Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Due to problems caused by the COVID-19 pandemic
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust | OTHER |
| Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust | OTHER_GOV |
| Northampton General Hospital NHS Trust | OTHER |
| University Hospital of Wales |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigators want to investigate the user friendliness, and performance of the LMA Protector. The principal research question is to assess the overall performance of the LMA Protector. The investigators are merely making observations related to use of the device during clinical practice.
There is a lack of research data on regarding the use of the LMA Protector. There is no regulatory requirement to collect or publish patient data on any device, either before CE marking or after. These devices are freely purchased and used.
There is, however, a professional duty to know that a device conforms to established norms for use. These norms are not official standards but rather, reference data against which a device can be clinically judged. Therefore, a device that is easy to insert but has a low 'leak pressure' (see above) is different from one that is more difficult to insert but as a high leak pressure. It is not that one is 'better' than the other, but rather that the data help create a 'usability profile' of the device which can be useful when making a clinical selection for the device.
Preoperative assessment:
During the preoperative visit, patient information leaflet will be given to the patients meeting the eligibility criteria.
Wherever possible, suitable patients will be identified in the preoperative assessment clinic and the information leaflet given. The patients will be given adequate time to read this information and any queries will be answered before being asked to sign a consent form. A detailed airway assessment will be performed by one of the investigators and documented on the study proforma.
Induction of anaesthesia:
On arrival in the anaesthetic room patients will be monitored with pulse oximetry, electrocardiography and invasive or non-invasive blood pressure measurements. After intravenous access is secured and the pre-surgical checklist completed, all patients will be pre-oxygenated using a facemask to achieve end tidal oxygen concentration of at least 80%. A 'sniffing' position of the head and neck and a 20 degree head-up bed tilt will be used for pre-oxygenation. General anaesthesia will be induced intravenously. After induction of anaesthesia, facemask ventilation will be commenced and anaesthesia maintained with an inhalational anaesthetic agent in oxygen or with total intravenous anaesthesia. The volatile agent's (anesthetic gases) concentration of 1 MAC adjusted for the patient's age will be achieved and maintained. This is normal process of anaesthesia applicable for all patients irrespective of participation in the study.
Supraglottic airway device (SAD) insertion:
Once deep plane of anaesthesia is confirmed, with the absence of movement to jaw thrust stimulation the SAD (LMA protector) will be inserted. The size of the device will be based on the manufacturer's recommendations for the body weight. The breathing system will be connected to the device. Ventilation of the lungs will be then confirmed by observing adequate bilateral chest inflation and square end-tidal capnogram wave with positive pressure ventilation. Adequate ventilation will be recorded if three tests are passed: 1) adequate chest movement, 2) an expired tidal volume of at least 7 ml/kg and 3) stable oxygenation. Time would continue until LMA® ProtectorTM inserted successfully. If it is not possible to insert the device or ventilate through it, two more attempts at placement of the device will be allowed. If placement has failed after two further attempts, the study will be abandoned and the other device will be used. If this fails on first attempt a different LMA or tracheal tube will be used as appropriate.
Maintenance of anaesthesia and recovery
The main interventions refer to the insertion of the airway device into the patient to obtain a airway and allow the conduct of the anaesthetic and therefore the surgery. However, if there are problems with the device and the airway obtained is suboptimal then the below interventions are allowed (which will be noted in the data collection form):
Postoperative assessment Postoperatively in recovery or on the ward, the investigators will visit each patient and determine whether the following airway complications are present after surgery: sore throat (constant pain, independent of swallowing), dysphagia (difficulty in, or pain provoked by, swallowing), sore jaw, dysphonia (difficulty in, or pain on, speaking), numbness of the tongue or the oropharynx, ear pain, neck or mouth ache, hearing changes. Each complication will be graded as none, mild, moderate or severe. The same questions will be asked 24-48 hours later.
First visit During the first visit by the anaesthetist to the participant, at the anaesthetist's earliest opportunity, either in the recovery area or on the ward, the participants will be asked about the following complications, which will be graded as none, mild, moderate or severe.
Second visit (or telephone consultation) During the second visit 24-48 hours post-operatively on the ward or via telephone the participants will be asked about the following complications, which will be graded as none, mild, moderate or severe.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMA Protector | The LMA Protector will be used |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMA Protector | Device | The LMA Protector will be inserted when a supraglottic device is needed |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| First go Insertion Success Rate | Whether insertion during first go was successful or not | Day 1 |
| First go Successful Ventilation Rate | Whether ventilation during first go was successful or not | Day 1 |
| Number of Participants With Complication Free Insertions | Number of participants with complication free insertions divided by total number of participants | Day 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to First Square Capnography Waveform | Record time in seconds of time to first capnography trace | Day 1 |
| Lowest Oxygen Saturation Level | Record of lowest oxygen saturation reading across all participants |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
The participant may not enter the study if ANY of the following apply:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients undergoing operation under general anaesthesia with a supraglottic airway device
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Vassilis Athanassoglou | Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Royal United Hospital | Bath | United Kingdom | ||||
| Aneurin Bevan University Health Board |
Data will be collected prospectively on data collection sheets completed by the anaesthetist / investigator during anaesthesia. Each site will manage their own data set and the data will be pooled at the end of the recruitment phase across all sites. Data will be sent from sites to the lead study team only at the end of the data collection.
Consent form and initial data collection forms will be filed in the master folder and kept locked in the dedicated research locker in the department. The PI at each site will have access to this log. Each site will assign a study ID for each participant and a record of these IDs will be kept in the site file. Only anonymised data will be sent from each trust to the main study team. No personal data will be sent to the coordinating centre.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | LMA Protector | The LMA Protector will be used LMA Protector: The LMA Protector will be inserted when a supraglottic device is needed |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | LMA Protector | The LMA Protector will be used LMA Protector: The LMA Protector will be inserted when a supraglottic device is needed |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | First go Insertion Success Rate | Whether insertion during first go was successful or not | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 1 |
|
|
1 day
Adverse events were collected upon removal of the device and upon questioning in the PACU.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | LMA Protector | The LMA Protector will be used LMA Protector: The LMA Protector will be inserted when a supraglottic device is needed Major Complications (desaturation to 91%) 1; 0.9% Minor Complications 39, 35%
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Desaturation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Hiccoughing occurred immediately post induction followed by laryngospasm with desaturation to 91% for less than one minute. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| hiccoughing | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr Vassilis Athanassoglou | Oxford University Hospitals | 01865 | 221590 | vassilis.athanassoglou@ouh.nhs.uk |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 6, 2019 | May 9, 2024 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Day 1 |
| Interventions Needed to Ensure Airway Patency | Collect number of predefined interventions needed to keep airway patent | Day 1 |
| Number of Participants With Visible Chest Movement | The success of ventilation will depend on whether there was visible chest movement | Day 1 |
| Number of Participants With Adequate Tidal Volume at Attempt of Ventilation | The success of ventilation will depend on whether there was tidal volume > 7ml/kg | Day 1 |
| Number of Participants With Stable Oxygen Saturations | The success of ventilation will depend on whether there was stable SpO2 | Day 1 |
| Number of Participants With Square Capnography Trace | The success of ventilation will depend on whether there was square capnography trace | Day 1 |
| Complications Occurrence During Insertion of Device, During Anaesthesia, and on Device Removal | Collect number of pre-defined complications of device usage | Day 1 |
| Complications Occurrence During Insertion of Device, During Anaesthesia, and on Device Removal | Collect number of pre-defined complications of device usage. Secondary complication where asked about on Day 2 to ensure patients had recovered from the effects of the anaesthetic and are able to report any complications. | Day 2 |
| Cardiff |
| United Kingdom |
| Nothampton General Hospital | Northampton | United Kingdom |
| Oxford University Hospitals | Oxford | United Kingdom |
| Royal Berkshire Hospital | Reading | United Kingdom |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | Race and Ethnicity were not collected from any participant. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
| Primary | First go Successful Ventilation Rate | Whether ventilation during first go was successful or not | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 1 |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Complication Free Insertions | Number of participants with complication free insertions divided by total number of participants | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Time to First Square Capnography Waveform | Record time in seconds of time to first capnography trace | Posted | Median | Inter-Quartile Range | Seconds | Day 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lowest Oxygen Saturation Level | Record of lowest oxygen saturation reading across all participants | Posted | Number | Percent of oxygen saturation | Day 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Interventions Needed to Ensure Airway Patency | Collect number of predefined interventions needed to keep airway patent | The number analysed in one or more rows relates to the number of participants for whom 1 or more airway manipulations was required. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Visible Chest Movement | The success of ventilation will depend on whether there was visible chest movement | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Adequate Tidal Volume at Attempt of Ventilation | The success of ventilation will depend on whether there was tidal volume > 7ml/kg | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Stable Oxygen Saturations | The success of ventilation will depend on whether there was stable SpO2 | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Square Capnography Trace | The success of ventilation will depend on whether there was square capnography trace | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Complications Occurrence During Insertion of Device, During Anaesthesia, and on Device Removal | Collect number of pre-defined complications of device usage | Further breakdown of when complications occurred and the pre-defined complications of device usage are presented for the number of participants who experienced complications. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Complications Occurrence During Insertion of Device, During Anaesthesia, and on Device Removal | Collect number of pre-defined complications of device usage. Secondary complication where asked about on Day 2 to ensure patients had recovered from the effects of the anaesthetic and are able to report any complications. | Further breakdown of when complications occurred and the pre-defined complications of device usage are presented for the number of participants who experienced complications. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Day 2 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 111 |
| 1 |
| 111 |
| 39 |
| 111 |
|
| Poor seal | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Repositioning of device | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood on device | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain on swallowing | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Tongue numbness | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Jaw pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Manipulation: Neck extension |
|
|
| Manipulation: Chin lift |
|
|
| Manipulation: Reposition device |
|
|
|
| Number who experienced complications during maintenance of anaesthesia |
|
|
| Number who experienced complications upon extubation |
|
|
| Number who experienced mucosal injury |
|
|
| Number who experienced mild post-operative sore throat |
|
|
| Number who experienced mild pain on swallowing |
|
|
| Number who experienced mild post-operative dysphonia |
|
|
| Number who experienced mild mouth pain |
|
|
| Number who experienced mild jaw pain |
|
|
| Number who experienced mild numbness of tongue |
|
|
|
| Sore throat |
|
|
| Pain on swallowing |
|
|
| Neck or mouth ache |
|
|