Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The supraglottic airway device (SAD) is currently widely used in patients undergoing general anaesthesia as a method of securing the airway. The usage of SAD does not require the patient to be paralysed prior to insertion, as opposed to an endotracheal tube.
Five tests have been recommend to ensure that the SAD can be used for advanced procedure after a blind insertion. These tests however are not confirmed with visual validation and hence the confirmation of optimal position can be misleading.
This study is conducted to validate by video laryngoscopy the five recommended tests for confirming the placement and efficacy of a SAD, thus enabling its safe application in institutions with limited availability of video laryngoscopes.
Subjects for this study will consist of patients scheduled for procedures under general anaesthesia in the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) who are amenable to supraglottic airway management.
The five tests are divided into placement and performance tests.
The placement tests are:-
1 - Easy 2 - Difficult 3 - Impossible
Confirmation of correct gastric tube placement is through detection of injected air by auscultation of the epigastrium and/or aspiration of gastric contents.
The performance tests are:-
MMV (in L/min):- 4 x (breaths/15 seconds) x (exhaled tidal volume)
The visual-guided grading system for the placement of SAD is divided into optimal (Grade 1) and suboptimal (Grade 2 and 3) views.
Optimal view is recorded when the direct view of SAD in the hypopharynx fulfils all these conditions:-
Suboptimal view is recorded when the direct view of SAD in the hypopharynx follows these conditions:-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video-laryngoscopy following SAD insertion | Device | Following insertion of a supraglottic airway device (SAD), the placement and performance tests are carried out. If the tests are successful, a video-laryngoscopy will be performed to confirm the placement of the SAD in the hypopharynx. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To evaluate the accuracy of the performance and placement tests for predicting SAD position in the hypopharynx as confirmed with video laryngoscopy | If all five placement and performance tests are successful, optimal (Grade 1) view of the SAD from video-laryngoscopy is expected. | Intraoperative (from commencement of SAD insertion until confirmation of satisfactory SAD placement via video-laryngoscopy) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Md Ariff Md Yusof, Dr | Contact | +6012-6066704 | mamy2517@yahoo.com |
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26539790 | Background | Timmermann A, Bergner UA, Russo SG. Laryngeal mask airway indications: new frontiers for second-generation supraglottic airways. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2015 Dec;28(6):717-26. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000262. | |
| 28510747 | Background | Van Zundert AAJ, Gatt SP, Kumar CM, Van Zundert TCRV, Pandit JJ. 'Failed supraglottic airway': an algorithm for suboptimally placed supraglottic airway devices based on videolaryngoscopy. Br J Anaesth. 2017 May 1;118(5):645-649. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex093. No abstract available. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
From date of publication until seven years after publication
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 41087887 | Derived | Chaw SH, Shariffuddin II, Md Yusof MA, Wong CW, Ruslan SR, Hussain NA, Zainal Abidin MF, van Zundert A. Predicting optimal supraglottic airway device placement: do placement and performance tests measure up? BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Oct 14;25(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03278-6. |