Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective, open label, dose-escalating, multicenter clinical investigation to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of THIODERM STRONG in the correction of nasolabial folds.
The performance is assessed using the 5-point Nasolabial Folds Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS) at Week 12 compared to baseline.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| THIODERM STRONG | Experimental | THIODERM STRONG injected into the upper arm (cohort 1) THIODERM STRONG injected into nasolabial folds (cohort 2) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| THIODERM STRONG | Device | Soft tissue filler containing crosslinked hyaluronic acid and Na-hyaluronate, supplemented with lidocaine hydrochloride as ancillary substance. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 1: Frequency, severity, seriousness and causal relationship of AEs | Up to 4 weeks | |
| Cohort 1: Local tolerability assessment based on presence and intensity of erythema, swelling and skin hardening | 5-grade scale ranging from 0 (absent), over 1 (minimal), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), to 4 (severe) | Up to 4 weeks |
| Cohort 2: Improvement of at least 1 point on the Nasolabial Folds Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS) based on investigator's live assessment | Scale from 0 (=none/ minimal) to 4 (= extreme) | Week 12 compared to baseline |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cohort 2: Response rate based on investigator's assessment of Nasolabial Folds Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS) | Scale from 0 (=none/ minimal) to 4 (= extreme) | Week 4, 24, 36 and 52 compared to baseline |
| Cohort 2: Gloabl aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) determined by the investigator |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medizinsche Universität Graz-Klinikum für Dermatologie und Venerologie | Graz | 8036 | Austria | |||
| Yuvell |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
global aesthetic improvement rated as 'very much improved', 'much improved', 'improved', 'no change' or 'worse' |
| Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 compared to baseline |
| Cohort 2: Gloabl aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) determined by the subject | global aesthetic improvement rated as 'very much improved', 'much improved', 'improved', 'no change' or 'worse' | Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 compared to baseline |
| Cohort 2: Subject satisfaction based on Face-Q questionnaire "Satisfaction with Outcome" Scale | Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 compared to baseline |
| Cohort 2: Response rate based on blinded photographic reviewer's assessment of Nasolabial Folds Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS) | Scale from 0 (=none/ minimal) to 4 (= extreme) | Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 compared to baseline |
| Cohort 2: Response rate based on investigator's assessment of Nasolabial Folds Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS) | Scale from 0 (=none/ minimal) to 4 (= extreme) | Week 4, 12, 24, 36 and 52 compared to baseline |
| Cohort 2: Mean pain intensity score using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) | 11-point scale ranging from 0 (= no pain) to 10 (=worst pain imaginable) | Immediately after administration and 15 minutes after treatment |
| Vienna |
| 1010 |
| Austria |