Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R21AA023880 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institutes of Health (NIH) | NIH |
| National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study evaluates the efficacy of the eCHECKUP TO GO as an intervention to reduce underage drinking and the associated negative consequences among high school seniors. The aim of this project is to provide a brief, low cost intervention that can be easily disseminated as a school-based intervention to address this important public health problem.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| eCHECKUP TO GO | Experimental | Brief, web-based alcohol intervention |
|
| Control | No Intervention | Assessment only |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| eCHECKUP TO GO | Behavioral | eCHECKUP TO GO is a personalized normative feedback intervention intended to help participants make better choices about alcohol use by changing beliefs about alcohol, alcohol expectancies, and perceptions of peer drinking |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Weekly Drinking | Daily Drinking Questionnaire Weekly drinking was assessed with the question "Given that it is a typical week, please write the number of drinks you probably would have each day." A response scale is provided for each day of the week (e.g., Monday__, Tuesday__, etc.)." Weekly drinking was calculated by combining the reports for the seven days of the week (sum of the 7 days). Minimum = 0; Maximum = none Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 26 Higher scores are worse outcomes | Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up |
| Peak Drinking Quantity | Quantity ⁄Frequency ⁄Peak Questionnaire Peak drinking quantity was assessed with the question "What is the most number of drinks that you have consumed on any given night in the past month?" Minimum = 0; Maximum = none Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 25 Higher scores are worse outcomes | Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up |
| Frequency of Alcohol Use | Quantity ⁄Frequency ⁄Peak Questionnaire Frequency of alcohol use was assessed with the question "How often do you use alcohol?" with responses provided on an 8-point Likert scale with options ranging from "0" to "7" ("Do not drink alcohol" to "Every day"). Items were reverse scores so higher scores represent higher levels of drinking frequency. Minimum = 0; Maximum = 7 Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 7 Higher scores are worse outcomes | Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up |
| Blood Alcohol Concentration | Blood alcohol concentration was calculated using the Widmark Formula (1932/1981); BAC = [Alcohol consumed in grams / (Body weight in grams x r)] x 100. In this formula, "r" is the gender constant. Minimum = 0; Maximum = none Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = .62 Higher scores are worse outcomes | Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Alcohol-Related Consequences | Rutgers Alcohol Problems Inventory Alcohol-related consequences were measured using the Rutgers Alcohol Problems Inventory. The Rutgers Alcohol Problems Inventory is a 23-item scale. Participants were asked "How many times have the following scenarios happened to you while you were consuming alcohol or as a result of your drinking in the past 30 days." Responses were measured on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (more than 10 times). A total consequence score is created by summing the 23 items. Minimum = 0; Maximum = 92 Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 24 Higher scores are worse outcomes |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Diana Doumas, PhD | Boise State Univeristy | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boise State University | Boise | Idaho | 83725 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32359042 | Result | Doumas DM, Esp S, Turrisi R, Bond L, Flay B. Efficacy of the eCHECKUP TO GO for High School Seniors: Sex Differences in Risk Factors, Protective Behavioral Strategies, and Alcohol Use. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2020 Mar;81(2):135-143. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2020.81.135. | |
| 39388851 | Derived | Doumas DM, Esp S, Turrisi R, Bond L, Glenn SD. A randomized controlled trial testing the efficacy of the eCHECKUP TO GO on drinking games participation and behavior among high school seniors. Addict Behav. 2025 Jan;160:108183. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2024.108183. Epub 2024 Sep 30. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | eCHECKUP TO GO | Brief, web-based alcohol intervention eCHECKUP TO GO: eCHECKUP TO GO is a personalized normative feedback intervention intended to help participants make better choices about alcohol use by changing beliefs about alcohol, alcohol expectancies, and perceptions of peer drinking |
| FG001 | Control | Assessment only |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | eCHECKUP TO GO | Brief, web-based alcohol intervention eCHECKUP TO GO: eCHECKUP TO GO is a personalized normative feedback intervention intended to help participants make better choices about alcohol use by changing beliefs about alcohol, alcohol expectancies, and perceptions of peer drinking |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Weekly Drinking | Daily Drinking Questionnaire Weekly drinking was assessed with the question "Given that it is a typical week, please write the number of drinks you probably would have each day." A response scale is provided for each day of the week (e.g., Monday__, Tuesday__, etc.)." Weekly drinking was calculated by combining the reports for the seven days of the week (sum of the 7 days). Minimum = 0; Maximum = none Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 26 Higher scores are worse outcomes | One participant was removed from the analyses due to unreliable reporting | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | drinks per week | Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up |
|
6 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | eCHECKUP TO GO | Brief, web-based alcohol intervention eCHECKUP TO GO: eCHECKUP TO GO is a personalized normative feedback intervention intended to help participants make better choices about alcohol use by changing beliefs about alcohol, alcohol expectancies, and perceptions of peer drinking |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Diana Doumas | Boise State Universtiy | 2084261219 | dianadoumas@boisestate.edu |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Jan 27, 2021 | Jan 27, 2021 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000066608 | Underage Drinking |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000294 | Adolescent Behavior |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D000428 | Alcohol Drinking |
| D004327 | Drinking Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Heavy Episodic Drinking |
Heavy Episodic Drinking is defined as having 5 or more drinks in a row for males and 3 or more for females in a 2 hour period in the past month. The number of drinks was based on research by Donovan (2009) establishing cut-points for children and adolescents. Participants were asked: "Males: Think back over the last two weeks. How many times have you had 5 or more drinks in a two hour period?" "Females: Think back over the last two weeks. How many times have you had 3 or more drinks in a two hour period?" Minimum = 0; Maximum = none Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = .76 Higher scores are worse outcomes |
| Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up |
| Baseline and 6-month follow up |
| 34347564 | Derived | Doumas DM, Esp S, Turrisi R, Bond L. A Randomized Controlled Trial of the eCHECKUP to GO for High School Seniors across the Academic Year. Subst Use Misuse. 2021;56(13):1923-1932. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2021.1958862. Epub 2021 Aug 4. |
| Control |
Assessment only |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants | No |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG001 | Control | Assessment only |
|
|
| Primary | Peak Drinking Quantity | Quantity ⁄Frequency ⁄Peak Questionnaire Peak drinking quantity was assessed with the question "What is the most number of drinks that you have consumed on any given night in the past month?" Minimum = 0; Maximum = none Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 25 Higher scores are worse outcomes | One participant was removed from the analyses due to unreliable reporting | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | drinks | Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up |
|
|
|
| Primary | Frequency of Alcohol Use | Quantity ⁄Frequency ⁄Peak Questionnaire Frequency of alcohol use was assessed with the question "How often do you use alcohol?" with responses provided on an 8-point Likert scale with options ranging from "0" to "7" ("Do not drink alcohol" to "Every day"). Items were reverse scores so higher scores represent higher levels of drinking frequency. Minimum = 0; Maximum = 7 Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 7 Higher scores are worse outcomes | One participant was removed from the analyses due to unreliable reporting | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up |
|
|
|
| Primary | Blood Alcohol Concentration | Blood alcohol concentration was calculated using the Widmark Formula (1932/1981); BAC = [Alcohol consumed in grams / (Body weight in grams x r)] x 100. In this formula, "r" is the gender constant. Minimum = 0; Maximum = none Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = .62 Higher scores are worse outcomes | One participant was removed from the analyses due to unreliable reporting | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of alcohol/100 ml of blood | Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up |
|
|
|
| Primary | Heavy Episodic Drinking | Heavy Episodic Drinking is defined as having 5 or more drinks in a row for males and 3 or more for females in a 2 hour period in the past month. The number of drinks was based on research by Donovan (2009) establishing cut-points for children and adolescents. Participants were asked: "Males: Think back over the last two weeks. How many times have you had 5 or more drinks in a two hour period?" "Females: Think back over the last two weeks. How many times have you had 3 or more drinks in a two hour period?" Minimum = 0; Maximum = none Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = .76 Higher scores are worse outcomes | One participant was removed from the analyses due to unreliable reporting | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | binge drinking events | Baseline, 1 month follow-up, and 6-month follow up |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Alcohol-Related Consequences | Rutgers Alcohol Problems Inventory Alcohol-related consequences were measured using the Rutgers Alcohol Problems Inventory. The Rutgers Alcohol Problems Inventory is a 23-item scale. Participants were asked "How many times have the following scenarios happened to you while you were consuming alcohol or as a result of your drinking in the past 30 days." Responses were measured on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (never) to 4 (more than 10 times). A total consequence score is created by summing the 23 items. Minimum = 0; Maximum = 92 Sample score range: Minimum = 0; Maximum = 24 Higher scores are worse outcomes | One participant was removed from the analyses due to unreliable reporting | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | Baseline and 6-month follow up |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 174 |
| 0 |
| 174 |
| 0 |
| 174 |
| EG001 | Control | Assessment only | 0 | 137 | 0 | 137 | 0 | 137 |
Not provided
Not provided
| 1 Month Follow-Up |
|
|
| 6 Month Follow-Up |
|
|
| 1 Month Follow-Up |
|
|
| 6 Month Follow-Up |
|
|
| 6 Month Follow-Up |
|
| 1 Month Follow-Up |
|
|
| 6 Month Follow-Up |
|
|
| 6 Month Follow-Up |
|
|