Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
comparative study evaluating stability of fracture segments in mandibular angle fracture with 3d strut plate with or with out post operative IMMF.
Two group of patient with mandibular angle fracture indicated for open reduction and internal fixation ,first group will be fixed with 3d stut plate with post operative IMMF. Second group will be fixed with 3d strut plate with out post operative IMMF.
Eligble patients will be randomised in equal proportions between study group (3d strut plate with out post operative IMMF) and control group (3d strut plate with post operative IMMF).
A- 3D strut plate without post operative IMMF:
B- 3D strut with post operative IMMF:
Follow up for both groups :
Clinical examination will be done at first week post operative and patients will be examined every week for one month. Last follow up visit will be after three months post operative.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| study group: 3d strut plate fixation without post op IMMF. | Experimental | Open reduction and internal fixation with 3d strut plate without post operative IMMF. |
|
| control group: 3d srut plate fixation with post op IMMF. | Active Comparator | Open reduction and internal fixation with 3d strut plate with post operative IMMF for 15 days. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3d strut plate. | Procedure | Under general anathesia fracture will be exposed and fixed with 3d srut plate.Wound closed in standered fashion. patient will be released from operating room with out IMMF. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| stability of fracture segments. | post operative bimanual manipulation of the fracture segment. | 15 days post operative. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| inferior alveolar nerve injury. | measurment by:Neurosensory testing: patient will be asked if there was numbness without stimulus and on stroking the lower lip skin with afinger.The patient will be asked to grade the sensation present on an analog scale from 0 (no sensation) to 10 (completely normal sensation) | pre operative and 1 week post operative. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mohamed T khater, MSc | Contact | +201003854552 | m_khater385@yahoo.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Hesham A Hakam, Prof | Cairo University | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6503575 | Background | Kellman RM. Repair of mandibular fractures via compression plating and more traditional techniques: a comparison of results. Laryngoscope. 1984 Dec;94(12 Pt 1):1560-7. | |
| 25232835 | Background | Saman M, Kadakia S, Ducic Y. Postoperative maxillomandibular fixation after open reduction of mandible fractures. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2014 Nov-Dec;16(6):410-3. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2014.543. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008337 | Mandibular Fractures |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007572 | Jaw Fractures |
| D008446 | Maxillofacial Injuries |
| D005151 | Facial Injuries |
| D006259 | Craniocerebral Trauma |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Accuracy of fracture reduction. | Post operative. Through computed tomography by measuring inter ramus distance using lingula as reference to measure. | one week post operative. |
| 15690289 | Background | Guimond C, Johnson JV, Marchena JM. Fixation of mandibular angle fractures with a 2.0-mm 3-dimensional curved angle strut plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Feb;63(2):209-14. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.03.018. |
| 8755408 | Background | Farmand M. [Experiences with the 3-D miniplate osteosynthesis in mandibular fractures]. Fortschr Kiefer Gesichtschir. 1996;41:85-7. German. |
| 22809633 | Background | Vineeth K, Lalitha RM, Prasad K, Ranganath K, Shwetha V, Singh J. "A comparative evaluation between single noncompression titanium miniplate and three dimensional titanium miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fracture"--a randomized prospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2013 Mar;41(2):103-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.05.015. Epub 2012 Jul 17. |
| 1475603 | Background | Farmand M, Dupoirieux L. [The value of 3-dimensional plates in maxillofacial surgery]. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac. 1992;93(6):353-7. French. |
| 24205475 | Background | Sadhwani BS, Anchlia S. Conventional 2.0 mm miniplates versus 3-D plates in mandibular fractures. Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013 Jul;3(2):154-9. doi: 10.4103/2231-0746.119231. |
| 20417012 | Background | Jain MK, Manjunath KS, Bhagwan BK, Shah DK. Comparison of 3-dimensional and standard miniplate fixation in the management of mandibular fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jul;68(7):1568-72. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.07.083. Epub 2010 Apr 22. |
| D020196 |
| Trauma, Nervous System |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012887 | Skull Fractures |
| D050723 | Fractures, Bone |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |