Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Alveolar ridge preservation following tooth extraction has the ability to maintain the ridge dimensions and allow the implant placement in an ideal position fulfilling both functional and aesthetic results. Postextraction socket healing commonly results in resorption of the alveolar ridge.
To prevent this clinical situation, different authors have described several surgical procedures, ranging from regenerative techniques for socket preservation to immediate implant placement. Regenerative techniques have been widely tested in controlled and uncontrolled studies with various materials and clinical approaches: bone grafting alone, including autografts, allografts, xenografts, and alloplasts; membrane alone, whether absorbable or not; and membrane in conjunction with grafting.
Various classic studies in the 1960s showed that the resorption process of the postextraction alveolus in both jaws was significantly more pronounced on the buccal aspect. This comes as no surprise, as the buccal surface of the anterior alveolar ridge is commonly thin and fragile. The maxilla tends to exhibit greater reductions in width than in height. The loss of tissue contour takes place mostly during the first 1 to 3 months following tooth extraction. Because the healing patterns of human sockets are unpredictable architecture), then such common procedures as extractions may lead to intraoral situations in which the remaining healed ridge does not allow for an esthetic and functional solution without the aid of significant bone grafting.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| socket preservation with camelline bone | Experimental | natural hydroxyapatite derived from camels prepared by investigator |
|
| socket preservation with bovine bone | Active Comparator | natural hydroxyapatite derived from cows (Bio-Oss) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| socket preservation procedure | Procedure | socket preservation of post extraction site using bone xenografts |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| patient-reported outcome | assessment of post-operative complication( pain, swelling, bleeding, infection) | within first week postoperatively |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| ridge contour changes | dimentional changes after extraction and socket preservation | 3 month, 6 month |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
patient eligable for implant placement after socket preservation more than 18 years
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ghada Adayil, Msc | Contact | (+202)01006010412 | ghada.adayil@dentistry.cu.edu.eg |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Manal Hosny, PhD | Cairo University | Study Chair |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30039627 | Result | Chang PC, Chang HC, Lin TC, Tai WC. Preclinical alveolar ridge preservation using small-sized particles of bone replacement graft in combination with a gelatin cryogel scaffold. J Periodontol. 2018 Oct;89(10):1221-1229. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0629. Epub 2018 Aug 29. |
Not provided
Not provided
check with university guidelines for raw data sharing
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
pilot randomized clinical trial
Not provided
Not provided
single blinded
|