Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Purpose:
To assess retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) and retinal structural changes in eyes with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) during long-term follow-up and to evaluate morphological markers potentially influencing prognosis.
Methods:
18 patients (18 eyes) with neovascular AMD were recruited subsequent to completion the Avastin Versus Lucentis in Age Related Macular Degeneration (MANTA) study following a mean period of 84 months (range: 69-93 months). After receiving a loading dose of 3 intravitreal anti-VEGF injections subsequent to baseline of the MANTA study, patients were treated as-needed [pro re nata (PRN)]. Functional and morphological changes were assessed using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCT | Device | Patients were recruited, visual acuity and optical coherence tomography Pictures were taken |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| visual acuity | visual acuity testing was performed | 93 months |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Initially 55 Participants were included in the Avastin Versus Lucentis in Age Related Macular Degeneration (MANTA) trial [16]. These patients received a loading dose of 3 intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF and were subsequently treated as-needed [pro re nata (PRN)] [16]. From that study population we recruited for another long term follow up visit. Of these patients 9 (16%) were excluded due to missed visits, another 14 patients (25%) died before the last study visit and 14 former participants (25%) did not approve further study participation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided