A Study to Evaluate Upadacitinib in Adolescents and Adult... | NCT03607422 | Trialant
NCT03607422
Sponsor
AbbVie
Status
Completed
Last Update Posted
Jun 2, 2026Actual
Enrollment
912Actual
Phase
Phase 3
Conditions
Atopic Dermatitis
Interventions
Placebo for Upadacitinib
Upadacitinib
Countries
United States
Australia
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Canada
Croatia
Czechia
Denmark
France
Germany
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Netherlands
New Zealand
Portugal
Singapore
South Korea
Spain
Taiwan
United Kingdom
Protocol Section
Identification Module
NCT ID
NCT03607422
Obsolete or Duplicate NCT IDs
Not provided
Organization Study
M18-891
Secondary IDs
ID
Type
Description
Link
2022-502936-38-00
Other Identifier
EU CT
Brief Title
A Study to Evaluate Upadacitinib in Adolescents and Adults With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (Measure Up 2)
Official Title
A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study to Evaluate Upadacitinib in Adolescent and Adult Subjects With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis
Acronym
Not provided
Organization
AbbVieINDUSTRY
Status Module
Record Verification Date
May 2026
Overall Recruitment Status or Expanded Access Status
Completed
Last Known Status
Not provided
Delayed Posting
Not provided
Why Stopped
Not provided
Expanded Access Info
YesNCT04159597Available
Start Date
Jul 27, 2018Actual
Primary Completion Date
Mar 11, 2021Actual
Completion Date
Nov 11, 2025Actual
First Submitted Date
Jul 25, 2018
First Submission Date that Met QC Criteria
Jul 25, 2018
First Posted Date
Jul 31, 2018Actual
Results Waived
Not provided
Results First Submitted Date
Mar 1, 2022
Results First Submitted that Met QC Criteria
Mar 1, 2022
Results First Posted Date
Mar 28, 2022Actual
Certification/Extension (aka Delayed Results) First Submitted Date
Not provided
Certification/Extension First Submitted that Passed QC Review
Not provided
Certification/Extension First Posted Date
Not provided
Last Update Submitted Date
May 6, 2026
Last Update Posted Date
Jun 2, 2026Actual
Sponsor/Collaborators Module
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Lead Sponsor
AbbVieINDUSTRY
Collaborators
Not provided
Oversight Module
Has Data Monitoring Committee (DMC)
Yes
Is FDA Regulated Drug
Yes
Is FDA Regulated Device
No
Is Unapproved Device
Not provided
Pediatric Postmarket Surveillance of a Device Product
Not provided
Product Exported from US
No
FDAAA801 Violation
Not provided
Description Module
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of upadacitinib for the treatment of adolescent and adult participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) who are candidates for systemic therapy.
Detailed Description
This study includes a 35-day screening period, a 16-week double-blind period, a blinded extension period up to Week 260, and a 30-day follow-up visit.
Participants who meet eligibility criteria in the main study will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive a daily oral dose of upadacitinib 30 mg or upadacitinib 15 mg or matching placebo. Upon completion of enrollment of a minimum of 810 participants in the main study, a supplemental study will continue to enroll adolescents (adolescent sub-study) until a total of 180 adolescent participants are enrolled overall (main study + adolescent sub-study).
Randomization in the main study will be stratified by baseline disease severity (validated Investigator Global Assessment scale for Atopic Dermatitis [vIGA-AD] score of moderate [3] versus severe [4]), by geographic region (United States [US]/Puerto Rico/Canada, and Other), and by age (adolescent [ages 12 to 17] versus adult [ages 18 to 75]). The separate randomization for the adolescent sub-study will be stratified by baseline disease severity (moderate [vIGA-AD = 3] vs. severe [vIGA-AD = 4]) and by geographic region (US/Puerto Rico/Canada and Other).
At Week 16 of the main study and the adolescent sub-study, participants in the placebo group will be re-randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive daily oral doses of upadacitinib 30 mg or upadacitinib 15 mg in the blinded extension period. In the main study the re-randomization at Week 16 will be stratified by Week 16 50% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI 50] responder [Yes/No], geographic region [US/Puerto Rico/Canada, and other], and age group [adolescent/adult]. For the adolescent sub-study, the re-randomization will be stratified by EASI 50 responder (Yes/No) and by geographic region (US/Puerto Rico/Canada and Other). Participants originally randomized to upadacitinib will continue upadacitinib in the extension period at the same dose.
Starting at the Week 4 visit, rescue treatment for AD may be provided at the discretion of the investigator if medically necessary.
The Primary Analysis for the main study will be conducted after all ongoing participants have completed Week 16. In addition, a Primary Analysis for the adolescent population (including the adolescent participants from the main study and the adolescent sub-study) will be conducted after all ongoing adolescent participants have completed Week 16.
Conditions Module
Conditions
Atopic Dermatitis
Keywords
Atopic Dermatitis
Upadacitinib
ABT-494
Measure Up 2
Design Module
Study Type
Interventional
Number of References to an Expanded Access Study
Not provided
Expanded Access Types
Not provided
Patient Registry
Not provided
Target Follow-Up Duration
Not provided
Phases
Phase 3
Interventional Study Design
Allocation
Biospecimen
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Enrollment
912Actual
Arms/Interventions Module
Arm Groups
Label
Type
Description
Intervention Names
Placebo / Upadacitinib
Placebo Comparator
Participants will receive placebo orally once a day (QD) for 16 weeks in the double-blind treatment period. At Week 16, participants will be re-randomized to receive either upadacitinib 15 mg or upadacitinib 30 mg QD up to Week 260.
Drug: Placebo for Upadacitinib
Drug: Upadacitinib
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Experimental
Participants will receive upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for up to 260 weeks.
Drug: Upadacitinib
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Experimental
Participants will receive upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for up to 260 weeks.
Drug: Upadacitinib
Interventions
Name
Type
Description
Arm Group Labels
Other Names
Placebo for Upadacitinib
Drug
Tablets taken orally once a day
Placebo / Upadacitinib
Outcomes Module
Primary Outcomes
Measure
Description
Time Frame
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI 75) From Baseline at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/ neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) of 0 or 1 With a Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 16
The vIGA-AD is a validated assessment instrument to rate the severity of atopic dermatitis globally, based on the following scale:
0 - Clear: No inflammatory signs of AD;
1 - Almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, no oozing or crusting;
2 - Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification, no oozing or crusting;
3 - Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, oozing or crusting may be present;
4 - Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; Oozing or crusting may be present.
Baseline and Week 16
Secondary Outcomes
Measure
Description
Time Frame
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Other Outcomes
Not provided
Eligibility Module
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Body weight of ≥ 40 kg at Baseline Visit for participants ≥ 12 and < 18 years of age
Chronic atopic dermatitis (AD) with onset of symptoms at least 3 years prior to Baseline and subject meets Hanifin and Rajka criteria
Active moderate to severe AD defined by Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) ≥ 16, validated Investigator's Global Assessment (vIGA) ≥ 3, body surface area (BSA) affected by AD ≥ 10%, and weekly average of daily Worst Pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) score ≥ 4.
Candidate for systemic therapy or have recently required systemic therapy for AD
Documented history (within 6 months prior to Baseline) of inadequate response to topical corticosteroid (TCS) or topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCI) or documented systemic treatment for AD or for whom topical treatments are otherwise medically inadvisable due to side effects or safety risks
Exclusion Criteria:
Prior exposure to any Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor
Unable or unwilling to discontinue current AD treatments prior to the study
Requirement of prohibited medications during the study
Other active skin diseases or skin infections requiring systemic treatment or would interfere with appropriate assessment of atopic dermatitis lesions
Female subject who is pregnant, breastfeeding, or considering pregnancy during the study
Eyerich K, Mendes-Bastos P, Holzer G, Jain V, Katoh N, Luna PC, Segura PC, Lane M, Grada A, Moreira A, Bunick CG. Efficacy of Upadacitinib in Patients with Atopic Dermatitis of the Head and Neck Region. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2026 Jul;16(7):3461-3477. doi: 10.1007/s13555-026-01793-z. Epub 2026 May 24.
AbbVie is committed to responsible clinical trial data sharing. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information.
Participants were randomized equally into 1 of 3 treatment groups, stratified by disease severity (validated Investigator Global Assessment Scale for Atopic Dermatitis [vIGA-AD] moderate [3] vs severe [4]), geographic region (US/Puerto Rico/Canada vs Other), and age (adolescent [ages 12 to 17] vs adult [ages 18 to 75]). Randomization for the adolescent substudy was stratified by disease severity (vIGA-AD 3 vs vIGA-AD 4) and geographic region (US/Puerto Rico/Canada vs Other).
Recruitment Details
Participants were enrolled at 165 study sites in 23 countries across Europe, North America, Oceania, and the Asia-Pacific region.
The study included a 16-week double-blind treatment period followed by a blinded extension period to Week 260, and a 30-day follow-up visit.
836 adults and adolescents were first enrolled in the Main Study; additional adolescents were enrolled in the Adolescent Substudy to ensure enrollment of 180 adolescents overall. All outcome measures were reported at Week 16.
Type of Units Analyzed
Not provided
Arm/Group Information
ID
Title
Description
FG000
Adults: Double-blind Period - Placebo
Participants ≥ 18 years old received placebo orally once a day (QD) for 16 weeks.
FG001
Adults: Double-blind Period - Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 90) at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 4
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 4
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 75 Response at Week 2
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Baseline and Week 2
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 1
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 1
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 2
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11- point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). The percentage of participants who had a 4-point or greater improvement from Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS score at Day 2 was pre-specified as a ranked secondary endpoint for participants in the upadacitinib 30 mg group versus placebo group only.
Baseline and Day 2
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 3
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
The percentage of participants who had a 4-point or greater improvement in Worst Pruritus NRS score from Baseline at Day 3 was pre-specified as a ranked secondary endpoint for participants in the upadacitinib 15 mg group versus placebo group only.
Baseline and Day 3
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Flare During the Double-blind Treatment Period
A flare, characterized as a clinically meaningful worsening in EASI, is defined as an increase in EASI score of ≥ 6.6 points from Baseline during the double-blind treatment period and prior to use of any rescue medication. Flare was assessed in participants with an EASI score of 65.4 or less at Baseline.
From first dose of study drug to Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 12 Points From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS) Sleep Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
The ADerm-IS sleep domain consists of 3 questions designed to assess the impact of AD on sleep on a daily basis over a 24-hour recall period. The items include difficulty falling asleep, impact on sleep, and waking at night. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain score is the sum of the 3 item scores and ranges from 0 (no impact) to 30 (worst impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS sleep domain score is 12.
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS) Skin Pain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-SS is an 11-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that patients may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. For the skin pain item participants were asked on a daily basis to indicate how bad their worst skin pain due to AD was in the past 24 hours on an NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The ADerm-SS skin pain score was analyzed using weekly rolling averages of daily scores. The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS skin pain score is 4.
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 28 Points From Baseline in ADerm-SS 7-Item Total Symptom Score (TSS-7) at Week 16
The ADerm-SS is an 11-item questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that participants may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. The 7-item total symptom score includes 7 symptoms (items 1-7 of the ADerm-SS), each assessed on a NRS from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 7 symptoms included in the score are itch while asleep, itch while awake, skin pain (each assessed daily), skin cracking, skin cracking pain, dry skin, and skin flaking (assessed weekly). The TSS-7 score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating worsening symptoms. The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS TSS-7 is 28.
Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 11 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Emotional State Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
ADerm-IS emotional state sums three items [Items 8-10] measuring self-consciousness, embarrassment, and sadness with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The emotional state domain score ranges from 0 to 30, where higher scores represent worst impact.
The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS emotional state domain score is 11.
Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 14 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Daily Activities Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
ADerm-IS Daily Activities sums four items measuring limitations of household, physical, and social activities, and difficulty concentrating with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The daily activities domain score ranges from 0 to 40, where higher scores represent worst impact.
The minimal clinically important difference for the ADerm-IS daily activities domain score is 14.
Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 100% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 100) at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 16
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1)] moderate [2], or severe [3]) for Redness (erythema, inflammation), Thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), Scratching (excoriation), and Lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Total Score at Week 16
The POEM is a 7-item, validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in both children and adults.
Participants respond to 7 questions, including dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding, and weeping, each scored on a 5-point scale based on frequency of occurrence during the previous week: 0 = no days, 1 = 1 to 2 days, 2 = 3 to 4 days, 3 = 5 to 6 days, and 4 = all days. Item scores are added to provide a total score ranging from 0 (clear) to 28 (very severe atopic eczema). A change in POEM score of 3.4 points is considered the minimal clinically important difference.
Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL.
the DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.
Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 16
SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A) Score and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression (HADS-D) Score of < 8 at Week 16
The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire, with seven items related to anxiety (HADS-A) and seven items related to depression (HADS-D). Each item is scored from 0 to 3; scores for each subscale range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more distress. For each domain, scores 7 or lower are considered normal, 8 to 10 are borderline, and 11 or higher indicate clinical anxiety or depression.
Week 16
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
The DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.
Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 75 Response at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a vIGA-AD of 0 or 1 With a Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 16
The vIGA-AD is a validated assessment instrument to rate the severity of atopic dermatitis globally, based on the following scale:
0 - Clear: No signs of AD;
1 - Almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, no oozing or crusting;;
2 - Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification, no oozing or crusting;
3 - Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, possible oozing or crusting;
4 - Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; possible oozing or crusting.
Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 16
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 90 Response at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 4
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 4
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 75 Response at Week 2
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Baseline and Week 2
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 1
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 1
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 2
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
Baseline and Day 2
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 3
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
Baseline and Day 3
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Flare During the Double-blind Treatment Period
A flare, characterized as a clinically meaningful worsening in EASI, is defined as an increase in EASI score of ≥ 6.6 points from Baseline during the double-blind treatment period and prior to use of any rescue medication. Flares were assessed in participants with an EASI score of 65.4 or less at Baseline.
From first dose of study drug to Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 12 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Sleep Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item patient reported outcome questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
The ADerm-IS sleep domain consists of 3 questions designed to assess the impact of AD on sleep on a daily basis over a 24-hour recall period. The items include difficulty falling asleep, impact on sleep, and waking at night. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain score is the sum of the 3 item scores and ranges from 0 (no impact) to 30 (worst impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS sleep domain score is 12.
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in ADerm-SS Skin Pain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-SS is an 11-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that patients may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. For the skin pain item participants were asked to indicate on a daily basis how bad their worst skin pain due to AD was in the past 24 hours on an NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS skin pain score is 4. The ADerm-SS skin pain score was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 28 Points From Baseline in ADerm-SS TSS-7 at Week 16
The ADerm-SS is an 11-item questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that participants may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. The 7-item total symptom score includes 7 symptoms (items 1-7 of the ADerm-SS), each assessed on a NRS from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 7 symptoms included in the score are itch while asleep, itch while awake, skin pain (each assessed daily), skin cracking, skin cracking pain, dry skin, and skin flaking (assessed weekly). The TSS-7 score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating worsening symptoms. The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS TSS-7 is 28.
Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 11 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Emotional State Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
ADerm-IS emotional state sums three items [Items 8-10] measuring self-consciousness, embarrassment, and sadness with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The emotional state domain score ranges from 0 to 30, where higher scores represent worst impact.
The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS emotional state domain score is 11.
Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 14 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Daily Activities Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
ADerm-IS daily activities sums four items measuring limitations of household, physical, and social activities, and difficulty concentrating with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The daily activities domain score ranges from 0 to 40, where higher scores represent worst impact.
The minimal clinically important difference for the ADerm-IS daily activities domain score is 14.
Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 100 Response at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 100 response is defined as a 100% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percent Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 16
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
Adolescents: Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1)] moderate [2], or severe [3]) for Redness (erythema, inflammation), Thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), Scratching (excoriation), and Lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in POEM Total Score at Week 16
The POEM is a 7-item, validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in both children and adults. Participants respond to 7 questions, including dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding, and weeping, each scored on a 5-point scale based on frequency of occurrence during the previous week: 0 = no days, 1 = 1 to 2 days, 2 = 3 to 4 days, 3 = 5 to 6 days, and 4 = all days. Item scores are added to provide a total score ranging from 0 (clear) to 28 (very severe atopic eczema). A change in POEM score of 3.4 points is considered the minimal clinically important difference.
Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL.
the DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.
Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Score at Week 16
SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving HADS-A Score and HADS-D Score of < 8 at Week 16
The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire, with seven items related to anxiety (HADS-A) and seven items related to depression (HADS-D). Each item is scored from 0 to 3; scores for each subscale range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more distress. For each domain, scores 7 or lower are considered normal, 8 to 10 are borderline, and 11 or higher indicate clinical anxiety or depression.
Week 16
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
the DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.
Week 16
Phoenix
Arizona
85006-2722
United States
Arizona Research Center, Inc. /ID# 205795
Phoenix
Arizona
85053-4061
United States
The Dermatology Clinic of Arkansas /ID# 218749
Bryant
Arkansas
72022-7514
United States
Arkansas Research Trials /ID# 218469
North Little Rock
Arkansas
72117
United States
Encino Research Center /ID# 207472
Encino
California
91436
United States
University of California Irvine /ID# 205136
Irvine
California
92697-1385
United States
Ark Clinical Research /ID# 218193
Long Beach
California
90806-2325
United States
Keck School of Medicine of USC /ID# 206971
Los Angeles
California
90033
United States
Wallace Medical Group /ID# 205701
Los Angeles
California
90056
United States
Child Hosp of Orange County,CA /ID# 205735
Orange
California
92868
United States
Palmtree Clinical Research Inc. /Id# 206184
Palm Springs
California
92262
United States
Rady Children's Hospital San Diego /ID# 208244
San Diego
California
92123
United States
Southern California Derma. Inc /ID# 205734
Santa Ana
California
92701
United States
Innovative Clinical Research - Lafayette /ID# 208400
Lafayette
Colorado
80026
United States
New England Research Associates, LLC /ID# 206896
Bridgeport
Connecticut
06606-1827
United States
Ideal Clinical Research Inc. /ID# 209880
Aventura
Florida
33180
United States
Skin Care Research, LLC /ID# 207099
Boca Raton
Florida
33486-2269
United States
Midflorida Clinical Research, Inc. /ID# 213700
Brandon
Florida
33511-5335
United States
Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc /ID# 206146
Clearwater
Florida
33765
United States
Revival Research /ID# 208383
Doral
Florida
33122-1902
United States
Universal Axon Clinical Research /ID# 213703
Doral
Florida
33166
United States
Lakes Research, LLC /ID# 209156
Miami
Florida
33014
United States
Miami Dade Medical Research Institute /ID# 209413
Miami
Florida
33176
United States
Savin Medical Group, LLC /ID# 206902
Miami Lakes
Florida
33014-2490
United States
Floridian Clinical Research /ID# 207433
Miami Lakes
Florida
33016-1842
United States
Advanced Research for Health Improvement /ID# 217987
Naples
Florida
34102-5430
United States
Advanced Research for Health Improvement /ID# 218003
Naples
Florida
34102-5430
United States
Complete Health Research /ID# 213459
Ormond Beach
Florida
32174-6302
United States
Precision Clinical Research /ID# 207364
Sunrise
Florida
33351-7311
United States
Clinical Research Trials of Florida, Inc. /ID# 206840
Tampa
Florida
33607
United States
ForCare Clinical Research /ID# 205120
Tampa
Florida
33613-1244
United States
Georgia Pollens Clinical Research Centers, Inc /ID# 218567
Albany
Georgia
31707-1282
United States
Marietta Dermatology Clinical Research /ID# 210317
Marietta
Georgia
30060-1047
United States
Agile Clinical Research Trials /ID# 218080
Sandy Springs
Georgia
30342
United States
Treasure Valley Medical Research /ID# 210298
Boise
Idaho
83706
United States
Great Lakes Clinical Trials /ID# 205830
Chicago
Illinois
60640
United States
Ashira Dermatology /ID# 205512
Gurnee
Illinois
60031-3393
United States
Clinical Investigation Specialists, Inc. /ID# 206898
Gurnee
Illinois
60031
United States
Northshore University Health System Dermatology Clinical Trials Unit /ID# 205135
Skokie
Illinois
60077
United States
Raga Clinical Studies, LLC. /ID# 206749
Crown Point
Indiana
46307
United States
Hutchinson Clinic /ID# 205970
Hutchinson
Kansas
67502-1131
United States
Continental Clinical Solutions /ID# 210327
Towson
Maryland
21204
United States
Beacon Clinical Research, LLC /ID# 206894
Quincy
Massachusetts
02169
United States
David Fivenson, MD, PLC /ID# 206903
Ann Arbor
Michigan
48103
United States
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center Michigan Medicine /ID# 206895
Ann Arbor
Michigan
48109
United States
Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Associates, PC /ID# 218169
Lincoln
Nebraska
68505-2343
United States
Skin Specialists, PC /ID# 205515
Omaha
Nebraska
68144
United States
Duplicate_Summit Medical Group /ID# 213863
Clifton
New Jersey
07012-1647
United States
Skin Laser and Surgery Specialists of NY and NJ /ID# 206754
Hackensack
New Jersey
07601-1997
United States
Care Access Research /ID# 218476
Hoboken
New Jersey
07030-2757
United States
University of New Mexico School of Medicine /ID# 206756
Albuquerque
New Mexico
87131-0001
United States
Fordham Dermatology /ID# 218508
The Bronx
New York
10458-5046
United States
PMG Research of Wilmington LLC /ID# 205968
Wilmington
North Carolina
28401
United States
University Hospitals Case Medical Center /ID# 206639
Cleveland
Ohio
44106
United States
Awasty Research Network, LLC /ID# 206748
Marion
Ohio
43302-6225
United States
Southside Dermatology /ID# 214451
Tulsa
Oklahoma
74132
United States
Vital Prospects Clinical Research Institute, PC /ID# 205824
Tulsa
Oklahoma
74136-7049
United States
Cyn3rgy Research /ID# 218064
Gresham
Oregon
97030-8316
United States
Velocity Clinical Research Hallandale Beach /ID# 207544
Medford
Oregon
97504
United States
Clinical Research Solutions, LLC /ID# 218416
Jackson
Tennessee
38305-2163
United States
Stones River Dermatology /ID# 205178
Murfreesboro
Tennessee
37129-3194
United States
Metroplex Dermatology /ID# 213307
Arlington
Texas
76014-3105
United States
Bellaire Dermatology /ID# 205470
Bellaire
Texas
77401
United States
Center for Clinical Studies /ID# 213186
Cypress
Texas
77433
United States
Dermatology Treatment and Research Center, PA /ID# 205473
Dallas
Texas
75230
United States
Epiphany Dermatology - Fort Worth /ID# 210073
Fort Worth
Texas
76244-6548
United States
Styde Research, LLC /ID# 213469
Lewisville
Texas
75067
United States
Austin Institute for Clinical Research /ID# 206640
Pflugerville
Texas
78660
United States
Derm Clin Res Ctr San Antonio /ID# 205469
San Antonio
Texas
78229
United States
EPIC Medical Research /ID# 206382
Murray
Utah
84123-5632
United States
Aspen Clinical Research /ID# 208399
Orem
Utah
84058
United States
Timber Lane Allergy & Asthma Research, LLC /ID# 206897
South Burlington
Vermont
05403-7204
United States
The Education & Research Foundation, Inc. /ID# 206900
Lynchburg
Virginia
24501-1403
United States
Bellingham Asthma Allergy and Immunology Clinic /ID# 210357
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Cagliari- Presidio Ospedaliero /ID# 205168
Cagliari
09124
Italy
Presidio Ospedaliero San Salvatore /ID# 205167
L’Aquila
67100
Italy
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Modena /ID# 205169
Modena
41124
Italy
Bravis Ziekenhuis /ID# 206676
Bergen op Zoom
North Brabant
4624 VT
Netherlands
Centrum Oosterwal /ID# 209640
Alkmaar
1817 MS
Netherlands
Reinier de Graaf /ID# 205811
Delft
2625 AD
Netherlands
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen /ID# 205162
Groningen
9713 GZ
Netherlands
Greenlane Clinical Centre /ID# 205664
Epsom
Auckland
1051
New Zealand
CCA Braga - Hospital de Braga /ID# 205854
Braga
4710-243
Portugal
Centro Hospitalar de Leiria, EPE /ID# 209906
Leiria
2410-197
Portugal
Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte, EPE - Hospital de Santa Maria /ID# 205839
Lisbon
1649-035
Portugal
Hospital CUF Descobertas /ID# 205431
Lisbon
1998-018
Portugal
CHP, EPE- Hospital Geral de Sa /ID# 205187
Porto
4050
Portugal
Centro Hospitalar Universitario de Sao Joao, EPE /ID# 205679
Porto
4200-319
Portugal
National Skin Centre /ID# 205222
Singapore
Central Singapore
308205
Singapore
National University Hospital /ID# 205224
Singapore
119074
Singapore
Singapore General Hospital /ID# 205225
Singapore
169608
Singapore
KK Women's & Children Hospital /ID# 206693
Singapore
229899
Singapore
Changi General Hospital /ID# 205223
Singapore
529889
Singapore
Korea University Ansan Hospital /ID# 206342
Ansan
Gyeonggido
15355
South Korea
SoonChunHyang University Buchon Hospital /ID# 206391
Bucheon-si
Gyeonggido
14584
South Korea
Ajou University Hospital /ID# 206341
Suwon
Gyeonggido
16499
South Korea
The Catholic University of Korea Incheon St.Mary's Hospital /ID# 206529
Incheon
21431
South Korea
Seoul National University Hospital /ID# 206396
Seoul
03080
South Korea
Chung-Ang University Hostipal /ID# 206397
Seoul
06973
South Korea
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital /ID# 206343
Seoul
07441
South Korea
Hospital Sant Joan de Deu /ID# 218047
Esplugues de Llobregat
Barcelona
08950
Spain
Hospital Vital Alvarez Buylla /ID# 205770
Mieres
Principality of Asturias
33611
Spain
Hospital Parc de Salut del Mar /ID# 204709
Barcelona
08003
Spain
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona /ID# 210564
Barcelona
08036
Spain
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia /ID# 204712
Córdoba
14004
Spain
Hospital Campus de la Salud /ID# 205544
Granada
18016
Spain
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon /ID# 204380
Madrid
28007
Spain
Hospital Infantil Universitario Nino Jesus /ID# 210437
Madrid
28009
Spain
Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor /ID# 204710
Madrid
28031
Spain
Hospital General Universitario de Valencia /ID# 210565
Valencia
46014
Spain
Taipei Medical University Shuang Ho Hospital /ID# 204804
New Taipei City
23561
Taiwan
Chung Shan Medical University Hospital /ID# 205092
Taichung
40201
Taiwan
National Taiwan University Hospital /ID# 204803
Taipei
100
Taiwan
Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Ho /ID# 204783
Taoyuan City
333
Taiwan
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust /ID# 205711
Southampton
Hampshire
SO16 6YD
United Kingdom
Northwick Park Hospital /ID# 205250
Middlesex
Harrow
HA1 3UJ
United Kingdom
Barts Health NHS Trust /ID# 206491
London
London, City of
E1 2ES
United Kingdom
The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust /ID# 204993
Newcastle upon Tyne
NE7 7DN
United Kingdom
University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust /ID# 204649
Plymouth
PL6 8DH
United Kingdom
Irvine AD, Prajapati VH, Guttman-Yassky E, Simpson EL, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, Chu CY, Hong HC, Gold LFS, de Bruin-Weller M, Bieber T, Kabashima K, Rosmarin D, Sancho C, Calimlim BM, Grada A, Yang Y, Wu X, Levy G, Raymundo EM, Teixeira HD, Silverberg JI. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial Results Through 140 Weeks. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2025 Nov;26(6):1003-1016. doi: 10.1007/s40257-025-00975-3. Epub 2025 Sep 3.
Silverberg JI, Gooderham M, Katoh N, Aoki V, Pink AE, Binamer Y, Glick B, Staubach P, Calimlim B, Li C, Grada A, Moreira A, Lee WJ, Wollenberg A. Achieving Optimal Treatment Targets and Minimal Disease Activity with Upadacitinib for Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Integrated Analysis of Phase 3 Studies (Measure Up 1 and 2). Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Sep;15(9):2583-2594. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01485-0. Epub 2025 Jul 14.
Simpson EL, Silverberg JI, Prajapati VH, Eyerich K, Katoh N, Boguniewicz M, Guttman-Yassky E, Song EJ, Lee WJ, Teixeira HD, Wu T, Sancho Sanchez C, Vigna N, Calimlim BM, de Bruin-Weller M. Rapid Itch Improvement and Skin Clearance with Upadacitinib Versus Placebo (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2) and Versus Dupilumab (Heads Up): Results from Three Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2025 Aug;15(8):2061-2076. doi: 10.1007/s13555-025-01443-w. Epub 2025 Jun 2.
Paller AS, Mendes-Bastos P, Siegfried E, Eichenfield LF, Soong W, Prajapati VH, Lio P, Simpson EL, Raymundo EM, Suravaram S, Hu X, Yang Y, Huang X, Calimlim BM, Platt AM, Su JC, Zheng M, Yamamoto-Hanada K, Teixeira HD, Irvine AD. Upadacitinib in Adolescents With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of 3 Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials Through 76 Weeks. JAMA Dermatol. 2024 Dec 1;160(12):1304-1313. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.3696.
Blauvelt A, Eyerich K, Irvine AD, de Bruin-Weller M, Kwatra SG, Gooderham M, Kim B, Calimlim BM, Lee WJ, Raymundo EM, Liu Y, Ofori S, Platt AM, Silverberg JI. More Time Spent with Clear Skin and No Itch with Upadacitinib versus Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Sep;14(9):2621-2630. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01242-9. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
Simpson EL, Prajapati VH, Leshem YA, Chovatiya R, de Bruin-Weller MS, Stander S, Pink AE, Calimlim BM, Lee WJ, Teixeira H, Ladizinski B, Hu X, Yang Y, Liu Y, Liu M, Grada A, Platt AM, Silverberg JI. Upadacitinib Rapidly Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in Atopic Dermatitis: 16-Week Results from Phase 3 Clinical Trials (Measure Up 1 and 2). Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 May;14(5):1127-1144. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01157-5. Epub 2024 May 2.
Silverberg JI, Gooderham MJ, Paller AS, Deleuran M, Bunick CG, Gold LFS, Hijnen D, Calimlim BM, Lee WJ, Teixeira HD, Hu X, Zhang S, Yang Y, Grada A, Platt AM, Thaci D. Early and Sustained Improvements in Symptoms and Quality of Life with Upadacitinib in Adults and Adolescents with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: 52-Week Results from Two Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2). Am J Clin Dermatol. 2024 May;25(3):485-496. doi: 10.1007/s40257-024-00853-4. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
Thyssen JP, Thaci D, Bieber T, Gooderham M, de Bruin-Weller M, Soong W, Kabashima K, Barbarot S, Luna PC, Xu J, Hu X, Liu Y, Raymundo EM, Calimlim BM, Nduaka C, Gamelli A, Simpson EL. Upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Stratified analysis from three randomized phase 3 trials by key baseline characteristics. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 Sep;37(9):1871-1880. doi: 10.1111/jdv.19232. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
Paller AS, Ladizinski B, Mendes-Bastos P, Siegfried E, Soong W, Prajapati VH, Lio P, Thyssen JP, Simpson EL, Platt AM, Raymundo EM, Liu J, Calimlim BM, Huang X, Gu Y, Hu X, Yang Y, Su JC, Zheng M, Yamamoto-Hanada K, Teixeira HD, Irvine AD. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib Treatment in Adolescents With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of the Measure Up 1, Measure Up 2, and AD Up Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2023 May 1;159(5):526-535. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.0391.
Mendes-Bastos P, Ladizinski B, Guttman-Yassky E, Jiang P, Liu J, Prajapati VH, Simpson EL, Vigna N, Teixeira HD, Barbarot S. Characterization of acne associated with upadacitinib treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: A post hoc integrated analysis of 3 phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022 Oct;87(4):784-791. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2022.06.012. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
Simpson EL, Papp KA, Blauvelt A, Chu CY, Hong HC, Katoh N, Calimlim BM, Thyssen JP, Chiou AS, Bissonnette R, Stein Gold LF, Wegzyn C, Hu X, Liu M, Liu J, Tenorio AR, Chu AD, Guttman-Yassky E. Efficacy and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Analysis of Follow-up Data From the Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2 Randomized Clinical Trials. JAMA Dermatol. 2022 Apr 1;158(4):404-413. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.0029.
Guttman-Yassky E, Teixeira HD, Simpson EL, Papp KA, Pangan AL, Blauvelt A, Thaci D, Chu CY, Hong HC, Katoh N, Paller AS, Calimlim B, Gu Y, Hu X, Liu M, Yang Y, Liu J, Tenorio AR, Chu AD, Irvine AD. Once-daily upadacitinib versus placebo in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (Measure Up 1 and Measure Up 2): results from two replicate double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials. Lancet. 2021 Jun 5;397(10290):2151-2168. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00588-2. Epub 2021 May 21.
Participants ≥ 18 years old received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
FG002
Adults: Double-blind Period - Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants ≥ 18 years old received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
FG003
Adolescents: Double-blind Period - Placebo
Adolescent participants (12 - 17 years old) received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
FG004
Adolescents: Double-blind Period - Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
FG005
Adolescents: Double-blind Period - Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
FG006
Adults: Blinded Extension Period - PBO/Upadacitinib 15 mg
Adult participants received placebo during the Double-Blind Period then went on to receive upadacitinib 15 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
FG007
Adults: Blinded Extension Period - PBO/Upadacitinib 30 mg
Adult participants received placebo during the Double-Blind Period then went on to receive upadacitinib 30 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
FG008
Adults: Blinded Extension Period - Upadacitinib 15 mg
Adult participants received upadacitinib 15 mg during the Double-Blind Period then continued to receive upadacitinib 15 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
FG009
Adults: Blinded Extension Period - Upadacitinib 30 mg
Adult participants received upadacitinib 30 mg during the Double-Blind Period then continued to receive upadacitinib 30 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
FG010
Adolescents: Blinded Extension Period - PBO/Upadacitinib 15 mg
Adolescent participants received placebo during the Double-Blind Period then went on to receive upadacitinib 15 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
FG011
Adolescents: Blinded Extension Period - PBO/Upadacitinib 30 mg
Adolescent participants received placebo during the Double-Blind Period then went on to receive upadacitinib 30 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
FG012
Adolescents: Blinded Extension Period - Upadacitinib 15 mg
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg during the Double-Blind Period then continued to receive upadacitinib 15 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
FG013
Adolescents: Blinded Extension Period - Upadacitinib 30 mg
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg during the Double-Blind Period then continued to receive upadacitinib 30 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
FG000242 subjects
FG001243 subjects
FG002247 subjects
FG00360 subjects
FG00458 subjects
FG00562 subjects
FG0060 subjects
FG0070 subjects
FG0080 subjects
FG0090 subjects
FG0100 subjects
FG0110 subjects
FG0120 subjects
FG0130 subjects
Included in Week 16 Analysis
FG000204 subjects
FG001233 subjects
FG002235 subjects
FG00355 subjects
FG00455 subjects
FG00559 subjects
FG0060 subjects
FG0070 subjects
FG0080 subjects
FG0090 subjects
FG0100 subjects
FG0110 subjects
FG0120 subjects
FG0130 subjects
COMPLETED
Completed DB Period
FG000210 subjects
FG001233 subjects
FG002236 subjects
FG00355 subjects
FG00455 subjects
FG00560 subjects
FG0060 subjects
FG0070 subjects
FG0080 subjects
FG0090 subjects
FG0100 subjects
FG0110 subjects
FG0120 subjects
FG0130 subjects
NOT COMPLETED
FG00032 subjects
FG00110 subjects
FG00211 subjects
FG0035 subjects
FG0043 subjects
FG0052 subjects
FG0060 subjects
FG0070 subjects
FG0080 subjects
FG0090 subjects
FG0100 subjects
FG0110 subjects
FG0120 subjects
FG0130 subjects
Type
Comment
Reasons
Adverse Event
FG0007 subjects
FG0013 subjects
FG0021 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0042 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG0060 subjects
FG0070 subjects
FG0080 subjects
FG0090 subjects
FG0100 subjects
FG0110 subjects
FG0120 subjects
FG0130 subjects
Withdrawal by Subject
FG00012 subjects
FG0013 subjects
FG0027 subjects
FG0032 subjects
FG004
Lost to Follow-up
FG0001 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0022 subjects
FG0031 subjects
FG004
Other
FG00012 subjects
FG0014 subjects
FG0021 subjects
FG0032 subjects
FG004
Blinded Extension Period
Type
Comment
Milestone Data
STARTED
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG006104 subjects
FG007104 subjects
FG008233 subjects
FG009236 subjects
FG01026 subjects
FG01129 subjects
FG01255 subjects
FG01360 subjects
Received Treatment in the BE Period
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
COMPLETED
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
NOT COMPLETED
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Type
Comment
Reasons
Adverse Event
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG003
All randomized participants
Type of Units Analyzed
Not provided
Arm/Group Information
ID
Title
Description
BG000
Adults: Placebo
Participants ≥ 18 years old received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
BG001
Adults: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants ≥ 18 years old received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
BG002
Adults: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants ≥ 18 years old received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
BG003
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
BG004
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
BG005
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
BG006
Total
Total of all reporting groups
Denominators
Units
Counts
Participants
BG000242
BG001243
BG002247
BG00360
BG00458
BG00562
BG006912
Baseline Measures
Title
Description
Population Description
Parameter Type
Dispersion Type
Unit of Measure
Calculate Percentage
Denominator Units Selected
Denominators
Classes
Age, Continuous
Mean
Standard Deviation
years
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000242
ParticipantsBG001243
ParticipantsBG002247
ParticipantsBG003
Age, Customized
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000242
ParticipantsBG001243
ParticipantsBG002
Sex: Female, Male
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000242
ParticipantsBG001243
ParticipantsBG002
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000242
ParticipantsBG001243
ParticipantsBG002
Race (NIH/OMB)
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000242
ParticipantsBG001243
ParticipantsBG002
Study Enrollment
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000242
ParticipantsBG001243
ParticipantsBG002
Geographic Region
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000242
ParticipantsBG001243
ParticipantsBG002
vIGA-AD
The vIGA-AD was used to assess the severity of AD based on lesion appearance on the following scale:
2-Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification. No oozing or crusting;
3-Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, oozing or crusting may be present;
4-Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, oozing or crusting may be present.
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000242
ParticipantsBG001
Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) Score
EASI is a tool to measure the extent and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the percentage of skin affected, and the severity of eczema (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness, thickness, scratching, and lichenification are assessed. The EASI score is the sum of the scores for each region and ranges from 0 to 72, where higher scores represent worse disease.
Participants with available data
Mean
Standard Deviation
score on a scale
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000241
ParticipantsBG001
Disease Duration since Diagnosis
Participants with available data
Mean
Standard Deviation
years
Title
Denominators
Categories
ParticipantsBG000242
ParticipantsBG001243
ParticipantsBG002
Type
Title
Description
Population Description
Reporting Status
Anticipated Posting Date
Parameter Type
Dispersion Type
Unit of Measure
Calculate Percentage
Time Frame
Units Analyzed
Denominator Units Selected
Arm/Group Information
Denominators
Classes
Analyses
Primary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction in Eczema Area and Severity Index Score (EASI 75) From Baseline at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/ neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
The intent-to-treat population for the main study (ITT_M) includes all participants who were randomized in the main study (adults and adolescents). Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic (COVID-19) (NRI-C) was used.
The pre-specified primary analysis included participants enrolled in the main study only; Efficacy analyses of adolescent participants were conducted separately and are reported below.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000278
OG001276
OG002282
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00013.3(9.3 to 17.3)
OG00160.1(54.4 to 65.9)
OG00272.9(67.7 to 78.2)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
59.6
2-Sided
95
53.1
66.2
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
Primary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) of 0 or 1 With a Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 16
The vIGA-AD is a validated assessment instrument to rate the severity of atopic dermatitis globally, based on the following scale:
0 - Clear: No inflammatory signs of AD;
1 - Almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, no oozing or crusting;
2 - Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification, no oozing or crusting;
3 - Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, oozing or crusting may be present;
4 - Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; Oozing or crusting may be present.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 16
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with Worst Pruritus NRS (weekly average) ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 90% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 90) at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 4
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with Worst Pruritus NRS (weekly average) ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 4
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 75 Response at Week 2
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 2
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 1
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with Worst Pruritus NRS (weekly average) ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 1
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 2
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11- point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). The percentage of participants who had a 4-point or greater improvement from Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS score at Day 2 was pre-specified as a ranked secondary endpoint for participants in the upadacitinib 30 mg group versus placebo group only.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with Worst Pruritus NRS (daily score) ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation with no special data handling for missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-NC) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Day 2
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 3
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
The percentage of participants who had a 4-point or greater improvement in Worst Pruritus NRS score from Baseline at Day 3 was pre-specified as a ranked secondary endpoint for participants in the upadacitinib 15 mg group versus placebo group only.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with Worst Pruritus NRS (daily score) ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation with no special data handling for missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-NC) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Day 3
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Flare During the Double-blind Treatment Period
A flare, characterized as a clinically meaningful worsening in EASI, is defined as an increase in EASI score of ≥ 6.6 points from Baseline during the double-blind treatment period and prior to use of any rescue medication. Flare was assessed in participants with an EASI score of 65.4 or less at Baseline.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with an EASI score ≤ 65.4 at Baseline and at least one EASI post-baseline assessment prior to use of rescue medication.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
From first dose of study drug to Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 12 Points From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Impact Scale (ADerm-IS) Sleep Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item patient reported outcome (PRO) questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
The ADerm-IS sleep domain consists of 3 questions designed to assess the impact of AD on sleep on a daily basis over a 24-hour recall period. The items include difficulty falling asleep, impact on sleep, and waking at night. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain score is the sum of the 3 item scores and ranges from 0 (no impact) to 30 (worst impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS sleep domain score is 12.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with ADerm-IS Sleep Domain score ≥ 12 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Atopic Dermatitis Symptom Scale (ADerm-SS) Skin Pain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-SS is an 11-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that patients may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. For the skin pain item participants were asked on a daily basis to indicate how bad their worst skin pain due to AD was in the past 24 hours on an NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). The ADerm-SS skin pain score was analyzed using weekly rolling averages of daily scores. The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS skin pain score is 4.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with ADerm-SS Skin Pain Score ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 28 Points From Baseline in ADerm-SS 7-Item Total Symptom Score (TSS-7) at Week 16
The ADerm-SS is an 11-item questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that participants may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. The 7-item total symptom score includes 7 symptoms (items 1-7 of the ADerm-SS), each assessed on a NRS from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 7 symptoms included in the score are itch while asleep, itch while awake, skin pain (each assessed daily), skin cracking, skin cracking pain, dry skin, and skin flaking (assessed weekly). The TSS-7 score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating worsening symptoms. The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS TSS-7 is 28.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with ADerm-SS TSS-7 ≥ 28 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 11 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Emotional State Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
ADerm-IS emotional state sums three items [Items 8-10] measuring self-consciousness, embarrassment, and sadness with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The emotional state domain score ranges from 0 to 30, where higher scores represent worst impact.
The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS emotional state domain score is 11.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with ADerm-IS Emotional State domain score ≥ 11 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 14 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Daily Activities Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
ADerm-IS Daily Activities sums four items measuring limitations of household, physical, and social activities, and difficulty concentrating with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The daily activities domain score ranges from 0 to 40, where higher scores represent worst impact.
The minimal clinically important difference for the ADerm-IS daily activities domain score is 14.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with ADerm-IS Daily Activities Domain Score ≥ 14 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a 100% Reduction From Baseline in EASI Score (EASI 100) at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 16
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with non-missing Baseline and Week 16 values; missing data were handled using a mixed-effect model with repeated measurements (MMRM) including observed measurements at all visits, except that measurements after any rescue medication were excluded.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
95% Confidence Interval
percent change
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1)] moderate [2], or severe [3]) for Redness (erythema, inflammation), Thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), Scratching (excoriation), and Lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with non-missing Baseline and Week 16 values; missing data were handled using a mixed-effect model with repeated measurements (MMRM) including observed measurements at all visits, except that measurements after any rescue medication were excluded.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
95% Confidence Interval
percent change
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Total Score at Week 16
The POEM is a 7-item, validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in both children and adults.
Participants respond to 7 questions, including dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding, and weeping, each scored on a 5-point scale based on frequency of occurrence during the previous week: 0 = no days, 1 = 1 to 2 days, 2 = 3 to 4 days, 3 = 5 to 6 days, and 4 = all days. Item scores are added to provide a total score ranging from 0 (clear) to 28 (very severe atopic eczema). A change in POEM score of 3.4 points is considered the minimal clinically important difference.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with POEM score ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) at Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL.
the DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study who were ≥ 16 years old at Screening with DLQI score ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Main Study: Percent Change From Baseline in Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) Score at Week 16
SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with non-missing Baseline and Week 16 values; missing data were handled using a mixed-effect model with repeated measurements (MMRM) including observed measurements at all visits, except that measurements after any rescue medication were excluded.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
95% Confidence Interval
percent change
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A) Score and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression (HADS-D) Score of < 8 at Week 16
The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire, with seven items related to anxiety (HADS-A) and seven items related to depression (HADS-D). Each item is scored from 0 to 3; scores for each subscale range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more distress. For each domain, scores 7 or lower are considered normal, 8 to 10 are borderline, and 11 or higher indicate clinical anxiety or depression.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study with HADS-A ≥ 8 or HADS-D ≥ 8 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Main Study: Percentage of Participants Achieving a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
The DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.
Intent-to-treat population for the main study who were ≥ 16 years old at Screening with DLQI score > 1 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 75 Response at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
The ITT population for adolescents (ITT_A) consists of all adolescent participants who were randomized in the main study or the adolescent sub-study. Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a vIGA-AD of 0 or 1 With a Reduction From Baseline of ≥ 2 Points at Week 16
The vIGA-AD is a validated assessment instrument to rate the severity of atopic dermatitis globally, based on the following scale:
0 - Clear: No signs of AD;
1 - Almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, no oozing or crusting;;
2 - Mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification, no oozing or crusting;
3 - Moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, possible oozing or crusting;
4 - Severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; possible oozing or crusting.
The ITT population for adolescents; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 16
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with Worst Pruritus NRS (weekly average) ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 90 Response at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 90 response is defined as at least a 90% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 4
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with Worst Pruritus NRS (weekly average) ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 4
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 75 Response at Week 2
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 75 response is defined as at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
The ITT population for adolescents; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 2
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 1
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with Worst Pruritus NRS (weekly average) ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 1
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 2
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with Worst Pruritus NRS (daily score) ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation with no special data handling for missing data due to COVID-19 was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Day 2
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Day 3
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch).
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with Worst Pruritus NRS (daily score) ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation with no special data handling for missing data due to COVID-19 was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Day 3
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Experiencing a Flare During the Double-blind Treatment Period
A flare, characterized as a clinically meaningful worsening in EASI, is defined as an increase in EASI score of ≥ 6.6 points from Baseline during the double-blind treatment period and prior to use of any rescue medication. Flares were assessed in participants with an EASI score of 65.4 or less at Baseline.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with an EASI score ≤ 65.4 at Baseline and at least one EASI post-baseline assessment prior to use of rescue medication.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
From first dose of study drug to Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 12 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Sleep Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item patient reported outcome questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
The ADerm-IS sleep domain consists of 3 questions designed to assess the impact of AD on sleep on a daily basis over a 24-hour recall period. The items include difficulty falling asleep, impact on sleep, and waking at night. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain score is the sum of the 3 item scores and ranges from 0 (no impact) to 30 (worst impact). The ADerm-IS sleep domain was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS sleep domain score is 12.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with ADerm-IS Sleep Domain score ≥ 12 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in ADerm-SS Skin Pain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-SS is an 11-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that patients may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. For the skin pain item participants were asked to indicate on a daily basis how bad their worst skin pain due to AD was in the past 24 hours on an NRS from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain).
The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS skin pain score is 4. The ADerm-SS skin pain score was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with ADerm-SS Skin Pain score ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 28 Points From Baseline in ADerm-SS TSS-7 at Week 16
The ADerm-SS is an 11-item questionnaire designed to assess signs and symptoms that participants may experience due to AD using a 24-hour recall period. The 7-item total symptom score includes 7 symptoms (items 1-7 of the ADerm-SS), each assessed on a NRS from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst imaginable). The 7 symptoms included in the score are itch while asleep, itch while awake, skin pain (each assessed daily), skin cracking, skin cracking pain, dry skin, and skin flaking (assessed weekly). The TSS-7 score ranges from 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating worsening symptoms. The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-SS TSS-7 is 28.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with ADerm-SS TSS-7 ≥ 28 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 11 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Emotional State Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
ADerm-IS emotional state sums three items [Items 8-10] measuring self-consciousness, embarrassment, and sadness with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The emotional state domain score ranges from 0 to 30, where higher scores represent worst impact.
The minimal clinically important difference for ADerm-IS emotional state domain score is 11.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with ADerm-IS Emotional State Domain score ≥ 11 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 14 Points From Baseline in ADerm-IS Daily Activities Domain Score at Week 16
The ADerm-IS is a 10-item PRO questionnaire designed to assess a variety of impacts that participants experience from their AD.
ADerm-IS daily activities sums four items measuring limitations of household, physical, and social activities, and difficulty concentrating with a 7-day recall. Each question is scored on an 11-point NRS from 0 (no impact) to 10 (extreme impact). The daily activities domain score ranges from 0 to 40, where higher scores represent worst impact.
The minimal clinically important difference for the ADerm-IS daily activities domain score is 14.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with ADerm-IS Daily Activities Domain Score ≥ 14 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving an EASI 100 Response at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1], moderate [2], or severe [3]) for redness (erythema, inflammation), thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), scratching (excoriation), and lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease.
An EASI 100 response is defined as a 100% reduction (improvement) from Baseline in EASI score.
The ITT population for adolescents; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Secondary
Adolescents: Percent Change From Baseline in Worst Pruritus NRS at Week 16
Participants were asked to rate itch (pruritus) intensity at its worst during the past 24 hours on a daily basis using an 11-point scale from 0 (no itch) to 10 (worst imaginable itch). Worst Pruritus NRS was analyzed based on weekly rolling averages of daily scores. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with non-missing Baseline and Week 16 values; missing data were handled using a mixed-effect model with repeated measurements including observed measurements at all visits, except that measurements after any rescue medication were excluded.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
95% Confidence Interval
percent change
Baseline (last available rolling average before the first dose of study drug) and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Adolescents: Percent Change From Baseline in EASI Score at Week 16
EASI is a tool used to measure the extent (area) and severity of atopic eczema based on assessments of the head/neck, trunk, upper limbs and lower limbs. For each region the area score is recorded as the percentage of skin affected by eczema. For each region, the severity score is calculated as the sum of the intensity scores (scored as none [0], mild [1)] moderate [2], or severe [3]) for Redness (erythema, inflammation), Thickness (induration, papulation, swelling - acute eczema), Scratching (excoriation), and Lichenification (lined skin, prurigo nodules - chronic eczema).
The total EASI score for each region is calculated by multiplying the severity score by the area score, with adjustment for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The final EASI score is the sum of the 4 region scores and ranges from 0 to 72 where higher scores represent worse disease; a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with non-missing Baseline and Week 16 values; missing data were handled using a mixed-effect model with repeated measurements including observed measurements at all visits, except that measurements after any rescue medication were excluded.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
95% Confidence Interval
percent change
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in POEM Total Score at Week 16
The POEM is a 7-item, validated questionnaire used to assess disease symptoms in both children and adults. Participants respond to 7 questions, including dryness, itching, flaking, cracking, sleep loss, bleeding, and weeping, each scored on a 5-point scale based on frequency of occurrence during the previous week: 0 = no days, 1 = 1 to 2 days, 2 = 3 to 4 days, 3 = 5 to 6 days, and 4 = all days. Item scores are added to provide a total score ranging from 0 (clear) to 28 (very severe atopic eczema). A change in POEM score of 3.4 points is considered the minimal clinically important difference.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with POEM score ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 4 Points From Baseline in DLQI Score at Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL.
the DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents who were ≥ 16 years old at Screening with DLQI score ≥ 4 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Adolescents: Percent Change From Baseline in SCORAD Score at Week 16
SCORAD is a clinical tool used to assess the extent and severity of eczema (SCORing Atopic Dermatitis). The extent is assessed using the rule of 9 to calculate the affected area (A) as a percentage of the whole body (0-100%). The intensity part of the SCORAD (B) consists of 6 items: erythema, oedema/papulation, excoriations, lichenification, oozing/crusts and dryness, each graded on a scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe), for a total score of 0 to 18. Subjective items (C) include daily pruritus and sleeplessness, each scored on a visual analogue scale (VAS) from 0 to 10 (total score 0-20). SCORAD is calculated as A/5 + 7B/2 + C, and ranges from 0 to 103 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with non-missing Baseline and Week 16 values; missing data were handled using a mixed-effect model with repeated measurements including observed measurements at all visits, except that measurements after any rescue medication were excluded.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
95% Confidence Interval
percent change
Baseline and Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving HADS-A Score and HADS-D Score of < 8 at Week 16
The HADS is a 14-item questionnaire, with seven items related to anxiety (HADS-A) and seven items related to depression (HADS-D). Each item is scored from 0 to 3; scores for each subscale range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating more distress. For each domain, scores 7 or lower are considered normal, 8 to 10 are borderline, and 11 or higher indicate clinical anxiety or depression.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents with HADS-A ≥ 8 or HADS-D ≥ 8 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Secondary
Adolescents: Percentage of Participants Achieving a DLQI Score of 0 or 1 at Week 16
The DLQI is a 10-item validated questionnaire used to assess the impact of AD disease symptoms and treatment on quality of life (QoL). It consists of 10 questions evaluating impact of skin diseases on different aspects of a participant's QoL over the prior week, including symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school, personal relationships, and the side effects of treatment. Each item is scored on a 4-point scale (0 = not at all/not relevant; 1 = a little; 2 = a lot; and 3 = very much).
Item scores are added to provide a total score, ranging from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater impairment of QoL. A score of 0 or 1 means that the disease has no effect at all.
the DLQI was administered to participants who were ≥ 16 (16 to 75) years old at the time of the Screening visit.
Intent-to-treat population for adolescents who were ≥ 16 years old at Screening with DLQI score > 1 at Baseline; Non-responder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19 (NRI-C) was used.
Posted
Number
95% Confidence Interval
percentage of participants
Week 16
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Adolescents: Placebo
Adolescent participants received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG001
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Time Frame
All-cause mortality and adverse event tables include events reported from enrollment to the end of the study. The median time followed ranged from 132 days to 137 days for the double-blind period and from 1234 days to 1713 days for the blinded extension period.
Description
Four participants in the UPA 15mg (Adults) group; one participant in UPA 30mg (Adults) group; and 1 participant in the UPA 30mg (Adolescents) group never received any study drug after they entered the Blinded Extension Period. All adverse events for these 6 participants occurred within 30 days of their last dose in the Double-blind Period and are reported in their respective groups in the Double-blind Period.
All-Cause Mortality Comment
Not provided
Arm/Groups
ID
Title
Description
Deaths (Affected)
Deaths (At Risk)
Serious Events (Affected)
Serious Events (At Risk)
Other Events (Affected)
Other Events (At Risk)
EG000
Adults: Double-blind Period - Placebo
Participants ≥ 18 years old received placebo orally once a day (QD) for 16 weeks.
0
242
7
242
93
242
EG001
Adults: Double-blind Period - Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Participants ≥ 18 years old received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
0
243
3
243
117
243
EG002
Adults: Double-blind Period - Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants ≥ 18 years old received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
0
247
7
247
126
247
EG003
Adolescents: Double-blind Period - Placebo
Adolescent participants (12 - 17 years old) received placebo orally once a day for 16 weeks.
0
60
3
60
19
60
EG004
Adolescents: Double-blind Period - Upadacitinib 15 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
0
58
2
58
26
58
EG005
Adolescents: Double-blind Period - Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
0
62
0
62
33
62
EG006
Adults: Blinded Extension Period - Upadacitinib 15 mg
Adult participants received upadacitinib 15 mg during the Double-Blind Period then continued to receive upadacitinib 15 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
1
229
38
229
180
229
EG007
Adults: Blinded Extension Period - Upadacitinib 30 mg
Adult participants received upadacitinib 30 mg during the Double-Blind Period then continued to receive upadacitinib 30 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
1
235
41
235
186
235
EG008
Adolescents: Blinded Extension Period - Upadacitinib 15 mg
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg during the Double-Blind Period then continued to receive upadacitinib 15 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
0
55
6
55
38
55
EG009
Adolescents: Blinded Extension Period - Upadacitinib 30 mg
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg during the Double-Blind Period then continued to receive upadacitinib 30 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
0
59
10
59
46
59
EG010
Adults: Blinded Extension Period - PBO/Upadacitinib 15 mg
Adult participants received placebo during the Double-Blind Period then went on to receive upadacitinib 15 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit
1
104
11
104
78
104
EG011
Adults: Blinded Extension Period - PBO/Upadacitinib 30 mg
Adult participants received placebo during the Double-Blind Period then went on to receive upadacitinib 30 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
0
104
18
104
80
104
EG012
Adolescents: Blinded Extension Period - PBO/Upadacitinib 15 mg
Adolescent participants received placebo during the Double-Blind Period then went on to receive upadacitinib 15 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
0
26
4
26
19
26
EG013
Adolescents: Blinded Extension Period - PBO/Upadacitinib 30 mg
Adolescent participants received placebo during the Double-Blind Period then went on to receive upadacitinib 30 mg up to week 260 during the Blinded Extension Period, followed by a 30-day follow-up visit.
0
29
4
29
23
29
Serious Adverse Events
Term
Organ System
Source Vocabulary
Assessment Type
Notes
Statistical Information
SPLENIC HAEMATOMA
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG0030 events0 affected60 at risk
EG0040 events0 affected58 at risk
EG0050 events0 affected62 at risk
EG0060 events0 affected229 at risk
EG0070 events0 affected235 at risk
EG0080 events0 affected55 at risk
EG0090 events0 affected59 at risk
EG0100 events0 affected104 at risk
EG0111 events1 affected104 at risk
EG0120 events0 affected26 at risk
EG0130 events0 affected29 at risk
ACUTE LEFT VENTRICULAR FAILURE
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
CARDIAC ARREST
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
CARDIAC FAILURE
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
CARDIAC VENTRICULAR THROMBOSIS
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
LEFT VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
SINUS BRADYCARDIA
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
SUPRAVENTRICULAR TACHYCARDIA
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
CONGENITAL MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDER OF SKULL
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
CATARACT
Eye disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
CORNEAL PERFORATION
Eye disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
DACRYOSTENOSIS ACQUIRED
Eye disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
RETINAL DETACHMENT
Eye disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
RETINAL TEAR
Eye disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT
Eye disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ABDOMINAL PAIN
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
APICAL GRANULOMA
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
COLITIS ULCERATIVE
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
DIVERTICULAR PERFORATION
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
DYSBIOSIS
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
HAEMOPERITONEUM
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ILEUS
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
LARGE INTESTINE POLYP
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
PANCREATITIS
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
SMALL INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
TOOTH DEVELOPMENT DISORDER
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
DEATH
General disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
DRUG-INDUCED LIVER INJURY
Hepatobiliary disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ANAPHYLACTIC REACTION
Immune system disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
DRUG HYPERSENSITIVITY
Immune system disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
HYPERSENSITIVITY
Immune system disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ANAL ABSCESS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
APPENDICITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
APPENDICITIS PERFORATED
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
BONE TUBERCULOSIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
BURKHOLDERIA PSEUDOMALLEI INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
COVID-19
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
COVID-19 PNEUMONIA
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
CARBUNCLE
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
CELLULITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
DERMATITIS INFECTED
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
DIVERTICULITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
DIVERTICULITIS INTESTINAL PERFORATED
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ECZEMA HERPETICUM
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ECZEMA INFECTED
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ENTEROVIRUS INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
GASTROENTERITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
HEPATITIS VIRAL
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
HERPES ZOSTER
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
HERPES ZOSTER CUTANEOUS DISSEMINATED
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
IMPETIGO
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
INFLUENZA
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
JOINT ABSCESS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
OPHTHALMIC HERPES SIMPLEX
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
OPHTHALMIC HERPES ZOSTER
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ORCHITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
OSTEOMYELITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
OTITIS MEDIA ACUTE
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
PERIORBITAL CELLULITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
PNEUMONIA
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
PNEUMONIA INFLUENZAL
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
POST PROCEDURAL INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
POSTOPERATIVE WOUND INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
PULMONARY SEPSIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION VIRAL
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
RHINOVIRUS INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
SEPSIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
STAPHYLOCOCCAL BACTERAEMIA
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
STAPHYLOCOCCAL SKIN INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
SUBCUTANEOUS ABSCESS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
TUBERCULOSIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
WOUND INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ZYGOMATIC ABSCESS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ANIMAL BITE
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ANKLE FRACTURE
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
CONCUSSION
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
CONTUSION
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
FALL
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
FRACTURE DISPLACEMENT
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
HEAT STROKE
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
HIP FRACTURE
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
HUMERUS FRACTURE
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
LIGAMENT RUPTURE
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
MENISCUS INJURY
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
MUSCLE RUPTURE
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
OVERDOSE
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
SHOULDER FRACTURE
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
SKIN LACERATION
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
SPINAL FRACTURE
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
SUBCUTANEOUS HAEMATOMA
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
TENDON RUPTURE
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
TOXICITY TO VARIOUS AGENTS
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
WRIST FRACTURE
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
OBESITY
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ARTHRALGIA
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
INTERVERTEBRAL DISC PROTRUSION
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
RHABDOMYOLYSIS
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ROTATOR CUFF SYNDROME
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
SPINAL STENOSIS
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ANAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
CLEAR CELL RENAL CELL CARCINOMA
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
CUTANEOUS T-CELL LYMPHOMA STAGE III
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
DIFFUSE LARGE B-CELL LYMPHOMA
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ENDOMETRIAL ADENOCARCINOMA
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
GASTRIC CANCER
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
MALIGNANT MELANOMA
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
PROSTATE CANCER
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
THYROID CANCER
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ALCOHOLIC SEIZURE
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
MIGRAINE
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
SYNCOPE
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
TRIGEMINAL NEURALGIA
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ADJUSTMENT DISORDER
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
AFFECTIVE DISORDER
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
BIPOLAR DISORDER
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
DEPRESSION
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
MAJOR DEPRESSION
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
SCHIZOPHRENIA
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
SUICIDAL IDEATION
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
SUICIDE ATTEMPT
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
NEPHROLITHIASIS
Renal and urinary disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
RENAL CYST
Renal and urinary disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
RENAL INFARCT
Renal and urinary disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ADENOMYOSIS
Reproductive system and breast disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ENDOMETRIOSIS
Reproductive system and breast disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
HAEMORRHAGIC OVARIAN CYST
Reproductive system and breast disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
OVARIAN CYST
Reproductive system and breast disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ACUTE RESPIRATORY FAILURE
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ASTHMA
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ASTHMATIC CRISIS
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
PLEURAL EFFUSION
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
PNEUMOMEDIASTINUM
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
PULMONARY EMBOLISM
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
RESPIRATORY FAILURE
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
DERMATITIS ATOPIC
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ECZEMA
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
ABORTION INDUCED
Surgical and medical procedures
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
AORTIC ANEURYSM
Vascular disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS
Vascular disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
HAEMORRHAGE
Vascular disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
HYPERTENSIVE EMERGENCY
Vascular disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASE
Vascular disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
Other Adverse Events
Term
Organ System
Source Vocabulary
Assessment Type
Notes
Statistical Information
LYMPHOPENIA
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG0030 events0 affected60 at risk
EG0040 events0 affected58 at risk
EG0050 events0 affected62 at risk
EG0064 events3 affected229 at risk
EG0075 events5 affected235 at risk
EG0080 events0 affected55 at risk
EG0090 events0 affected59 at risk
EG0101 events1 affected104 at risk
EG01111 events7 affected104 at risk
EG0120 events0 affected26 at risk
EG0130 events0 affected29 at risk
EAR PAIN
Ear and labyrinth disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0022 events2 affected247 at risk
EG003
ABDOMINAL PAIN
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
DIARRHOEA
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0007 events7 affected242 at risk
EG00111 events11 affected243 at risk
EG0026 events6 affected247 at risk
EG003
NAUSEA
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0016 events5 affected243 at risk
EG0024 events4 affected247 at risk
EG003
TOOTHACHE
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0013 events3 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
VOMITING
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0012 events2 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
FATIGUE
General disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0003 events3 affected242 at risk
EG0012 events2 affected243 at risk
EG0029 events8 affected247 at risk
EG003
INFLUENZA LIKE ILLNESS
General disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0013 events3 affected243 at risk
EG0023 events3 affected247 at risk
EG003
PYREXIA
General disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0003 events3 affected242 at risk
EG0014 events4 affected243 at risk
EG0026 events6 affected247 at risk
EG003
BRONCHITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0022 events2 affected247 at risk
EG003
COVID-19
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
EAR INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
FOLLICULITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0017 events6 affected243 at risk
EG00211 events10 affected247 at risk
EG003
HERPES SIMPLEX
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0012 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0025 events4 affected247 at risk
EG003
HERPES ZOSTER
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0016 events6 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
HORDEOLUM
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
IMPETIGO
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0013 events3 affected243 at risk
EG0022 events2 affected247 at risk
EG003
INFECTIOUS MONONUCLEOSIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
INFLUENZA
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0014 events4 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
NASOPHARYNGITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG00020 events11 affected242 at risk
EG00118 events15 affected243 at risk
EG00220 events20 affected247 at risk
EG003
ORAL HERPES
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0019 events8 affected243 at risk
EG00212 events11 affected247 at risk
EG003
OTITIS MEDIA
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
PYODERMA
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0014 events4 affected243 at risk
EG0024 events2 affected247 at risk
EG003
TINEA VERSICOLOUR
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
TONSILLITIS
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0022 events2 affected247 at risk
EG003
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG00014 events12 affected242 at risk
EG00115 events14 affected243 at risk
EG00220 events15 affected247 at risk
EG003
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0009 events9 affected242 at risk
EG0012 events2 affected243 at risk
EG0023 events3 affected247 at risk
EG003
VIRAL INFECTION
Infections and infestations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
FALL
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED
Investigations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0004 events4 affected242 at risk
EG0012 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0024 events4 affected247 at risk
EG003
ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED
Investigations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0012 events2 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
BLOOD CREATINE PHOSPHOKINASE INCREASED
Investigations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0007 events6 affected242 at risk
EG0019 events8 affected243 at risk
EG00213 events12 affected247 at risk
EG003
WEIGHT INCREASED
Investigations
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0003 events3 affected242 at risk
EG0014 events4 affected243 at risk
EG0023 events3 affected247 at risk
EG003
ARTHRALGIA
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0014 events3 affected243 at risk
EG0023 events3 affected247 at risk
EG003
MYALGIA
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0027 events7 affected247 at risk
EG003
SKIN PAPILLOMA
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
HEADACHE
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG00013 events12 affected242 at risk
EG00120 events17 affected243 at risk
EG00217 events16 affected247 at risk
EG003
ANXIETY
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
INSOMNIA
Psychiatric disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0004 events4 affected242 at risk
EG0013 events3 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
ASTHMA
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0022 events2 affected247 at risk
EG003
COUGH
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0006 events6 affected242 at risk
EG0019 events8 affected243 at risk
EG0029 events8 affected247 at risk
EG003
OROPHARYNGEAL PAIN
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0005 events5 affected242 at risk
EG0015 events5 affected243 at risk
EG0025 events4 affected247 at risk
EG003
RHINITIS ALLERGIC
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
RHINORRHOEA
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
ACNE
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0005 events5 affected242 at risk
EG00132 events31 affected243 at risk
EG00238 events37 affected247 at risk
EG003
DERMATITIS
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0003 events3 affected242 at risk
EG0012 events2 affected243 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected247 at risk
EG003
DERMATITIS ATOPIC
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG00021 events18 affected242 at risk
EG00110 events9 affected243 at risk
EG0023 events3 affected247 at risk
EG003
ECZEMA
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0008 events6 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected243 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected247 at risk
EG003
HYPERTENSION
Vascular disorders
MedDRA 28.0
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0014 events4 affected243 at risk
EG0025 events5 affected247 at risk
EG003
Certain Agreements
Are all PI(s) employees of the sponsor?
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Results Disclosure Restriction on PI(s)?
Yes
Other Details
AbbVie requests that any investigator or institution that plans on presenting/publishing results disclosure, provide written notification of their request 60 days prior to their presentation/publication. AbbVie requests that no presentation/publication will be instituted until 12 months after a study is completed, or after the first presentation/publication whichever occurs first. A delay may be proposed of a presentation/publication if AbbVie needs to secure patent or proprietary protection.
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities
D003872
Dermatitis
D012871
Skin Diseases
D017437
Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
D017443
Skin Diseases, Eczematous
D006969
Hypersensitivity, Immediate
D006967
Hypersensitivity
D007154
Immune System Diseases
Browse Leaves
Not provided
Browse Branches
Not provided
ID
Term
C000613732
upadacitinib
Ancestor Terms
Not provided
Browse Leaves
Not provided
Browse Branches
Not provided
1 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG0060 subjects
FG0070 subjects
FG0080 subjects
FG0090 subjects
FG0100 subjects
FG0110 subjects
FG0120 subjects
FG0130 subjects
0 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG0060 subjects
FG0070 subjects
FG0080 subjects
FG0090 subjects
FG0100 subjects
FG0110 subjects
FG0120 subjects
FG0130 subjects
0 subjects
FG0052 subjects
FG0060 subjects
FG0070 subjects
FG0080 subjects
FG0090 subjects
FG0100 subjects
FG0110 subjects
FG0120 subjects
FG0130 subjects
0 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG006104 subjects
FG007104 subjects
FG008229 subjects
FG009235 subjects
FG01026 subjects
FG01129 subjects
FG01255 subjects
FG01359 subjects
0 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG00650 subjects
FG00757 subjects
FG008124 subjects
FG009139 subjects
FG01010 subjects
FG01112 subjects
FG01223 subjects
FG01324 subjects
0 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG00654 subjects
FG00747 subjects
FG008109 subjects
FG00997 subjects
FG01016 subjects
FG01117 subjects
FG01232 subjects
FG01336 subjects
0 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG00614 subjects
FG00712 subjects
FG00815 subjects
FG00921 subjects
FG0103 subjects
FG0114 subjects
FG0121 subjects
FG0135 subjects
Withdrawal by Subject
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG00618 subjects
FG00717 subjects
FG00841 subjects
FG00940 subjects
FG0106 subjects
FG0116 subjects
FG01215 subjects
FG01311 subjects
Lost to Follow-up
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG0067 subjects
FG0073 subjects
FG00811 subjects
FG0099 subjects
FG0101 subjects
FG0112 subjects
FG0121 subjects
FG0135 subjects
COVID-19 Infection
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG0060 subjects
FG0070 subjects
FG0080 subjects
FG0091 subjects
FG0100 subjects
FG0110 subjects
FG0120 subjects
FG0130 subjects
Other
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG00615 subjects
FG00715 subjects
FG00842 subjects
FG00926 subjects
FG0106 subjects
FG0115 subjects
FG01215 subjects
FG01314 subjects
1 Subject prematurely discontinued the study during BE period after wk 164 with no additional visits
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG0040 subjects
FG0050 subjects
FG0060 subjects
FG0070 subjects
FG0080 subjects
FG0090 subjects
FG0100 subjects
FG0110 subjects
FG0120 subjects
FG0131 subjects
60
ParticipantsBG00458
ParticipantsBG00562
ParticipantsBG006912
Title
Measurements
BG00036.0± 14.08
BG00135.7± 15.15
BG00236.7± 15.36
BG00315.5± 1.67
BG00415.2± 1.79
BG00515.8± 1.70
BG00632.1± 15.66
247
ParticipantsBG00360
ParticipantsBG00458
ParticipantsBG00562
ParticipantsBG006912
Title
Measurements
12 - 14 years
BG0000
BG0010
BG0020
BG00318
BG00423
BG00515
BG00656
15 - 17 years
BG0000
BG0010
BG0020
BG00342
BG004
18 - < 40 years
BG000161
BG001165
BG002161
BG0030
BG004
40 - < 65 years
BG00070
BG00163
BG00267
BG0030
BG004
≥ 65 years
BG00011
BG00115
BG00219
BG0030
BG004
247
ParticipantsBG00360
ParticipantsBG00458
ParticipantsBG00562
ParticipantsBG006912
Title
Measurements
Female
BG000104
BG001102
BG002103
BG00335
BG00438
BG00526
BG006408
Male
BG000138
BG001141
BG002144
BG00325
BG004
247
ParticipantsBG00360
ParticipantsBG00458
ParticipantsBG00562
ParticipantsBG006912
Title
Measurements
Hispanic or Latino
BG00025
BG00118
BG00217
BG00310
BG00412
BG00511
BG00693
Not Hispanic or Latino
BG000217
BG001225
BG002230
BG00350
BG004
Unknown or Not Reported
BG0000
BG0010
BG0020
BG0030
BG004
247
ParticipantsBG00360
ParticipantsBG00458
ParticipantsBG00562
ParticipantsBG006912
Title
Measurements
American Indian or Alaska Native
BG0005
BG0014
BG0021
BG0030
BG0042
BG0051
BG00613
Asian
BG00052
BG00162
BG00255
BG0036
BG004
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
BG0001
BG0010
BG0020
BG0031
BG004
Black or African American
BG00015
BG00116
BG00217
BG0037
BG004
White
BG000165
BG001160
BG002172
BG00345
BG004
More than one race
BG0004
BG0011
BG0022
BG0031
BG004
Unknown or Not Reported
BG0000
BG0010
BG0020
BG0030
BG004
247
ParticipantsBG00360
ParticipantsBG00458
ParticipantsBG00562
ParticipantsBG006912
Title
Measurements
Main Study
BG000242
BG001243
BG002247
BG00336
BG00433
BG00535
BG006836
Adolescent Substudy
BG0000
BG0010
BG0020
BG00324
BG004
247
ParticipantsBG00360
ParticipantsBG00458
ParticipantsBG00562
ParticipantsBG006912
Title
Measurements
US/Puerto Rico/Canada
BG00095
BG00195
BG00299
BG00325
BG00424
BG00527
BG006365
Other
BG000147
BG001148
BG002148
BG00335
BG004
243
ParticipantsBG002247
ParticipantsBG00360
ParticipantsBG00458
ParticipantsBG00562
ParticipantsBG006912
Title
Measurements
3 (Moderate)
BG000110
BG001111
BG002111
BG00326
BG00427
BG00529
BG006414
4 (Severe)
BG000132
BG001132
BG002136
BG00334
BG004
243
ParticipantsBG002247
ParticipantsBG00360
ParticipantsBG00458
ParticipantsBG00562
ParticipantsBG006911
Title
Measurements
BG00028.74± 11.865
BG00128.65± 11.633
BG00229.61± 12.030
BG00330.12± 13.263
BG00428.01± 12.216
BG00531.15± 13.998
BG00629.16± 12.112
246
ParticipantsBG00360
ParticipantsBG00458
ParticipantsBG00562
ParticipantsBG006911
Title
Measurements
BG00022.263± 14.0798
BG00119.802± 13.8089
BG00221.911± 14.8401
BG00312.169± 4.7104
BG00411.184± 4.5479
BG00512.128± 4.6414
BG00619.452± 13.4892
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
46.9
2-Sided
95
39.9
53.9
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000278
OG001276
OG002282
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0004.7(2.2 to 7.2)
OG00138.8(33.0 to 44.5)
OG00252.0(46.1 to 57.9)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
47.4
2-Sided
95
41.0
53.7
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
34.0
2-Sided
95
27.8
40.2
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000274
OG001270
OG002280
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0009.1(5.7 to 12.5)
OG00141.9(36.0 to 47.7)
OG00259.6(53.9 to 65.4)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
50.4
2-Sided
95
43.8
57.1
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
32.6
2-Sided
95
25.8
39.4
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000278
OG001276
OG002282
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0005.4(2.7 to 8.1)
OG00142.4(36.6 to 48.2)
OG00258.5(52.7 to 64.2)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
53.1
2-Sided
95
46.7
59.4
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
36.9
2-Sided
95
30.6
43.3
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000274
OG001270
OG002280
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0003.6(1.4 to 5.9)
OG00148.9(42.9 to 54.9)
OG00260.7(55.0 to 66.4)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
57.0
2-Sided
95
50.9
63.0
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
45.2
2-Sided
95
38.9
51.4
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000278
OG001276
OG002282
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0003.6(1.4 to 5.8)
OG00133.0(27.4 to 38.5)
OG00244.0(38.2 to 49.8)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
40.4
2-Sided
95
34.2
46.5
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
29.4
2-Sided
95
23.5
35.3
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000274
OG001270
OG002280
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0000.7(0.0 to 1.7)
OG0017.4(4.3 to 10.5)
OG00215.7(11.5 to 20.0)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
14.9
2-Sided
95
10.6
19.3
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
6.7
2-Sided
95
3.4
10.0
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000267
OG001269
OG002278
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0000.7(0.0 to 1.8)
OG0017.4(4.3 to 10.6)
OG0027.9(4.7 to 11.1)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
7.2
2-Sided
95
3.8
10.5
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000267
OG001269
OG002278
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0003.0(1.0 to 5.0)
OG00111.5(7.7 to 15.3)
OG00217.3(12.8 to 21.7)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
8.6
2-Sided
95
4.3
12.9
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000269
OG001274
OG002277
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00024.5(19.4 to 29.7)
OG0012.2(0.5 to 3.9)
OG0021.4(0.0 to 2.8)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
-23.1
2-Sided
95
-28.4
-17.8
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
-22.4
2-Sided
95
-27.8
-16.9
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000233
OG001219
OG002228
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00012.4(8.2 to 16.7)
OG00150.2(43.6 to 56.9)
OG00262.3(56.0 to 68.6)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
49.8
2-Sided
95
42.2
57.3
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
37.9
2-Sided
95
30.1
45.8
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000247
OG001237
OG002238
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00013.4(9.1 to 17.6)
OG00149.4(43.0 to 55.7)
OG00265.1(59.1 to 71.2)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
51.8
2-Sided
95
44.4
59.1
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
35.9
2-Sided
95
28.2
43.5
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000244
OG001230
OG002234
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00012.7(8.5 to 16.9)
OG00153.0(46.6 to 59.5)
OG00266.2(60.2 to 72.3)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
53.3
2-Sided
95
46.0
60.6
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
40.3
2-Sided
95
32.7
48.0
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000234
OG001228
OG002228
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00016.7(11.9 to 21.4)
OG00157.0(50.6 to 63.4)
OG00271.5(65.6 to 77.4)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
54.8
2-Sided
95
47.2
62.3
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
40.3
2-Sided
95
32.3
48.3
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000227
OG001207
OG002223
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00018.9(13.8 to 24.0)
OG00157.0(50.3 to 63.7)
OG00269.5(63.5 to 75.5)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
50.6
2-Sided
95
42.8
58.5
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
37.9
2-Sided
95
29.5
46.3
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000278
OG001276
OG002282
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0000.7(0.0 to 1.7)
OG00114.1(10.0 to 18.2)
OG00218.8(14.2 to 23.4)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.0001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
18.1
2-Sided
95
13.5
22.7
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
13.4
2-Sided
95
9.2
17.6
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000119
OG001224
OG002235
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-17.04(-22.39 to -11.69)
OG001-51.20(-55.80 to -46.61)
OG002-66.49(-71.03 to -61.96)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
Mixed-effect model repeat measurement with Baseline, treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline vIGA-AD category and age in the model.
<0.001
Least Squares (LS) Mean Difference
-49.45
Standard Error of the Mean
3.364
2-Sided
95
-56.05
-42.84
Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer. This endpoint was a multiplicity-controlled key secondary endpoint for European Union (EU)/European Medicines Agency (EMA) regulatory purposes only.
OG000
OG001
Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
Mixed-effect model repeat measurement with Baseline, treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline vIGA-AD category and age in the model.
<0.001
LS Mean Difference
-34.16
Standard Error of the Mean
3.386
2-Sided
95
-40.81
-27.51
Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer. This endpoint was a multiplicity-controlled key secondary endpoint for EU/EMA regulatory purposes only.
Participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000142
OG001246
OG002250
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-34.51(-39.60 to -29.42)
OG001-74.13(-78.45 to -69.82)
OG002-84.65(-88.93 to -80.37)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
Mixed-effect model repeat measurement with Baseline, treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline vIGA-AD category and age in the model.
<0.001
LS Mean Difference
-50.14
Standard Error of the Mean
3.127
2-Sided
95
-56.28
-44.00
Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer. This endpoint was a multiplicity-controlled key secondary endpoint for EU/EMA regulatory purposes only.
OG000
OG001
Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
Mixed-effect model repeat measurement with Baseline, treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline vIGA-AD category and age in the model.
<0.001
LS Mean Difference
-39.62
Standard Error of the Mean
3.139
2-Sided
95
-45.79
-33.46
Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer. This endpoint was a multiplicity-controlled key secondary endpoint for EU/EMA regulatory purposes only.
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000268
OG001268
OG002269
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00028.7(23.3 to 34.1)
OG00170.9(65.5 to 76.3)
OG00283.5(79.1 to 88.0)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
54.7
2-Sided
95
47.7
61.7
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer. This endpoint was a multiplicity-controlled key secondary endpoint for EU/EMA regulatory purposes only.
OG000
OG001
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer. This endpoint was a multiplicity-controlled key secondary endpoint for EU/EMA regulatory purposes only.
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
42.1
2-Sided
95
34.5
49.8
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000250
OG001251
OG002251
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00028.4(22.8 to 34.0)
OG00171.7(66.1 to 77.3)
OG00277.6(72.5 to 82.8)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
49.0
2-Sided
95
41.4
56.5
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer. This endpoint was a multiplicity-controlled key secondary endpoint for EU/EMA regulatory purposes only.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
0.002
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
42.8
2-Sided
95
35.0
50.6
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer. This endpoint was a multiplicity-controlled key secondary endpoint for EU/EMA regulatory purposes only.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000136
OG001245
OG002241
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-28.43(-33.34 to -23.52)
OG001-57.90(-61.84 to -53.97)
OG002-68.44(-72.44 to -64.44)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
Mixed-effect model repeat measurement with Baseline, treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline vIGA-AD category and age in the model.
<0.001
LS Mean Difference
-40.01
Standard Error of the Mean
2.949
2-Sided
95
-45.80
-34.22
Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer. This endpoint was a multiplicity-controlled key secondary endpoint for EU/EMA regulatory purposes only.
OG000
OG001
Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
Mixed-effect model repeat measurement with Baseline, treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, Baseline vIGA-AD category and age in the model.
<0.001
LS Mean Difference
-29.47
Standard Error of the Mean
2.941
2-Sided
95
-35.24
-23.69
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer. This endpoint was a multiplicity-controlled key secondary endpoint for EU/EMA regulatory purposes only.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000140
OG001137
OG002146
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00011.4(6.2 to 16.7)
OG00146.0(37.6 to 54.3)
OG00256.1(48.1 to 64.2)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
44.5
2-Sided
95
35.0
54.1
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer. This endpoint was a multiplicity-controlled key secondary endpoint for EU/EMA regulatory purposes only.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
34.4
2-Sided
95
24.7
44.2
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer. This endpoint was a multiplicity-controlled key secondary endpoint for EU/EMA regulatory purposes only.
OG002
Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000257
OG001252
OG002256
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0004.7(2.1 to 7.2)
OG00123.8(18.6 to 29.1)
OG00237.9(32.0 to 43.9)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
33.3
2-Sided
95
26.9
39.8
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 30 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer. This endpoint was a multiplicity-controlled key secondary endpoint for EU/EMA regulatory purposes only.
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for strata (Baseline vIGA-AD categories and age [adolescent vs. adult])
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
19.1
2-Sided
95
13.3
24.9
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
The overall type I error rate of the primary and secondary endpoints for upadacitinib 15 mg was strongly controlled using a graphical multiple testing procedure at the two-sided 0.05 level following a pre-specified α transfer path which includes downstream transfer along the endpoints sequence within each dose as well as cross-dose transfer. This endpoint was a multiplicity-controlled key secondary endpoint for EU/EMA regulatory purposes only.
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00060
OG00158
OG00262
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00013.3(4.7 to 21.9)
OG00169.0(57.1 to 80.9)
OG00273.4(62.3 to 84.6)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
59.9
2-Sided
95
45.9
73.8
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
55.8
2-Sided
95
41.1
70.4
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00060
OG00158
OG00262
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0005.0(0.0 to 10.5)
OG00144.8(32.0 to 57.6)
OG00259.4(47.0 to 71.8)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
53.9
2-Sided
95
40.6
67.3
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
39.4
2-Sided
95
25.7
53.1
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00059
OG00155
OG00260
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0003.4(0.0 to 8.0)
OG00138.2(25.3 to 51.0)
OG00256.7(44.1 to 69.2)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
53.1
2-Sided
95
40.0
66.1
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
35.0
2-Sided
95
21.8
48.2
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00060
OG00158
OG00262
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0001.7(0.0 to 4.9)
OG00148.3(35.4 to 61.1)
OG00262.0(49.8 to 74.3)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
60.2
2-Sided
95
47.5
72.9
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
46.7
2-Sided
95
33.4
59.9
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00059
OG00155
OG00260
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0003.4(0.0 to 8.0)
OG00138.2(25.3 to 51.0)
OG00250.0(37.3 to 62.7)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
46.4
2-Sided
95
33.2
59.6
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
34.9
2-Sided
95
21.4
48.4
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00060
OG00158
OG00262
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0006.7(0.4 to 13.0)
OG00137.9(25.4 to 50.4)
OG00253.2(40.8 to 65.6)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
46.2
2-Sided
95
32.4
60.0
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
31.3
2-Sided
95
17.3
45.3
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00059
OG00155
OG00260
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0000.0(NA to NA)Could not be calculated using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution
OG00112.7(3.9 to 21.5)
OG0025.0(0.0 to 10.5)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
0.075
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
5.0
2-Sided
95
-0.5
10.6
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
0.005
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
12.7
2-Sided
95
3.9
21.5
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00059
OG00156
OG00262
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0000.0(NA to NA)Could not be calculated using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution
OG0018.9(1.5 to 16.4)
OG0023.2(0.0 to 7.6)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
0.151
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
3.2
2-Sided
95
-1.2
7.6
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00059
OG00156
OG00262
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0001.7(0.0 to 5.0)
OG00114.3(5.1 to 23.5)
OG0029.7(2.3 to 17.0)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
0.008
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
12.9
2-Sided
95
3.4
22.3
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00060
OG00158
OG00261
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00020.0(9.9 to 30.1)
OG0011.7(0.0 to 5.1)
OG0021.6(0.0 to 4.8)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
-18.0
2-Sided
95
-28.0
-8.0
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
-17.9
2-Sided
95
-28.1
-7.7
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00042
OG00140
OG00244
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0009.5(0.6 to 18.4)
OG00137.5(22.5 to 52.5)
OG00261.4(47.0 to 75.8)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
51.5
2-Sided
95
34.8
68.3
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
29.2
2-Sided
95
11.8
46.6
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00053
OG00148
OG00251
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0007.5(0.4 to 14.7)
OG00139.6(25.7 to 53.4)
OG00260.8(47.4 to 74.2)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
53.2
2-Sided
95
38.4
68.0
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
31.8
2-Sided
95
16.5
47.1
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00055
OG00148
OG00255
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00010.9(2.7 to 19.1)
OG00147.9(33.8 to 62.0)
OG00260.0(47.1 to 72.9)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
48.9
2-Sided
95
33.8
64.1
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
37.3
2-Sided
95
21.1
53.6
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00050
OG00145
OG00250
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00018.0(7.4 to 28.6)
OG00160.0(45.7 to 74.3)
OG00272.0(59.6 to 84.4)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
53.8
2-Sided
95
37.4
70.2
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
42.0
2-Sided
95
24.3
59.7
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00049
OG00140
OG00250
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00022.4(10.8 to 34.1)
OG00152.5(37.0 to 68.0)
OG00268.0(55.1 to 80.9)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
45.3
2-Sided
95
28.0
62.7
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
0.002
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
29.8
2-Sided
95
10.7
48.8
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00060
OG00158
OG00262
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0001.7(0.0 to 4.9)
OG00115.5(6.2 to 24.8)
OG00219.4(9.5 to 29.2)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
17.1
2-Sided
95
7.5
26.7
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
0.006
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
13.7
2-Sided
95
3.9
23.5
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00027
OG00149
OG00255
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-11.02(-22.14 to 0.10)
OG001-47.56(-57.00 to -38.13)
OG002-66.95(-76.07 to -57.84)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
Mixed-effect model repeat measurement with Baseline, treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, and Baseline vIGA-AD category in the model.
<0.001
LS Mean Difference
-55.93
Standard Error of the Mean
7.284
2-Sided
95
-70.32
-41.55
Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
Mixed-effect model repeat measurement with Baseline, treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, and Baseline vIGA-AD category in the model.
<0.001
LS Mean Difference
-36.54
Standard Error of the Mean
7.384
2-Sided
95
-51.12
-21.96
Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 15 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00031
OG00153
OG00252
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-42.19(-52.06 to -32.33)
OG001-77.85(-85.95 to -69.74)
OG002-84.81(-92.84 to -76.78)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
Mixed-Effect Model Repeat Measurement with Baseline, treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, and Baseline vIGA-AD category in the model.
<0.001
LS Mean Difference
-42.62
Standard Error of the Mean
6.432
2-Sided
95
-55.34
-29.90
Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
Mixed-Effect Model Repeat Measurement with Baseline, treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, and Baseline vIGA-AD category in the model.
<0.001
LS Mean Difference
-35.66
Standard Error of the Mean
6.447
2-Sided
95
-48.41
-22.90
Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00057
OG00156
OG00257
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00028.1(16.4 to 39.7)
OG00166.1(53.7 to 78.5)
OG00280.7(70.5 to 90.9)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
52.5
2-Sided
95
36.9
68.1
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
38.1
2-Sided
95
21.2
54.9
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00026
OG00122
OG00230
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00019.2(4.1 to 34.4)
OG00168.2(48.7 to 87.6)
OG00273.3(57.5 to 89.2)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
55.9
2-Sided
95
35.5
76.3
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
49.6
2-Sided
95
26.3
72.9
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00030
OG00154
OG00249
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-27.91(-37.98 to -17.83)
OG001-57.89(-65.49 to -50.28)
OG002-72.81(-80.77 to -64.85)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
Mixed-effect model repeat measurement with Baseline, treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, and Baseline vIGA-AD category
<0.001
LS Mean Difference
-44.90
Standard Error of the Mean
6.492
2-Sided
95
-57.74
-32.06
Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Mixed Effect Model Repeated Measurement
Mixed-effect model repeat measurement with Baseline, treatment, visit, treatment by visit interaction, and Baseline vIGA-AD category
<0.001
LS Mean Difference
-29.98
Standard Error of the Mean
6.383
2-Sided
95
-42.60
-17.36
Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00025
OG00124
OG00232
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00016.0(1.6 to 30.4)
OG00137.5(18.1 to 56.9)
OG00243.8(26.6 to 60.9)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
0.016
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
27.8
2-Sided
95
5.2
50.4
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
0.062
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
22.3
2-Sided
95
-1.1
45.7
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG002
Adolescents: Upadacitinib 30 mg QD
Adolescent participants received upadacitinib 30 mg orally once a day for 16 weeks.
Units
Counts
Participants
OG00026
OG00122
OG00232
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG0007.7(0.0 to 17.9)
OG00113.6(0.0 to 28.0)
OG00246.9(29.6 to 64.2)
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG000
OG002
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)
<0.001
Adjusted Response Rate Difference
38.9
2-Sided
95
18.4
59.4
Response Rate Difference = Upadacitinib - Placebo
Superiority
OG000
OG001
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for stratum (Baseline vIGA-AD categories)