Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main goal of ERAS is to enhance the recovery of patients, and this has secondary effects, such reduced length of hospital stay, minimal postoperative complications and lessen readmission rates. ERAS protocols have been shown to be feasible and safe across the world. Although it has been shown to be effective in the developed settings and can potentially reduce the length of hospital stay, and the cost of healthcare in the perioperative period. The multimodal program of ERAS has been less implemented in the low and middle income African countries. Studies done outside Uganda (Egypt and South Africa) have demonstrated that ERAS program can be feasible and yields favorable outcomes in patients.
The efficacy of ERAS has been demonstrated in resource rich settings but limited evidence is available from resource poor settings. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and test efficacy of ERAS in reducing length of post-operative hospital stay and the incidence of postoperative complications compared to the standard of care as the control group.
33 participants above 18 years of age, undergoing laparotomy, were randomly assigned to an intervention (ERAS) arm or to a control (standard surgical care) arm at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital in Uganda. The ERAS and the control arm had 16 and 17 patients respectively, followed-up 14 days after surgery.
Patients in the ERAS arm had 2.4 days (SD 0.7) of post-operative hospital stay shorter than those in the control arm, p=0.0025 (4.1±0.2 vs 6.5±0.6 respectively). 18.8% of patients in the control arm developed post-operative complications compared to 5.9% in the ERAS arm (Statistical insignificance, p=0.34). ERAS patients passed flatus eight hours earlier than patients in the control arm, and mobilisation out of bed happened 12 hours earlier in the ERAS group p value=0.4.
ERAS is feasible at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital, and it leads to reduced hospital stay duration but not post-operative complications in laparotomy cases.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ERAS arm | Experimental | Preoperative: Counseling and education about the ERAS program; Oral intake until 6 hours before the surgery; Carbohydrate drinks load; No mechanical bowel preparation; Antithrombotic prophylaxis (Tinzaparin 3500 IU) Intraoperative: Spinal anaesthesia (15 mg hyperbaric Bupivacaine + 200mcg intrathecal Morphine); Intravenous Ceftriaxone 2g, Metronidazole 500mg / Gentamycin 160mg, Ondansetron 8mg and Dexamethasone 8mg; Crystalloid fluid 10 to 20ml/Kg; Adrenaline 200mcg in each 500 ml of intravenous fluid; Avoidance of abdominal drains; Postoperative: Early oral intake; Nasogastric tube and urinary catheter removed immediately after the surgery; Early enteral nutrition; Chewing gum for 2 to 4 hours after surgery; Oral sips 8 hours postoperatively; Intravenous fluids discontinued at four hours after transfer to the ward. |
|
| Control arm | No Intervention | Preoperative: No carbohydrate drink loads, no antithrombotic prophylaxis; Mechanical bowel preparation as needed; Spinal anaesthesia, fluid therapy and antibiotherapy done according to standard hospital practice. The urinary catheter and drains were removed at the discretion of the surgeon. Postoperative: Enteral feeding delayed by the auscultation of bowel sounds. The standard hospital practices involve keeping active the nasogastric tube, fasting patients postoperative, strict bed rest… Pain control was managed with medication of choice by surgeon and anesthesiologist. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrate drink load | Dietary Supplement | Administration of 5% Dextrose orally as a carbohydrate drink load two hours before surgery and as an oral sips eight hours after the surgery. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Length of hospital stay | It is the duration of a single episode of hospitalization measured as time . | From the day of surgical operation up to time 14 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Perioperative morbidity and mortality | Adverse events or death occurring during or 14 days after the surgical operation | From the start of surgical intervention to 14 days after discharge from the hospital |
| Readmission rate |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Serge M Tshijuke, MD, MMed | Kabale University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital | Mbarara | 00256 | Uganda |
Not provided
Participants were randomly allocated into two arms: intervention arm (ERAS) and control arm
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) | Combination Product | The ERAS intervention consisted of exposing patients to ERAS protocol of care as described by the ERAS Society® for the entire perioperative period. However, some of these ERAS protocols were modified to our local resources and requirements. |
|
|
Admission of a patient in the hospital within 14 days after discharge
| Within 14 days from the day of discharge from the hospital |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000080482 | Enhanced Recovery After Surgery |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019990 | Perioperative Care |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided