Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A brief Mindfulness-Based Family Psychoeducation programme is developed to reduce the caregiver's stress and to promote young people's recovery.
A randomized controlled trial will be conducted to compare a mindfulness-based family psychoeducation intervention, with an ordinary family psychoeducation intervention. 300 caregivers of a youth who have experienced early psychosis will be recruited.
Programme effectiveness will be assessed by comparing outcomes measuring caregiver's perceived stress, positive well-being, and the young people's mental health symptoms. As part of the programme activity, Photovoice approach is selected to explore the complex family experiences and the benefits of mindfulness from the caregiver's personal perspectives. Caregivers can offer their voices about their burdens, and how mindfulness can benefit to the families through their involvement in a photo taking activity during the psychoeducation programme.
According to the World Health Organization Global Burden of Disease Study, for youth aged 10 to 24 years old, schizophrenia ranked as the third among all causes of disability. Schizophrenia shows a marked increase in prevalence after aged 15 and many manifests in early 20s. The term early psychosis is used for young people before and after their first identified psychotic episode.
The support of family members during the treatment and recovery of early psychosis is critical. Schizophrenia results in serious functional impairment, including a delimited social networks, termination or suspension of schooling. Caregivers encounter much psychological distress, particularly in handling the violent behaviours, suicidal ideation, failures in treatment, and other illness behaviours of such students. One-third of such caregivers have experienced emotional difficulties, such as depression. Family psychoeducation intervention has been recommended as a major component in the treatment of early psychosis.
International and local studies have reported positive outcomes using family psychoeducation interventions, but many limitations have also been identified. Many previous studies implemented an intensive programme design, with an emphasis on improvements in illness outcome of patients only. A recent review concluded that benefits of such programmes to caregivers were limited. There have been calls for a time-limited but more cost-effective programme for caregivers of a youth with early psychosis to mitigate the looming realities of eventual serious mental illness and family suffering. A brief Mindfulness-Based Family Psychoeducation programme is developed to reduce the caregiver's stress and to promote young people's recovery. Results from the pilot study suggested that such programme could reduce caregiver stress, and promote positive caregiving experience.
A more rigorous study is proposed using a mixed methods design. A randomized controlled trial will be conducted to compare a mindfulness-based family psychoeducation intervention, with an ordinary family psychoeducation intervention. 300 caregivers of a youth who have experienced early psychosis will be recruited, with the assistance of five NGO collaborators. Programme effectiveness will be assessed by comparing outcomes measuring caregiver's perceived stress, positive well-being, and the young people's mental health symptoms. As part of the programme activity, Photovoice approach is selected to explore the complex family experiences and the benefits of mindfulness from the caregiver's personal perspectives. Caregivers can offer their voices about their burdens, and how mindfulness can benefit to the families through their involvement in a photo taking activity during the psychoeducation programme.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness-Based Family Psycho-Education (MBFBE) | Experimental | A programme focuses on non-judgmental attitudes, collaborative inquiry and self-care, including components of understanding early psychosis, medication, treatment management, mental health service collaboration, attention to caregiver's experiences and distress, strategies for improving communication and problem-solving, and crisis planning. |
|
| Family Psycho-Education (FPE) | Active Comparator | A programme focuses on information giving, problem-solving and mutual support, including components of understanding early psychosis, medication, treatment management, mental health service collaboration, attention to caregiver's experiences and distress, strategies for improving communication and problem-solving, and crisis planning. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mindfulness-Based Family Psycho-Education (MBFBE) | Behavioral | Six sessions includes: 1. Working with Caregiving Stress; 2. The Struggles of a Caregiver; 3. The Struggles of a Person in Recovery; 4. The Path of Recovery; 5. A Supportive Caregiving; and 6. Review of Learning. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline caregiver's general stress level at 6 weeks and at 12 months | Measured by Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) (22 items) (Zarit, Reever, Bach-Peterson 1980), assessing caregivers' subjective burden. The total score ranges from 0 (low burden) to 88 (high burden). | (1) Pretest baseline, (2) through intervention completion, 6 weeks, and (3) 12-month follow up after intervention completion |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change from baseline caregiver's caregiving experiences at 6 weeks and at 12 months | Measured by Experience of Caregiving Inventory (Szmukler et al., 1996), with selected subscales of Stigma (5 items), Effects on the Family (7 items), Positive Experience in Caregiving (14 items), assessing caregivers' experience in the caregiving relationship. The Stigma score ranges from 0 (little experience of stigma) to 20 (much experience of stigma). The Effects on the Family score ranges from 0 (little negative effects on the family) to 28 (much negative effects on the family). The Positive Experience in Caregiving score ranges from 0 (little positive experience in caregiving) to 56 (much positive experience in caregiving). No total scores are calculated. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Hong Kong Polytechnic University | Hong Kong | 852 | Hong Kong |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39391083 | Derived | Zhang ZJ, Lo HHM, Ho WC, Lau ENS, Ng SM, Mak WWS, Wong SYS, Hung KSY, Lai IYS, Lo CSL, Wong JOY, Lui SSY, Siu CMW, Yan EWC, Chan SHW, Lin E, Wong GOC, Mak JWH, Tam HSW, Tse IHH. Mindfulness-based family psychoeducation intervention for caregivers of young adults with first-episode psychosis: results at 9-month follow-up. Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 26;15:1460151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1460151. eCollection 2024. | |
| 36673773 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 17, 2018 | Sep 24, 2018 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011618 | Psychotic Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019967 | Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Family Psycho-Education (FPE) | Behavioral | Six sessions includes: 1. Working with Caregiving Stress; 2. The Struggles of a Caregiver; 3. The Struggles of a Person in Recovery; 4. The Path of Recovery; 5. A Supportive Caregiving; and 6. Review of Learning. |
|
| (1) Pretest baseline, (2) through intervention completion, 6 weeks, and (3) 12-month follow up after intervention completion |
| Change from baseline caregiver's physical health and mental health at 6 weeks and at 12 months | Physical health measured by 14 item, Physical Distress subscale in Body-Mind-Spirit Well-Being Inventory (Ng et al., 2005), assessing caregivers' level of subjective distress caused by specific physical symptoms; mental health, i.e., Anxiety and Depression, measured by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983), assessing caregivers' severity of anxiety and depression. The Physical Distress score ranges from 0 (low distress) to 140 (high distress). The Anxiety score ranges from 0 (low anxiety) to 21 (high anxiety). The Depression score ranges from 0 (low depression) to 21 (high depression). No total scores are calculated. | (1) Pretest baseline, (2) through intervention completion, 6 weeks, and (3) 12-month follow up after intervention completion |
| Change from baseline caregiver's well-being at 6 weeks and at 12 months | Measured by WHO-5 Well-Being Index (Johansen, 1998), assessing caregivers' emotional well-being. The total score ranges from 0 (bad well-being) to 25 (good well-being). | (1) Pretest baseline, (2) through intervention completion, 6 weeks, and (3) 12-month follow up after intervention completion |
| Change from baseline caregiver's perceived family functioning at 6 weeks and at 12 months | Measured by 5 item, Family APGAR Scale (Smilkstein, Ashworth, & Montano, 1982), with five subscales in adaptation, partnership, growth, affection and resolve, assessing parent's satisfaction of family functions. The total score ranges from 0 (dissatisfaction) to 10 (good satisfaction). | (1) Pretest baseline, (2) through intervention completion, 6 weeks, and (3) 12-month follow up after intervention completion |
| Change from baseline youth's recovery at 6 weeks and at 12 months | Measured by Mental Health Recovery Measure (Young & Bullock, 2005), with 30 items in eight subscales relating to positive dimensions in recovery including Overcoming Stuckness (OS; 4 items), Self-Empowerment (SE; 4 items), Learning and Self-Redefinition (LSR; 4 items), Basic Functioning (BF; 4 items), Overall Well-Being (OWB; 4 items), New Potentials (NP; 4 items), Advocacy/Enrichment (A/E; 4 items) and Spirituality (2 items), assessing recovery-related experiences of people with severe mental illness. The total score ranges from 0 (bad recovery-related experiences) to 120 (good recovery-related experiences). OS, SE, LSR, BF, OWB, NP and A/E range from 0 (bad recovery-related experiences) to 16 (good recovery-related experiences). Spirituality ranges from 0 (bad recovery-related experiences) to 8 (good recovery-related experiences). Eight subscale scores are summed to compute a total score. | (1) Pretest baseline, (2) through intervention completion, 6 weeks, and (3) 12-month follow up after intervention completion |
| Change from baseline caregiver's interpersonal mindfulness at 6 weeks and at 12 months | Measured by the Interpersonal mindfulness in Parenting Scale (Duncan, 2007), with 23 items in four factors in Compassion for Child (CC), Emotional Awareness in Parenting (EAP), Nonjudgmental Acceptance in Parenting (NAP) and Listening with Full Awareness (LFA) (Lo et al., 2018), assessing caregivers' quality of mindfulness specific to his or her family context. The total score ranges from 23 (low mindfulness) to 115 (high mindfulness). CC ranges from 7 (low compassion for child) to 35 (high compassion for child). EAP ranges from 6 (low emotional awareness in parenting) to 30 (high emotional awareness in parenting). NAP ranges from 6 (low nonjudgmental acceptance in parenting) to 30 (high nonjudgmental acceptance in parenting). LFA ranges from 4 (less likely listening with full awareness) to 20 (more likely listening with full awareness). Four subscale scores are summed to compute a total score. | (1) Pretest baseline, (2) through intervention completion, 6 weeks, and (3) 12-month follow up after intervention completion |
| Change from baseline caregiver's non-attachment at 6 weeks and at 12 months | Measured by short form (8 items) of Non-attachment Scale (Sahdra, Shaver & Brown, 2010), assessing caregivers' subjective level of nonattachment. The total score ranges from 8 (low level of nonattachment) to 48 (high level of nonattachment). | (1) Pretest baseline, (2) through intervention completion, 6 weeks, and (3) 12-month follow up after intervention completion |
| Change from baseline youth's expressed emotion at 6 weeks and at 12 months | Measured by 12 item Level of Expressed Emotion Scale (Cole & Kazarian, 1988), with subscales in Criticism (4 items), Hostility (4 items) and Over-Involvement (4 items), assessing patients' perceived expressed emotions from the most influential person. The total score ranges from 12 (low perceived expressed emotions) to 48 (high perceived expressed emotions). Criticism, Hostility and Over-Involvement scores range from 4 (low perceived expressed emotions from particular sources) to 16 (high perceived expressed emotions from particular sources). Three subscale scores are summed to compute a total score. | (1) Pretest baseline, (2) through intervention completion, 6 weeks, and (3) 12-month follow up after intervention completion |
| Change from baseline youth's psychiatric symptom at 6 weeks and at 12 months | Measured by the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PNSS) (Kay, Flszbein & Opler, 1988), subscales in Positive Scale (7 items), Negative Scale (7 items) and General Psychopathology Scale (16 items), assessing students' psychiatric symptoms. Positive Scale ranges from 7 (few positive syndromes) to 49 (many positive syndromes). Negative Scale ranges from 7 (few negative syndromes) to 49 (many negative syndromes). General Psychopathology Scale ranges from 16 (few general psychopathological symptoms) to 112 (many). No total scores are calculated. | (1) Pretest baseline, (2) through intervention completion, 6 weeks, and (3) 12-month follow up after intervention completion |
| Derived |
| Zhang ZJ, Lo HHM, Ng SM, Mak WWS, Wong SYS, Hung KSY, Lo CSL, Wong JOY, Lui SSY, Lin E, Siu CMW, Yan EWC, Chan SHW, Yip A, Poon MF, Wong GOC, Mak JWH, Tam HSW, Tse IHH, Leung BFH. The Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Family Psychoeducation Intervention for the Caregivers of Young Adults with First-Episode Psychosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 5;20(2):1018. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021018. |
| 30915004 | Derived | Lo HH, Ho WC, Lau EN, Lo CW, Mak WWS, Ng SM, Wong SY, Wong JO, Lui SSY, Lo CS, Lin EC, Poon MF, Choi K, Leung CW. A Brief Mindfulness-Based Family Psychoeducation Intervention for Chinese Young Adults With First Episode Psychosis: A Study Protocol. Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 11;10:516. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00516. eCollection 2019. |