Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A novel stent, called Universal Partially Covered Removable Self-expanding Stent and Anchoring System for the Treatment of Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures (UAS-RBS) was designed to improve the treatment of benign esophageal refractory strictures with a novel stent. This study aims at evaluating the safety of this new device.
Refractory strictures are defined as benign esophageal strictures who do not achieve acceptable symptom relief despite an intensive dilation schedule. Considering the failure of balloon or mechanical dilation other techniques such as intralesional injection of corticosteroids or stents placement were developed.
Self-expandable metal stents, plastic stents and biodegradable stents are also used in that indication. In a meta-analysis of 18 studies with 444 patients, clinical success was achieved in 41 percent of patients. Stent migration occurred in 29 percent of patients, and adverse events occurred in 21 percent.
A self-expending nitinol stent has been design to reduce the migration risk. The stent is partially covered on both extremities, allowing the formation of small hyperplasia in the middle part of the stent. This design with the inner sheet (usually, when using fully covered stents, the sheet is outside) allows formation of hyperplasia (therefore reducing the risk of migration) but partly controlled by the inner sheet to reduce the risk of lumen occlusion. By this design, the balance between hyperplasia formation to avoid the risk of migration and reducing the risk of lumen occlusion could be entailed stable esophageal calibration.
The UAS-RBS system is a reversible procedure to treat Refractory Benign Esophageal Strictures through stent implantation. Above standard of care monitoring, safety assessment of the procedure and device performance decreases the risk and unforeseen events.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Esophageal stent implantation (UAS-RBS implantation) | Experimental | Esophageal stent implantation (UAS-RBS implantation) at J0, removal after 6 months and follow-up for 6 months |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Esophageal stent implantation | Device | An upper endoscopy will be performed with the use of fluoroscopy. Depending on the size of the stricture a dilation can be performed prior to the stent deployment. Otherwise, the stent will be deployed over a guidewire, under fluoroscopy. After, the gastroscopy will go through the esophagus to check for the stent deployment, or any complications. An injection of contrast agent will be done to be sure of the correct positioning and that no complications was happened. The patient will be kept overnight, with liquid food for 3 days and under PPI until one month after the stent placement. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of all Adverse Device Effects | Serious adverse event (SAE) during the period of stent implantation | 6 months |
| Technical stent placement success | Ability to deploy the UAS-RBS in satisfactory position across the stricture | Day 0 |
| Full deployment of stent | Endoscopic visualization | Day 0 |
| Technical stent removal success | Ability to remove the stent without complications | up to 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| SAE during the period after stent removal | 6 months post retrieval | |
| Number of re-interventions | within 12 months following stent placement | |
| Change of dysphagia score (Dakkak and Bennett score of Dysphagia) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CUB Hopital erasme | Anderlecht | 1070 | Belgium |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
As a proof of concept, feasibility study - First In Man Study (FIM). The study will enroll 10 patients and an additional 10% of patients to compensate for potential attrition during follow-up, resulting in a sample size of 11 patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Stent removal | Device | Six months after implantation, the removal of the stent will be performed. Patient will undergo a first endoscopy under general anesthesia for the placement of a FCSEMS. Then, depending on the importance of the hyperplasia, removal of both stents, under general anesthesia, will be done after 7 to 10 days. |
|
| Baseline and at week 1, month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 after implantation |
| Patient's satisfaction with the therapy | scored by a visual analog scale (0 worse - 10 best) | week 1, month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 after implantation |
| Patient's report of pain | scored by a visual analog scale (0 worse - 10 best) | before treatment, and at week 1, month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 after implantation |
| Quality Of Life SF36 questionnaire | SF36 | before treatment, and at week 1, month 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12 after implantation |