Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients who have severe crowding that require four premolars extraction will be treated in this study. The efficacy of the clear aligners and vestibular fixed appliances will be assessed. The treatment result of these two different methods will be explored using the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) in two different times (T0: Before treatment, T1: After treatment) and the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS) after treatment (T1).
There are two groups:
First group (Experimental): the patients in this group will be treated using clear aligners.
Second group (Control): the patients in this group will be treated using fixed appliances.
For years, orthodontists and dentists have used removable appliances for orthodontic treatment. Today, with the CAD/CAM technology, clear aligners treat a broader range of cases with greater precision. They consist of a series of plastic aligners that are intended to replace conventional wire and bracket technology for many orthodontic cases. Each custom manufactured aligner exerts gentle, continuous forces to move teeth incrementally from their original state to a final, treated state. Each aligner is worn for about two weeks, then replaced by the next in the series until the final position is achieved.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| fixed appliances | Active Comparator | patients will be treated using fixed appliances in order to align their teeth after extraction of four premolars |
|
| clear aligners | Experimental | patients will be treated using clear aligners in order to align their teeth after extraction of four premolars |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Appliances | Device | Using an MBT-prescription of metallic brackets, patients will be treated in the conventional way |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in the American Board of Orthodontics - Objective Grading System (ABO-OGS) | Eight domains are evaluated: Alignment: No more than 2 points shall be subtracted for any tooth when it is poorly aligned; Marginal Ridges: The total number of deductions shall be subtracted from 32 to give the score for this domain; Buccolingual inclination: If the mandibular lingual cusps or maxillary buccal cusps are more than 1 mm from the straight edge surface, 1 point shall be subtracted for that tooth; Occlusal Contacts: If a cusp is out of contact with the opposing arch, 1 point is subtracted for that tooth; Occlusal relationships. The total number of deductions are subtracted from 24 to give the score for occlusal relationships; Overjet; Interproximal contacts. If no interproximal spaces exist, then no points are subtracted; and Root angulation: Any deviations in roots' angulations will cause a deduction form the general score. Finally, a case that loses more than 30 points will be considered a failure. A case that loses less than 20 points will be considered acceptable. | T1: one day before the commencement of treatment. T2: one day following the end of treatment (that is expected to happen within 24 months) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Samer T Jaber, DDS MSc | PhD Student in Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus | Principal Investigator |
| Mohammad Y Hajeer, DDS MSc PhD | Associate Professor of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School, Damascus, Syria | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Department of Orthodontics, University of Damascus Dental School | Damascus | DM20AM18 | Syria |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14614415 | Background | Bollen AM, Huang G, King G, Hujoel P, Ma T. Activation time and material stiffness of sequential removable orthodontic appliances. Part 1: Ability to complete treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Nov;124(5):496-501. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(03)00576-6. | |
| 22928114 | Background | Drake CT, McGorray SP, Dolce C, Nair M, Wheeler TT. Orthodontic tooth movement with clear aligners. ISRN Dent. 2012;2012:657973. doi: 10.5402/2012/657973. Epub 2012 Aug 14. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Clear Aligners | Device | Using a sequence of clear aligners, patients will be give an aligner every two weeks until the completion of treatment |
|
| 19904051 | Background | Giancotti A, Di Girolamo R. Treatment of severe maxillary crowding using Invisalign and fixed appliances. J Clin Orthod. 2009 Sep;43(9):583-9; quiz 582. No abstract available. |
| 25939782 | Background | Hennessy J, Al-Awadhi EA. Clear aligners generations and orthodontic tooth movement. J Orthod. 2016 Mar;43(1):68-76. doi: 10.1179/1465313315Y.0000000004. |
| 19121497 | Background | Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B, BeGole E, Obrez A, Agran B. How well does Invisalign work? A prospective clinical study evaluating the efficacy of tooth movement with Invisalign. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Jan;135(1):27-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.018. |
| 26221410 | Background | Li W, Wang S, Zhang Y. The effectiveness of the Invisalign appliance in extraction cases using the the ABO model grading system: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 May 15;8(5):8276-82. eCollection 2015. |
| 26629473 | Background | Zhang XJ, He L, Guo HM, Tian J, Bai YX, Li S. Integrated three-dimensional digital assessment of accuracy of anterior tooth movement using clear aligners. Korean J Orthod. 2015 Nov;45(6):275-81. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2015.45.6.275. Epub 2015 Nov 20. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008311 | Malocclusion, Angle Class I |
| D008310 | Malocclusion |
| D000848 | Anodontia |
| D003441 | Crowding |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D014071 | Tooth Abnormalities |
| D018640 | Stomatognathic System Abnormalities |
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D013037 | Spatial Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077744 | Orthodontic Appliances, Fixed |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009967 | Orthodontic Appliances |
| D009970 | Orthodontics |
| D003813 | Dentistry |
Not provided
Not provided