Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1T32NS100663-01 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigators are conducting this research study to better understand how individuals with bipolar disorder regulate their emotions, and if the study can use a technique called "transcranial magnetic stimulation" or TMS to help improve emotion regulation for individuals with bipolar disorder.
Emotion dysregulation contributes to the development and maintenance of a wide range of psychopathology, but is especially relevant for individuals with bipolar mood disorders (BD). These individuals experience severe and episodic emotion dysregulation associated with maladaptive functioning, interpersonal problems, decreased work productivity, and suicidal ideation and behavior. To date, both pharmacological and psychosocial treatments fail to normalize emotion dysregulation for many bipolar patients. As a consequence, all too many experience poor outcomes. Thus, there is a significant need for new innovative approaches to target and improve emotion dysregulation in bipolar patients. Non-invasive neuromodulation using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) may provide a viable strategy to help improve emotion dysregulation in bipolar mood disorders. As a first step to test this hypothesis, the current proposal seeks to experimentally identify specific neural target sites for improving emotion regulation using TMS. If the investigators can demonstrate target engagement of emotion regulation at the behavioral level using TMS, this will provide an important first step towards examining the potential utility of TMS as a viable strategy to help improve emotion dysregulation in bipolar mood disorders. While this is not a definitive clinical trial, the sham-controlled double-crossover design of this study will provide valuable information for target site selection for the development of TMS as an intervention strategy to improve emotion dysregulation in BD.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients | Active Comparator | Individuals with Bipolar 1 Disorder |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) | Device | Non-Invasive neuromodulation |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Affective Multisource Interference Task - Reaction Time During Negative Interference Trials | The Affective Multisource Interference Task is a behavioral task measuring the ability to identify an oddball number when overlayed on affective images as a proxy for emotion regulation. Outcome Measure 1: Slope of reaction time during trials with negative valenced stimuli where the oddball number is other than zero and in a location incongruent with the location on the button box | Task administered 10 minutes pre TMS and 5 minutes post TMS |
| Affective Multisource Interference Task - Reaction Time During Positive Interference Trials | The Affective Multisource Interference Task is a behavioral task measuring the ability to identify an oddball number when overlayed on affective images as a proxy for emotion regulation. Outcome Measure 2: Slope of reaction time during trials with positive valenced stimuli where the oddball number is other than zero and in a location incongruent with the location on the button box | Task administered 10 minutes pre TMS and 5 minutes post TMS |
| Emotion Conflict Resolution Task - Incongruent Fear Trials Reaction Time | The Emotion Conflict Resolution Task is a behavioral task requiring correct identification of an emotion word overlayed on photographs of facial expressions of emotion. Outcome measure 3: Slope of reaction time during trials when the image is of a fearful facial expression but the word is "Happy" (incongruent) | Task administered 10 minutes pre TMS and 5 minutes post TMS |
| Emotion Conflict Resolution Task - Incongruent Happy Trials Reaction Time | The Emotion Conflict Resolution Task is a behavioral task requiring correct identification of an emotion word overlayed on photographs of facial expressions of emotion. Outcome measure 4: Slope of reaction time during trials when the image is of a happy facial expression but the word is "Fear" (incongruent) | Task administered 10 minutes pre TMS and 5 minutes post TMS |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients
Healthy Controls:
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients
Any change in psychiatric medications within a month prior to and during study participation
Legal or mental incompetency
Intellectual disability
Current manic (YMRS > 12) or severe depressive episode (HAM-D-17 > 5)
Substance use disorder (abuse or dependence) with active use within the last 3 months
Significant medical or neurological illness
Prior neurosurgical procedure
History of seizures
History of ECT treatment or clinical TMS within the past three months
Implanted cardiac pacemakers
Patients who have conductive, ferromagnetic or other magnetic-sensitive metals implanted in their head or neck, or are non-removable and within 30 cm of the treatment coil. These include:
Pregnant women
Healthy Controls:
History of major psychiatric illness, including psychosis
Has a first-degree relative with psychosis
Active use of neuropsychoactive medications
Legal or mental incompetency
Intellectual disability
Substance use disorder (abuse or dependence) with active use within the last 3 months
Significant medical or neurological illness
Prior neurosurgical procedure
History of seizures
History of ECT treatment or clinical TMS within the past three months
Implanted cardiac pacemakers
Individuals who have conductive, ferromagnetic or other magnetic-sensitive metals implanted in their head or neck, or are non-removable and within 30 cm of the treatment coil. These include:
Pregnant women
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Kristen K Ellard, PhD | Massachusetts General Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging | Charlestown | Massachusetts | 02129 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Sham Stimulation First, Then VLPFC Stimulation, Then IPL Stimulation | Participants attended three study visits separated by a minimum of 3 days and a maximum of 10 days. During each study visit, participants completed two behavioral computer tasks, followed by TMS stimulation within 10 minutes of completing computer tasks, followed by repeat completion of computer tasks within 5 minutes of completing stimulation. Visit 1: participants recieved Sham stimulation. Visit 2: Participants received VLPFC stimulation. Visit 3: Participants received IPL stimulation. |
| FG001 | Sham Stimulation First, Then IPL Stimulation, Then VLPFC Stimulation | Participants attended three study visits separated by a minimum of 3 days and a maximum of 10 days. During each study visit, participants completed two behavioral computer tasks, followed by TMS stimulation within 10 minutes of completing computer tasks, followed by repeat completion of computer tasks within 5 minutes of completing stimulation. Visit 1: participants recieved Sham stimulation. Visit 2: Participants received IPL stimulation. Visit 3: Participants received VLPFC stimulation. |
| FG002 | VLPFC Stimulation First, Then Sham Stimulation, Then IPL Stimulation | Participants attended three study visits separated by a minimum of 3 days and a maximum of 10 days. During each study visit, participants completed two behavioral computer tasks, followed by TMS stimulation within 10 minutes of completing computer tasks, followed by repeat completion of computer tasks within 5 minutes of completing stimulation. Visit 1: participants recieved VLPFC stimulation. Visit 2: Participants received Sham stimulation. Visit 3: Participants received IPL stimulation. |
| FG003 | VLPFC, Stimulation First, Then IPL Stimulation, Then Sham Stimulation | Participants attended three study visits separated by a minimum of 3 days and a maximum of 10 days. During each study visit, participants completed two behavioral computer tasks, followed by TMS stimulation within 10 minutes of completing computer tasks, followed by repeat completion of computer tasks within 5 minutes of completing stimulation. Visit 1: participants received VLPFC stimulation. Visit 2: Participants received IPL stimulation. Visit 3: Participants received Sham stimulation. |
| FG004 | IPL Stimulation First, Then Sham Stimulation, Then VLPFC Stimulation | Participants attended three study visits separated by a minimum of 3 days and a maximum of 10 days. During each study visit, participants completed two behavioral computer tasks, followed by TMS stimulation within 10 minutes of completing computer tasks, followed by repeat completion of computer tasks within 5 minutes of completing stimulation. Visit 1: participants received IPL stimulation. Visit 2: Participants received Sham stimulation. Visit 3: Participants received VLPFC stimulation. |
| FG005 | IPL Stimulation First, Then VLPFC Stimulation, Then Sham Stimulation | Participants attended three study visits separated by a minimum of 3 days and a maximum of 10 days. During each study visit, participants completed two behavioral computer tasks, followed by TMS stimulation within 10 minutes of completing computer tasks, followed by repeat completion of computer tasks within 5 minutes of completing stimulation. Visit 1: participants received IPL stimulation. Visit 2: Participants received VLPFC stimulation. Visit 3: Participants received Sham stimulation. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | All Participants | Demographic information (gender, age, race, ethnicity) was collected from all enrolled participants prior to randomization into experimental study arms/groups. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | A description of the ages of participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Affective Multisource Interference Task - Reaction Time During Negative Interference Trials | The Affective Multisource Interference Task is a behavioral task measuring the ability to identify an oddball number when overlayed on affective images as a proxy for emotion regulation. Outcome Measure 1: Slope of reaction time during trials with negative valenced stimuli where the oddball number is other than zero and in a location incongruent with the location on the button box | 3 participants were excluded from the analysis due to greater than 30% missing responses | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Reaction Time (ms) | Task administered 10 minutes pre TMS and 5 minutes post TMS |
|
From enrollment until end of Visit 3, up to 4 weeks.
Adverse events are evaluated by the PI and actions are taken guided by the principles of Human Subjects research. An adverse event report is submitted to the IRB and regulatory officials using the Research Subject Report of Adverse Event form, according to the PHRC reporting guidelines, within 5 working days or 7 calendar days of the date they become aware of the problem.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | All Participants | All participants enrolled in the study | 0 |
Not provided
Not provided
The current study is intended to collect pilot data and therefore uses a small sample, which limits the interpretability of the results. All results from this study should thus be interpreted with caution.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kristen K. Ellard, PhD | Massachusetts General Hospital | 617-724-3221 | kellard@mgh.harvard.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Mar 7, 2024 | Dec 19, 2025 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001714 | Bipolar Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068105 | Bipolar and Related Disorders |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050781 | Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D055909 | Magnetic Field Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are blinded to whether they received active versus sham (placebo) TMS.
Not provided
| Count of Participants |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Participant Gender | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Participant Race | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Participant Ethnicity | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Sham Post TMS |
Performance on behavioral task after Sham (placebo) TMS stimulation |
| OG002 | IPL Pre TMS | Performance on behavioral task before IPL TMS stimulation |
| OG003 | IPL Post TMS | Performance on behavioral task after IPL TMS stimulation |
| OG004 | VLPFC Pre TMS | Performance on behavioral task before VLPFC TMS stimulation |
| OG005 | VLPFC Post TMS | Performance on behavioral task after VLPFC TMS stimulation |
|
|
|
| Primary | Affective Multisource Interference Task - Reaction Time During Positive Interference Trials | The Affective Multisource Interference Task is a behavioral task measuring the ability to identify an oddball number when overlayed on affective images as a proxy for emotion regulation. Outcome Measure 2: Slope of reaction time during trials with positive valenced stimuli where the oddball number is other than zero and in a location incongruent with the location on the button box | 3 participants were excluded from analysis due to greater than 30% missing responses | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Reaction Time (ms) | Task administered 10 minutes pre TMS and 5 minutes post TMS |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Emotion Conflict Resolution Task - Incongruent Fear Trials Reaction Time | The Emotion Conflict Resolution Task is a behavioral task requiring correct identification of an emotion word overlayed on photographs of facial expressions of emotion. Outcome measure 3: Slope of reaction time during trials when the image is of a fearful facial expression but the word is "Happy" (incongruent) | 3 participants were excluded from analysis due to greater than 30% missing responses | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Reaction time (ms) | Task administered 10 minutes pre TMS and 5 minutes post TMS |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Emotion Conflict Resolution Task - Incongruent Happy Trials Reaction Time | The Emotion Conflict Resolution Task is a behavioral task requiring correct identification of an emotion word overlayed on photographs of facial expressions of emotion. Outcome measure 4: Slope of reaction time during trials when the image is of a happy facial expression but the word is "Fear" (incongruent) | 3 participants were excluded from analysis due to greater than 30% missing responses | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Reaction time (ms) | Task administered 10 minutes pre TMS and 5 minutes post TMS |
|
|
|
|
| 19 |
| 0 |
| 19 |
| 0 |
| 19 |
Not provided
Not provided
Mixed model generalized linear models computing slope of trial by trial reaction time differences (Time x Target Interaction)
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| 0.002 |
| Slope |
| -37.43 |
| Superiority |
| Mixed model generalized linear models computing slope of trial by trial reaction time differences (Time x Target Interaction) | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.33 | Slope | -2.872 | Superiority |
Mixed model generalized linear models computing slope of trial by trial reaction time differences (Time x Target Interaction)
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| .02 |
| Slope |
| -0.0412190 |
| Superiority |
| Mixed model generalized linear models computing slope of trial by trial reaction time differences (Time x Target Interaction) | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.58 | Slope | 0.00925260 | Superiority |
Mixed model generalized linear models computing slope of trial by trial reaction time differences (Time x Target Interaction)
| Mixed Models Analysis |
| 0.34 |
| Slope |
| -0.0172125 |
| Superiority |
| Mixed model generalized linear models computing slope of trial by trial reaction time differences (Time x Target Interaction) | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.85 | Slope | 0.00327321 | Superiority |