Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-A02839-44 | Other Identifier | ANSM |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Motor control, notably expressed through the complexity of the variability of the locomotor pattern, is disturbed at the central level by an apprehension of pain and movement, more than pain itself (or by biomechanical / structural damage of the spine) in chronic low back pain (cLBP) patients.
The aim of this study is to control that variability is reduced during gait at comfortable level and to test that distraction can reduce pain avoidance and therefore increase variability in cLBP patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventional group | Experimental | Patients are asked to walk ont a treadmill in four conditions: with and without distraction (virtual environment) and at different speed (comfortable vs high). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| walk test | Behavioral | The patient will have to walk on a treadmill in four different conditions:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Estimation of the fractal exponent when walking without distraction at preferential speed | [0,5; 1,5] | Day 0 |
| Estimation of the fractal exponent when walking with distraction at preferential speed | [0,5; 1,5] | Day 0 |
| Estimation of the fractal exponent when walking without distraction at the speed of 130% of the preferential speed | [0,5; 1,5] | Day 0 |
| Estimation of the fractal exponent when walking with distraction at the speed of 130% of the preferential speed | [0,5; 1,5] | Day 0 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| EVA after walking without distraction at preferential speed | [0; 100] | Day 0 |
| EVA after walking with distraction at preferential speed | [0; 100] |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Arnaud Dupeyron, Pr | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NÄ«mes | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimes University Hospital | Nîmes | 30029 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34001770 | Result | Homs AF, Dupeyron A, Torre K. Relationship between gait complexity and pain attention in chronic low back pain. Pain. 2022 Jan 1;163(1):e31-e39. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002303. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009043 | Motor Activity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Day 0 |
| EVA after walking without distraction at the speed of 130% of the preferential speed | [0; 100] | Day 0 |
| EVA after walking with distraction at the speed of 130% of the preferential speed | [0; 100] | Day 0 |
| Reaction time to auditory stimuli without distraction at preferential speed | second | Day 0 |
| Reaction time to auditory stimuli with distraction at preferential speed | second | Day 0 |
| Reaction time to auditory stimuli without distraction at the speed of 130% of the preferential speed | second | Day 0 |
| Reaction time to auditory stimuli with distraction at the speed of 130% of the preferential speed | second | Day 0 |
| Tampa Scale for kinesophobia | The total score ranges between 17 and 68. A high value on the Tampa Scale for the "Tampa Scale for kinesophobia" indicates a high degree of kinesiophobia | Day 0 |
| Dallas Pain Questionnaire for Back Pain | This questionnaire has been designed to give health care provider information as to how pain affects daily activities. It assesses the impact of low back pain (LBP) on four components (daily activities, work and leisure activities, anxiety/depression, and social interest) (expressed as a value between 0 and 100) of daily life.The higher the score, the more the low back pain has an impact on the quality of life. | Day 0 |
| Quebec Back Pain Disability Index | The item scores were summed for a total score between 0 and 100, with higher numbers representing greater levels of disability. | Day 0 |
| Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ) | The Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire is a two-part questionnaire assessing fear, avoidance, and beliefs about professional activity and physical activity. The FABQ physical activity score of 14 responds better to a cognitive/behavioral approach and de-emphasize the traditional pain specific treatment goals. The "Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire" Work score that is >18 has a decrease likelihood of success from a joint manipulation/mobilization treatment approach. The "Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire" Work score of 34 or greater increases the risk for prolonged disability and will most likely require a multi-disciplinary approach to treatment. | Day 0 |
| Hospital and Anxiety Depression Scale | Score: 0-7 = Normal 8-10 = Borderline abnormal (borderline case) 11-21 = Abnormal (case) | Day 0 |