Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The main purpose of this retrospective case series study was to evaluate long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of a consecutive series of patients with diagnosis of isolated, displaced, closed talar neck or body fractures treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Secondly, it was aimed to verify the influence of the location of talar fractures on the outcomes, the prognostic value of the Hawkins sign, whether operative delays promote avascular necrosis (AVN) and if the fractures require emergent surgical management.
From January 2007 to December 2012, 31 patients underwent ORIF by screws at our institution. On the basis of Inokuchi criteria, the injuries were divided between neck and body fractures, which were classified according to Hawkins and Sneppen, respectively. The patients included were divided into two groups in relation to fracture location and complexity. Radiographic assessment focused on reduction quality, bone healing, Hawkins sign and osteoarthritis development. For clinical evaluation, clinical-functional scores (AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score; MFS; FFI-17; SF-36) and VAS were determined, and statistical analysis was performed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). | Procedure | Depending on the fracture location, a single anteromedial or anterolateral approach was carried out. The fracture site was cleaned to make it visible, allowing anatomical reduction. Subsequently, fixation of provisional fragments was achieved using temporary Kirschner wires under radiographic guidance. Having obtained satisfactory reduction as seen with the radiographic intensifier, definitive fixation of the main bone fragments was carried out using two or more 3.5 mm titanium cannulated screws or 4.0 mm lag screws, placed anteriorly to posteriorly. Fractures complicated by severe comminution necessitated 3.5 mm cortical screws in order to avoid shortening, translation or angulation of the fragments. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of the quality reduction after surgery | Radiographic examination of anteroposterior, lateral and oblique view radiographs enabled to evaluate the quality of the reduction. Any offset of more than 2 mm or neck angulation of more than 5° between the fragment was labelled as a poor reduction. | at day 1 after surgery |
| Evaluation of bone healing | Criteria to define bone healing and union: The bridging bone/callus formation was evaluated on radiographs The absence of radiolucent lines was verified at different follow-ups. | at different follow-ups (1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months) |
| Evaluation of osteonecrosis | The Hawkins sign appearance (only on the A/P X-ray), which resembles a subchondral atrophy in the talus dome, was evaluated indicating that the talus is well vascularized. On the contrary, its absence at this time suggests the presence of osteonecrosis | at 6-8 weeks after injury |
| Evaluation of the development of post-injury peritalar osteoarthritis | Post-injury peritalar osteoarthritis was evaluated on X-ray and differentiated between necrosis without collapse (sclerosis with and without geodes) and necrosis with collapse of the talar dome at the last follow-up | at last follow-up (seven years) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot score | The AOFAS score enabled to quantify pain and functional disability. It includes 9 questions related to pain (1 question; 40 points), function (7 questions; 50 points) and alignment (10 questions; 10 points); a score of 90-100 is considered an excellent result; 75-89 as good; 50-74 as fair and less than 49 points is considered a failure or a poor outcome. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
There were 19 men (1 bilateral case for a total of 20 fractures, 71.4%) and 8 women (29.6%). Overall, mean age at the time of injury was 38.3 years old (range 18-81)
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Carlo Biz, MD | Padua University Orthopaedic Clinic | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000070799 | Open Fracture Reduction |
| D005593 | Fracture Fixation, Internal |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005592 | Fracture Fixation |
| D019637 | Orthopedic Procedures |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| at last follow-up (seven years) |
| the Maryland Foot Score (MFS) | The MFS is a score conceptually analogous to AOFAS score, but points are differently distributed (45 for pain, 55 for functional limitation); they indicate excellent results if the score is between 90 to 100, good for a score of 75 to 89, fair for a score of 50 to 74 and poor if the score is < 50. | at last follow-up (seven years) |
| the 17-Foot Functional Index (FFI-17) | The FFI-17 measures the persistence of pain, disability and restriction of activity, with 17 number-rating scales from 0 to 10. The maximum score is 100, which indicates complete disability. | at last follow-up (seven years) |