Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| U01DK116743 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine if a procedure called Endoscopic Retrograde CholangioPancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy reduces the risk of pancreatitis or the number of recurrent pancreatitis episodes in patients with pancreas divisum. ERCP with sphincterotomy is a procedure where doctors used a combination of x-rays and an endoscope (a long flexible lighted tube) to find the opening of the duct where fluid drains out of the pancreas. People who have been diagnosed with pancreas divisum, have had at least two episodes of pancreatitis, and are candidates for the ERCP with sphincterotomy procedure may be eligible to participate. Participants will be will be randomly assigned to either have the ERCP with sphincterotomy procedure, or to have a "sham" procedure. Participants will have follow up visits 30 days after the procedure, 6 months after the procedure, and continuing every 6 months until a maximum follow-up period of 48 months.
This is a sham-controlled, single blinded with a blinded outcome assessment, multi-center, randomized clinical trial of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy (miES) for the treatment of recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP) with pancreas divisum. ERCP with miES is often offered in clinical practice to patients with RAP, pancreas divisum, and no other clear risk factors for their acute pancreatitis episodes. The hypothesis is that obstruction at the level of the minor papilla is one cause of RAP in pancreas divisum; miES will relieve the obstruction, thereby reducing the risk of a recurrent attack(s) of acute pancreatitis. The trial requires a total sample size of approximately 234 subjects, and a planned enrollment period of approximately 3.5 years with total planned study duration of 5 years (minimum follow-up of 6 months, maximum follow-up of 48 months).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUS + Sham | Sham Comparator | Subjects randomized to EUS + sham will undergo a diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) under sedation. The physician investigator will not make any attempts to achieve minor papilla cannulation, but photo document the minor papilla using a duodenoscope. Diluted dye will be injected into the duodenum. A small caliber prophylactic pancreatic duct stent will be deposited into the duodenal lumen. These maneuvers are performed to minimize the risk of unmasking. |
|
| EUS + ERCP with miES | Experimental | Subjects randomized to EUS + ERCP with miES will undergo the procedure at the same time as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), under sedation. Indomethacin (100 mg) will be administered rectally at the onset of the ERCP procedure in patients with no known allergy to indomethacin. The techniques used to perform the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)with miES (minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy) will be left to the discretion of the study endoscopist. The extent of sphincterotomy will be per the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Unless methylene blue (or similar chromoendoscopy agent such as indigo carmine) has already been used to facilitate minor papilla cannulation, diluted dye will be injected into the duodenum. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ERCP with miES | Procedure | Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Reduce the Risk of Subsequent Acute Pancreatitis Episodes by 33% | To test this aim, compare the incidence of acute pancreatitis > 30 days after treatment allocation as the primary outcome measure, using the next attack of acute pancreatitis as a time-to-event outcome. | This is a time-to-event outcome that is assessed starting 30 days after treatment through a maximum follow-up of 48 months. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To Compare the Incidence Rate Ratio of Acute Pancreatitis Between Treatment Groups | All randomized subjects will be followed longitudinally until study completion (minimum follow-up of six months, maximum follow-up of 48 months), even if acute pancreatitis occurs during follow-up. A secondary benefit of miES may be a reduction in acute pancreatitis frequency, defined as the incidence rate (episodes/time pre- and post-randomization). Since baseline incidence rate is a probable predictor of post-randomization incidence rate, the investigators will compare the incidence rate ratios between the two arms, keeping person-time equal between the pre/post periods. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient must consent to be in the study and must have signed and dated an approved consent form.
>18 years
Two or more episodes of acute pancreatitis, with each episode meeting two of the following three criteria:
At least one episode of acute pancreatitis within 24 months of enrollment
Pancreas divisum confirmed by prior MRCP that is reviewed by an abdominal radiologist at the recruiting site.
By physician assessment, there is no certain explanation for recurrent acute pancreatitis.
Subjects must be able to fully understand and participate in all aspects of the study, including completion of questionnaires and telephone interviews, in the opinion of the clinical investigator
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gregory A Cote, MD, MS | Oregon Health and Science University | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences | Little Rock | Arkansas | 72205 | United States | ||
| Keck Hospital of USC |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 31404020 | Background | Cote GA, Durkalski-Mauldin VL, Serrano J, Klintworth E, Williams AW, Cruz-Monserrate Z, Arain M, Buxbaum JL, Conwell DL, Fogel EL, Freeman ML, Gardner TB, van Geenen E, Groce JR, Jonnalagadda SS, Keswani RN, Menon S, Moffatt DC, Papachristou GI, Ross A, Tarnasky PR, Wang AY, Wilcox CM, Hamilton F, Yadav D; SHARP Consortium. SpHincterotomy for Acute Recurrent Pancreatitis Randomized Trial: Rationale, Methodology, and Potential Implications. Pancreas. 2019 Sep;48(8):1061-1067. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001370. | |
| 36585282 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | EUS + Sham | Subjects randomized to EUS + sham will undergo a diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) under sedation. The physician investigator will not make any attempts to achieve minor papilla cannulation, but photo document the minor papilla using a duodenoscope. Diluted dye will be injected into the duodenum. A small caliber prophylactic pancreatic duct stent will be deposited into the duodenal lumen. These maneuvers are performed to minimize the risk of unmasking. EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | May 5, 2022 |
Subjects will be randomized 1:1 to either EUS+sham or EUS+ERCP with miES.
Not provided
Not provided
In addition to the participant and the investigator assessing outcomes, study coordinators involved in collecting outcomes data will be masked to the treatment assignment.
| EUS | Procedure | Endoscopic ultrasound |
|
| Incidence rate will be assessed starting 30 days after treatment through a maximum follow-up of 48 months. |
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| 90033 |
| United States |
| Cedars-Sinai | Los Angeles | California | 90048 | United States |
| UCSF Medical Center | San Francisco | California | 94143 | United States |
| Yale School of Medicine | New Haven | Connecticut | 06520 | United States |
| Emory University Hospital | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Northwestern University | Chicago | Illinois | 60611 | United States |
| Indiana University | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States |
| Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02215 | United States |
| University of Minnesota | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55455 | United States |
| Saint Luke's Hospital System | Kansas City | Missouri | 64111 | United States |
| Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | Lebanon | New Hampshire | 03756 | United States |
| University of Rochester | Rochester | New York | 14627 | United States |
| The Ohio State University - Wexner Medical Center | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
| Oregon Health and Science University | Portland | Oregon | 97202 | United States |
| University of Pittsburgh Medical Center | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29407 | United States |
| Methodist Dallas Medical Center | Dallas | Texas | 75203 | United States |
| University of Virginia | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22908 | United States |
| Virginia Mason Hospital & Seattle Medical Center | Seattle | Washington | 98101 | United States |
| Health Sciences Centre | Winnipeg | Manitoba | R3A 1R9 | Canada |
| Background |
| Cote GA, Durkalski-Mauldin V, Williams A, Nitchie H, Serrano J, Yadav D; SHARP Consortium. Design and execution of sham-controlled endoscopic trials in acute pancreatitis: Lessons learned from the SHARP trial. Pancreatology. 2023 Mar;23(2):187-191. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.12.011. Epub 2022 Dec 21. |
| 41533371 | Derived | Cote GA, Durkalski-Mauldin V, Fogel EL, Moffatt DC, Wang AY, Lara LF, Tarnasky PR, Buxbaum JL, Dai SC, Jonnalagadda S, Willingham FF, Ross A, Keswani RN, Inamdar S, Kothari TH, Gardner TB, Jamidar PA, Gaddam S, Pleskow DK, Easler JJ, Elmunzer BJ, Coneys JG, Mallery JS, Strand DS, Papachristou GI, Slivka A, Kedia P, Sahakian AB, Kouanda A, Phan A, Williams A, Andersen DK, Serrano J, Yadav D; SHARP Consortium. Minor Papillotomy for Treatment of Idiopathic Acute Pancreatitis With Pancreas Divisum: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2026 Feb 24;335(8):682-692. doi: 10.1001/jama.2025.23988. |
| FG001 | EUS + ERCP With miES | Subjects randomized to EUS + ERCP with miES will undergo the procedure at the same time as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), under sedation. Indomethacin (100 mg) will be administered rectally at the onset of the ERCP procedure in patients with no known allergy to indomethacin. The techniques used to perform the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)with miES (minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy) will be left to the discretion of the study endoscopist. The extent of sphincterotomy will be per the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Unless methylene blue (or similar chromoendoscopy agent such as indigo carmine) has already been used to facilitate minor papilla cannulation, diluted dye will be injected into the duodenum. ERCP with miES: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | EUS + Sham | Subjects randomized to EUS + sham will undergo a diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) under sedation. The physician investigator will not make any attempts to achieve minor papilla cannulation, but photo document the minor papilla using a duodenoscope. Diluted dye will be injected into the duodenum. A small caliber prophylactic pancreatic duct stent will be deposited into the duodenal lumen. These maneuvers are performed to minimize the risk of unmasking. EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound |
| BG001 | EUS + ERCP With miES | Subjects randomized to EUS + ERCP with miES will undergo the procedure at the same time as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), under sedation. Indomethacin (100 mg) will be administered rectally at the onset of the ERCP procedure in patients with no known allergy to indomethacin. The techniques used to perform the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)with miES (minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy) will be left to the discretion of the study endoscopist. The extent of sphincterotomy will be per the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Unless methylene blue (or similar chromoendoscopy agent such as indigo carmine) has already been used to facilitate minor papilla cannulation, diluted dye will be injected into the duodenum. ERCP with miES: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Inter-Quartile Range | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Reduce the Risk of Subsequent Acute Pancreatitis Episodes by 33% | To test this aim, compare the incidence of acute pancreatitis > 30 days after treatment allocation as the primary outcome measure, using the next attack of acute pancreatitis as a time-to-event outcome. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | This is a time-to-event outcome that is assessed starting 30 days after treatment through a maximum follow-up of 48 months. |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | To Compare the Incidence Rate Ratio of Acute Pancreatitis Between Treatment Groups | All randomized subjects will be followed longitudinally until study completion (minimum follow-up of six months, maximum follow-up of 48 months), even if acute pancreatitis occurs during follow-up. A secondary benefit of miES may be a reduction in acute pancreatitis frequency, defined as the incidence rate (episodes/time pre- and post-randomization). Since baseline incidence rate is a probable predictor of post-randomization incidence rate, the investigators will compare the incidence rate ratios between the two arms, keeping person-time equal between the pre/post periods. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Incidence rate ratio | Incidence rate will be assessed starting 30 days after treatment through a maximum follow-up of 48 months. |
|
Serious adverse events were collected from randomization through the end of the 48-month study period. Non-serious adverse events were collected from randomization through Day 30.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | EUS + Sham | Subjects randomized to EUS + sham will undergo a diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) under sedation. The physician investigator will not make any attempts to achieve minor papilla cannulation, but photo document the minor papilla using a duodenoscope. Diluted dye will be injected into the duodenum. A small caliber prophylactic pancreatic duct stent will be deposited into the duodenal lumen. These maneuvers are performed to minimize the risk of unmasking. EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound | 3 | 73 | 48 | 73 | 8 | 73 |
| EG001 | EUS + ERCP With miES | Subjects randomized to EUS + ERCP with miES will undergo the procedure at the same time as endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), under sedation. Indomethacin (100 mg) will be administered rectally at the onset of the ERCP procedure in patients with no known allergy to indomethacin. The techniques used to perform the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)with miES (minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy) will be left to the discretion of the study endoscopist. The extent of sphincterotomy will be per the discretion of the treating endoscopist. Unless methylene blue (or similar chromoendoscopy agent such as indigo carmine) has already been used to facilitate minor papilla cannulation, diluted dye will be injected into the duodenum. ERCP with miES: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with minor papilla endoscopic sphincterotomy EUS: Endoscopic ultrasound | 2 | 75 | 48 | 75 | 15 | 75 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Missing | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiogenic shock | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Palpitations | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abdominal hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Autoimmune colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Crohn's disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Diverticulum intestinal | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Enteritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastric perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastric ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Impaired gastric emptying | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Obstruction gastric | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pancreatitis acute | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Chest pain | General disorders and administration site conditions | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Death | General disorders and administration site conditions | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sudden cardiac death | General disorders and administration site conditions | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Acute hepatic failure | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Bile duct stone | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hepatitis alcoholic | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Jaundice | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Clostridium difficile colitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Clostridium difficile infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Corona virus infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cystitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumonia legionella | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Post procedural infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pyelonephritis acute | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urosepsis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Alcohol poisoning | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cervical vertebral fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Clavicle fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Multiple fractures | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Procedural nausea | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Adult failure to thrive | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Flank pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Adenocarcinoma pancreas | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Migraine | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Presyncope | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abortion spontaneous | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Delivery | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pregnancy | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Threatened labour | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Alcohol withdrawal syndrom | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Alcohol withdrawal syndrome | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Delirium | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Hallucinations, mixed | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Major depression | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Suicidal ideation | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Suicide attempt | Psychiatric disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Acute kidney injury | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| End stage renal disease | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Interstitial lung disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiac pacemaker insertion | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pituitary tumour removal | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Spinal laminectomy | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Orthostatic hypotension | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Missing | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Small intestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pyrexia | General disorders and administration site conditions | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Folliculitis | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Post procedural constipation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Eczema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory Cote | Oregon Health and Science University | 503-494-4373 | coteg@ohsu.edu |
| Jul 2, 2025 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010195 | Pancreatitis |
| D000092142 | Pancreas Divisum |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010182 | Pancreatic Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D004065 | Digestive System Abnormalities |
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002760 | Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002758 | Cholangiography |
| D011860 | Radiography, Abdominal |
| D011859 | Radiography |
| D003952 | Diagnostic Imaging |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D003938 | Diagnostic Techniques, Digestive System |
| D016145 | Endoscopy, Digestive System |
| D004724 | Endoscopy |
| D003949 | Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical |
| D013505 | Digestive System Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D019060 | Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
|