Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This protocol describes an attempt to capture the development phase of a mobile support for individuals with schizophrenia. The intent is to describe and account for a rigorous development process that will result in the creation of a beta version that would be tested in a randomized trial for effectiveness - to be addressed in a subsequent protocol
General Issues The most common contributors to relapse in schizophrenia and associated mental illnesses are medication non-adherence, social isolation, and inadequate supports. Driven to a large extent by system of care shortcomings and the many challenges presented by symptoms, the impacts of these problems are profound from individual to system levels. This is a global issue, and to date technology has not been substantively leveraged in generating solutions - despite evidence of substantial uptake of relevant technologies by relevant populations. To date, there are few products on the market that address the constellation of issues outlined above. It is an area where a nuanced approach is needed as this illness is highly diverse in presentation, attended by a number of social determinants of health that greatly affect outcomes and, quite commonly, ambivalence with respect to service provider and caregiver engagement. This scenario as it exists for schizophrenia stands in sharp contrast with the many thousands of applications developed for other mental health issues.
Cellphone Based Technologies and Schizophrenia There is a small, emergent literature that is examining the feasibility and outcomes of mobile applications that address schizophrenia. Broadly, targeted mobile and online applications in areas such as cognitive remediation (brain training games) have been found feasible and do not result in any noted risks in their use and there have been promising findings in outcome studies of emergent mHealth strategies for schizophrenia of the kind tested here.
Local Work in this Area to Date
Initial mapping of key domains relevant to an app in this area has been conducted based upon the experience of the collaborators and an understanding of the relevant practice literatures. This initial draft, which might be considered a 'paper prototype', let to the identification of the following needs:
The platform would:
Specifically, the app was designed to be made up of 4 functional areas:
Research Objective
This study was undertaken to engage in a rigorous process of feasibility testing. This will then be followed by a randomized trial of the beta version that will be generated through the process outlined in this protocol (will be the subject of a subsequent protocol and not addressed here). As such, the objective of this research is to capture and record the process of development of a functional, beta version of this technology. This test includes outcome data derived from 1 month of app use comprised of both qualitative feedback and quantitative outcome data. The objective is to determine feasibility prior to further trials and validation efforts.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Use of mHealth Technology | Experimental | This single arm of the study involves the provision of the mobile health technology entitled App4Independence. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| App4Independence | Combination Product | The mobile, app-based platform was designed to:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Symptomatology | The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) assesses the level of psychiatric symptomatology providing both total and subscale scores. All 53 items are 5-point likert with higher scores meaning higher symptomatology. For the overall score the total is used and can range from 0-212. Total scores from each of the 9 subscales are similarly used with higher scores meaning greater subscale symptomatology. Lowest scores for all are 0, with 20 the highest score for hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, psychoticism; 16 the highest score for interpersonal sensitivity; 24 the highest for obsessive compulsive, depression, anxiety; and 28 for somatization. | 1 Month |
| Recovery Process Engagement | Personal Recovery Outcome Measure (PROM) was used to assess degree of engagement in the recovery process. The prom has 30 items, all 5 point likert with higher scores meaning more recovery engagement. The metric is the total score (0-120)/4 to provide an adjusted score. There are no subscales. | 1 month |
| Treatment Adherence | Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) was used to examine implications of A4i for medication use. A total score ranging from 0-100 is provided with 100 indicating better adherence. | 1 month |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Sean Kidd, PhD | Centre for Addiction and Mental Health | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre for Addiction and Mental Health | Toronto | Ontario | M5T 1R8 | Canada |
Data will be made available via a supplementary file in the publication.
Available upon publication indefinitely.
Publically accessible.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Use of mHealth Technology | This single arm of the study involves the provision of the mobile health technology entitled App4Independence. App4Independence: The mobile, app-based platform was designed to:
|
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Use of mHealth Technology | This single arm of the study involves the provision of the mobile health technology entitled App4Independence. App4Independence: The mobile, app-based platform was designed to:
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Symptomatology | The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) assesses the level of psychiatric symptomatology providing both total and subscale scores. All 53 items are 5-point likert with higher scores meaning higher symptomatology. For the overall score the total is used and can range from 0-212. Total scores from each of the 9 subscales are similarly used with higher scores meaning greater subscale symptomatology. Lowest scores for all are 0, with 20 the highest score for hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, psychoticism; 16 the highest score for interpersonal sensitivity; 24 the highest for obsessive compulsive, depression, anxiety; and 28 for somatization. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 Month |
|
1 month
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Use of mHealth Technology | This single arm of the study involves the provision of the mobile health technology entitled App4Independence. App4Independence: The mobile, app-based platform was designed to:
|
Not provided
Not provided
No control condition limits comments on effectiveness and ability to control for confounders. The time period might speak to a lack of signal in medication adherence. Cannot speak to how well A4i would perform outside of the research context.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Sean Kidd | Centre for Addiction and Mental Health | 416-535-8501 | 36295 | sean.kidd@camh.ca |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Oct 20, 2017 | Mar 16, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Feb 5, 2018 | Mar 16, 2020 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019967 | Schizophrenia Spectrum and Other Psychotic Disorders |
| D012559 | Schizophrenia |
| D011618 | Psychotic Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| years |
|
| Sex/Gender, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Level of Education | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Employment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Diagnosis | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Age of first illness onsent/Age at 1st Hospitalization | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Mobile technology use | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Brief Symptom Inventory | The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) assesses the level of psychiatric symptomatology providing both total and subscale scores. All 53 items are 5-point likert with higher scores meaning higher symptomatology. Overall total can range from 0-212 (average of the subscale totals plus 4 items). Lowest scores for all are 0, with 20 the highest score for hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation, psychoticism; 16 the highest score for interpersonal sensitivity; 24 the highest for obsessive compulsive, depression, anxiety; and 28 for somatization.Subscale items are averaged to get the subscale total. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Personal Recovery Outcome Measure | Personal Recovery Outcome Measure (PROM) was used to assess degree of engagement in the recovery process. The prom has 30 items, all 5 point likert with higher scores meaning more recovery engagement. The metric is the total score (0-120)/4 to provide an adjusted score. There are no subscales. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Brief Adherence Rating Scale | Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) was used to examine implications of A4i for medication use. A total score ranging from 0-100 is provided with 100 indicating better adherence. | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Living Circumstances | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Recovery Process Engagement | Personal Recovery Outcome Measure (PROM) was used to assess degree of engagement in the recovery process. The prom has 30 items, all 5 point likert with higher scores meaning more recovery engagement. The metric is the total score (0-120)/4 to provide an adjusted score. There are no subscales. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Treatment Adherence | Brief Adherence Rating Scale (BARS) was used to examine implications of A4i for medication use. A total score ranging from 0-100 is provided with 100 indicating better adherence. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 1 month |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 38 |
| 0 |
| 38 |
| 0 |
| 38 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Other |
| Other |