Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The overall purpose of the FAVOR III China trial is to investigate if a strategy of quantitative flow ratio (QFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) yields superior clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness compared to a strategy of standard coronary angiography-guided PCI in evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease.
The FAVOR III China is a prospective, multicenter, blinded, randomized, superiority clinical trial comparing the clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of the two PCI strategies, QFR-augmented angiography-guided (QFR-guided) strategy versus an angiography-only-guided (angiography-guided) strategy , in evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). The study is adequately powered to detect if the primary outcome by the QFR-guided PCI strategy is superior to the standard angiography-guided PCI strategy. The hypothesis is that a QFR-guided PCI strategy results in superior clinical outcome, assessed by rate of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction (MI) and any ischemia-driven revascularization at 1 year, compared to a standard angiography-guided PCI strategy. If QFR-guided strategy is shown to be superior to the angiography-guided strategy, the lower clinical costs and better clinical outcome by QFR may suggest it to be the preferred strategy for invasive functional evaluation of coronary artery stenosis.
The primary and major secondary endpoints will be analyzed in prespecified subgroups, including age, sex, diabetes, smoking status, acute coronary syndrome, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, lesion location, length and reference vessel diameter, stenosis severity, multivessel disease, calcified lesion, bifurcation, tandem and bending/tortuous lesion, QFR gray zone (0.75-0.85), QFR based functional and residual functional SYNTAX score, residual QFR, center experience for invasive physiology, and learning experience with QFR.
For the purpose of protecting trial subjects and study personnel while maintaining trial data integrity during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we particularly arranged an unscheduled telephone follow-up for all the participants, to evaluate the potential impact of the pandemic. Using a special designed follow-up questionnaire, all subjects were required to report the presence of COVID-19 infection and its related complications, any possible ischemia symptom, any hospitalization or outpatient visit, and interruption of cardiovascular medicine during this time (from Jan 20, 2019 to May 1, 2020). Clinical event committees (CEC) will update the working protocol to enable the re-adjudication of events from the onset of the pandemic to the end of the trial. All the events will be classified as related, possibly related, or not related to COVID-19 infection. To identify the interaction between COVID-19 pandemic and randomized revascularization strategy in the current study, several prespecified subsets will be added to the subgroups analysis, including COVID-19 positive vs. negative subjects, pre-pandemic vs. during pandemic vs. post-pandemic subjects, and the sites located at the high-risk region vs. low- to mediate-risk region.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| QFR-guided PCI group | Experimental | If the patient is assigned to QFR-guided PCI, QFR is first measured in all coronary arteries with DS% ≥ 50% and ≤ 90%. Then PCI treatment is performed in lesions with QFR ≤ 0.80, and optimal medicine treatment is prescribed to those with QFR > 0.80. It is strongly recommended to select the device size based on the 3D-QCA measurements in this group. |
|
| Angiography-guided PCI group | Active Comparator | If the patient is assigned to angiography-guided PCI, then the investigator performs PCI according to the stenosis severity based on visual assessment of the angiogram. No other functional tests such as FFR/iFR can be used for further assessment of the lesion before PCI. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QFR | Diagnostic Test | QFR is a novel method for evaluating the functional significance of coronary stenosis by calculation of the pressure drop in the vessel based on two angiographic projections. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| MACE | A composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction and any ischemia-driven revascularization | 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| MACE excluding peri-procedural MI (Major secondary endpoint) | all-cause mortality, any spontaneous myocardial infarction and any ischemia-driven revascularization | 1 year |
| MACE | A composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction and any ischemia-driven |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
General inclusion criteria:
Angiographic inclusion criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
General exclusion criteria:
Angiographic exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Bo Xu, MBBS | Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences | Principal Investigator |
| Shubin Qiao, MD | Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fu Wai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences | Beijing | Beijing Municipality | 100037 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 27712739 | Background | Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, Nef H, Tebaldi M, Murasato Y, Lansky A, Barbato E, van der Heijden LC, Reiber JHC, Holm NR, Wijns W; FAVOR Pilot Trial Study Group. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2024-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013. | |
| 29980523 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003324 | Coronary Artery Disease |
| D023921 | Coronary Stenosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003327 | Coronary Disease |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000792 | Angiography |
| D017023 | Coronary Angiography |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011859 | Radiography |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a blinded clinical trial. Subjects and clinical assessor will be blinded to the assignment results. All the study site personnel will receive training for the blinding measures before the trial initiating. In addition to standard procedural sedation, music-playing headphones will be worn by the patient during the whole procedure, and patients in both groups will be preset a 10 minutes delay for QFR calculation before the PCI procedure, a lesion/device evaluation form is required to fill in during the period in both groups, to reduce the possibility of unblinding. All the study site personnel will be trained not to disclose the treatment assignment to the subject in any unplanned time. Subject blinding should be maintained until the one-year follow-up visit for all registered subjects is completed.
|
| Angiography | Diagnostic Test | Coronary angiography is a procedure that uses contrast under x-ray pictures to detect stenosis in the coronary arteries |
|
|
| 1 month, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years |
| Death | Cardiovascular, non-cardiovascular and undetermined death | 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years |
| MI | Target vessel related and non-target vessel related MI | 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years |
| Target vessel revascularization (TVR) | The ischemia driven and non-ischemia driven TVR | 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years |
| Any coronary artery revascularization | The The ischemia driven and non-ischemia driven Revascularization | 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years |
| Definite or probable stent thrombosis | Definite and probable stent thrombosis during acute, sub-acute, late, and very late phase according to the Academic Research Consortium (ARC)-2 | 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4 years and 5 years |
| The PCI strategy changes based on the QFR and 3D-QCA | PCI strategy changes following QFR and three-dimension quantitative coronary angiography (3D-QCA) | During the procedure |
| Cost during 1-year follow-up | Costs include direct clinical costs during the initial hospitalization and other resources used, main cardiovascular medication expenses, and outpatient and/or hospitalization expenses associated with MACE. | 1 month, 6 months, 1 year |
| Quality-adjusted-life-years (QALYs) index | QALYs determined using EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire (EQ-5D) in official Chinese version, to assess the quality of life. | 1 month, 6 months, 1 year |
| Background |
| Westra J, Andersen BK, Campo G, Matsuo H, Koltowski L, Eftekhari A, Liu T, Di Serafino L, Di Girolamo D, Escaned J, Nef H, Naber C, Barbierato M, Tu S, Neghabat O, Madsen M, Tebaldi M, Tanigaki T, Kochman J, Somi S, Esposito G, Mercone G, Mejia-Renteria H, Ronco F, Botker HE, Wijns W, Christiansen EH, Holm NR. Diagnostic Performance of In-Procedure Angiography-Derived Quantitative Flow Reserve Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: The FAVOR II Europe-Japan Study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jul 6;7(14):e009603. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009603. |
| 29101020 | Background | Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, Guo L, Sun Z, Li Z, Tian F, Fang W, Chen J, Li W, Guan C, Holm NR, Wijns W, Hu S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-3087. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035. Epub 2017 Oct 31. |
| 19144937 | Background | Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, van' t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF; FAME Study Investigators. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jan 15;360(3):213-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0807611. |
| 22924638 | Background | De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winkler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Juni P, Fearon WF; FAME 2 Trial Investigators. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 13;367(11):991-1001. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205361. Epub 2012 Aug 27. |
| 32179258 | Background | Song L, Tu S, Sun Z, Wang Y, Ding D, Guan C, Xie L, Escaned J, Fearon WF, Kirtane AJ, Serruys PW, Wijns W, Windecker S, Leon MB, Stone GW, Qiao S, Xu B; FAVOR III China Investigators. Quantitative flow ratio-guided strategy versus angiography-guided strategy for percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the FAVOR III China trial. Am Heart J. 2020 May;223:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.02.015. Epub 2020 Feb 24. |
| 34742368 | Result | Xu B, Tu S, Song L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Zhou Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Pu J, Chen L, Qu X, Yang J, Liu X, Guo L, Shen C, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Pan H, Fu X, Liu J, Zhao Y, Escaned J, Wang Y, Fearon WF, Dou K, Kirtane AJ, Wu Y, Serruys PW, Yang W, Wijns W, Guan C, Leon MB, Qiao S, Stone GW; FAVOR III China study group. Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. Lancet. 2021 Dec 11;398(10317):2149-2159. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0. Epub 2021 Nov 4. |
| 36137676 | Result | Jin Z, Xu B, Yang X, Jia R, Meng S, Hu H, Deng Y, Cao X, Ruan Y, Han J, Liu J, Qu X, Zhou Y, Wang J, Fu G, Yu B, Wang Y, Guan C, Song L, Tu S, Qiao S, Stone GW; FAVOR III China Study Group. Coronary Intervention Guided by Quantitative Flow Ratio vs Angiography in Patients With or Without Diabetes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Sep 27;80(13):1254-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.06.044. |
| 36424680 | Result | Song L, Xu B, Tu S, Guan C, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Zhou Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Pu J, Chen L, Qu X, Yang J, Liu X, Guo L, Shen C, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Pan H, Zhang R, Liu J, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Dou K, Kirtane AJ, Wu Y, Wijns W, Yang W, Leon MB, Qiao S, Stone GW; FAVOR III China Study Group. 2-Year Outcomes of Angiographic Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Coronary Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Nov 29;80(22):2089-2101. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Sep 19. |
| 42268156 | Derived | Zhang H, Guan C, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Zhou Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Pu J, Chen L, Qu X, Yang J, Liu X, Guo L, Shen C, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Pan H, Liu J, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Dou K, Kirtane AJ, Wu Y, Yang W, Qiao S, Tu S, Stone GW, Song L; FAVOR III China Study Group. Angiographic Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Coronary Intervention: 5-Year Follow-Up From the FAVOR III China Randomized Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026 Jun 2:S0735-1097(26)06356-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.04.037. Online ahead of print. |
| 41944160 | Derived | Zhang H, Shi W, Zhao Z, Niu G, Liu Z, Guan C, Xie L, Zou T, Cheng X, Guo N, Ye F, Wang L, Mi J, Tu S, Ge J, Song L, Wu Y; FAVOR III China Study Group. Prognostic Value of Angiographic Microcirculatory Resistance After Coronary Intervention: Insights From the FAVOR III China Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2026 Apr 21;15(8):e045639. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.125.045639. Epub 2026 Apr 7. |
| 41263729 | Derived | Zhang R, Wang HY, Song L, Guan C, Yin D, Zhu C, Feng L, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Zhou Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Pu J, Chen L, Qu X, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Liu W, Qiao S, Tu S, Wijns W, Dou K; FAVOR III China Study Group. Rationales Behind Physiology-Guided Revascularization: Diagnostic Impact of Quantitative Flow Ratio in the FAVOR III China Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2026 Feb 23;19(4):422-434. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2025.10.042. Epub 2025 Nov 20. |
| 40926902 | Derived | Ding S, Zhou Z, Zou Z, Cheng F, Sheng X, Liu X, Guo L, Shen C, Zhang Y, Pan H, Xu Y, Chu M, Wang Y, Guan C, Tu S, Kirtane AJ, Qiao S, Song L, Stone GW, Pu J; FAVOR III China Study Group. Two-year outcomes of quantitative flow ratio-based physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with low-risk acute coronary syndrome: a prespecified secondary analysis of FAVOR III China. EClinicalMedicine. 2025 Aug 30;88:103461. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103461. eCollection 2025 Oct. |
| 40780826 | Derived | Geng Y, Guan C, Jiang Y, Yang W, Yu B, Fu G, Pu J, Qu X, Zhang Q, Zhao Y, Yu L, Huang Y, Tu S, Qiao S, Song L. Prognostic impact of guideline-directed medical therapy after functionally complete revascularisation in patients with obstructive coronary artery diseases. Heart. 2026 Feb 12;112(5):270-277. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2025-325670. |
| 40118790 | Derived | Dai J, Guan C, Xu X, Hou J, Jia H, Yu H, Jin Z, Fu G, Wu X, Wang L, Huang R, Shen Z, Zhao Y, Jin Y, Song L, Tu S, Qiao S, Yu B, Xu B, Stone GW; FAVOR III China study group. Angiographic Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Treatment of Patients With Physiologically Intermediate Coronary Lesions. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Apr;14(7):e035756. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035756. Epub 2025 Mar 21. |
| 40025631 | Derived | Zhao Y, Guan C, Wang Y, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Chen Y, Guo L, Qu X, Zhang Y, Dou K, Wu Y, Yang W, Tu S, Escaned J, Fearon WF, Qiao S, Cohen DJ, Krumholz HM, Xu B, Song L; FAVOR III China Study Group. Cost-effectiveness of angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention: A multicenter, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Chin Med J (Engl). 2025 May 20;138(10):1186-1193. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003484. Epub 2025 Mar 3. |
| 38463683 | Derived | Chen Y, Gao L, Vogel B, Tian F, Jin Q, Guo J, Sun Z, Yang W, Jin Z, Yu B, Fu G, Pu J, Qu X, Zhang Q, Zhao Y, Yu L, Guan C, Tu S, Qiao S, Xu B, Mehran R, Song L; FAVOR III China Study Group. Sex Differences in Clinical Outcomes Associated With Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. JACC Asia. 2023 Nov 28;4(3):201-212. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.09.012. eCollection 2024 Mar. |
| 36813375 | Derived | Tu S, Xu B, Chen L, Hong H, Wang Z, Li C, Chu M, Song L, Guan C, Yu B, Jin Z, Fu G, Liu X, Yang J, Chen Y, Ge J, Qiao S, Wijns W; FAVOR III China Study Group. Short-Term Risk Stratification of Non-Flow-Limiting Coronary Stenosis by Angiographically Derived Radial Wall Strain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023 Feb 28;81(8):756-767. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.11.056. |
| D001161 |
| Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D003935 |
| Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular |
| D057791 | Cardiac Imaging Techniques |
| D006334 | Heart Function Tests |