Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| K23MH101238 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Youth depression and anxiety represent a serious public health concern, with affected youth often experiencing social, familial, and academic impairment. Research evidence supports a growing array of effective treatments for youth depression and anxiety, yet as the collection of evidence-based treatments expands, so do the challenges of utilizing the evidence: clinicians must be able to (1) access, integrate, and apply the available evidence, and (2) engage in a collaborative process with each family to develop a plan that is responsive to each family's unique characteristics, preferences, and goals. Engaging caregivers and youths as active collaborators in the treatment planning process is a patient-centered approach with the potential to improve the process and outcome of youth mental health care by facilitating the personalization of established evidence-based treatment approaches. Such collaboration, frequently referred to as shared decision-making (SDM), is a hallmark of evidence-based practice and a key feature of federal guidelines for health care delivery. However, despite growing rhetorical support for SDM, empirical support is lacking, particularly in the area of youth mental health treatment. The absence of such research is unfortunate, given the potential for SDM to facilitate the dissemination and implementation of evidence-based treatments, and to personalize the use of established treatments to increase acceptability, retention, satisfaction, and overall effectiveness.
The present project tests the feasibility and acceptability of SDM through a pilot randomized controlled trial of 40 youths (ages 7-15) meeting diagnostic criteria for an anxiety or depressive disorder. The trial will compare an evidence-based treatment that is planned collaboratively with youths and caregivers using the SDM protocol, to an evidence-based treatment that is planned by the clinician and supervisor using pretreatment assessment data. Eligible youths will received up to 26 treatment sessions at no cost and complete assessments prior to the start of treatment, at the end of treatment, and six months following the end of treatment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared Decision Making | Experimental | In this arm, parents and children will participate in a shared decision-making protocol with the clinician to plan their treatment. The treatment options available are established, evidence-based treatment techniques. The shared decision-making protocol was developed for this research project. |
|
| Clinician Guided | Active Comparator | In this arm, the clinician will plan the treatment in consultation with their supervisor, and share the treatment plan with the parent and child. The parent and child will have the opportunity to ask questions about the treatment plan (and, if they do not agree, reject the treatment plan), but they are not actively involved in making each decision. This is more typical of usual care. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modular Approach to Therapy for Children (MATCH) | Behavioral | MATCH is a collection of 31 modules that correspond to the treatment procedures included in standard evidence-based treatments for youth depression, anxiety, and behavioral disorders. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV - Child/Parent | The Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule for DSM-IV - Child/Parent is an extensively tested semi-structured interview assessing the major anxiety, mood, and externalizing disorders. | Through completion of treatment, anticipated to be an average of 5 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction with Decision Scale | The 6-item Satisfaction with Decision Scale assesses satisfaction with treatment-related decisions. The scale score ranges from 6 (very low satisfaction) to 30 (very high satisfaction). | At the start of treatment, anticipated to be an average of 3 weeks after the initial assessment |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David A Langer, Ph.D. | Boston University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston University | Boston | Massachusetts | 02215 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D003863 | Depression |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are randomly assigned to receive a treatment planned primarily by the clinician (clinician guided) or planned collaboratively by the clinician, parent, and child (shared decision-making).
Not provided
Not provided
The outcomes assessors do not have access to data regarding which arm each participant is in.