Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is a randomized, 4-visit, subject-masked, 2x3 bilateral crossover, dispensing trial. Each study lens will be worn bilaterally in a daily wear (DW) modality for at least 6 hours per day and 5 days per week for approximately two weeks each. The subject will wear either the Test or Control lens twice and the other study lens once.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TEST/CONTROL/CONTROL | Experimental | Subjects that are 18 to 49 years of age and current spherical soft contact lens wears will be randomized into one of two lens wear sequences. Subjects will wear the Test and Control lenses for two weeks each with one of the study lenses being worn twice for a total of 6 weeks. |
|
| CONTROL/TEST/TEST | Experimental | Subjects that are 18 to 49 years of age and current spherical soft contact lens wears will be randomized into one of two lens wear sequences. Subjects will wear the Test and Control lenses for two weeks each with one of the study lenses being worn twice for a total of 6 weeks. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTROL Lens | Device | Acuvue OASYS |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Comfort Score | Overall comfort was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. | 2-Week Follow-up |
| Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting | Vision satisfaction in bright light was assessed using the individual item" I was satisfied with the quality of my vision in bright lighting" from the CLUE™ questionnaire. This item used the response scale, 1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Neither Agree nor Disagree, 4: Agree and 5: Strongly Agree. CLUE is the Contact Lens User Experience™ questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The Proportion of responses in each category were reported for each lens type. | 2-Week Follow-up |
| Distance Monocular LogMAR Visual Acuity | Distance Monocular LogMAR visual acuity was assessed at 4 meters using an ETDRS chart under high illumination low contrast (room illumination > 400 lux and chart luminance 120-200 cd/m2) and low illumination high contrast (room illumination <2.5 lux and chart luminance 2.0 - 5.0 cd/m2 at the 2-week follow-up for each subject eye. The average visual acuity for each lens was reported. | 2-Week Follow-up |
| Contact Lens Fitting Acceptance Rate |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Quality of Vision Score | Overall quality of vision was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randall Go, OD | San Francisco | California | 94110 | United States | ||
| VRC-East |
Not provided
A total of 126 subjects were enrolled into this study. Of those enrolled, 120 subjects were randomized and dispensed at least one study lens. Of the dispensed subjects, 110 completed the study, while 10 subjects were discontinued.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Test/Control/Control | Subjects that were randomized to receive the test lens during the first period and the control lens during both the second and third periods. |
| FG001 | Control/Test/Test | Subjects that were randomized to receive the control lens during the first period and the test lens during both the second and third periods. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period 1 |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Period 2 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Period 3 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | All Dispensed Subjects | All subjects dispensed at least one study lens regardless of randomization. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Overall Comfort Score | Overall comfort was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. | Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a Scale | 2-Week Follow-up |
|
Throughout the entire duration of the study. Approximately 6-Weeks per subject.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Test | Subjects that wore the Test lens during any of the 3 period during the study. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| John Buch, O.D., M.S. Sr. Prinicpal Research Optometrist | Johnson & Johnson Vision Care | 904 443-1707 | JBUCH@its.jnj.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Nov 14, 2018 | Nov 4, 2019 | SAP_000.pdf |
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Aug 9, 2018 | Nov 4, 2019 | Prot_001.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| TEST Lens |
| Device |
senofilcon A |
|
Contact lens fitting acceptance was assessed for each subject eye using a biomicroscope at all study visits. Lens fit was a binary variable where acceptable lens fit=1 and unacceptable lens fit=0. The percentage of eyes with acceptable lens fit was reported for each lens.
| Up to 2-Week Follow-up |
| Number of Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings | Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). This was performed on each subject eye at every study visit (baseline, unscheduled visits and 2-week follow-up). The data was then dichotomized into two groups. Those with grade 3 or higher and those with grade 2 or lower. The proportion of eyes with SLF with grade 3 or higher by lens was reported. | Up to 2-Week Follow-up |
| 2-Week Follow-up |
| Overall Handling Scores | Overall handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. | 2-Week Follow-up |
| Overall Quality of Vision Indoors | Overall Quality of Vision Indoors was assessed using the individual item" Overall Quality of Vision Indoors" from questionnaire assessing contact lens performance. This item used the response scale, 0: Not Applicable, 1: Excellent, 2: Very Good, 3: Good, 4: Fair and 5: Poor. The Proportion of responses in each category were reported for each lens type. | 2-Week Follow-up |
| Jacksonville |
| Florida |
| 32256 |
| United States |
| Sacco Eye Group | Vestal | New York | 13850 | United States |
| Pickens Eye Care | Pickens | South Carolina | 29671 | United States |
| William J. Bogus, OD, FAAO | Salt Lake City | Utah | 29671 | United States |
| Botetourt Eyecare, LLC | Roanoke | Virginia | 24153 | United States |
| Adverse Event |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 |
| Control |
Subjects that wore the Control lens during any of the three periods during the study. |
|
|
|
| Primary | Vision Satisfaction in Bright Lighting | Vision satisfaction in bright light was assessed using the individual item" I was satisfied with the quality of my vision in bright lighting" from the CLUE™ questionnaire. This item used the response scale, 1: Strongly Disagree, 2: Disagree, 3: Neither Agree nor Disagree, 4: Agree and 5: Strongly Agree. CLUE is the Contact Lens User Experience™ questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. The Proportion of responses in each category were reported for each lens type. | subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. | Posted | Number | Proportion of participants | 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Distance Monocular LogMAR Visual Acuity | Distance Monocular LogMAR visual acuity was assessed at 4 meters using an ETDRS chart under high illumination low contrast (room illumination > 400 lux and chart luminance 120-200 cd/m2) and low illumination high contrast (room illumination <2.5 lux and chart luminance 2.0 - 5.0 cd/m2 at the 2-week follow-up for each subject eye. The average visual acuity for each lens was reported. | subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | logMAR | 2-Week Follow-up | Eyes | Eyes |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Contact Lens Fitting Acceptance Rate | Contact lens fitting acceptance was assessed for each subject eye using a biomicroscope at all study visits. Lens fit was a binary variable where acceptable lens fit=1 and unacceptable lens fit=0. The percentage of eyes with acceptable lens fit was reported for each lens. | Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. | Posted | Number | percentage of eyes | Up to 2-Week Follow-up | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Grade 3 or Higher Slit Lamp Findings | Slit Lamp Findings (SLF) were assessed using a biomicroscope and was graded using the FDA grading scale (Grade: 0, 1,2, 3 and 4) with grade 0 represents the absence of findings and 1 to 4 representing successively worse findings (i.e. Grade 1 = trace, Grade 2 = Mild, Grade 3 = moderate and Grade 4 = severe). This was performed on each subject eye at every study visit (baseline, unscheduled visits and 2-week follow-up). The data was then dichotomized into two groups. Those with grade 3 or higher and those with grade 2 or lower. The proportion of eyes with SLF with grade 3 or higher by lens was reported. | All subjects dispensed a study lens. | Posted | Number | proportion of eyes | Up to 2-Week Follow-up | eyes | eyes |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Overall Quality of Vision Score | Overall quality of vision was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. | Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a Scale | 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Overall Handling Scores | Overall handling was assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience™ (CLUE) questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes (PRO) questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Derived CLUE scores using Item Response Theory (IRT) follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response with a range of 0-120. | Subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a Scale | 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Overall Quality of Vision Indoors | Overall Quality of Vision Indoors was assessed using the individual item" Overall Quality of Vision Indoors" from questionnaire assessing contact lens performance. This item used the response scale, 0: Not Applicable, 1: Excellent, 2: Very Good, 3: Good, 4: Fair and 5: Poor. The Proportion of responses in each category were reported for each lens type. | subjects that completed all study visits without a major protocol deviation. | Posted | Number | Proportion of participants | 2-Week Follow-up |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 120 |
| 0 |
| 120 |
| 0 |
| 120 |
| EG001 | Control | Subjects that wore the Controllens during any of the 3 period during the study. | 0 | 120 | 0 | 120 | 0 | 120 |
Not provided
| Neither Agree Nor Agree |
|
| Disagree |
|
| Strongly Disagree |
|
A non-inferiority margin of 0.05 logMAR was used. This margin corresponds to a half line difference. Non-inferiority was declared if the upper bound of the 95% credible interval was below 0.05 logMAR. |
| It was calculated that 4 participants randomized in a 1:1 fashion between the two lens types would have at least 80% power to detect non-inferiority with respect to visual acuity (logMAR) at the 2-week follow-up. Sample size was determined using Stroup's method. The analysis presented below, summarizes the high illumination low contrast lighting condition. | Bayesian multivariate normal model | with random effect | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.034 | Standard Deviation | 0.0075 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.049 | -0.020 | Mean difference was calculated as Test minus Control | Non-Inferiority | A non-inferiority margin of 0.05 logMAR was used. This margin corresponds to a half line difference. Non-inferiority was declared if the upper bound of the 95% credible interval was below 0.05 logMAR. |
A non-inferiority cumulative odds ratio margin of 2 was used. This margin corresponds to no more than a 5% difference between the Test and Control lenses assuming the Control reference rate does not exceed 5%. Non-inferiority was declared if the upper bound of the 95% credible interval was below 2. |
| Good |
|
| Fair |
|
| Poor |
|
| Not Applicable |
|