Evaluation of Pain Before and After Removal of Non-obstructive Kidney Stones
Evaluation of Pain Before and After Removal of Non-obstructive Kidney Stones
Pain associated with renal stone disease is typically caused by an obstructing stone that obstructs the flow of urine, which results in renal collecting system dilatation. Non-obstructing renal calculi that do not cause renal collecting system dilatation are thought to be painless. The objective of this study is to prospectively determine if the removal of non-obstructing renal calculi can reduce or eliminate participant's pain and/or improve their quality of life.
Research Protocol
Rationale & background information Renal stone disease is a common condition representing a lifetime occurrence risk of 10% in men and 7% in women. Renal stone disease is a chronic condition with a high recurrence rate. Additionally, renal stone disease is associated with considerable morbidity including pain. Pain associated with renal stone disease is typically caused by an obstructing stone that obstructs the flow of urine, which results in renal collecting system dilatation. This increases the intraluminal pressure of the urinary collecting system and stretches nerve ending in the ureteral mucosa and renal capsule. Non-obstructing renal calculi that do not cause renal collecting system dilatation are thought to be painless. There is however, some evidence that non-obstructing renal calculi located within the renal calyces actually do cause pain. In a small (n=13) retrospective study, it was found that ureteroscopic removal of non-obstructing renal calyceal stones achieved complete or partial resolution of pain in all patients. The reason for this pain is unknown.
Objective and hypothesis Objective To prospectively determine if the removal of non-obstructing renal calculi can reduce or eliminate participant's pain and/or improve their quality of life.
Hypothesis We hypothesize that the removal of non-obstructing renal calculi will decrease or eliminate the participant's pain and will improve their quality of life.
Design and methodology
Study type:
o Prospective multicentric study
Study population:
o Patients with non-obstructing renal calculi
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Methodology Our experimental plan begins with the identification of patients with non-obstructing kidney stones (< =10 mm (maximum length; measured via CT) with associated flank pain. Once all other causes of the pain have been eliminated, these patients will undergo ureteroscopy (URS) (standard treatment) to remove the offending kidney stones.
URS will be performed in the standard fashion including the use of a guide wire +/- a ureteral access sheath. Laser lithotripsy will be performed if necessary and all fragments will be extracted with the use of a basket and will be sent for stone analysis. Once the offending stone(s) has/have been removed a double J ureteral stent will be placed if deemed necessary by the surgeon. The duration of the double J ureteral stent will be determined by the surgeon.
All consented patients will undergo 3 evaluations preoperatively; The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) (short version)[3], the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Pain inference/form 6b and the Wisconsin stone quality of life questionnaire (WSQOL). After removal of the renal calculi, these 3 forms will be completed by the participant at the time of stent removal or if no stent was placed, at 2 weeks post-operatively. Thereafter, the forms will be completed again at 6-8 weeks (+/- 1 week) after the initial procedure or 4 weeks (+/- 1 week) after the removal of their double J stent. Finally, the evaluations will be repeated at 12 weeks. Additionally, as with standard care at 6-8 weeks each patient will undergo post-operative imaging to determine if any renal calculi remain.
Analysis of Data With regards to the BPI, if removal of the offending kidney stone(s) is the cause of the patient's pain we expect a decrease in pain ("pain at its worst in the last 24 hours") of at least 20%. Patients included in this study should experience moderate to elevated flank pain in order to be able to detect a decrease of 20% of this pain post-intervention. This decrease will be considered clinically significant. In order to test our hypothesis, we plan to recruit a minimum of 53 patients to achieve a power of 80%. Patients will be their own control.
Sample size calculation Sample size calculation was performed using GPower software, version 3.1. Considering a baseline means Visual Analog Scale (VAS) of 7, we conservatively supposed a correlation of 0 and a standard deviation of 2.5. The standard deviation was estimated with the range (i.e. σ ≈ range/4), assuming the VAS to be normally distributed. Thus, a sample size of n = 53 is required to ensure at least 80% power to detect a clinically significant difference of 20 % (post-mean = 5.6), at a significance level of 5 %.
Impact of the Proposed Research The results of this study will conceivably provide significant evidence on whether small non-obstructing renal calculi can cause flank pain.
Ethical considerations
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: