Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background and Aim: The immunosuppression influence on the response to antiviral therapy (AVT) for recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients remains controversial, especially for the rarely investigated genotype 4.This study aims to compare the effects of the two widely used calcineurin inhibitors(CNIs)(Cyclosporine A (CsA) and tacrolimus (Tac)) on the therapeutic response to different AVT regimens. Method: In126 living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients with recurrent HCV infection, participants were categorized to three groups according to AVT. Group one received pegylated interferon (Peg IFN-α 2a) and ribavirin (RBV) (n= 44), group two received the direct antiviral agent (DAA) sofosbuvir plus RBV (n=52) and group three received daclatasvir, sofosbuvir (other DAAs) plus RBV(n=30) each group was further subdivided according to primary immunosuppression (CsA or Tac). The sustained virological response (SVR) and relapse rates were considered the primary therapeutic outcomes of AVT. The virological response guided therapy end points for AVT were considered the secondary outcomes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFN group received Cyclosporine | Living donor liver transplantation recipients with recurrent HCV received Peg IFN-α 2a and RBV as antiviral therapy and Cyclosporine A as primary immunosuppression ,this was routinely taken not as intervention according to local practice |
| |
| IFN group received tacrolimus | Living donor liver transplantation recipients with recurrent HCV received Peg IFN-α 2a and RBV as antiviral therapy and Tacrolimus as primary immunosuppression ,this was routinely taken not as interventing according to local practice |
| |
| Sof plus Rbv group received Cyclosporine | Living donor liver transplantation recipients with recurrent HCV received sofosbuvir and RBV as antiviral therapy and Cyclosporine as primary immunosuppression,this was routinely taken not as intervention according to local practice |
| |
| Sof plus Rbv received tacrolimus | Living donor liver transplantation recipients with recurrent HCV received sofosbuvir and RBV as antiviral therapy and Tacrolimus as primary immunosuppression,this was routinely taken not as intervention according to local practice |
| |
| Sof,dac pus ribavirin received cyclosporine |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cycloserine,Tacrolimus | Drug |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| sustained virological response | a negative serum HCV RNA | 24 weeks for group I and 12 weeks for group II and III |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:group(I):participants received Peg IFN-α 2a and RBV therapy who fulfilled the following inclusion criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:group I
Group II and III:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
living donor liver transplant (LDLT) recipients with recurrent HCV infection, participants were categorized to three groups according to AVT. Group one received pegylated interferon (Peg IFN-α 2a) and ribavirin (RBV) , group two received the direct antiviral agent (DAA) sofosbuvir plus RBV and group three received daclatasvir, sofosbuvir (other DAAs) plus RBV each group was further subdivided according to primary immunosuppression (CsA or Tac)
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003523 | Cycloserine |
| D016559 | Tacrolimus |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007555 | Isoxazoles |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Living donor liver transplantation recipients with recurrent HCV received daclatasvir, sofosbuvir and RBV as antiviral therapy and Cyclosporine as primary immunosuppression,this was routinely taken not as intervention according to local practice
|
| sof,dac plus rbv received tacrolimus | Living donor liver transplantation recipients with recurrent HCV received daclatasvir, sofosbuvir and RBV as antiviral therapy and Tacrolimus as primary immunosuppression,this was routinely taken not as intervention according to local practice |
|
| D023303 |
| Oxazolidinones |
| D010080 | Oxazoles |
| D012694 | Serine |
| D021542 | Amino Acids, Neutral |
| D000596 | Amino Acids |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D018942 | Macrolides |
| D007783 | Lactones |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |