This study randomises patients with venous leg ulcers, to be managed either using conventional compression bandages or a bridged vacuum assisted closure system under compression.

Venous ulcers are characterised by a cyclical pattern of healing and recurrence, with recurrence rates between 45 and 70% at one year. Venous leg ulceration has been identified as a common source of morbidity and reduced quality of life, especially in the elderly population. Non-healing ulcers place the patient at a much higher risk for lower extremity amputation.

Compression therapy is currently recognised as the main treatment for venous leg ulcers. External compression is applied as a therapy for venous leg ulcers, in an attempt to reverse the increased hydrostatic pressure in the veins.

The application of negative pressure to successfully treat and aid in the healing of open wounds has been studied extensively for decades, demonstrating favourable clinical results. However, there is a lack of evidence in the literature regarding the use of VAC in venous ulcers.

The combination of negative pressure therapy and compression therapy is theorized to provide the benefits of both individual therapies. As such, the utilization of the Bridge VAC under a compression dressing is expected to expedite the healing of venous ulcers.

The investigators aim to randomise patients with venous ulcers to either be managed using conventional compression dressings or combined bridge vacuum assisted closure with compression dressings.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Aged 18 years or more
• Provide written informed consent
• Venous ulcer present, greater than 10cm2 in surface area
• A C6 grading in the CEAP classification

Exclusion Criteria:

Pregnant (confirmed by β-HCG analysis). Female patients of childbearing potential are advised to adhere to an appropriate form of contraception, and those unwilling to follow contraceptive advice are excluded from the study

• Involvement in another clinical trial in the previous six months
• Legal incapacity
• Patient is bed-ridden or immobile
• Ulcer smaller than 10cm2 in surface area
• Ischaemic ulcer/s present
• Diabetic ulcer/s present
• Malignant ulceration/s present
• Ulcer exposing bone or tendon
• Osteomyelitis
• Pseudomonas infection
• Presence of gangrene
• Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) present
• Connective tissue disease present
• Presence of any illness that could limit long-term compliance (e.g. epilepsy)

IPD of primary and secondary outcomes, could be made available to other researchers by request, while maintaining participant confidentiality

Due to the obvious differences between the intervention and comparator, it is impossible to blind the participants or the care providers.

However, the investigator, the outcomes assessor and statistician are blinded to treatment received.