Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R03NS106088-01A1 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study will examine how electrical stimulation of vagus nerve (i.e. nerve around the outer ear) from the skin surface during motor training influences a brain hormone (called norepinephrine), brain activity, and motor performance.
Motor function is compromised with advanced age, and motor impairment is involved in various neuromotor injuries and disorders including stroke, spinal cord injury, amputation, and aging. Development of effective interventions for facilitating neuromotor adaptation is essential for accelerating or augmenting rehabilitation outcomes in the control of impaired limbs. The ultimate goal of the study is to find non-pharmacological and non-invasive neuromodulating interventions for enhancing the rehabilitation outcomes that may be applied to individuals with impaired motor function. In rats, implanted afferent vagus nerve stimulation paired with motor training enhanced neuromotor adaptation and motor recovery most likely through increased release of central neuromodulators that originate from the brainstem. The investigators propose to translate the findings in rats into humans by applying vagus nerve stimulation noninvasively. Transcutaneous VNS (tVNS) can noninvasively activate the brainstem including locus coeruleus, where norepinephrine (i.e. neuromodulator) is synthesized. However, it is unknown whether tVNS leads to increasing neuromodulators and facilitating neuromotor adaptations when combined with motor training in humans. With potential applicability of this novel intervention for facilitating neuromotor adaptation to various clinical human populations in future scope, it is essential to start with the basic understanding about the effect of tVNS on the neuromotor system and training-induced adaptation in neuromotor behavior in non-disabled humans. The overarching hypothesis is that an application of tVNS increases central norepinephrine and facilitates training-induced neuromotor adaptations in humans. The specific aim is to examine the effect of tVNS on central norepinephrine and training-induced neuromotor adaptations in humans. The effect of applying tVNS concurrently to visuomotor training will be investigated by comparing the changes in central norepinephrine and changes in the visuomotor skill and corticospinal excitability due to training with and without tVNS (sham) in non-disabled humans. The visuomotor skill will be assessed with the root-mean-square error of the produced force against the target force, which will be normalized to the maximal voluntary contraction force (MVC) . The investigators expect that subjects with concurrent tVNS during training show greater increases in the visuomotor skill and corticospinal excitability after training. The investigators also expect that tVNS increases central norepinephrine, and the amount of neuromotor adaptations due to training is associated with that of tVNS-induced increase in central norepinephrine. These expected findings will be the first evidence on the efficacy of concurrent tVNS with motor training for upregulating central norepinephrine and facilitating training-induced neuromotor adaptations in humans. They will open new scientific and clinical fields of study that will lead to the creation of motor rehabilitation paired with tVNS that can enhance rehabilitation outcomes in individuals with motor impairment. Demonstration of associated changes between central norepinephrine and neuromotor adaptations due to tVNS in non-disabled humans is a necessary step for applying tVNS to rehabilitation with the understanding of the underlying mechanism and for potentially using central norepinephrine as a predictor of tVNS efficacy in rehabilitation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sham-tVNS to ear lobe | Sham Comparator | Sham-tVNS will be applied to the ear lobe. |
|
| tVNS to tragus | Active Comparator | tVNS will be applied to the tragus. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| tVNS | Other | Intervention |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Visuomotor Skill | Visuomotor skill was assessed with the amount of force error against the target trajectory. In the visuomotor task, subjects produced finger force against a force transducer to match a target trajectory as close as possible. The target was made of three low-frequency sinusoids with each sinusoid at different frequencies and amplitudes. This pattern spanned 20 s. The data in the middle 16 s were used for data analysis. For determining the visuomotor skill, the deviation of produced force from the target trajectory was calculated as the root-mean-square error. In this calculation, the difference between the target and produced force at each sampling point was squared, the squared values were summed across sampling points, and the squared root value of the summed value was determined and normalized to the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force. The data were expressed as the ratio of the baseline value (no unit). A lower value is considered a better outcome. | Day 1 (Baseline), Day 2 - 4, and Day 5 (Post) |
| Brain Excitability (MEP Amplitude) | Brain excitability was assessed with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude of the resting first dorsal interosseus muscles as resting corticospinal excitability. Surface EMG electrodes were attached over the muscle in a belly-tendon configuration. Subjects received single-pulse TMS to evoke MEP in the muscle. MEP was obtained from the surface EMG using a high-gain EMG preamplifier. Peak-to-peak- amplitude of MEP in response to TMS were averaged across the intensities of 115-160% relative to the resting motor threshold. Additionally, maximal M-wave amplitude was obtained by stimulating the ulnar nerve that innervates the muscle. MEP amplitude was normalized to the maximal M-wave amplitude of the muscle, so it was expressed in % of maximal M-wave. A higher value is considered higher brain excitability and a better outcome. | Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 5 (Post) |
| Salivary Amylase Activity | Central noradrenaline was assessed indirectly with salivary amylase activity. Saliva was sampled via salivette strips in the resting state before and after the training. Subjects were seated and rested for 5 minutes before sampling the samples. Collected saliva samples were immediately analyzed by using a dry-chemistry system automatically. Three saliva samples were analyzed and averaged across samples. Salivary amylase activity was measured and expressed in kU/I (kilo units per liter). |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
To ensure the safety associated with TMS and transcutaneous afferent vagus nerve stimulation, following adults will be excluded as in our previous studies (Buharin et al. 2013, 2014) and following the standard recommendations (Keel et al. 2001):
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Minoru Shinohara, PhD | Georgia Institute of Technology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human Neuromuscular Physiology Lab | Atlanta | Georgia | 30332 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
There was no significant event in the study that occurred after participant enrollment.
Participants were recruited from May 2019 to June 2021 through flyers posted in the classroom buildings and recreational buildings on the Georgia Tech campus.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Sham-tVNS to Ear Lobe | Sham-tVNS will be applied to the ear lobe. tVNS: Intervention Motor training: Same finger training for both arms |
| FG001 | tVNS to Tragus | tVNS will be applied to the tragus. tVNS: Intervention Motor training: Same finger training for both arms |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Sham-tVNS to Ear Lobe | Sham-tVNS will be applied to the ear lobe. tVNS: Intervention Motor training: Same finger training for both arms |
| BG001 | tVNS to Tragus | tVNS will be applied to the tragus. tVNS: Intervention Motor training: Same finger training for both arms |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Visuomotor Skill | Visuomotor skill was assessed with the amount of force error against the target trajectory. In the visuomotor task, subjects produced finger force against a force transducer to match a target trajectory as close as possible. The target was made of three low-frequency sinusoids with each sinusoid at different frequencies and amplitudes. This pattern spanned 20 s. The data in the middle 16 s were used for data analysis. For determining the visuomotor skill, the deviation of produced force from the target trajectory was calculated as the root-mean-square error. In this calculation, the difference between the target and produced force at each sampling point was squared, the squared values were summed across sampling points, and the squared root value of the summed value was determined and normalized to the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force. The data were expressed as the ratio of the baseline value (no unit). A lower value is considered a better outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Ratio of the baseline value | Day 1 (Baseline), Day 2 - 4, and Day 5 (Post) |
|
Up to one week
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Sham-tVNS to Ear Lobe | Sham-tVNS will be applied to the ear lobe. tVNS: Intervention Motor training: Same finger training for both arms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Minoru Shinohara | Georgia Institute of Technology | 404-894-1030 | shinohara@gatech.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Apr 16, 2021 | Jul 21, 2022 | Prot_SAP_001.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Apr 16, 2021 | Apr 20, 2022 | ICF_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Motor training |
| Other |
Same finger training for both arms |
|
| Day 3 |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Visuomotor Skill | The visuomotor skill was assessed with the root-mean-square error of the produced force against the target force, which was normalized to the maximal voluntary contraction force (MVC) of the finger and expressed in %MVC. A lower value is considered a smaller error and thus a better outcome. | Mean | Standard Deviation | % of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) |
|
| OG000 |
| Sham-tVNS to Ear Lobe |
Sham-tVNS will be applied to the ear lobe. tVNS: Intervention Motor training: Same finger training for both arms |
| OG001 | tVNS to Tragus | tVNS will be applied to the tragus. tVNS: Intervention Motor training: Same finger training for both arms |
|
|
|
| Primary | Brain Excitability (MEP Amplitude) | Brain excitability was assessed with motor evoked potential (MEP) amplitude of the resting first dorsal interosseus muscles as resting corticospinal excitability. Surface EMG electrodes were attached over the muscle in a belly-tendon configuration. Subjects received single-pulse TMS to evoke MEP in the muscle. MEP was obtained from the surface EMG using a high-gain EMG preamplifier. Peak-to-peak- amplitude of MEP in response to TMS were averaged across the intensities of 115-160% relative to the resting motor threshold. Additionally, maximal M-wave amplitude was obtained by stimulating the ulnar nerve that innervates the muscle. MEP amplitude was normalized to the maximal M-wave amplitude of the muscle, so it was expressed in % of maximal M-wave. A higher value is considered higher brain excitability and a better outcome. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of maximal M-wave | Day 1 (Baseline) and Day 5 (Post) |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Salivary Amylase Activity | Central noradrenaline was assessed indirectly with salivary amylase activity. Saliva was sampled via salivette strips in the resting state before and after the training. Subjects were seated and rested for 5 minutes before sampling the samples. Collected saliva samples were immediately analyzed by using a dry-chemistry system automatically. Three saliva samples were analyzed and averaged across samples. Salivary amylase activity was measured and expressed in kU/I (kilo units per liter). | The number of participants is 11 (not 12) in each group because data were not obtained in one subject in the Sham-tVNS group and one subject in tVNS group due to technical difficulties during the measurement. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | kU/l | Day 3 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 12 |
| 0 |
| 12 |
| 0 |
| 12 |
| EG001 | tVNS to Tragus | tVNS will be applied to the tragus. tVNS: Intervention Motor training: Same finger training for both arms | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 12 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Day 5 (Post) before practice |
|
| Day 5 (Post) after practice |
|