Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this study is to assess efficacy and safety of Pressure-controlled intermittent Coronary Sinus Occlusion (PiCSO) therapy started post flow restoration but prior to stenting during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to standard PCI in the setting of acute ST-segment elevation anterior myocardial infarction (STEMI).
This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1), controlled, study. Patients with an ST-segment elevated anterior infarct eligible for PCI will be invited to participate in the PiCSO-AMI-I study. After consent as per pproved ethics committee requirements, baseline assessments will be performed. PCI of the culprit vessel should be performed per standard practices. After blood flow restoration, the subjects meeting all inclusion and none exclusion criterial will be enrolled into the study and randomized either to PiCSO Group or Control Group. If the subject is randomized to PiCSO Group, the coronary sinus (CS) will be cannulated through the femoral vein and the PiCSO Impulse Catheter will be placed in the CS. In the event the PiCSO Impulse Catheter cannot be placed in the CS within 30 minutes, the physician should proceed with the regular PCI and the PiCSO treatment will be considered a failure. Once PiCSO Impulse Catheter is placed into CS, PiCSO treatment is started followed by stenting. The physician shall target a PiCSO treatment of 45 minutes (at minimum 30 minutes) whereas the treatment should be continued during and post stent insertion, but should not exceed a maximum duration of 90 minutes. At the end of the PiCSO treatment, the PiCSO Impulse Console is stopped and the PiCSO Impulse Catheter is removed. The patient is seen for a FU visit at 5 days, 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, 2 year and 3 years post index procedure. 5 days and 6 months post index the patient will get a CMR scan. At every FU visit safety data and health status will be documented and quality of life questionnaire will be completed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | No Intervention | This is the actual control group receiving conventional therapy, ie. percutaneous coronary intervention. | |
| PICSO | Experimental | This arm will be treated with Pressure controlled intermittent Coronary Sinus Occlusion (PiCSO) in addition to conventional therapy (percutaneous coronary intervention). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PiCSO | Device | After blood flow restoration, the subjects meeting all inclusion and none exclusion criterial will be enrolled into the study and randomized either to PiCSO Group or Control Group. If the subject is randomized to PiCSO Group, the coronary sinus (CS) will be cannulated through the femoral vein and the PiCSO Impulse Catheter will be placed in the CS. Once PiCSO Impulse Catheter is placed into CS, PiCSO treatment is started followed by stenting. The physician shall target a PiCSO treatment of 45 minutes (at minimum 30 minutes) whereas the treatment should be continued during and post stent insertion, but should not exceed a maximum duration of 90 minutes. At the end of the PiCSO treatment, the PiCSO Impulse Console is stopped and the PiCSO Impulse Catheter is removed. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Infarct size 5 days post MI | Difference in myocardial infarct size (extent of myocardial necrosis quantified by delayed gadolinium enhancement presented as a percentage of LV mass) between the PiCSO Group and the Control Group, assessed by CMR at 5 days post index PCI | 5 days post MI |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Infarct size 6 months post MI | Myocardial infarct size (% of LV mass) assessed by CMR at 6 months post index PCI | 6 months post MI |
| MVO | Occurrence and extent of microvascular obstruction (MVO, % of LV mass) and hemorrhage assessed by CMR at 5 days post index PCI |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Adrian Banning, Prof. | Study principal Investigator | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aarhus Universitetshospital | Aarhus | Denmark | ||||
| Odense University Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 38626079 | Derived | De Maria GL, Greenwood JP, Zaman AG, Carrie D, Coste P, Valgimigli M, Behan M, Berry C, Erglis A, Panoulas VF, Van Belle E, Juhl Terkelsen C, Hunziker Munsch L, Jain AK, Lassen JF, Palmer N, Stone GW, Banning AP. Pressure-Controlled Intermittent Coronary Sinus Occlusion (PiCSO) in Acute Myocardial Infarction: The PiCSO-AMI-I Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Apr;17(4):e013675. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013675. Epub 2024 Apr 16. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A prospective, multicenter, randomized (1:1), controlled, study
Not provided
Not provided
Analysis of the primary endpoint, infarct size 5-days post MI assessed by CMR, will be analyzed by an independent Corelab, blinded to the allocated treatment arm.
|
| 5 days post MI |
| LVEF | LVEF assessed by CMR at 5 days and 6 months post index PCI | 5 days and 6 months post MI |
| LVESV | LVESV assessed by CMR at 5 days and 6 months post index PCI | 5 days and 6 months post MI |
| LVEDV | LVEDV assessed by CMR at 5 days and 6 months post index PCI | 5 days and 6 months post MI |
| Myocardial Salvage | Myocardial Salvage Index at 5 days and 6 month post index PCI | 5 days and 6 months post MI |
| ST-segment resolution | ST-segment resolution at 90 minutes post flow restoration | 90 minutes |
| Device and Procedural success, assessed as percent of subjects with successful access, delivery, and retrieval of the device and its delivery system | Device success and procedural success rate presented as % of subjects | 1 day |
| Odense |
| Denmark |
| CHU Hôpiteaux de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut Lévéque | Bordeaux | France |
| Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Lille | Lille | France |
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse | Toulouse | 31059 | France |
| Klinikum Coburg GmbH | Coburg | Germany |
| Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital | Riga | Latvia |
| Bern University Hospital | Bern | Switzerland |
| EOC Ospedale Regionale di Lugano - Civico | Lugano | Switzerland |
| Golden Jubilee National Hospital | Clydebank | United Kingdom |
| New Edinburgh Royal Infirmary | Edinburgh | United Kingdom |
| Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospital | Harefield | UB9 6JH | United Kingdom |
| Leeds Teaching Hopsitals | Leeds | LS1 3EX | United Kingdom |
| Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital | Liverpool | United Kingdom |
| St Bartholomew's Hospital | London | United Kingdom |
| Freeman Hospital | Newcastle | United Kingdom |
| John Radcliffe Hospital | Oxford | OX3 9DU | United Kingdom |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000072657 | ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction |
| D056988 | Anterior Wall Myocardial Infarction |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009203 | Myocardial Infarction |
| D017202 | Myocardial Ischemia |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D007238 | Infarction |
| D007511 | Ischemia |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D009336 | Necrosis |
Not provided
Not provided