Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The LAVA-CRLM trial (Local Ablation Versus Ablative radiotherapy in ColoRectal Liver Metastases) is a prospective, randomised, phase 2 study designed to compare local control and safety of microwave ablation (MWA) versus stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT)in patients with colorectal liver metastases and oligometastatic disease. Primary endpoint is freedom form local lesion progression.
Colorectal cancer patients with 1-3 liver metastases (diameter ≤4.0 cm) found unsuitable for resection are randomized 1:1 to either MWA or SBRT. Chemotherapy is allowed. Curative treatment of extrahepatic disease must be initiated in patients with lung metastases and/or primary tumors. Patients will be analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| MWA | Active Comparator | Percutaneous ultrasound-guided MWA or open surgery MWA. The patient is fully anesthetized during the treatment. |
|
| SBRT | Active Comparator | 3 fractions of 15 Gy (in total 45 Gy), 3 fractions per week. The dose is prescribed to the PTV encompassing 67% isodose. The SBRT plan is normalized such that the mean dose to the GTV is 100% = 67.5 Gy. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MWA | Device | Patients are allocated to one of the two arms in a 1:1 randomization |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Freedom from local lesion progression (analyzed on patient-level) |
| 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall survival |
| From enrollment to 01/01/2026 - minimum follow-up 1 year after treatment for all randomised patients. |
| ≥ grade 3 toxicity potentially associated with the treatment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Colorectal cancer patients with oligo metastatic disease in the liver (1 to 3 tumors), and where metastases are found unsuitable for resection because of
The multidisciplinary team should all agree that both percutaneous or open surgical MW-ablation and SBRT are safe as first treatment choice for the individual patient.
Tumor sizes ≤4.0 cm
Age > 18 years
Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Righospitalet | Copenhagen | Denmark |
De-identified individual participant data will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author after publication of all analyses of the primary and secondary trial endpoints
Immediately following publication of all analyses of the primary and secondary trial endpoints and until 5 years after.
Investigators whose proposed use of the data has been approved by an independent review committee identified for this purpose for individual participant data meta-analysis. For this please contact the principal investigator of the trial. Data sharing will be conducted in accordance with Danish law on the processing of personal data, regulations of the Danish Data Protection Authority, and applicable health legislation.
Contact Principal investigator Signe Lenora Risumlund Senior Oncologist Department of Oncology, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark Signe.lenora.risumlund@regionh.dk
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Apr 16, 2019 | Oct 15, 2019 |
Not provided
SBRT for oligometastases in the liver from colorectal cancer patients. Standard considered MWA.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| SBRT |
| Radiation |
Patients are allocated to one of the two arms in a 1:1 randomization |
|
- Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 |
| 1 month after treatment |
| Toxicity profile as descriptive statistics | Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v 5.0 | From enrollment to last follow-up 5 years after treatment |
| Prot_002.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 24, 2026 | Mar 17, 2026 | SAP_005.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided