Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| St. Jude Children's Research Hospital | OTHER |
| Children's Hospital of Philadelphia | OTHER |
| State University of New York | OTHER |
| University of Miami |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to test a multi-faceted Tailored Motivational Interviewing Implementation intervention (TMI), based on the Dynamic Adaptation Process (DAP) to scale up an Evidence-based Practice (EBP) in multidisciplinary adolescent HIV care settings while balancing flexibility and fidelity.
A mixed-methods design will be used, in which the dominant method is quantitative (a dynamic wait-listed design; DWLD) to determine the impact of TMI on the integration of MI with fidelity in 10 adolescent HIV clinics with an average of 15 providers and 100 patients each.
The NIH Office of AIDS Research called for implementation science (IS) to address the behavioral research-practice gap.Motivational Interviewing (MI) is the only behavioral intervention to date shown to be effective to improve self-management for youth living with HIV (YLH). MI was also the only intervention to demonstrate success across the youth HIV care cascade. MI interventions can target multiple behaviors and be delivered by multiple provider-types as is common in adolescent HIV care settings. Finally, MI is already embedded in the clinical guidelines for HIV care and HIV risk reduction. Implementation Science is the scientific study of methods to promote the uptake of research findings and evidence-based practice (EBPs) to improve the quality of behavior change approaches in health care settings. A primary challenge of scaling up EBP's is the balance of flexibility (adaptation to context) and fidelity (provider adherence and competence). The Dynamic Adaptation Process (DAP) guides tailoring of MI implementation at the exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment phases (EPIS) of scale up. The goal of this proposal is to test a multi-faceted Tailored Motivational Interviewing, Implementation intervention (TMI), based on the DAP to scale up an EBP in multidisciplinary adolescent HIV care settings while balancing flexibility and fidelity.
The pilot work for TMI included tailoring of initial workshop training based on innovative methods in communication science, developing efficient fidelity measurement, and pilot testing the revised intervention. The initial TMI workshop was adapted based on findings from sequential analysis of provider interactions with youth living with HIV (YLH) by emphasizing provider communication strategies most associated with patient motivational statements ("change talk"), de-emphasizing MI strategies that were unrelated to change talk, and suppressing those that were associated with a motivational statements ("counter-change talk"). Additional tailoring based on the DAP requires that qualitative and quantitative data are collected during the exploration phase. In the preparation phase, these data are reviewed by an implementation team comprised of local stakeholders and experts in MI implementation who recommend necessary adaptations for the service context while balancing the need for fidelity (adherence to minimum implementation requirements and achieving provider competency thresholds). In the implementation phase, ongoing fidelity monitoring determines the need for ongoing coaching, thus amount of coaching is tailored to the individual provider. Finally, the sustainment phase addresses the maintenance of innovation beyond 1 year utilizing strategies such as developing communities of practice (CoPs) and promoting internal facilitation of TMI.
In a hybrid implementation-effectiveness (Type 3) trial, the effect of TMI will be tested on fidelity EBP, and secondarily on HIV cascade-related outcomes, using a dynamic wait-listed design (DWLD) 18 with 165 providers nested within 10 Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions (ATN4) sites. With this design, the 10 clinics will be randomly assigned in 5 clusters to receive TMI. For each randomization, 2 clinics receive TMI and the others remain in the wait-list condition. This will continue until the 5th cluster has been randomized to TMI. After one year of TMI's external facilitation based on the DAP, a second randomization will compare internal facilitator monitoring and coaching plus the encouragement of CoPs to CoPs alone. Fidelity will be assessed on a quarterly basis through the 24 months of intervention and an additional 6 months of follow-up. The proposal uses the EPIS model, to guide the investigation of the interacting elements that influence successful implementation. The qualitative method will be nested within the quantitative study to provide a deeper understanding of the implementation context and understand why or why not MI is integrated with fidelity across the 150 providers. Providers and key stakeholders will complete qualitative interviews and brief assessments based on EPIS at baseline, after one year of TMI (first randomization), and after 1 year of follow-up (second randomization).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implementation Block 1 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 3 months. |
| |
| Implementation Block 2 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 6 months. |
| |
| Implementation Block 3 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 9 months. |
| |
| Implementation Block 4 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 12 months. |
| |
| Implementation Block 5 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 15 months. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) | Behavioral | Coaching feedback will be triggered by a provider falling below the competency threshold on the standardized patient interaction. Everyone will receive coaching for two assessments in the month following training. After that, if mean scores fall below competency, then the provider will receive a 45-minute coaching session by the external Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) facilitator. Feedback on two highest and two lowest ratings, review of the audio recording and interactive coaching activities (e.g., fidelity assessments) targeting the lowest ratings. While many aspects of this implementation strategy are adaptable, organizational leadership will review data on completion of coaching feedback sessions and will determine corrective action for suboptimal adherence. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Raw Average: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) | Providers will complete a 15-minute standard patient role-play at each point during baseline, implementation and sustainment. The Research Assistant (RA) will code these interactions on the 12-item MI CRS and reliability will continue to be monitored with one coding per month co-coded by Dr. Naar. These reports will be cumulatively reported and collected quarterly. Each item on the CRS has a score of 1 (lowest) to 4 (highest). The 12 scores are added and averaged for a score that reflects competency: <2.0=Beginner. >=2.0 to <2.6. >=2.6 to <3.3=Intermediate. >=3.3=Advanced. The outcomes provided below represent the average of the provider scores and reported by site and implementation phase. For sites randomized to internal facilitation in the sustainment period, the RA will code the same interactions so that the facilitator ratings will not be used for research purposes. | Every three months over fifteen months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Individual Patients' Records Report Related to HIV Viral Load | Record/chart abstraction conducted for patients in care at the site for
These data include viral load | 12 months prior to start; The end of the 12 month intervention, and 6 months after end of implementation interview |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Providers of prevention and care for youth with HIV
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lisa Todd, MS, JD | Wayne State University | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wayne State University | Detroit | Michigan | 48202 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42063152 | Derived | MacDonell KK, Simpson KN, Todd L, Hall AL, Naar S. Cost of implementing tailored motivational interviewing training in youth HIV clinics. BMC Health Serv Res. 2026 Apr 30;26(1):841. doi: 10.1186/s12913-026-14622-y. | |
| 36273221 | Derived | Coyle K, Carcone AI, Butame S, Pooler-Burgess M, Chang J, Naar S. Adapting the self-assessment of contextual fit scale for implementation of evidence-based practices in adolescent HIV settings. Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Oct 22;3(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00349-4. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
TMI study staff will work with the SC at each site to introduce the project and recruit participants by scheduling and conducting introductory meetings. After the introductory meetings, the SC or PI from each site will send contact information (email, phone number) to the TMI study staff. The TMI study staff will contact participants via email and/or phone call to provide the information sheet and schedule of assessments.
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Block 1 Site 7 | Site 7 was randomized into Block 1 at baseline. In our stepped wedged design, this site entered the implementation phase first, along with site 10, and randomized at the sustainment phase. |
| FG001 | Block 1 Site 10 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Dec 1, 2018 | Dec 16, 2022 |
Not provided
| OTHER |
| Johns Hopkins University | OTHER |
| University of California, San Diego | OTHER |
| University of Alabama at Birmingham | OTHER |
| University of South Florida | OTHER |
| Children's Hospital Los Angeles | OTHER |
| Children's National Research Institute | OTHER |
| City University of New York, School of Public Health | OTHER |
| Wayne State University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Sustainment Block 1 Facilitated CoP | Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation. |
|
| Sustainment Block 2 Facilitated CoP | Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation. |
|
| Sustainment Block 3 Facilitated CoP | Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation. |
|
| Sustainment Block 4 Facilitated CoP | Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation. |
|
| Sustainment Block 5 Facilitated CoP | Randomized Guided Development of CoPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation. |
|
| Sustainment Block 1 CoP Alone | After one year of implementation, site is randomized to receive CoP development without internal facilitation. |
|
| Sustainment Block 2 CoP Alone | After one year of implementation, site is randomized to receive CoP development without internal facilitation. |
|
| Sustainment Block 3 CoP Alone | After one year of implementation, site is randomized to receive CoP development without internal facilitation. |
|
| Sustainment Block 4 CoP Alone | After one year of implementation, site is randomized to receive CoP development without internal facilitation. |
|
| Sustainment Block 5 CoP Along | After one year of implementation, site is randomized to receive CoP development without internal facilitation. |
|
|
| Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation. | Behavioral | Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity monitoring, and prevent drift. In addition to CoP, half the sites will be randomized to receive an internal facilitator who will be trained to continue quarterly fidelity monitoring and coaching feedback when scores fall below competency. |
|
| CoP development without internal facilitation. | Behavioral | Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity |
|
| 31237839 | Derived | Naar S, MacDonell K, Chapman JE, Todd L, Gurung S, Cain D, Dilones RE, Parsons JT. Testing a Motivational Interviewing Implementation Intervention in Adolescent HIV Clinics: Protocol for a Type 3, Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Jun 7;8(6):e11200. doi: 10.2196/11200. |
Site 10 was randomized into Block 1 at baseline. In our stepped wedged design, this site entered the implementation phase first, along with site 7, and randomized at the sustainment phase.
| FG002 | Block 2 Site 3 | Site 3 was randomized into Block 2 at baseline. In our stepped wedged design, this site entered the implementation phase second, along with site 8, and randomized at the sustainment phase. |
| FG003 | Block 2 Site 8 | Site 8 was randomized into Block 2 at baseline. In our stepped wedged design, this site entered the implementation phase second, along with site 3, and randomized at the sustainment phase. |
| FG004 | Block 3 Site 1 | Site 1 was randomized into Block 3 at baseline. In our stepped wedged design, this site entered into implementation phase third, along with Site 11, and randomized at the sustainment phase. |
| FG005 | Block 3 Site 11 | Site 11 was randomized into Block 3 at baseline. In our stepped wedged design, this site entered the implementation phase third, along with site 1, and randomized at the sustainment phase. |
| FG006 | Block 4 Site 2 | Site 2 was randomized into Block 4 at baseline. In our stepped wedged design, this site entered the implementation phase fourth, along with site 12, and randomized at the sustainment phase. |
| FG007 | Block 4 Site 12 | Site 12 was randomized to Block 4 at baseline. In our stepped wedged design, this site entered the implementation phase fourth, along with Site 2, and randomized at the sustainment phase. |
| FG008 | Block 5 Site 6 | Site 6 was randomized into Block 5 at baseline. In our stepped wedged design, this site entered the implementation phase fifth, along with site 13, and randomized at the sustainment phase. |
| FG009 | Block 5 Site 13 | Site 13 was randomized into Block 5 at baseline. In our stepped wedged design, this site entered the implementation phase fifth, along with site 6, and randomized at the sustainment phase. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Block 1 Site 7 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 3 months. |
| BG001 | Block 1 Site 10 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 3 months. |
| BG002 | Block 2 Site 3 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 3 months. |
| BG003 | Block 2 Site 8 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 3 months. |
| BG004 | Block 3 Site 1 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 3 months. |
| BG005 | Block 3 Site 11 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 3 months. |
| BG006 | Block 4 Site 2 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 3 months. |
| BG007 | Block 4 Site 12 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 3 months. |
| BG008 | Block 5 Site 6 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 3 months. |
| BG009 | Block 5 Site 13 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 3 months. |
| BG010 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| |||||||||||
| Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) (Raw Average) | Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) is a 12-item measure, rated on a 4-point categorical rating scale (1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Excellent). A coder selected a 15 minute portion of the session and coded the provider's MI skills (e.g., empathy, collaboration, supporting autonomy, open ended questions, etc.). The 12 items were averaged with a min of 1 and max of 4. The final competence categories were: Beginner (<2.0), Novice (>=2.0 and <2.6), Intermediate (>=2.6 and <3.3), and Advanced (>=3.3), analyzed according to a Gaussian distribution. | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale |
| |||||||||
| Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) Criterion Score | Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) is a 12-item measure, rated on a 4-point categorical rating scale (1=Poor, 2=Fair, 3=Good, 4=Excellent). A coder selected a 15 minute portion of the session and coded the provider's MI skills (e.g., empathy, collaboration, supporting autonomy, open ended questions, etc.). The 12 items were averaged with a min of 1 and max of 4. The final competence categories were: Beginner (<2.0), Novice (>=2.0 and <2.6), Intermediate (>=2.6 and <3.3), and Advanced (>=3.3), analyzed according to an ordinal distribution (logit link). | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Raw Average: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) | Providers will complete a 15-minute standard patient role-play at each point during baseline, implementation and sustainment. The Research Assistant (RA) will code these interactions on the 12-item MI CRS and reliability will continue to be monitored with one coding per month co-coded by Dr. Naar. These reports will be cumulatively reported and collected quarterly. Each item on the CRS has a score of 1 (lowest) to 4 (highest). The 12 scores are added and averaged for a score that reflects competency: <2.0=Beginner. >=2.0 to <2.6. >=2.6 to <3.3=Intermediate. >=3.3=Advanced. The outcomes provided below represent the average of the provider scores and reported by site and implementation phase. For sites randomized to internal facilitation in the sustainment period, the RA will code the same interactions so that the facilitator ratings will not be used for research purposes. | Participants may choose to leave the study at any point. Participants may be removed from the study based on changes in their clinical role and if they have less than 4 hours of client contact per week on average. Participant data will be included, unless a participant requests that their data is removed. In such cases, the participant's data will be deleted. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Every three months over fifteen months |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Individual Patients' Records Report Related to HIV Viral Load | Record/chart abstraction conducted for patients in care at the site for
These data include viral load | Record/Chart Abstraction was conducted based on number of patients at clinic for a given year. Clinic patient population numbers fluctuate. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Log of copies/mL | 12 months prior to start; The end of the 12 month intervention, and 6 months after end of implementation interview |
|
Not applicable as we did not monitor for adverse events.
All-Cause Mortality, Serious, and Other (Not Including Serious) Adverse Events were not monitored/assessed because the study was deemed no more than minimal risk.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Implementation Block 1 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 3 months. Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS): Coaching feedback will be triggered by a provider falling below the competency threshold on the standardized patient interaction. Everyone will receive coaching for two assessments in the month following training. After that, if mean scores fall below competency, then the provider will receive a 45-minute coaching session by the external Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) facilitator. Feedback on two highest and two lowest ratings, review of the audio recording and interactive coaching activities (e.g., fidelity assessments) targeting the lowest ratings. While many aspects of this implementation strategy are adaptable, organizational leadership will review data on completion of coaching feedback sessions and will determine corrective action for suboptimal adherence. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG001 | Implementation Block 2 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 6 months. Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS): Coaching feedback will be triggered by a provider falling below the competency threshold on the standardized patient interaction. Everyone will receive coaching for two assessments in the month following training. After that, if mean scores fall below competency, then the provider will receive a 45-minute coaching session by the external Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) facilitator. Feedback on two highest and two lowest ratings, review of the audio recording and interactive coaching activities (e.g., fidelity assessments) targeting the lowest ratings. While many aspects of this implementation strategy are adaptable, organizational leadership will review data on completion of coaching feedback sessions and will determine corrective action for suboptimal adherence. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG002 | Implementation Block 3 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 9 months. Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS): Coaching feedback will be triggered by a provider falling below the competency threshold on the standardized patient interaction. Everyone will receive coaching for two assessments in the month following training. After that, if mean scores fall below competency, then the provider will receive a 45-minute coaching session by the external Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) facilitator. Feedback on two highest and two lowest ratings, review of the audio recording and interactive coaching activities (e.g., fidelity assessments) targeting the lowest ratings. While many aspects of this implementation strategy are adaptable, organizational leadership will review data on completion of coaching feedback sessions and will determine corrective action for suboptimal adherence. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG003 | Implementation Block 4 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 12 months. Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS): Coaching feedback will be triggered by a provider falling below the competency threshold on the standardized patient interaction. Everyone will receive coaching for two assessments in the month following training. After that, if mean scores fall below competency, then the provider will receive a 45-minute coaching session by the external Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) facilitator. Feedback on two highest and two lowest ratings, review of the audio recording and interactive coaching activities (e.g., fidelity assessments) targeting the lowest ratings. While many aspects of this implementation strategy are adaptable, organizational leadership will review data on completion of coaching feedback sessions and will determine corrective action for suboptimal adherence. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG004 | Implementation Block 5 | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS) performed monthly but reported quarterly, starting at 15 months. Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS): Coaching feedback will be triggered by a provider falling below the competency threshold on the standardized patient interaction. Everyone will receive coaching for two assessments in the month following training. After that, if mean scores fall below competency, then the provider will receive a 45-minute coaching session by the external Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) facilitator. Feedback on two highest and two lowest ratings, review of the audio recording and interactive coaching activities (e.g., fidelity assessments) targeting the lowest ratings. While many aspects of this implementation strategy are adaptable, organizational leadership will review data on completion of coaching feedback sessions and will determine corrective action for suboptimal adherence. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG005 | Sustainment Block 1 Facilitated CoP | Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation. Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity monitoring, and prevent drift. In addition to CoP, half the sites will be randomized to receive an internal facilitator who will be trained to continue quarterly fidelity monitoring and coaching feedback when scores fall below competency. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG006 | Sustainment Block 2 Facilitated CoP | Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation. Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity monitoring, and prevent drift. In addition to CoP, half the sites will be randomized to receive an internal facilitator who will be trained to continue quarterly fidelity monitoring and coaching feedback when scores fall below competency. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG007 | Sustainment Block 3 Facilitated CoP | Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation. Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity monitoring, and prevent drift. In addition to CoP, half the sites will be randomized to receive an internal facilitator who will be trained to continue quarterly fidelity monitoring and coaching feedback when scores fall below competency. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG008 | Sustainment Block 4 Facilitated CoP | Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation. Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity monitoring, and prevent drift. In addition to CoP, half the sites will be randomized to receive an internal facilitator who will be trained to continue quarterly fidelity monitoring and coaching feedback when scores fall below competency. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG009 | Sustainment Block 5 Facilitated CoP | Randomized Guided Development of CoPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation. Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity monitoring, and prevent drift. In addition to CoP, half the sites will be randomized to receive an internal facilitator who will be trained to continue quarterly fidelity monitoring and coaching feedback when scores fall below competency. | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG010 | Sustainment Block 1 CoP Alone | After one year of implementation, site is randomized to receive CoP development without internal facilitation. CoP development without internal facilitation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG011 | Sustainment Block 2 CoP Alone | After one year of implementation, site is randomized to receive CoP development without internal facilitation. CoP development without internal facilitation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG012 | Sustainment Block 3 CoP Alone | After one year of implementation, site is randomized to receive CoP development without internal facilitation. CoP development without internal facilitation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG013 | Sustainment Block 4 CoP Alone | After one year of implementation, site is randomized to receive CoP development without internal facilitation. CoP development without internal facilitation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| EG014 | Sustainment Block 5 CoP Along | After one year of implementation, site is randomized to receive CoP development without internal facilitation. CoP development without internal facilitation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sylvie Naar, PhD; Distinguished Endowed Professor | Florida State University | 850-644-2334 | sylvie.naar@med.fsu.edu |
| Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 30, 2020 | Dec 16, 2022 | SAP_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015658 | HIV Infections |
| D010349 | Patient Compliance |
| D016312 | Treatment Refusal |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000086982 | Blood-Borne Infections |
| D003141 | Communicable Diseases |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D015229 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral |
| D012749 | Sexually Transmitted Diseases |
| D016180 | Lentivirus Infections |
| D012192 | Retroviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D007153 | Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D010342 | Patient Acceptance of Health Care |
| D000074822 | Treatment Adherence and Compliance |
| D015438 | Health Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Female |
|
|
| Unknown |
|
|
|
|
| Black / African American |
|
|
| Middle Eastern / North African |
|
|
| White |
|
|
| Other |
|
|
| Unknown |
|
|
| Hispanic |
|
|
| Not Hispanic |
|
|
| Uknown Hispanic |
|
|
|
|
| OG002 | Block 2 Site 3 - CoP Facilitated | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS): Coaching feedback will be triggered by a provider falling below the competency threshold on the standardized patient interaction. Everyone will receive coaching for two assessments in the month following training. After that, if mean scores fall below competency, then the provider will receive a 45-minute coaching session by the external Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) facilitator. Feedback on two highest and two lowest ratings, review of the audio recording and interactive coaching activities (e.g., fidelity assessments) targeting the lowest ratings. While many aspects of this implementation strategy are adaptable, organizational leadership will review data on completion of coaching feedback sessions and will determine corrective action for suboptimal adherence. Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity monitoring, and prevent drift. In addition to CoP, half the sites will be randomized to receive an internal facilitator who will be trained to continue quarterly fidelity monitoring and coaching feedback when scores fall below competency. |
| OG003 | Block 2 Site 8 - CoP Alone | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS): Coaching feedback will be triggered by a provider falling below the competency threshold on the standardized patient interaction. Everyone will receive coaching for two assessments in the month following training. After that, if mean scores fall below competency, then the provider will receive a 45-minute coaching session by the external Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) facilitator. Feedback on two highest and two lowest ratings, review of the audio recording and interactive coaching activities (e.g., fidelity assessments) targeting the lowest ratings. While many aspects of this implementation strategy are adaptable, organizational leadership will review data on completion of coaching feedback sessions and will determine corrective action for suboptimal adherence. CoP development without internal facilitation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity |
| OG004 | Block 3 Site 1 - CoP Facilitated | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS): Coaching feedback will be triggered by a provider falling below the competency threshold on the standardized patient interaction. Everyone will receive coaching for two assessments in the month following training. After that, if mean scores fall below competency, then the provider will receive a 45-minute coaching session by the external Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) facilitator. Feedback on two highest and two lowest ratings, review of the audio recording and interactive coaching activities (e.g., fidelity assessments) targeting the lowest ratings. While many aspects of this implementation strategy are adaptable, organizational leadership will review data on completion of coaching feedback sessions and will determine corrective action for suboptimal adherence. Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity monitoring, and prevent drift. In addition to CoP, half the sites will be randomized to receive an internal facilitator who will be trained to continue quarterly fidelity monitoring and coaching feedback when scores fall below competency. |
| OG005 | Block 3 Site 11 - CoP Alone | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS): Coaching feedback will be triggered by a provider falling below the competency threshold on the standardized patient interaction. Everyone will receive coaching for two assessments in the month following training. After that, if mean scores fall below competency, then the provider will receive a 45-minute coaching session by the external Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) facilitator. Feedback on two highest and two lowest ratings, review of the audio recording and interactive coaching activities (e.g., fidelity assessments) targeting the lowest ratings. While many aspects of this implementation strategy are adaptable, organizational leadership will review data on completion of coaching feedback sessions and will determine corrective action for suboptimal adherence. CoP development without internal facilitation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity |
| OG006 | Block 4 Site 2 - CoP Facilitated | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS): Coaching feedback will be triggered by a provider falling below the competency threshold on the standardized patient interaction. Everyone will receive coaching for two assessments in the month following training. After that, if mean scores fall below competency, then the provider will receive a 45-minute coaching session by the external Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) facilitator. Feedback on two highest and two lowest ratings, review of the audio recording and interactive coaching activities (e.g., fidelity assessments) targeting the lowest ratings. While many aspects of this implementation strategy are adaptable, organizational leadership will review data on completion of coaching feedback sessions and will determine corrective action for suboptimal adherence. Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity monitoring, and prevent drift. In addition to CoP, half the sites will be randomized to receive an internal facilitator who will be trained to continue quarterly fidelity monitoring and coaching feedback when scores fall below competency. |
| OG007 | Block 4 Site 12 - CoP Alone | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS): Coaching feedback will be triggered by a provider falling below the competency threshold on the standardized patient interaction. Everyone will receive coaching for two assessments in the month following training. After that, if mean scores fall below competency, then the provider will receive a 45-minute coaching session by the external Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) facilitator. Feedback on two highest and two lowest ratings, review of the audio recording and interactive coaching activities (e.g., fidelity assessments) targeting the lowest ratings. While many aspects of this implementation strategy are adaptable, organizational leadership will review data on completion of coaching feedback sessions and will determine corrective action for suboptimal adherence. CoP development without internal facilitation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity |
| OG008 | Block 5 Site 6 - CoP Alone | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS): Coaching feedback will be triggered by a provider falling below the competency threshold on the standardized patient interaction. Everyone will receive coaching for two assessments in the month following training. After that, if mean scores fall below competency, then the provider will receive a 45-minute coaching session by the external Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) facilitator. Feedback on two highest and two lowest ratings, review of the audio recording and interactive coaching activities (e.g., fidelity assessments) targeting the lowest ratings. While many aspects of this implementation strategy are adaptable, organizational leadership will review data on completion of coaching feedback sessions and will determine corrective action for suboptimal adherence. CoP development without internal facilitation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity |
| OG009 | Block 5 Site 13 - CoP Facilitated | Competency: 12-Item Motivational Interviewing (MI) Coach Rating Scale (CRS): Coaching feedback will be triggered by a provider falling below the competency threshold on the standardized patient interaction. Everyone will receive coaching for two assessments in the month following training. After that, if mean scores fall below competency, then the provider will receive a 45-minute coaching session by the external Motivational Interviewing Network of Trainers (MINT) facilitator. Feedback on two highest and two lowest ratings, review of the audio recording and interactive coaching activities (e.g., fidelity assessments) targeting the lowest ratings. While many aspects of this implementation strategy are adaptable, organizational leadership will review data on completion of coaching feedback sessions and will determine corrective action for suboptimal adherence. Randomized Guided Development of COPs with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation.: Development of the CoP will be guided by scheduling and assisting in setting the agenda for the first three meetings to encourage MI practice, peer coaching and potentially fidelity monitoring, and prevent drift. In addition to CoP, half the sites will be randomized to receive an internal facilitator who will be trained to continue quarterly fidelity monitoring and coaching feedback when scores fall below competency. |
|
| Sustainment Phase |
|
|
| Block 2 Site 8 |
Communities of Practice (CoP) development without internal facilitation |
| OG004 | Block 3 Site 1 | Randomized Guided Development of Communities of Practice (CoP) with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation. |
| OG005 | Block 3 Site 11 | Communities of Practice (CoP) development without internal facilitation. |
| OG006 | Block 4 Site 2 | Randomized Guided Development of Communities of Practice (CoP) with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation. |
| OG007 | Block 4 Site 12 | Communities of Practice (CoP) development without internal facilitation. |
| OG008 | Block 5 Site 6 | Communities of Practice (CoP) development without internal facilitation. |
| OG009 | Block 5 Site 13 | Randomized Guided Development of Communities of Practice (CoP) with an internal facilitator after one year of implementation. |
|
|
|
|