused Family Prevention Program. Prev Sci. 2026 Mar;27(3):376-389. doi: 10.1007/s11121-026-01886-3. Epub 2026 Apr 9. |
| Mar 16, 2026 |