Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been gradually adopted as a feasible and effective treatment option for esophageal cancer. Previously the investigators have published the adoption of single-incision approach both in the thoracoscopic and laparoscopic phases in MIE (SIMIE).The preliminary clinical results showed that SIMIE can provide an equivalent perioperative outcome whereas reduced the wound pain on the days 7 after surgery as compared to MIE performed with multi-incision (MIMIE). The goal of the current study was to conduct a prospective randomized trial to compare the perioperative outcome and survival of SIMIE and MIMIE.
Surgery remains the main stay of treating esophageal cancer. However, esophagectomy is a complex and technical demanding surgical procedure harboring substantial morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has been gradually adopted as a feasible and effective treatment option for esophageal cancer. The standardized procedure including lymph node dissection, esophageal mobilization and reconstruction can be effectively performed under minimized wound incision whereas rendering the patients a possibility of faster postoperative recovery and reduced risk of perioperative postoperative pulmonary complication. The procedure of MIE including the thoracoscopic and laparoscopic phases which are usually performed multiple incisional wounds. Previously the investigators have published the adoption of single-incision approach both in the thoracoscopic and laparoscopic phases in MIE (SIMIE). The preliminary clinical results showed that SIMIE can provide an equivalent perioperative outcome whereas reduced the wound pain on the days 7 after surgery as compared to MIE performed with multi-incision (MIMIE). The goal of the current study was to conduct a prospective randomized trial to compare the perioperative outcome and survival of SIMIE and MIMIE.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| single-incision MIE | Experimental | Esophageal cancer patients received single-incision Minimally invasive esophagectomy |
|
| multi-incision MIE | Active Comparator | Esophageal cancer patients received multi-incision Minimally invasive esophagectomy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimally invasive esophagectomy | Procedure | Minimally invasive esophagectomy is a surgical procedure for esophageal resection |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall survival rate | Overall survival rate of the participants after surgery | 60 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Pain score as assessed by the face rating scale | The scale range of face rating scale is ranging from 0 (happy face) to 10 (crying face). Higher values represent a worse outcome. | 1,7,14,28 days |
| Ratio of ambulation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jang-Ming Lee, MD PhD | Contact | +886972651439 | ntuhlee@yahoo.com | |
| Pei-Wen Yang, PhD | Contact | +88623123456 | 65123 | pwy1210@gmail.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jang-Ming Lee | Recruiting | Taipei | Zhongzheng Dist. | 100 | Taiwan |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| previous SIMIE study 1 | View source |
| previous SIMIE study 2 | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004938 | Esophageal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
30-minute walk test
| post-operative day 2 (POD2) |
| Postoperative force vital capacity | Force vital capacity (FVC) is one of the most common parameters for pulmonary function measured in spirometry | 1 and 3 months |
| Post operative forced expiratory volume in one second | Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is one of the most common parameters for pulmonary function measured in spirometry | 1 and 3 months |
| Postoperative pulmonary complication | pulmonary complication after esophagectomy | 1 month |
| D006258 |
| Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |