Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to examine how the 'Best Possible Self' (BPS) intervention influences diabetes symptomatology over a four week period by assessing stress and resilience as mediatory effects. Half of the participants will receive the BPS straight away while the other half will be put on a waiting list and will act as the control group.
The BPS is a "positive" psychology intervention; i.e. it facilitates positive emotion in order to achieve psychological, behavioural, and even physiological changes. The present team's previous research has demonstrated that the BPS is effective at reducing certain diabetes symptoms, though the exact mechanisms by which it does so are unclear. According to the Stress Buffering Model of Physical Activity, psychological stress is the catalyst that triggers behavioural and physiological responses critical to health while positive emotions can improve health by helping people to cope. The Broaden and Build Theory of Positive Emotions, meanwhile, suggests that this is because positive emotions allow people to build resilience.
In this study, the aim is to examine whether stress and resilience in particular mediate the relationship between intervention and diabetes symptoms. Research around stress and resilience has shown these factors to be important not only in the physical health of people with diabetes but for also decreasing illness symptomatology in non-clinical samples more generally.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Participants receive a tailored version of Laura King's 'Best Possible Self' intervention: a brief, self-administered, psychological intervention. It is fundamentally a writing exercise, whereby recipients are asked to spend 10 minutes writing about their best possible future self and the steps they need to take to become that person. This helps the individual set goals while facilitating positive affect. Our version of the task has people focus on their health-related goals in particular. |
|
| Waiting List Control | No Intervention | Participants are informed that they are on a waiting list and will receive the intervention at the end of the study. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best Possible Self | Behavioral | A writing exercise developed in 2001 by Laura King. The frequency of engagement with the exercise is down to the user's discretion though we recommend to them to write things down once every week for the duration of the study. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diabetes Symptomatology (assessed using the Diabetes Symptoms Checklist - Revised) | Subscales assess the existence of, and the distress caused by, fatigue, cognitive, pain, sensory, cardiology, ophthalmology, hypoglycaemia, and hyperglycaemia symptoms individually. For each sub-scale, participants can score between 0 and 5, with a lower score meaning fewer symptoms and less distress caused by that subset of symptoms. Subscales do not come together to create a total symptomatology score. | Four Weeks |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Reported Stress (assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale) | Mediatory Effect. Individual scores are added up and can range from 0-40. A higher score means that the individuals perceives themselves to be more stressed. | Four weeks |
| Self-Reported Resilience (assessed using the Six-Item Brief Resilience Scale) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kanayo F Umeh | Liverpool John Moores University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liverpool John Moores University | Liverpool | Merseyside | L3 5AF | United Kingdom |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Study link | View source |
Not provided
We have no plans to share individual participant data.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Sep 14, 2018 | Sep 14, 2018 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Sep 14, 2018 | Sep 14, 2018 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003924 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Mediatory Effect. Responses are added up to give a score between 6 and 30. The total sum is then divided by 6 (the number of questions). A higher score indicates a higher level of resilience. |
| Four Weeks |
| Diabetes Risk (calculated using the Canadian Diabetes Risk Questionnaire) | Control Variable. A total risk score is assessed by summing up the scores of each of the 12 questions. Scores range from 0-87. A lower score indicates less risk. Participants with a score of < 21 are low risk, participants with a score of 21 - 32 are medium risk, and participants with a score of >32 are high risk. | Four Weeks |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |