Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Thomayer University Hospital | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the efficiency and analgesic use in the therapy of iatrogenic Pneumothorax when using the Pleuralventâ„¢ system in comparison with large bore chest tubes (catheter 16F).
Rationale:
Pneumothorax is a common, usually invasively treated, disorder. The usual methods of treatment are needle aspiration (14-16 G needles) or chest drainage (16+ F catheters).
A third therapeutic option is the use of small calibre catheters (< 16F). According to some studies, the success rates of these methods are comparable. These catheters have the same success rate as large bore chest tubes and treatment with them is less painful for patients.
The use of Heimlich valves allows for increased patient mobility - or even out-patient treatment.
According to a review by the European Respiratory Society, nowadays there is an availability of systems which are part of advanced intervention techniques. These devices are designed for ease of insertion allowing for the full mobility of patients. It is, however, not clear whether treatment with these new systems is less painful.
The aim of this clinical trial is to compare the efficiency and analgesic use in the therapy of iatrogenic Pneumothorax when using the Pleuralventâ„¢ system in comparison with large bore chest tubes (catheter 16F).
Process:
Following the completion of the initial screening (fulfilling of both inclusion and exclusion criteria) and the signing of informed consent, a patient with iatrogenic pneumothorax (PNO) will be treated with, according to randomisation, either the Pleuralventâ„¢ system or with a large bore chest tube - 16F. A control chest X-ray will be performed immediately after the introduction of the therapeutic method and following 3 days of therapy.
If no signs of PNO are present, the therapy will be terminated. In cases where the lung will not be completely expanded, the control X-ray will be repeated on the 5th, 7th and 10th day of therapy. If, following this, the PNO will persist without resolution, the therapy will be declared non-effective and other therapy modes will be used (conversion to large bore chest drainage in the Pleuralventâ„¢group and surgical treatment in the chest drainage group).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pleuralventâ„¢ | Experimental | Patients treated with Pleuralventâ„¢ device |
|
| Chest tube | Active Comparator | Patients treated with Chest tube |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pleuralventâ„¢ | Device | Pneumothorax treatment with Pleuralventâ„¢ device (Heimlich valve device) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment efficiency | Condition with no need for further therapy modes defined as a absence of pneumothorax on chest X-ray | up to 10 days of treatment or until the treatment is terminated |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Analgesic use | Comparison of analgesic use in groups - with Pleuralventâ„¢ or large bore chest tube therapy | up to 10 days of treatment or until the treatment is terminated |
| The time to lung re-expansion |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Milan Sova, MD, Ph.D. | Contact | +420588445326 | milan.sova@fnol.cz |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Milan Sova, MD, Ph.D. | Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital, Olomouc, Czech Republic | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital Olomouc | Recruiting | Olomouc | Czechia |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20696690 | Background | MacDuff A, Arnold A, Harvey J; BTS Pleural Disease Guideline Group. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax: British Thoracic Society Pleural Disease Guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010 Aug;65 Suppl 2:ii18-31. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.136986. No abstract available. | |
| 17167009 | Background | Horsley A, Jones L, White J, Henry M. Efficacy and complications of small-bore, wire-guided chest drains. Chest. 2006 Dec;130(6):1857-63. doi: 10.1378/chest.130.6.1857. |
Not provided
Not provided
Raw data will be available upon legitimate request.
The data will be available after completion of the study
Upon request
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011030 | Pneumothorax |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010995 | Pleural Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015505 | Chest Tubes |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013523 | Surgical Equipment |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
Not provided
Not provided
Randomised, non-blinded, actively controlled clinical trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Method of closed envelopes
| Chest tube | Procedure | Chest tube insertion |
|
The treatment duration needed to lung re-expansion
| up to 10 days of treatment or until the treatment is terminated |
| Subjective pain perception according to Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scale | Subjective pain perception according to Visual Analogue Scale (scale 0-10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 excruciating pain) | up to 10 days of treatment or until the treatment is terminated |
| 21326805 | Background | Funaki B. Pneumothorax treated by small-bore chest tube. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2007 Jun;24(2):272-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-980051. No abstract available. |
| 14656251 | Background | Vedam H, Barnes DJ. Comparison of large- and small-bore intercostal catheters in the management of spontaneous pneumothorax. Intern Med J. 2003 Nov;33(11):495-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-5994.2003.00467.x. |
| 12407390 | Background | Akowuah E, Ho EC, George R, Brennan K, Tennant S, Braidley P, Cooper G. Less pain with flexible fluted silicone chest drains than with conventional rigid chest tubes after cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Nov;124(5):1027-8. doi: 10.1067/mtc.2002.125641. No abstract available. |
| 27246597 | Background | Bhatnagar R, Corcoran JP, Maldonado F, Feller-Kopman D, Janssen J, Astoul P, Rahman NM. Advanced medical interventions in pleural disease. Eur Respir Rev. 2016 Jun;25(140):199-213. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0020-2016. |
| 32153301 | Derived | Sova M, Poruba M, Genzor S, Jakubec P, Zatloukal J, Kolek V, Urbanek K, Vasakova M, Stehlik L, Zackova P, Asswad AG. Efficacy and analgesic use during the therapy of iatrogenic pneumothorax using Pleuralvent and Chest Tube (ASPIRATE): A randomised controlled trial protocol. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2020 Jun;164(2):213-215. doi: 10.5507/bp.2020.008. Epub 2020 Mar 9. |