Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Because patient recruitment was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, the study sponsor and funding partner halted enrollment at that time to meet contractual obligations
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Bristol-Myers Squibb | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Percutaneous ablation (PA) is the only non-surgical curative treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Due to its excellent tolerance, particularly in patients with portal hypertension or bearing comorbidities, it now represents in France nearly 70% of the first-line curative treatment of "in Milan" tumours. For HCC less than 3 cm, ideal indication for percutaneous ablations, results of monopolar radiofrequency ablation (mRFA), are excellent with only 5% of reported non-tumoral control after a first procedure .
In addition to mRFA the arsenal of ablations has grown considerably with the emergence of new techniques. They allow the expansion of indications for PA, especially in patients with poor prognostic tumors or relatively advanced beyond the Milan criteria . In this setting, multibipolar mode using no touch technique (mbpRFAnt) increases the tumour volume that can be ablated, allowing the removal of large tumors> 5 cm . Furthermore, electroporation (EP) is a new PA technique that does not promote thermoablation but induce tumoral cells apoptosis and is particularly interesting for difficult-to-treat lesions located near vascular or biliary trunks . Inadequate tumour control is then de facto greater in these situations, around 20% at one year.
The idea of optimizing HCC curative treatments using neoadjuvant or adjuvant biotherapy, particularly in patients with advanced tumors in curative intent, is particularly attractive. One trial in adjuvant setting was conducted, the STORM trial, that tested the benefit of sorafenib in curative intent of in Milan HCC. This negative trial included patients with in Milan HCC, with an expected low rate of recurrence with only few patients treated by PA.
In parallel, the development of new molecules for HCC treatment, especially immunotherapy, seems to give promising results in palliative setting . Furthermore, PA procedures and most likely electroporation induce T-cell recruitement that may foster immunomodulation .
Neoadjuvant and adjuvant trials using these new molecules must now be cautiously designed based on the rigorous selection of special populations and therapeutic indications.
This project proposes a Phase 2 trial testing the safety and efficacy of treatment with Nivolumab in neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting in patients with advanced HCC treated by electroporation in curative intent.
Multicenter (6 centers), Phase 2 trial.
-Inclusion visit The inclusion visit takes place between 15 days and no later than 3 days before the patient's hospitalization for Neoadjuvant therapy
Eligible patients will receive :
Constitution of a biobank with :
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab Injection [Opdivo] | Experimental | Intravenous Nivolumab 240 Q2W neoadjuvant Intravenous Nivolumab 480 mg Q4W- adjuvant for 12 months |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab Injection [Opdivo] | Drug | Intravenous Nivolumab 240 Q2W neoadjuvant Intravenous Nivolumab 480 mg Q4W- adjuvant up to 12 months after EP |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Local recurrence-free survival during a 1-year follow-up after Nivolumab neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy and EP procedure | Recurrence rates (whether local or distant) will be assessed using imaging techniques as recommended by international guidelines (3-months US and MRI during two years). Patients who will meet primary endpoint will be alive 1 year after EP procedure without evidence of local recurrence on 3-months US/MRI evaluations. | At 1 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Changes of tumorous and non-tumorous perfusion parameters observed with CUS and MRI after one months of neoadjuvant treatments | Evaluation performed by CUS and MRI | after one month of neoadjuvant treatment |
| Per nodule rates of early response |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female patients ≥ 18 years of age
Histological diagnosis of HCC, whether new or recurrent following a prior curative therapeutic management > 6 months.
Barcelona Clinical Liver Cancer(BCLC) stage Category A
Patients with HCC eligible for EP as assessed by multidisciplinary board corresponding to the following extension:
At least one uni-dimensional measurable lesion by computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) according to modified RECIST for HCC
Liver function status Child-Pugh Class A
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status ≤ 2
Adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function
Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
Women of childbearing potential and men must agree to use adequate contraception
Patients affiliated to a Social Security System
Written informed consent signed
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Pierre NAHON, MD,PhD | APHP-Hôpital Jean Verdier | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hôpital Jean Verdier | Bondy | 93140 | France |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28453431 | Background | Sutter O, Calvo J, N'Kontchou G, Nault JC, Ourabia R, Nahon P, Ganne-Carrie N, Bourcier V, Zentar N, Bouhafs F, Sellier N, Diallo A, Seror O. Safety and Efficacy of Irreversible Electroporation for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Not Amenable to Thermal Ablation Techniques: A Retrospective Single-Center Case Series. Radiology. 2017 Sep;284(3):877-886. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017161413. Epub 2017 Apr 28. | |
| 26361969 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006528 | Carcinoma, Hepatocellular |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077594 | Nivolumab |
| D018274 | Electroporation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D061067 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
Not provided
Not provided
Clinical study phase II
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Evaluation performed by MRI
| At one month after a single procedure of EP |
| Incidences of intra segmental/ extra segmental distant recurrence | Evaluation performed by MRI | During follow-up (2 yrs) |
| Assessment of overall survival | patients will meet this endpoint if they are alive with or without HCC recurrence 2 years after EP. procedures. Causes and date of death will be specified when applicable during this timeframe. | At 2-yrs following EP procedure |
| Assessment of tolerance of the immunotherapy treatment: | Adverse events related to Nivolumab infusions will be monitored according to manufacturer guidelines and recommendation. | During follow-up (2 yrs) |
| Compliance to neoadjuvant treatments | Respect of scheduled Nivolumab infusions | During follow-up (13 months) |
| Compliance to adjuvant treatments | Respect of scheduled Nivolumab infusions | During follow-up (13 months) |
| Frequency of SAEs | adverse events related to Nivolumab infusions will be monitored according to manufacturer guidelines and recommendation. | During follow-up (2 yrs) |
| Frequency of discontinuations treatment due to AEs | adverse events related to Nivolumab infusions will be monitored according to manufacturer guidelines and recommendation. | During follow-up (2 yrs) |
| Background |
| Bruix J, Takayama T, Mazzaferro V, Chau GY, Yang J, Kudo M, Cai J, Poon RT, Han KH, Tak WY, Lee HC, Song T, Roayaie S, Bolondi L, Lee KS, Makuuchi M, Souza F, Berre MA, Meinhardt G, Llovet JM; STORM investigators. Adjuvant sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma after resection or ablation (STORM): a phase 3, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1344-54. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00198-9. Epub 2015 Sep 8. |
| 28434648 | Background | El-Khoueiry AB, Sangro B, Yau T, Crocenzi TS, Kudo M, Hsu C, Kim TY, Choo SP, Trojan J, Welling TH Rd, Meyer T, Kang YK, Yeo W, Chopra A, Anderson J, Dela Cruz C, Lang L, Neely J, Tang H, Dastani HB, Melero I. Nivolumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CheckMate 040): an open-label, non-comparative, phase 1/2 dose escalation and expansion trial. Lancet. 2017 Jun 24;389(10088):2492-2502. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31046-2. Epub 2017 Apr 20. |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008113 | Liver Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D008107 | Liver Diseases |
| D007162 |
| Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
| D003584 | Cytological Techniques |
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
| D055664 | Electrochemical Techniques |