Saline Versus Albumin Fluid for Extracorporeal Removal With Slow Low Efficiency Dialysis (SAFER-SLED): A Feasibility Study
Saline Versus Albumin Fluid for Extracorporeal Removal With Slow Low Efficiency Dialysis (SAFER-SLED): A Feasibility Study
Objective: The primary aim of this 60 patient feasibility trial is to determine if, for critically ill patients treated with SLED for AKI, randomization to receive albumin (25%) boluses versus normal saline placebo boluses is feasible, with respect to the recruitment rate, blinding and adherence to the protocol.
Background: Intravenous albumin (25%) boluses are frequently given to critically ill patients during slow low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) treatments for acute kidney injury (AKI). The intention of giving albumin during SLED is to stabilize the blood pressure to permit more aggressive overall fluid removal with ultrafiltration; however, there is little evidence to support this expensive practice.
Objective: The primary aim of this feasibility trial is to determine if, for critically ill patients treated with SLED for AKI, randomization to receive albumin (25%) boluses versus normal saline placebo boluses is feasible, with respect to the recruitment rate, blinding and adherence to the protocol.
The results of this feasibility trial will help us to plan and carry out a multicentre pilot trial comparing the efficacy of the interventions in achieving fluid removal in critically ill patients with AKI on SLED.
Design: A randomized controlled trial with two parallel arms. Setting: The mixed medical-surgical intensive care units of a Canadian tertiary care hospital.
Study Population: 60 patients with AKI requiring treatment with SLED (by definition, Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) stage 3 AKI). Intervention: Participants will be randomized to receive either albumin (25%) boluses or normal saline placebo boluses during their SLED treatments.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: