| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2R44DA044025 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to modify a smoking prevention program for 5th and 6th grade students to also target vaping e-cigarettes. Aims were to modify the program along with associated materials and to conduct a trial with 5th grade students in the school setting to see how well the updated program worked. Students either participated in the four-week computer based program or continued with their usual tobacco prevention curriculum.
This study showed that students who received the computer program reduced their intentions and willingness to use e-cigarettes or smoke in the future more than did students who used their usual tobacco curriculum.
Given the increase in prevalence of e-cigarette use among youth, investigators modified a smoking prevention program to not only target smoking but also vaping e-cigarettes. Investigators conducted a pragmatic randomized trial with 5th grade students in schools across Arizona and Oregon to evaluate the effectiveness of the updated program in a "real-world" setting. Forty-five schools were randomized to the intervention condition, wherein students used the updated version of Click City®: Tobacco, or the control condition, wherein students were taught their usual tobacco prevention curriculum. Students in the intervention schools decreased their intentions and willingness to use e-cigarettes and cigarettes significantly, as compared to students in control schools. The intervention also significantly changed all etiological mechanisms. The effects on all outcomes of the intervention were similar as a function of state (Arizona vs Oregon), gender, ethnicity (Hispanic vs not Hispanic), and historical timing (prior to school closures in 2020 vs after schools re-opened in 2022). The intervention was also more effective for at-risk students, as defined by student's previous tobacco use, current family use and/or high in sensation seeking. Close to 90% of the students completed the entire program, and most completed it in 3 to 4 weeks, the expected time frame. The effectiveness of the updated Click City®: Tobacco was demonstrated in a "real world" setting and findings suggested that all students can potentially benefit from the program.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention: Click City Tobacco Prevention Program | Experimental | Participation consisted of a baseline assessment one-week prior to starting the program, and a follow-up assessment one-week following completion of the program. The expectation was that students complete two lessons a week of the computer-based program over a four-week period. |
|
| Control: Usual Tobacco Prevention Curriculum | Experimental | Students in control schools completed the baseline and follow-up assessments during the same week as students in their yoked intervention school. The expectation was that students would participate in the standard tobacco curriculum over this period. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Click City®: Tobacco | Other | A computer-based program assigned to students designed to prevent subsequent tobacco use. Students complete one 15 to 20 minute lesson two times a week for four weeks. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Behavioral Intentions to Vape E-cigarettes | Measured by two items, assessing the student's intentions regarding vaping e-cigarettes as a teen or as a grown-up. Responses were on a five-point scale ranging from "definitely not" (1) to "definitely will" (5). The scale was created by summing the two items with potential range from 2 to 10. A higher score means a worse outcome. | baseline; six months |
| Change in Behavioral Intentions to Smoke Cigarettes | Measured by two items assessing the student's intentions to smoke cigarettes as a teen or as a grown-up. Responses were on a five-point scale ranging from "definitely not" (1) to "definitely will" (5). The scale was created by summing the two items with a potential range from 2 to 10. A higher score means a worse outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Willingness to Vape E-cigarettes | Measured by four items, assessing the student's willingness to vape e-cigarettes if the opportunity presented itself (with a group of kids with e-cigaretes available and with kids who are vaping and you want to be a part of the group. Willingness to vape was assessed for two levels, "try a few vapes" and "try vaping several times in a row". Responses were on a five point scale, "not at all willing" (1) to "very willing" (5) and were summed for the two scenarios and two levels, yielding a scale from 4 to 20. A higher score means a worse outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Willingness to Smoke Cigarettes | Measured by four items, assessing the student's willingness to smoke cigarettes if the opportunity presented itself ("with a group of kids with cigarettes available" and "with kids who are smoking and you want to be a part of the group". Willingness to smoke was assessed for two levels, "try a few puffs" and "smoking the whole cigarette". Responses were on a five point scale, "not at all willing" (1) to "very willing" (5) and were summed for the two scenarios and two levels, yielding a scale from 4 to 20. A higher score means a worse outcome. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Favorable Social Images of Smokers | Students rate what they "think kids who smoke are like" using a three-point rating scale from "not at all like this" (1) to "very much like this" (3) to rate three attributes, "popular", "cool or neat" and "exciting". The three attributes are summed and the potential score goes from 3 to 9. A higher score means a worse outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Judy A Andrews, PhD | Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc. | Principal Investigator |
| Judith S. Gordon, PhD | University of Arizon | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc. | Springfield | Oregon | 97477 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
No events.
The study took place in the schools from January 6, 2020 through June 10, 2022. Within 43 recruited schools, 2906 5th grade students were initially eligible for participation. Among these students, 111 had parents who actively declined their participation, resulting in 2795 students within randomized schools, as eligible for enrollment. Among these, 2673 were enrolled in the study, as defined by completing the baseline and/or follow-up assessment.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Intervention | Students in intervention schools were expected to complete Click City®: Tobacco, a computer-based program designed to prevent subsequent tobacco use. Students were expected to do a 15 to 20 minute lesson two times a week for four weeks. Participation also consisted of a baseline assessment one-week prior to starting the program, and a follow-up assessment one-week following completion of the program. |
| FG001 | Control | Students in control schools were expected to complete their usual tobacco curriculum, designed to prevent tobacco use. Students completed the baseline and follow-up assessments during the same week as students in their yoked intervention school. The expectation was that students would participate in the standard tobacco curriculum over the same period that students in the intervention group completed Click City®: Tobacco. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
The baseline analyses are based on those who completed the baseline assessment. Students enrolled in the study completed either the baseline assessment, the follow-up assessment or both assessments.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Intervention | Students in the intervention group were expected to complete Click City®: Tobacco, a computer-based program designed to prevent subsequent tobacco use. Students were expected to do a 15 to 20 minute lesson two times a week for four weeks. Participation also consisted of a baseline assessment one-week prior to starting the program, and a follow-up assessment one-week following completion of the program. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Behavioral Intentions to Vape E-cigarettes | Measured by two items, assessing the student's intentions regarding vaping e-cigarettes as a teen or as a grown-up. Responses were on a five-point scale ranging from "definitely not" (1) to "definitely will" (5). The scale was created by summing the two items with potential range from 2 to 10. A higher score means a worse outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although schools are the unit of randomization, students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six months |
|
Adverse events were collected across the six weeks participation window of each student.
If adverse events are reported, they are referred to a clinical psychologist and evaluated. No adverse events were reported.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Intervention | Participation consisted of a baseline assessment one-week prior to starting the program, and a follow-up assessment one-week following completion of the program. The expectation was that students complete two lessons a week of the computer-based program over a four-week period. Click City®: Tobacco: A computer-based program assigned to students designed to prevent subsequent tobacco use. Students complete one 15 to 20 minute lesson two times a week for four weeks. |
Not provided
Not provided
The trial was interrupted half way through by school closures as a result of the pandemic. The trial was re-instated two years later. There were no differences on the effect of the intervention due to timing of the implementation of the trial (prior to versus following school closures). Technical problems led to inability to match IDs. The data for these participants was dropped from that portion of the study.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judy A. Andrews, Senior Scientist | Oregon Research Behavioral Intervention Strategies, Inc. | 541-484-2123 | Judy.Andrews@Influentsin.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 6, 2023 | Aug 4, 2023 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Mar 6, 2023 | Aug 4, 2023 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D064424 | Tobacco Use |
| D000072137 | Vaping |
| D012907 | Smoking |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Schools were stratified by state, size of school (small, medium, large) and desired start date and randomized to intervention or control. Intervention and control schools were yoked for the timing of assessments (baseline and follow-up assessments).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Usual Tobacco Curriculum | Other | Students complete their usual curriculum designed to prevent tobacco use. |
|
| baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Favorable Social Images of E-cigarette Vapers | Students rate what they "think kids who vape e-carettes are like" using a three-point rating scale using "not at all like this" (1) to "very much like this" (3) to rate three attributes, "popular", "cool or neat" and "exciting". The three attributes are summed and the potential score ranges from 3 to 9. A higher score means a worse outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Normative Social Images of Smokers | Students rate what they "think other 5th grade kids think kids who smoke cigarettes are like" using a three-point rating scale using "not at all like this" (1) to "very much like this" (3) to rate three attributes, "popular", "cool or neat" and "exciting". The three attributes are summed and the potential score ranges from 3 to 9. A higher score means a worse outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Normative Social Images of Vapers | Students rate what they "think other 5th grade kids think kids who vape e-cigarettes are like" using a three-point rating scale using "not at all like this" (1) to "very much like this" (3) to rate three attributes, "popular", "cool or neat" and "exciting". The three attributes are summed and the potential score ranges from 3 to 9. A higher score means a worse outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Perception of Friends Approval of Smoking | Students indicated their perception of friends' approval of their smoking of each of three levels of cigarettes, trying, smoking a few, and smoking a few a day. Responses to each item ranged from "yes" (1) to "no" (3). Summing the three levels ranged from 3 to 9, with a higher score means a better outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Perception of Friends Approval of Vaping | Students indicated their perception of friends' approval of their vaping of each of three levels of cigarettes, trying, vaping a few, and vaping a few a day. Responses to each item ranged from "yes" (1) to "no" (3). Summing the three levels ranged from 3 to 9, with a higher score indicating a better outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Perception of Risk of Second-hand Smoke Exposure | Perception of the risk of getting four diseases ("breathing problems", "asthma", "ear infections" "heart disease", and "lung disease or cancer") as a result of being "often around someone who smokes". Responses for each disease are on a five point scale ranging from "no chance" (1) to "certain to happen" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale of five items ranged from 4 to 20. A higher score means a better outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Perception of Risk of Second-hand Vape Exposure | Perception of the risk of getting each of four diseases ("breathing problems", "asthma", "ear infections" , and "lung disease or cancer") as a result of being "often around someone who vapes". Responses for each disease are on a five point scale ranging from "no chance" (1) to "certain to happen" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale of four items ranged from 4 to 20. The follow-up measure was subtracted from the baseline measure, with a higher score indicating a favorable outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Perception of Risk of Cumulative Consequences of Smoking | Perception of risk of getting three diseases (lung cancer, serious breathing diseases, and heart disease) as a result of three levels of cigarettes, "one", "a few cigarettes a day for two years", "a pack of cigarettes a day for two years". Responses for each disease and each level ranged from "no chance" (1) to "certain to happen" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale of nine items ranged from 9 to 45. A higher score means a better outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Perception of Risk of Cumulative Consequences of Vaping | Perception of risk of getting three diseases (lung cancer, serious breathing diseases, and heart disease) as a result of three levels of e-cigarettes, "one time", "a few times a day for two years", "Twenty or more times a day for two years'. Responses for each disease and each level ranged from "no chance" (1) to "certain to happen" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale of nine items ranged from 9 to 45. A higher score means a better outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Perception of Risk of Smoking Each Cigarette | Risk of smoking each cigarette was measured by two items indicating what would happen to a 12 year old who started smoking, "every cigarette smoked hurts them a bit" and "The very next cigarette probably won't hurt their bodies". The response scale was a five-point scale ranging from "strongly agree" (1) to "strongly disagree" (5). The scale consisted of summing both items with the former item reversed scored. Scale scores ranged from 2 to 10. A higher score indicated a more favorable outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Perception of Risk of Vaping Each E-cigarette | Risk of vaping each e-cigarette was measured by two items indicating what would happen to a 12 year old who started vaping, "every e-cigarette vaped hurts them a bit" and "the very next e-cigarette probably won't hurt their bodies". The response scale was a five-point scale ranging from "strongly agree" (1) to "strongly disagree" (5). The scale consisted of summing both items with the former item reversed scored. Scale scores ranged from 2 to 10. A higher score indicated a more better outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Perception of Risk of Addiction From Smoking | Change in perception of risk of getting addicted to smoking as a result of five levels of smoking, ranging from "one time" to a "a pack of cigarettes a day for five years". Responses for each level were on a five-point scale ranging from "no chance" (1) to "certain to happen" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale of the five items ranged from 5 to 25. A higher score means a better outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Perception of Risk of Addiction From Vaping | Perception of risk of getting addicted to vaping as a result of vaping five levels of increasing quantities of e-cigarettes, ranging from "one time" to a "20 times a day for 5 years". Responses for each level were on a five-point scale ranging from "no chance" (1) to "certain to happen" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale ranged from 5 to 25. A higher score means a better outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Perception of Control Over Quitting Smoking | Students answered "how much control do you think you would have over quitting smoking" using a four-point response scale ranging from "no control" (1) to "total control" (4). Perception of control was indicated within four levels of increasing quantities of cigarettes, ranging from "tried a cigarette" to "a pack a day for five years". The four Items were summed to form a scale with the total scale ranging from 4 to 16. A higher score means a worse outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Perception of Control Over Vaping | Students answered "how much control do you think you would have over quitting vaping e-cigarettes" using a four-point response scale ranging from "no control" (1) to "total control" (4). Students indicated thier perception of control within each of four levels of increasing quantities of e-cigarettes, ranging from "tried vaping" to "20 times a day for five years". The four Items were summed to form a scale with the total scale ranging from 4 to 16. A lower score indicated a better outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Perception of Risk of Difficulty Quitting Smoking | Perception of risk of difficulty quitting smoking as a result of vaping five levels of increasing quantities of cigarettes smoked, ranging from "one cigarette" to a " a pack of cigarettes a day for 5 years". Responses for each level were on a five-point scale ranging from "Very easy" (1) to "Very difficult" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale ranged from 5 to 25. A higher score meant a better outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| Change in Perception of Risk of Difficulty Quitting Vaping | Perception of risk of difficulty of quitting vaping as a result of vaping five levels of increasing quantities of e-cigarettes vaped, ranging from "one time" to a " 20 times a day for 5 years". Responses for each level were on a five-point scale ranging from "Very easy" (1) to "Very difficult" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale ranged from 5 to 25. A higher score means a better outcome. | baseline; six weeks |
| BG001 | Control | Students in control schools were expected to complete their usual tobacco curriculum, designed to prevent tobacco use. Students completed the baseline and follow-up assessments during the same week as students in their yoked intervention school. The expectation was that students would participate in the standard tobacco curriculum over the same period that students in the intervention group completed Click City®: Tobacco. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Student's use of tobacco prior to the trial | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Family members' current use of tobacco | This variable was assessed by four items: (a) "Do any of your brothers, sisters, stepbrothers or stepsisters smoke cigarettes?"; (b) ". . . vape e-cigarettes?"; (c) Does your mom/stepmother smoke or father/step-father smoke cigarettes?"; (d) . . . "vape e-cigarettes?". If the student answered in the affirmative to any of the four items, they were considered to be a member of an nicotine-using family | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Control | Students in control schools completed the baseline and follow-up assessments during the same week as students in their yoked intervention school. The expectation was that students would participate in the standard tobacco curriculum over this period. Usual tobacco curriculum: Students complete their usual curriculum designed to prevent tobacco use |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Behavioral Intentions to Smoke Cigarettes | Measured by two items assessing the student's intentions to smoke cigarettes as a teen or as a grown-up. Responses were on a five-point scale ranging from "definitely not" (1) to "definitely will" (5). The scale was created by summing the two items with a potential range from 2 to 10. A higher score means a worse outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although schools are the unit of randomization, students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Willingness to Vape E-cigarettes | Measured by four items, assessing the student's willingness to vape e-cigarettes if the opportunity presented itself (with a group of kids with e-cigaretes available and with kids who are vaping and you want to be a part of the group. Willingness to vape was assessed for two levels, "try a few vapes" and "try vaping several times in a row". Responses were on a five point scale, "not at all willing" (1) to "very willing" (5) and were summed for the two scenarios and two levels, yielding a scale from 4 to 20. A higher score means a worse outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although schools are the unit of randomization, students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Willingness to Smoke Cigarettes | Measured by four items, assessing the student's willingness to smoke cigarettes if the opportunity presented itself ("with a group of kids with cigarettes available" and "with kids who are smoking and you want to be a part of the group". Willingness to smoke was assessed for two levels, "try a few puffs" and "smoking the whole cigarette". Responses were on a five point scale, "not at all willing" (1) to "very willing" (5) and were summed for the two scenarios and two levels, yielding a scale from 4 to 20. A higher score means a worse outcome. | Students were nested within schools. Students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Favorable Social Images of Smokers | Students rate what they "think kids who smoke are like" using a three-point rating scale from "not at all like this" (1) to "very much like this" (3) to rate three attributes, "popular", "cool or neat" and "exciting". The three attributes are summed and the potential score goes from 3 to 9. A higher score means a worse outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Schools were randomly assigned to an arm. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Favorable Social Images of E-cigarette Vapers | Students rate what they "think kids who vape e-carettes are like" using a three-point rating scale using "not at all like this" (1) to "very much like this" (3) to rate three attributes, "popular", "cool or neat" and "exciting". The three attributes are summed and the potential score ranges from 3 to 9. A higher score means a worse outcome. | Students are nested within schools and schools are randomly assigned to condition. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Normative Social Images of Smokers | Students rate what they "think other 5th grade kids think kids who smoke cigarettes are like" using a three-point rating scale using "not at all like this" (1) to "very much like this" (3) to rate three attributes, "popular", "cool or neat" and "exciting". The three attributes are summed and the potential score ranges from 3 to 9. A higher score means a worse outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although schools are the unit of randomization, students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Normative Social Images of Vapers | Students rate what they "think other 5th grade kids think kids who vape e-cigarettes are like" using a three-point rating scale using "not at all like this" (1) to "very much like this" (3) to rate three attributes, "popular", "cool or neat" and "exciting". The three attributes are summed and the potential score ranges from 3 to 9. A higher score means a worse outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although schools are the unit of randomization, students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perception of Friends Approval of Smoking | Students indicated their perception of friends' approval of their smoking of each of three levels of cigarettes, trying, smoking a few, and smoking a few a day. Responses to each item ranged from "yes" (1) to "no" (3). Summing the three levels ranged from 3 to 9, with a higher score means a better outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although schools are the unit of randomization, students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perception of Friends Approval of Vaping | Students indicated their perception of friends' approval of their vaping of each of three levels of cigarettes, trying, vaping a few, and vaping a few a day. Responses to each item ranged from "yes" (1) to "no" (3). Summing the three levels ranged from 3 to 9, with a higher score indicating a better outcome. | Students nested within schools. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perception of Risk of Second-hand Smoke Exposure | Perception of the risk of getting four diseases ("breathing problems", "asthma", "ear infections" "heart disease", and "lung disease or cancer") as a result of being "often around someone who smokes". Responses for each disease are on a five point scale ranging from "no chance" (1) to "certain to happen" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale of five items ranged from 4 to 20. A higher score means a better outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although schools are the unit of randomization, students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perception of Risk of Second-hand Vape Exposure | Perception of the risk of getting each of four diseases ("breathing problems", "asthma", "ear infections" , and "lung disease or cancer") as a result of being "often around someone who vapes". Responses for each disease are on a five point scale ranging from "no chance" (1) to "certain to happen" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale of four items ranged from 4 to 20. The follow-up measure was subtracted from the baseline measure, with a higher score indicating a favorable outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although the school was the unit of randomization, the student is the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perception of Risk of Cumulative Consequences of Smoking | Perception of risk of getting three diseases (lung cancer, serious breathing diseases, and heart disease) as a result of three levels of cigarettes, "one", "a few cigarettes a day for two years", "a pack of cigarettes a day for two years". Responses for each disease and each level ranged from "no chance" (1) to "certain to happen" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale of nine items ranged from 9 to 45. A higher score means a better outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perception of Risk of Cumulative Consequences of Vaping | Perception of risk of getting three diseases (lung cancer, serious breathing diseases, and heart disease) as a result of three levels of e-cigarettes, "one time", "a few times a day for two years", "Twenty or more times a day for two years'. Responses for each disease and each level ranged from "no chance" (1) to "certain to happen" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale of nine items ranged from 9 to 45. A higher score means a better outcome. | Students are nested with schools, which are randomized to condition. Students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perception of Risk of Smoking Each Cigarette | Risk of smoking each cigarette was measured by two items indicating what would happen to a 12 year old who started smoking, "every cigarette smoked hurts them a bit" and "The very next cigarette probably won't hurt their bodies". The response scale was a five-point scale ranging from "strongly agree" (1) to "strongly disagree" (5). The scale consisted of summing both items with the former item reversed scored. Scale scores ranged from 2 to 10. A higher score indicated a more favorable outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although schools are the unit of randomization, students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perception of Risk of Vaping Each E-cigarette | Risk of vaping each e-cigarette was measured by two items indicating what would happen to a 12 year old who started vaping, "every e-cigarette vaped hurts them a bit" and "the very next e-cigarette probably won't hurt their bodies". The response scale was a five-point scale ranging from "strongly agree" (1) to "strongly disagree" (5). The scale consisted of summing both items with the former item reversed scored. Scale scores ranged from 2 to 10. A higher score indicated a more better outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Schools are the unit of assignment while students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perception of Risk of Addiction From Smoking | Change in perception of risk of getting addicted to smoking as a result of five levels of smoking, ranging from "one time" to a "a pack of cigarettes a day for five years". Responses for each level were on a five-point scale ranging from "no chance" (1) to "certain to happen" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale of the five items ranged from 5 to 25. A higher score means a better outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although schools are the unit of randomization, students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perception of Risk of Addiction From Vaping | Perception of risk of getting addicted to vaping as a result of vaping five levels of increasing quantities of e-cigarettes, ranging from "one time" to a "20 times a day for 5 years". Responses for each level were on a five-point scale ranging from "no chance" (1) to "certain to happen" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale ranged from 5 to 25. A higher score means a better outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although schools are the unit of randomization, students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perception of Control Over Quitting Smoking | Students answered "how much control do you think you would have over quitting smoking" using a four-point response scale ranging from "no control" (1) to "total control" (4). Perception of control was indicated within four levels of increasing quantities of cigarettes, ranging from "tried a cigarette" to "a pack a day for five years". The four Items were summed to form a scale with the total scale ranging from 4 to 16. A higher score means a worse outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although schools are the unit of randomization, students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perception of Control Over Vaping | Students answered "how much control do you think you would have over quitting vaping e-cigarettes" using a four-point response scale ranging from "no control" (1) to "total control" (4). Students indicated thier perception of control within each of four levels of increasing quantities of e-cigarettes, ranging from "tried vaping" to "20 times a day for five years". The four Items were summed to form a scale with the total scale ranging from 4 to 16. A lower score indicated a better outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although schools are the unit of randomization, students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perception of Risk of Difficulty Quitting Smoking | Perception of risk of difficulty quitting smoking as a result of vaping five levels of increasing quantities of cigarettes smoked, ranging from "one cigarette" to a " a pack of cigarettes a day for 5 years". Responses for each level were on a five-point scale ranging from "Very easy" (1) to "Very difficult" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale ranged from 5 to 25. A higher score meant a better outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although schools are the unit of randomization, students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Perception of Risk of Difficulty Quitting Vaping | Perception of risk of difficulty of quitting vaping as a result of vaping five levels of increasing quantities of e-cigarettes vaped, ranging from "one time" to a " 20 times a day for 5 years". Responses for each level were on a five-point scale ranging from "Very easy" (1) to "Very difficult" (5). Items were summed to form a scale. The total scale ranged from 5 to 25. A higher score means a better outcome. | Students are nested within schools. Although schools are the unit of randomization, students are the unit of analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | baseline; six weeks |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 1,346 |
| 0 |
| 1,346 |
| 0 |
| 1,346 |
| EG001 | Control | Students in control schools completed the baseline and follow-up assessments during the same week as students in their yoked intervention school. The expectation was that students would participate in the standard tobacco curriculum over this period. Usual tobacco curriculum: Students complete their usual curriculum designed to prevent tobacco use | 0 | 1,327 | 0 | 1,327 | 0 | 1,327 |
Not provided
Not provided