Evaluation of the Efficacy for Sentinel Lymph Node Policy in Intermediate-risk Endometrial Carcinomas
Evaluation of the Efficacy for Sentinel Lymph Node Policy in Intermediate-risk Endometrial Carcinomas
To evaluate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node policy in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial carcinomas
Surgical assessment for staging of endometrial carcinoma during primary surgery remains one of the most varied practices worldwide, as it may include no nodal assessment, sentinel node mapping, and complete pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy up to the renal vessels. Since lymphadenectomy is significantly associated with longer operating time, higher surgical costs, greater rate of infection, as well as the occurrence of lymphocysts and lymphedema, gynecologists agree that pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy should be routinely performed in high-risk patients (grade 3, deep myometrial invasion, type 2 cancer). However, whether lymphadenectomy is required in patients with endometrioid endometrial cancers of grade 1 or 2 and with less than 50% myometrial invasion is controversial. Then, the investigators conducted this prospective cohort study to investigate the efficacy of sentinel lymph node policy in patients with intermediate-risk endometrial carcinomas (grade 1 or 2, < 50% myometrial invasion, and a tumor diameter ≥ 2 cm) as well as their outcomes.
Surgery should be performed within a maximum of 4 weeks from the patient's first consultation.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: