Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5R44CA211013-02 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a multi-center, two-arm randomized, blinded pivotal study to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the LUM Imaging System (LUM015 imaging agent in conjunction with the LUM Imaging Device and decision software), in identifying residual cancer in the lumpectomy bed of female breast cancer patients undergoing breast surgery in order to assist surgeons in reducing the rates of positive margins.
All enrolled subjects will be injected with LUM015 prior to surgery. Surgeons are blinded to whether a participant will be randomized into the device arm until after the standard of care lumpectomy is complete. Participants will then be randomized to receiving the device. Therapeutic (LUM guided) shaves will be removed based on the guidance of the LUM Imaging System. Patients will be followed until their first standard of care post-operative follow-up visit.
All subjects will be injected with LUM015. The injection of the study drug will occur 2-6 hours prior to surgery at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg. Surgeons will complete the standard of care lumpectomy. Prior to removing any shaves as part of the standard of care, the surgeon will use the LUM Imaging System to scan and image the cavity where shaves will be obtained. The system will not provide guidance. The intent of the standard of care lumpectomy procedure is to achieve negative margins.
Randomization of whether the patient will receive the device will be revealed after the completion of the standard of care lumpectomy. If the patient is randomized to the non-device arm, then the surgeon will complete the surgery per their standard practice. If the patient is randomized to the device arm, the surgeon will use the LUM Imaging Device to scan inside the lumpectomy cavity to indicate areas that may contain residual tumor. If the imaging system identifies that there may be cancer cells remaining in the lumpectomy cavity, the surgeon will remove an additional piece of tissue. This process will be continued until a negative reading from the device is obtained or a maximum of 2 shaves of additional tissue has been removed in each orientation.
Study treatment ends when the surgery is completed. All patients will continue their enrollment in the study until their first follow-up visit and they will continue to be followed until the medical team determines no further surgical intervention is required. Patients who have consented to completing Quality of Life Questionnaires will be in the study until the schedule of questionnaires is complete. Patients with adverse events that are determined to be possibly related to the LUM Imaging System will be followed until resolution or stabilization of the adverse event.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System used during surgery | Experimental | The LUM Imaging Device will be used to look inside the lumpectomy cavity to see if the dye indicates any areas that may contain residual tumor. If the imaging identifies that there may be cancer cells remaining in the lumpectomy cavity, the surgeon will remove an additional piece of tissue. This process will be continued until a negative reading from the device is obtained or a maximum of 2 shaves of additional tissue has been removed. Patients in this arm will receive the study drug, LUM015. |
|
| Standard of Care Arm | No Intervention | The LUM Imaging Device will not be used to guide additional tissue removal. Patients in this arm will receive the study drug, LUM015. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Device Arm | Combination Product | LUM015 will be administered 2 to 6 hours prior to surgery. The LUM Imaging device will be used to assist in the removal of additional tumor tissue. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients Who Had Residual Cancer Found in at Least One LUM Imaging System Guided Shave Among All Patients. | Residual cancer was defined as tumor found by pathology in a therapeutic shave after the SOC surgical procedure was completed; that is, tumor that current Standard of Care (SOC) surgery failed to remove. LUM Imaging System was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. | Day 1, during surgery |
| Sensitivity of LUM Imaging System on Cancer in the Lumpectomy Cavity | Sensitivity of LUM Imaging System on cancer was calculated as percentage of tissues with cancer that was removed from lumpectomy cavity due to positive detection by LUM Imaging System. The estimates of the instrument diagnostic sensitivity used Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) approach. This method was used to analyze correlated data which was modeled with generalized linear model having binomial link function and including correlation cluster and matrix information (here within each subject). LUM Imaging System was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. | Day 1, during surgery |
| Specificity of LUM Imaging System Detection on Cancer in the Lumpectomy Cavity | Specificity of LUM Imaging System Detection on Cancer in the Lumpectomy Cavity was measured as percentage of the negative margins without cancer, that were tested negative by LUM Imaging System. The estimate of the instrument diagnostic specificity used Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) approach with random effects from intraclass correlation within subjects. | Day 1, during surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Detection and Conversion of Positive Margins. | Detection of positive margins: Percentage of patients with positive margins after standard of care breast-conserving surgery, all had LUM Imaging System signals above the threshold in the cavity as defined by the tumor detection algorithm. Conversion of positive margins: Percentage of patients with positive margins after standard of care breast-conserving surgery resulted in the negative margin after LUM Imaging System was used. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects must have histologically or cytologically confirmed primary invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or primary invasive breast cancer with a DCIS component.
Female, age of 18 years or older.
Subjects must be scheduled for a lumpectomy for a breast malignancy.
Subjects must be able and willing to follow study procedures and instructions.
Subjects must have received and signed an informed consent form.
Subjects must have no uncontrolled serious medical problems except for the diagnosis of breast cancer, as per the exclusion criteria listed below.
Subjects must have organ and marrow function within limits as defined below:
Subjects with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Barbara Smith, MD, PhD | Massachusetts General Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Jorge Ferrer, PhD | Lumicell, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of South Alabama Mitchell Cancer Institute | Mobile | Alabama | 36604 | United States | ||
| HonorHealth Research Institute |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38320161 | Derived | Smith BL, Hunt KK, Carr D, Blumencranz PW, Hwang ES, Gadd MA, Stone K, Dyess DL, Dodge D, Valente S, Dekhne N, Clark P, Lee MC, Samiian L, Lesnikoski BA, Clark L, Smith KP, Chang M, Harris DK, Schlossberg B, Ferrer J, Wapnir IL. Intraoperative Fluorescence Guidance for Breast Cancer Lumpectomy Surgery. NEJM Evid. 2023 Jul;2(7):EVIDoa2200333. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2200333. Epub 2023 Apr 27. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
406 injected with LUM015 (LUMISIGHT), 14 withdrawn before randomization.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Device Intervention: Lum Imaging Device Used During Surgery | The LUM Imaging Device was used to examine inside the lumpectomy cavity to determine if the dye indicated any areas that might contain residual tumor. If the imaging tested positive for the cancer cells remaining in the lumpectomy cavity, the surgeon would remove an additional piece of tissue. This process was continued until a negative reading from the device was obtained or a maximum of 2 shaves of additional tissue had been removed. Patients in this arm received the study drug, LUM015. Study Device Arm: LUM015 was administered 2 to 6 hours prior to surgery. The LUM Imaging device was used to assist in the removal of additional tumor tissue. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 7, 2021 | Apr 26, 2023 |
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects will be randomized to receive the device intervention. All subjects will receive the study drug.
Not provided
Not provided
Masking will only be applied until the standard of care surgery is complete. At time of randomization, the study arm will be revealed to the study team. The pathologist will be masked to the type of tissue obtained from the patient.
|
| Day 1, during surgery |
| Removal of Residual Cancer Guided by the LUM Imaging System in Participants With Negative Margins After Standard-of-Care Surgery | Percentage of participants having residual tumor removed within subpopulation of having negative margins after Standard of Care surgery. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. | Day 1, during surgery |
| Removal of Residual Cancer Guided by the LUM Imaging System in Subjects With Positive Margins After Standard-of-Care Surgery | Percentage of participants having residual tumor removed within subpopulation of having positive margins after Standard of Care surgery. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. | Day 1, during surgery |
| Volume of Therapeutic Shaves Removed During Lumpectomy. | The median volumes of Lumicell Imaging System - guided shaves (therapeutic shaves) were measured and the median total volume removed during lumpectomy was presented as well. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. | Day 1, during surgery |
| Contribution of Therapeutic Shaves to Total Volume Removed During Lumpectomy. | Median of the percentages of the volumes of Lumicell Imaging System - guided shaves (therapeutic shaves) out of total volume removed during lumpectomy for each participant were measured. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. | Day 1, during surgery |
| Scottsdale |
| Arizona |
| 85258 |
| United States |
| Stanford Hospital and Clinics | Palo Alto | California | 94304 | United States |
| Morton Plant Mease Health Care Oncology Research | Clearwater | Florida | 33756 | United States |
| Baptist MD Anderson Cancer Center | Jacksonville | Florida | 32207 | United States |
| Moffitt Cancer Center | Tampa | Florida | 33612 | United States |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| Comprehensive Breast Care Center/Beaumont Health | Royal Oak | Michigan | 48073 | United States |
| Duke Cancer Center | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| Novant Health Salem Surgical Associates | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Cleveland Clinic | Cleveland | Ohio | 44195 | United States |
| Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center | Hershey | Pennsylvania | 17033 | United States |
| The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| CHI Franciscan Research Center | Tacoma | Washington | 98405 | United States |
| FG001 | Standard of Care Arm | The LUM Imaging Device was not used to guide additional tissue removal. Patients in this arm received the study drug, LUM015. |
| FG002 | Withdrawn Before Randomization | All the patients injected with LUM015 but withdrawn before randomization after standard of care. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used During Surgery | The LUM Imaging Device was used to examine inside the lumpectomy cavity to determine if the dye indicated any areas that might contain residual tumor. If the imaging tested positive for the cancer cells remaining in the lumpectomy cavity, the surgeon would remove an additional piece of tissue. This process was continued until a negative reading from the device was obtained or a maximum of 2 shaves of additional tissue had been removed. Patients in this arm received the study drug, LUM015. Study Device Arm: LUM015 was administered 2 to 6 hours prior to surgery. The LUM Imaging device was used to assist in the removal of additional tumor tissue. |
| BG001 | Standard of Care Arm | The LUM Imaging Device was not used to guide additional tissue removal. Patients in this arm received the study drug, LUM015. |
| BG002 | Withdrawn Before Randomization | All the patients injected with LUM015 but withdrawn before randomization. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Body Mass Index | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
| |||||||||||||||
| Menopausal Status | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Mammographic breast density | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Palpability | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Tumor Histology From Biopsy | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Estrogen Receptor (ER) (+) Genetic Marker from Biopsy | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Progesterone Receptor (PR) (+) Genetic Marker from Biopsy | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) (+) Genetic Marker from Biopsy | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Triple Negatives Genetic Marker from Biopsy | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Lymph Nodes Biopsy | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Patients Who Had Residual Cancer Found in at Least One LUM Imaging System Guided Shave Among All Patients. | Residual cancer was defined as tumor found by pathology in a therapeutic shave after the SOC surgical procedure was completed; that is, tumor that current Standard of Care (SOC) surgery failed to remove. LUM Imaging System was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. | modified intent to treat population (mITT) includes subjects injected with LUM015 and LUM Imaging was performed | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Day 1, during surgery |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Sensitivity of LUM Imaging System on Cancer in the Lumpectomy Cavity | Sensitivity of LUM Imaging System on cancer was calculated as percentage of tissues with cancer that was removed from lumpectomy cavity due to positive detection by LUM Imaging System. The estimates of the instrument diagnostic sensitivity used Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) approach. This method was used to analyze correlated data which was modeled with generalized linear model having binomial link function and including correlation cluster and matrix information (here within each subject). LUM Imaging System was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. | modified intent to treat population (mITT) includes subjects injected with LUM015 and LUM Imaging was performed | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of tissues with cancer | Day 1, during surgery | Tissue with cancer | Tissue with cancer |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Detection and Conversion of Positive Margins. | Detection of positive margins: Percentage of patients with positive margins after standard of care breast-conserving surgery, all had LUM Imaging System signals above the threshold in the cavity as defined by the tumor detection algorithm. Conversion of positive margins: Percentage of patients with positive margins after standard of care breast-conserving surgery resulted in the negative margin after LUM Imaging System was used. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. | modified intent to treat population (mITT) includes subjects injected with LUM015 and LUM Imaging was performed | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Day 1, during surgery |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Removal of Residual Cancer Guided by the LUM Imaging System in Participants With Negative Margins After Standard-of-Care Surgery | Percentage of participants having residual tumor removed within subpopulation of having negative margins after Standard of Care surgery. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. | Participants having negative margin after standard of care procedure of lumpectomy. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Day 1, during surgery |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Removal of Residual Cancer Guided by the LUM Imaging System in Subjects With Positive Margins After Standard-of-Care Surgery | Percentage of participants having residual tumor removed within subpopulation of having positive margins after Standard of Care surgery. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. | Participants with positive margins after standard of care procedure of lumpectomy. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | Day 1, during surgery |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Volume of Therapeutic Shaves Removed During Lumpectomy. | The median volumes of Lumicell Imaging System - guided shaves (therapeutic shaves) were measured and the median total volume removed during lumpectomy was presented as well. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. | mITT and control populations | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | cm^3 | Day 1, during surgery |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Contribution of Therapeutic Shaves to Total Volume Removed During Lumpectomy. | Median of the percentages of the volumes of Lumicell Imaging System - guided shaves (therapeutic shaves) out of total volume removed during lumpectomy for each participant were measured. The system was used during the surgery, but the assessment of the outcomes was unknown until the pathology report was available. | mITT and Control arm populations | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | Percent | Day 1, during surgery |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Specificity of LUM Imaging System Detection on Cancer in the Lumpectomy Cavity | Specificity of LUM Imaging System Detection on Cancer in the Lumpectomy Cavity was measured as percentage of the negative margins without cancer, that were tested negative by LUM Imaging System. The estimate of the instrument diagnostic specificity used Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) approach with random effects from intraclass correlation within subjects. | modified intent to treat population (mITT) includes subjects injected with LUM015 and LUM Imaging was performed | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of negative margins w/o ca | Day 1, during surgery | Negative margins without cancer | Negative margins without cancer |
|
|
All adverse events and adverse device effects, both serious and non-serious, and deaths that are encountered from initiation of study intervention, throughout the study, and within the first post-operative follow-up visit should be followed to their resolution, or until the principal investigator assesses them as stable, or the principal investigator determines the event to be irreversible, or the subject is lost to follow-up. Adverse events were assessed up to 30 days after enrollment.
Serious adverse events should be reported within 24 hours of learning of the occurrence. Non-serious adverse events and non-serious adverse device effects will be reported to Lumicell on the adverse events Case Report Forms during the study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Device Intervention: LUM Imaging System Used During Surgery | The LUM Imaging Device was used to examine inside the lumpectomy cavity to determine if the dye indicated any areas that might contain residual tumor. If the imaging tested positive for the cancer cells remaining in the lumpectomy cavity, the surgeon would remove an additional piece of tissue. This process was continued until a negative reading from the device was obtained or a maximum of 2 shaves of additional tissue had been removed. Patients in this arm received the study drug, LUM015. Study Device Arm: LUM015 was administered 2 to 6 hours prior to surgery. The LUM Imaging device was used to assist in the removal of additional tumor tissue. | 0 | 357 | 3 | 357 | 334 | 357 |
| EG001 | Standard of Care Arm | The LUM Imaging Device was not used to guide additional tissue removal. Patients in this arm will receive the study drug, LUM015. | 0 | 35 | 0 | 35 | 32 | 35 |
| EG002 | Withdrawn Before Randomization | All the patients injected with LUM015 but withdrawn before randomization. | 0 | 14 | 2 | 14 | 13 | 14 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vascular pseudoaneurysm | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaphylactic reaction | Immune system disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chromaturia | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast pain | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Erythema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ecchymosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematoma | Vascular disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blood creatinine decreased | Investigations | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Extravasation | General disorders | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Seroma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA version 22.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Our trial did not take additional margin specimens from cavity orientations with negative Pegulicianine fluorescence-guided (pFGS) readings but scored the pFGS cavity reading as falsely negative if the corresponding lumpectomy margin was positive.
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jorge Ferrer, PhD | Lumicell | 617-571-0592 | jmferrer@lumicell.com |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 17, 2021 | Apr 26, 2023 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Between 18 and 65 years |
|
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Pre/Peri |
|
| Scattered Areas of Fibroglandular Density |
|
| Heterogeneously Dense |
|
| Extremely Dense |
|
| Unknown |
|
| Not palpable Mass |
|
| IDC +/- DCIS |
|
| ILC +/- DCIS |
|
| IDC + ILC |
|
| ER (-) |
|
| Not available |
|
| PR (-) |
|
| Unknown |
|
| HER2 (-) |
|
| Unknown |
|
| Triple Negatives - No |
|
| Lymph Node (-) |
|
| No Lymph Node Biopsy |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
| Negative margins without cancer |
|
|