Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Cromos Pharma LLC | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This trial was a multi-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled, phase II study in adult hospitalized female patients with the confirmed diagnosis of pelvic adhesive disease in Study centres in Russia.
In order to evaluate efficacy and safety of Seroguard, solution for IP administration, a study design meeting the set objectives was selected: prospective, multi-center, double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled study.
Given the fact that comparison with placebo is considered the best way to prove efficacy and safety of a drug and that currently there are no drugs with a similar mechanism of action at the pharmaceutical product market, a placebo-controlled, parallel group study design was selected.
A randomized, parallel group study design was chosen in order to ensure minimization of a selection bias.
Subjects were randomized into four groups (two groups of the test drug and two placebo groups corresponding to the two doses) to enable a comparison of Seroguard administration at two doses.
A double-blind study design was selected in order to ensure minimization of an outcome evaluation bias.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo, 1.5 mL/kg | Placebo Comparator | each subject received the placebo at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight; |
|
| Placebo, 2.4 mL/kg | Placebo Comparator | each subject received the placebo at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight; |
|
| Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kg | Experimental | each subject received the test drug at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight; |
|
| Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kg | Experimental | each subject received the test drug at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seroguard | Drug | Seroguard 0.41 g/L solution |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Reduction of Adhesions Number by 3 or More | The number of adhesions according to the first MRI data was compared to the number according to the data of second MRI | 30±4 days after surgical intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Thickness of Pelvic Adhesions | The change from baseline was defined. It was evaluated by comparing baseline MRI data and repeated MRI data. Results were estimated according to scale from 0 to 3 where 0 - no adhesions, 1 - thin (filmy or filiform), 2 - marked, 3 - marked with an impaired passage through organs involved. | 30±4 days after surgery |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Shurygin, PhD,D.M.Sc. | Pharmasyntez | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Krai Government-Owned State Funded Healthcare Institution "Krai Clinical Hospital" | Krasnoyarsk | Krasnoyarsk Krai | 660022 | Russia | ||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10521760 | Background | Miller JH, Weinberg RK, Canino NL, Klein NA, Soules MR. The pattern of infertility diagnoses in women of advanced reproductive age. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Oct;181(4):952-7. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(99)70331-5. | |
| 23182560 | Background | Dun EC, Nezhat CH. Tubal factor infertility: diagnosis and management in the era of assisted reproductive technology. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2012 Dec;39(4):551-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2012.09.006. |
Not provided
Not provided
114 is the number of enrolled and screened participants according to the protocol, but during the screening process some people were withdrawn from the study before randomization because some of them did not meet the inclusion criteria and some withdrew the informed consent form themselves. So, the number of randomized participants is 104.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo, 1.5 mL/kg | each subject received the placebo at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight; Placebo: Saline |
| FG001 | Placebo, 2.4 mL/kg | each subject received the placebo at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight; Placebo: Saline |
| FG002 | Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kg | each subject received the test drug at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight; Seroguard: Seroguard 0.41 g/L solution |
| FG003 | Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kg | each subject received the test drug at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight. Seroguard: Seroguard 0.41 g/L solution |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo, 1.5 mL/kg | each subject received the placebo at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight; Placebo: Saline |
| BG001 | Placebo, 2.4 mL/kg | each subject received the placebo at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight; Placebo: Saline |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Reduction of Adhesions Number by 3 or More | The number of adhesions according to the first MRI data was compared to the number according to the data of second MRI | 7 patients had no results of repeated Pelvic MRI examination that is why the number of Participants is different | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 30±4 days after surgical intervention |
|
30+-4 days
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo, 1.5 mL/kg | each subject received the placebo at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight; Placebo: Saline |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mikhail Shurygin | Pharmasyntez | +7 3952 550 355 | 1150 | m.shurygin@pharmasyntez.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Mar 6, 2017 | Oct 31, 2018 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 24, 2017 | Oct 31, 2018 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000267 | Tissue Adhesions |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002921 | Cicatrix |
| D005355 | Fibrosis |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The present study was conducted as a double blind trial. Neither a medical investigator, nor patients had access to the treatment assignment code in order to ensure the maximum objective evaluation of the primary endpoint.
Blinding was performed in such a way that disclosing a randomization code of a certain subject excluded a disclosure of the code in general (i.e. the randomization code had no indication to the treatment group). However, there were no cases of the randomization code disclosure in the study
| Placebo |
| Drug |
Saline |
|
| Number of Participants With Detection of Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility | The frequency was estimated based on transvaginal ultrasound results | 30±4 days after surgery |
| Number of Participants With Detection of Hyperechoic Linear Lesions Post Surgery | The frequency was estimated based on transvaginal ultrasound results | 30±4 days after surgery |
| Change in Number of Participants in Detecting Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility | Absolute change of count of participants was measured with detecting pelvic organs limited mobility from the baseline | 30±4 days after surgery |
| Change Number of Participants in Detecting Hyperechoic Linear Lesions | Frequency of detecting after repeated transvaginal ultrasound results was compared to baseline indications (4 or more) | 30±4 days after surgery |
| Number of Participants With Detection of no Ultrasound Signs of Pelvic Adhesive Disease Post Surgery | No limited mobility of pelvic organs and no hyperechoic linear lesions should be shown | 30±4 days after surgery |
| State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Professional Education "Krasnoyarsk State Medical University named after Prof. V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation at the clinical site Publicly Funded |
| Krasnoyarsk |
| Krasnoyarsk Krai |
| 660074 |
| Russia |
| State Funded Healthcare Institution of Moscow of City Health Department "V.M. Buyanov Municipal Clinical Hospital" | Moscow | Moscow Oblast | 115516 | Russia |
| Federal State Institution "V.I. Kulakov Research Center for Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Perinatology" of the Ministry of Healthcare and Social Development of the Russian Federation. | Moscow | Moscow Oblast | 117997 | Russia |
| State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Professional Education "Kazan State Medical University" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian at the clinical site of Kazan Maternity Hospital No. 3 named after V.S. Gruzdev | Kazan' | Tatarstan Republic | 420012 | Russia |
| State Funded Health Care Institution "Bryansk Municipal Hospital No 1 | Bryansk | The Bryansk Region | 241035 | Russia |
| Federal State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Education "Kemerovo State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation at the clinical site of Kemerovo Oblast Publicly Funded Healthcare Institution "L.A. | Kemerovo | The Kemerovo Region | 650000 | Russia |
| Federal State Funded Healthcare Institution "L.G. Sokolov Federal Biomedical Agency Clinical Hospital No 122". | Saint Petersburg | The Leningrad Region | 194291 | Russia |
| Federal State Funded Scientific Institution "Research Institute of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductology named after D.O. Ott" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation | Saint Petersburg | The Leningrad Region | 199034 | Russia |
| Moscow Oblast State Funded Healthcare Institution "Moscow Oblast Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology" | Moscow | The Moscow Region | 101000 | Russia |
| State Funded Healthcare Institution of Moscow of City Health Department "Moscow Municipal Clinical Hospital No 31" | Moscow | The Moscow Region | 119415 | Russia |
| State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Professional Education "Rostov State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation at the clinical site of Obstetrics and Pediatrics Research Institute | Rostov-on-Don | The Rostov Region | 344013 | Russia |
| Federal State Educational Government-Financed Institution of Higher Education "I.P. Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation at the clinical site of State Funded Healthcare Institution "Municipal Clin | Ryazan | The Ryazan Region | Russia |
| Federal State Funded Healthcare Institution "Ural Research Institute of Maternal and Infant Care" of the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation | Yekaterinburg | The Sverdlovsk Region | 620028 | Russia |
| 123123 | Background | Westrom L. Effect of acute pelvic inflammatory disease on fertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1975 Mar 1;121(5):707-13. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(75)90477-9. |
| 8042113 | Background | Westrom LV. Sexually transmitted diseases and infertility. Sex Transm Dis. 1994 Mar-Apr;21(2 Suppl):S32-7. |
| 19562067 | Background | Patil M. Assessing tubal damage. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2009 Jan;2(1):2-11. doi: 10.4103/0974-1208.51335. |
| 6667046 | Background | Sutherland AM. The changing pattern of tuberculosis of the female genital tract. A thirty year survey. Arch Gynecol. 1983;234(2):95-101. doi: 10.1007/BF00207681. |
| 3785307 | Background | Mueller BA, Daling JR, Moore DE, Weiss NS, Spadoni LR, Stadel BV, Soules MR. Appendectomy and the risk of tubal infertility. N Engl J Med. 1986 Dec 11;315(24):1506-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198612113152402. |
| Background | Schwartz L, Diamond M. Formation, Reduction, and Treatment of Adhesive Disease. Seminars in Reproductive Medicine. 1991; 9(02): p. 89-99. |
| 24701493 | Background | Vaid K, Mehra S, Verma M, Jain S, Sharma A, Bhaskaran S. Pan endoscopic approach "hysterolaparoscopy" as an initial procedure in selected infertile women. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Feb;8(2):95-8. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7271.4018. Epub 2014 Feb 3. |
| 25935960 | Background | Neerja, Jain K. Role of laporoscopy-hysteroscopy in cases of infertility with pregnancy outcome. J Indian Med Assoc. 2014 Feb;112(2):85-6, 88. |
| 2952528 | Background | Diamond MP, Daniell JF, Feste J, Surrey MW, McLaughlin DS, Friedman S, Vaughn WK, Martin DC. Adhesion reformation and de novo adhesion formation after reproductive pelvic surgery. Fertil Steril. 1987 May;47(5):864-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)59181-x. |
| 6231195 | Background | DeCherney AH, Mezer HC. The nature of posttuboplasty pelvic adhesions as determined by early and late laparoscopy. Fertil Steril. 1984 Apr;41(4):643-6. doi: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)47793-9. |
| 21437827 | Background | Al-Jabri S, Tulandi T. Management and prevention of pelvic adhesions. Semin Reprod Med. 2011 Mar;29(2):130-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1272475. Epub 2011 Mar 24. |
| 22297658 | Background | Brochhausen C, Schmitt VH, Planck CN, Rajab TK, Hollemann D, Tapprich C, Kramer B, Wallwiener C, Hierlemann H, Zehbe R, Planck H, Kirkpatrick CJ. Current strategies and future perspectives for intraperitoneal adhesion prevention. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jun;16(6):1256-74. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1819-9. |
| 19665431 | Background | Coulthard LR, White DE, Jones DL, McDermott MF, Burchill SA. p38(MAPK): stress responses from molecular mechanisms to therapeutics. Trends Mol Med. 2009 Aug;15(8):369-79. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Aug 6. |
| 21492875 | Background | Ward BC, Kavalukas S, Brugnano J, Barbul A, Panitch A. Peptide inhibitors of MK2 show promise for inhibition of abdominal adhesions. J Surg Res. 2011 Jul;169(1):e27-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.01.043. Epub 2011 Feb 23. |
| 15576468 | Background | Katada J, Saito H, Ohashi A. Significance of cyclooxygenase-2 induced via p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase in mechanical stimulus-induced peritoneal adhesion in mice. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2005 Apr;313(1):286-92. doi: 10.1124/jpet.104.078717. Epub 2004 Dec 2. |
| Background | U.S. Food and Drug Administration. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. [Online]. Northborough; 2006 [cited 2015 Dec 22. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/06/briefing/2006-4217b1_01_Executive%20Summary.pdf. |
| 25024524 | Background | Ghonge NP, Ghonge SD. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of pelvic peritoneal adhesions: What radiologists need to know? Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2014 Apr;24(2):149-55. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.134400. |
| 2217485 | Background | diZerega GS. The peritoneum and its response to surgical injury. Prog Clin Biol Res. 1990;358:1-11. No abstract available. |
| 11727863 | Background | diZerega GS, Campeau JD. Peritoneal repair and post-surgical adhesion formation. Hum Reprod Update. 2001 Nov-Dec;7(6):547-55. doi: 10.1093/humupd/7.6.547. |
| 10702313 | Background | Lali FV, Hunt AE, Turner SJ, Foxwell BM. The pyridinyl imidazole inhibitor SB203580 blocks phosphoinositide-dependent protein kinase activity, protein kinase B phosphorylation, and retinoblastoma hyperphosphorylation in interleukin-2-stimulated T cells independently of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 2000 Mar 10;275(10):7395-402. doi: 10.1074/jbc.275.10.7395. |
| 20068172 | Background | Kumar B, Koul S, Petersen J, Khandrika L, Hwa JS, Meacham RB, Wilson S, Koul HK. p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase-driven MAPKAPK2 regulates invasion of bladder cancer by modulation of MMP-2 and MMP-9 activity. Cancer Res. 2010 Jan 15;70(2):832-41. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-2918. Epub 2010 Jan 12. |
| 16328673 | Background | Louizos AA, Hadzilia SJ, Leandros E, Kouroukli IK, Georgiou LG, Bramis JP. Postoperative pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trial of preincisional infiltration and intraperitoneal instillation of levobupivacaine 0.25%. Surg Endosc. 2005 Nov;19(11):1503-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-3002-4. Epub 2005 Oct 3. |
| 7970121 | Background | Innes A, Burden RP, Finch RG, Morgan AG. Treatment of resistant peritonitis in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis with intraperitoneal urokinase: a double-blind clinical trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1994;9(7):797-9. |
| 8711605 | Background | Szem JW, Hydo L, Barie PS. A double-blinded evaluation of intraperitoneal bupivacaine vs saline for the reduction of postoperative pain and nausea after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1996 Jan;10(1):44-8. doi: 10.1007/s004649910011. |
| 11772809 | Background | Labaille T, Mazoit JX, Paqueron X, Franco D, Benhamou D. The clinical efficacy and pharmacokinetics of intraperitoneal ropivacaine for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anesth Analg. 2002 Jan;94(1):100-5, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200201000-00019. |
| 25005450 | Background | Ahmad G, Mackie FL, Iles DA, O'Flynn H, Dias S, Metwally M, Watson A. Fluid and pharmacological agents for adhesion prevention after gynaecological surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 9;(7):CD001298. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001298.pub4. |
| Background | U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER). Non-Inferiority Clinical Trials.; 2010 [cited 2015 Dec. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/./Guidances/UCM202140.pdf. |
| Background | Chow S, Shao J, Wang H. Sample Size Calculations in Clinical Research. 2nd ed.: Chapman&Hall / CRC Biostatistics Series; 2008. |
| 9455829 | Background | Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Lai MP, Mais V, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pelvic adhesions. Hum Reprod. 1997 Dec;12(12):2649-53. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.12.2649. |
| 19368917 | Background | Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Garau N, Alcazar JL, Mais V, Melis GB. Diagnosis of pelvic adhesions in patients with endometrioma: the role of transvaginal ultrasonography. Fertil Steril. 2010 Jul;94(2):742-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.035. Epub 2009 Apr 14. |
| Background | Julious SA. Sample Sizes for Clinical Trials: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis; 2010. |
| 15802321 | Background | Gnoth C, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Friol K, Tigges J, Freundl G. Definition and prevalence of subfertility and infertility. Hum Reprod. 2005 May;20(5):1144-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deh870. Epub 2005 Mar 31. |
| 12923157 | Background | Gnoth C, Godehardt D, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G. Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Hum Reprod. 2003 Sep;18(9):1959-66. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deg366. |
| BG002 | Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kg | each subject received the test drug at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight; Seroguard: Seroguard 0.41 g/L solution |
| BG003 | Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kg | each subject received the test drug at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight. Seroguard: Seroguard 0.41 g/L solution |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG002 | Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kg | each subject received the test drug at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight; Seroguard: Seroguard 0.41 g/L solution |
| OG003 | Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kg | each subject received the test drug at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight. Seroguard: Seroguard 0.41 g/L solution |
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Thickness of Pelvic Adhesions | The change from baseline was defined. It was evaluated by comparing baseline MRI data and repeated MRI data. Results were estimated according to scale from 0 to 3 where 0 - no adhesions, 1 - thin (filmy or filiform), 2 - marked, 3 - marked with an impaired passage through organs involved. | 7 patients had no results of repeated Pelvic MRI examination that is why the number of Participants is different | Posted | Median | Full Range | score on a scale | 30±4 days after surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Detection of Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility | The frequency was estimated based on transvaginal ultrasound results | Posted | Number | participants | 30±4 days after surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Detection of Hyperechoic Linear Lesions Post Surgery | The frequency was estimated based on transvaginal ultrasound results | Posted | Number | participants | 30±4 days after surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Number of Participants in Detecting Pelvic Organs Limited Mobility | Absolute change of count of participants was measured with detecting pelvic organs limited mobility from the baseline | Posted | Number | participants | 30±4 days after surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change Number of Participants in Detecting Hyperechoic Linear Lesions | Frequency of detecting after repeated transvaginal ultrasound results was compared to baseline indications (4 or more) | Posted | Number | participants | 30±4 days after surgery |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Detection of no Ultrasound Signs of Pelvic Adhesive Disease Post Surgery | No limited mobility of pelvic organs and no hyperechoic linear lesions should be shown | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 30±4 days after surgery |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 25 |
| 0 |
| 25 |
| 3 |
| 25 |
| EG001 | Placebo, 2.4 mL/kg | each subject received the placebo at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight; Placebo: Saline | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | 2 | 25 |
| EG002 | Seroguard, 1.5 mL/kg | each subject received the test drug at the dose of 1.5 mL/kg of body weight; Seroguard: Seroguard 0.41 g/L solution | 0 | 25 | 0 | 25 | 1 | 25 |
| EG003 | Seroguard, 2.4 mL/kg | each subject received the test drug at the dose of 2.4 mL/kg of body weight. Seroguard: Seroguard 0.41 g/L solution | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | 0 | 26 |
| Abdominal pain lower | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Respiratory tract infection viral | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysmenorrhoea | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Polymenorrhoea | Reproductive system and breast disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided