An Open-label Randomized-Controlled Trial of Early Screening Test for Pre-eclampsia and Growth Restriction
An Open-label Randomized-Controlled Trial of Early Screening Test for Pre-eclampsia and Growth Restriction
A study of aspirin use in pregnancy to prevent high blood pressure and growth restriction of the fetus
Ischemic placental disease (IPD) is an entity encompassing pre-eclampsia, fetal growth restriction (FGR) and placental abruption and has a combined incidence in pregnancy of 10-15%. Pre-eclampsia is a serious systemic condition affecting 3-5% of pregnancies and is responsible for > 50,000 of maternal deaths annually worldwide. The International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy defines pre-eclampsia as gestational hypertension with proteinuria of 300 mg or more in 24 h.
The use of low dose aspirin (LDA) prior to 16-weeks' gestation can prevent the pathological process causing placental disease by altering the balance of prostacyclin and thromboxane; hence preventing spiral artery thrombosis and widespread endothelial dysfunction.
There is extensive evidence, demonstrating the efficacy and safety of LDA for prevention of placental disease in high-risk pregnancies where there are clearly identifiable risk factors. However, there is a paucity of research into its efficacy in low-risk women. Administration of aspirin in pregnancy is associated with absolute risk reductions of 2% to 5% for pre-eclampsia, 1% to 5% for FGR 2% to 4% for preterm delivery with no associated increase in perinatal or maternal morbidity.
Several screening tests have been devised to detect the risk of pre-eclampsia and FGR from the first trimester. One of the most notable is that of The Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF), UK that have devised an algorithm encompassing uterine artery Doppler pulsatility indices, mean arterial pressure (MAP), the placental biomarkers PAPP-A and PLGF in addition to maternal characteristics, which can detect 96% of cases of pre-eclampsia requiring delivery before 34 weeks and 54% of all cases of pre-eclampsia at a fixed false-positive rate of 10%. The FMF screening test is reserved as a research tool, pending validation within a low-risk population. Thus far it has been externally validated in other studies of unselected women with conflicting results as to sensitivity and specificity for placental disease prediction. Following validation of the FMF screening test in low-risk nulliparous women, which is currently the topic of on-going research, the FMF pre-eclampsia screening test may potentially come into clinical practice in the future. Current guidelines followed within the UK, set by The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence advocate screening through history taking and provision of LDA in the presence of one major risk factor or two moderate risk-factors. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists have a similar stance and do not recommend screening to predict pre-eclampsia beyond obtaining an appropriate medical history to evaluate for risk factors. They recommend that any further screening tests beyond this should undergo a cost-effectiveness analysis before being used in routine practice.
It has been postulated that it is more cost-effective to use prophylactic medication, notably aspirin for the prevention of placental disease rather than screening and treating an entire low-risk population. The reason for this is because aspirin is felt to be an effective, affordable and safe treatment in pregnancy.
In light of such evidence, with an emerging novel screening test for pre-eclampsia and the efficacy of LDA for placental disease prevention it may be more clinically effective and affordable to prescribe LDA routinely to all women in their first pregnancy as opposed to being upon the basis of a screening test. To assess this hypothesis a preliminary pilot study is required to determine feasibility, acceptability and statistical power required for such a study. The study proposed is a three-armed parallel, multi-center, open-label randomized control trial (RCT) in low-risk women to determine; (i) the efficacy and (ii) the acceptability of women to take routine LDA, versus no LDA versus LDA on the basis of a pre-eclampsia screening test in their first pregnancy. It can be anticipated that the use of such a three-armed study will aid in determining if it is more acceptable to women and feasible to prescribe LDA routinely compared to not at all, or based on results of a screening test.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: