Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to ascertain the feasibility and safety of the procedure using SilkBridge - a biocompatible silk fibroin-based scaffold - for the regeneration of sensory nerve fibres and follow it up together with the reinnervation of the target organs (sensory receptors in the skin).
This is a pre-market, monocentre, first-in-human pilot on adult patients with digital nerve defects. Category C clinical trial, medical devices. The study will be performed in Switzerland.
SilkBridge is a biocompatible silk fibroin-based scaffold, which recruits the patients' own cells to remodel or regenerate the nerve, without pre-seeding of the scaffold nor biological/chemical treatments.
SilkBridge will provide surgeons with an implant with unique features, such as easy suturability, full biocompatibility and specific biomimetic properties that enhance cells adhesion and integration of the device with the surrounding tissue.
The study will have a 12 months and 1 week duration per patient, including the follow-up period, and with an expected enrollment period of 15 months.
The study will evaluate 15 adult patients, aged 18-65 years, diagnosed with digital nerve defects (> 5 mm gap) in whom surgical repair may not allow direct suture.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SilkBridge treatment | Experimental | Surgery for digital nerve reconstruction with SilkBridge |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SilkBridge | Device | SilkBridge is a biocompatible silk fibroin-based scaffold, which recruits the patients' own cells to remodel or regenerate the nerve, without pre-seeding of the scaffold nor biological/chemical treatments. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety of SilkBridge | Assess type and severity of adverse device effects related to SilkBridge and surgical procedure throughout the follow-up period | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Performance - assess at each study visit versus baseline | Sensory recovery after nerve reconstruction by static and moving 2-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing Pain evaluation via a visual analog scale (VAS: scale where patient has to specify level of pain by indicating a position along a continuous line between two end-points (0 - 10). 0 indicates no pain while 10 represents the highest level.) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Maurizio Calcagni, MD | Klinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Handchirurgie - UniversitätsSpital Zürich | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Klinik für Plastische Chirurgie und Handchirurgie - UniversitätsSpital Zürich | Zurich | 8091 | Switzerland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25446133 | Background | Faroni A, Mobasseri SA, Kingham PJ, Reid AJ. Peripheral nerve regeneration: experimental strategies and future perspectives. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015 Mar;82-83:160-7. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 14. | |
| 23303520 | Background | Konofaos P, Ver Halen JP. Nerve repair by means of tubulization: past, present, future. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2013 Mar;29(3):149-64. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1333316. Epub 2013 Jan 9. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059348 | Peripheral Nerve Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010523 | Peripheral Nervous System Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D020196 | Trauma, Nervous System |
Not provided
Not provided
Open Label Monocentre Study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 12 months |
| Performance - assess at V5 and at last visit versus opposite control finger | Sensory recovery by static and moving 2-point discrimination and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament testing | 6 and 12 months |
| Performance - assess at the last visit | Patient's satisfaction through the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire (Patient has to describe the change (if any) in activity limitations, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life, in relation to its painful condition. 0 value represent no change, 7 a considerable improvement). | 12 months |
| 29349931 | Background | Wieringa PA, Goncalves de Pinho AR, Micera S, van Wezel RJA, Moroni L. Biomimetic Architectures for Peripheral Nerve Repair: A Review of Biofabrication Strategies. Adv Healthc Mater. 2018 Apr;7(8):e1701164. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201701164. Epub 2018 Jan 19. |
| 18804584 | Background | Ichihara S, Inada Y, Nakamura T. Artificial nerve tubes and their application for repair of peripheral nerve injury: an update of current concepts. Injury. 2008 Oct;39 Suppl 4:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.08.029. |
| 17565531 | Background | Pfister LA, Papaloizos M, Merkle HP, Gander B. Nerve conduits and growth factor delivery in peripheral nerve repair. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2007 Jun;12(2):65-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2007.00125.x. |
| 22090283 | Background | Daly W, Yao L, Zeugolis D, Windebank A, Pandit A. A biomaterials approach to peripheral nerve regeneration: bridging the peripheral nerve gap and enhancing functional recovery. J R Soc Interface. 2012 Feb 7;9(67):202-21. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0438. Epub 2011 Nov 16. |
| 15363160 | Background | Meek MF, Varejao AS, Geuna S. Use of skeletal muscle tissue in peripheral nerve repair: review of the literature. Tissue Eng. 2004 Jul-Aug;10(7-8):1027-36. doi: 10.1089/ten.2004.10.1027. |
| 19543442 | Background | Vepari C, Kaplan DL. Silk as a Biomaterial. Prog Polym Sci. 2007;32(8-9):991-1007. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.013. |
| 26322725 | Background | Thurber AE, Omenetto FG, Kaplan DL. In vivo bioresponses to silk proteins. Biomaterials. 2015 Dec;71:145-157. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.039. Epub 2015 Aug 20. |
| 25422034 | Background | De Vita R, Buccheri EM, Pozzi M, Zoccali G. Direct to implant breast reconstruction by using SERI, preliminary report. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2014 Nov 25;33(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s13046-014-0078-5. |
| 26045909 | Background | Lee JH, Lee JS, Kim DK, Park CH, Lee HR. Clinical outcomes of silk patch in acute tympanic membrane perforation. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Jun;8(2):117-22. doi: 10.3342/ceo.2015.8.2.117. Epub 2015 May 13. |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |