Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
poor patient accrual
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to study the safety and tumor response of ACE for large HCC.
Transarterial treatment has been playing an important role in the treatment algorithm for patients with multifocal or large intrahepatic hepatocellular carcinoma not eligible for surgical resection, transplantation, or local ablative therapy. Among the patient group with intermediate tumor stage, in which the tumor dimension exceeds 10cm, the treatment outcome of conventional chemoembolization (cTACE), chemoembolization using drug eluting beads (DEB-TACE) and radioembolization using yttrium 90 is generally unsatisfactory. Some would consider HCC of size >10cm a relative contraindication for cTACE because of the poor treatment outcome. However, there is no better alternative treatment for local control of these tumors. Ablative chemoembolization (ACE) using Lipiodol-ethanol and anhydrous cisplatin has been found to be highly effective for local control of HCC as compared to cTACE in a case-control study. It is hypothesized that ACE is safe and effective for local control of large HCC of size >10cm.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACE for HCC of size >10cm | Other | Ablative chemoembolization (ACE) using Lipiodol-ethanol and anhydrous cisplatin |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ablative chemoembolization (ACE) | Procedure | Ablative chemoembolization (ACE) using Lipiodol-ethanol and anhydrous cisplatin |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to progression | the interval between the first treatment date and the date of radiological progression, including intralesional progression, extralesional progression, or extra-hepatic progression | 3 to 6 months after treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Tumor response | Tumor response at 3 month and 6 month from the date of first treatment as evaluated by triphasic contrast enhanced CT according to the EASL criteria | 3 to 6 months after treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Simon Yu | DIIR, CUHK, Hong Kong | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong | Hong Kong | Hong Kong |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006528 | Carcinoma, Hepatocellular |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
Use of ACE for HCC of size > 10cm
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008113 | Liver Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D008107 | Liver Diseases |