Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R34DK109503-01 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The study used the Practical, Robust, Implementation and Sustainability Model (PRISM) with mixed methods to: redesign a diabetes survival skills education (DSSE) program (DM2Go) content and the processes for its inpatient delivery; and to evaluate the feasibility of integrating and implementing high-tech tablet computer-enabled delivery of the DSSE program for hospital inpatients within usual workflow by staff on general medical/surgical units (MSUs) and a behavioral health unit. The four study phases were: I) Interviews and focus groups with stakeholders to identify perceived barriers and facilitators for implementation; II) Redesign of the D2Go program to address usability issues and potential barriers and to optimize perceived facilitators; III) Development of implementation processes and a D2Go toolkit; IV) Conduct of a prospective cohort pilot study on three MSUs and one BHU.
The investigators sought to determine the feasibility of integrating the Diabetes To Go inpatient DSSE program sustainably into ongoing hospital nursing unit processes for diabetes patient education and discharge planning. If successful, preliminary data generated will be used to develop a randomized controlled trial which will further assess program outcomes, including clinical and economic measures and potential for widespread dissemination.
The objectives of the R34 Diabetes To Go Inpatient proposal were to refine the Diabetes To Go program content based on user feedback and experience, as well as to design and develop processes to enhance the feasibility of integrated implementation within usual nursing unit workflow within one hospital belonging to a regional health system. A mixed-methods approach is used to leverage implementation science frameworks and human factors principles to make DSSE and discharge support more accessible, interactive and engaging for patients. The long-term goal of this research is to optimize scalable and sustainable solutions for DSSE delivery and for DM-related discharge support. This personalized approach leverages e-health technologies to pursue the following Specific Aims:
Aim 1: To refine and optimize the Diabetes To Go program content and implementation processes.
This will be achieved by applying user-centered interface design principles, content development in partnership with patients and providers, detailed process mapping for program integration into existing processes and workflow, and integrating mobile and e-health technology to support care transitions. The Practical, Robust, Implementation and Sustainability Model will guide implementation planning and evaluation.
Hypothesis 1. Diabetes To Go: will be optimized for patient and provider usability and integration into nursing unit workflow; will enhance patient self-care knowledge and skills; and will support the discharge transition process.
Aim 2: To conduct iterative rapid-cycle usability testing of the enhanced Diabetes To Go program content and processes and establish a Diabetes To Go program toolkit for widespread implementation.
This will be achieved by a series of intervention-evaluation cycles of field testing, refinement, retesting of the Diabetes To Go program and evaluation through: direct observation; patient, provider and system leadership stakeholder interviews and focus groups; and evaluation of changes in early patient outcomes.
Hypothesis 2. The Diabetes To Go program will be perceived favorably by stakeholders yielding a high-quality toolkit for implementation and delivery of the program for further evaluation and testing.
Preliminary data gathered during this study will be used to design an R18 pragmatic trial in response to PAR 15-157 which will examine outcomes of implementation of the Diabetes To Go program when delivered on hospital nursing units to adult patients with diabetes across multiple hospitals in a regional health system. The model has the potential to cause a paradigm shift in sustainable and generalizable approaches for delivery of patient-centered education and medication adherence and discharge transition support in the hospital.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diabetes Survival Skills Education | Other | Application of human factors and education principles to refine and optimize an DSSE program for delivery to inpatients with type 2 diabetes (D2Go - IN) using a table-based e-learning platform ; utilization of implementation science to inform design of implementation processes for delivery within nursing unit workflow; establishment of a D2Go program toolkit; and evaluation of the feasibility and preliminary impact of the program when delivered by nursing unit staff on medical-surgical units (MSUs) to adults with type 2 diabetes. Barriers and facilitators of the D2Go - Inpatient program's reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance (RE-AIM)(31) were explored |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Integration of Diabetes Self Management Education and Support (DSMES) into nurses workflow | To identify and validate barriers and facilitators of reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance of a diabetes survival skills education program which is delivered at the bedside using a web-based e-learning platform by nursing unit staff to adult patients with type 2 diabetes prior to discharge from the hospital. Nursing unit staff (RN, patient care technician, clerical, leadership) provided input via focus groups and key informant interviews to inform intervention design. | July 2016-May 2017 (11 months) |
| Patient acceptance of diabetes self-management education delivered via an e-learning platform. | Rates of patient engagement with the DSMES program via the e-learning platform. | November 2017 to March 2018 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To conduct iterative rapid-cycle usability testing of the enhanced Diabetes To Go program content and processes and establish a Diabetes To Go program toolkit for widespread implementation | This will be achieved by a series of intervention-evaluation cycles of field testing, refinement, retesting of the Diabetes To Go program and evaluation through: direct observation; patient, provider and system leadership stakeholder interviews and focus groups; and evaluation of changes in early patient outcomes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation effectiveness evaluation | Implementation effectiveness evaluation will be guided by the RE-AIM framework. Our approach considers differences in hospital and nursing workflow, patient characteristics and is sensitive to differences in patient culture, knowledge and beliefs. Our mixed methods approach to operationalizing the RE-AIM framework used both qualitative and quantitative outcomes at the setting, staff, and patient levels. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
1. Age < 18 years (MWHC does not admit minors to its Medicine units and Diabetes To Go content has been prepared for adult learners) 2. Pregnancy or anticipated conception within 3 mos (Diabetes To Go content does not address gestational diabetes or diabetes in pregnancy where management and glycemic targets differ considerably from those for non-pregnant adults ); 3. Admission to an intensive-care unit, diabetic ketoacidosis, hyperglycemic hyperosmolar state - conditions in which the acuity level would likely preclude participation in DSME; 4. Patient declines participation in the education program for any reason; and any medical condition or cognitive dysfunction that, in the opinion of unit staff, would preclude participation in the education program.
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All patients with diabetes on the selected units who meet the criteria above are eligible.
Among 596 T2DM patients identified on three medical-surgical units, 415 (70%) were program eligible (mean age 64 years, 57% male, 51% Black).
The criteria for inclusion were intentionally been kept broad to minimize disruption to unit workflow and to increase generalizability of findings. Where appropriate, the justification for each criteria is also presented, e.g. exclusion of minors.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michelle F Magee, MD | Medstar Health Research Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MedStar Washington Hospital Center | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20010 | United States |
All data collected will be housed and maintained within the MedStar Health system on shared drives equipped with appropriate security measures behind the MedStar Health firewall. Data sharing will be housed within the MedStar Health Research Data Capture (RedCap) file server that provides HIPAA level protection of research data. Analytics on identifiable patient data will be maintained within MedStar Health's research servers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 18, 2016 | Oct 20, 2020 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ICF | No | No | Yes | Informed Consent Form | Jan 27, 2016 | Oct 20, 2020 | ICF_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| May 2017 to Oct 2017 months |
| February 2018 - October 2018 (6 months) |