Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Background and Rationale:
LASIK has been among the highest satisfaction rates of surgical procedures, ranging from 82%-98%. Different ablation profiles have been developed over the years. The purpose of this study is to validate this novel measurement by comparing the visual outcomes when the TMR is used in myopic astigmatic LASIK to using the standard manifest refraction or the Topolyzer measurements alone.
Objectives :
To evaluate the safety, efficacy and predictability of topography-guided myopic LASIK with three different refraction treatment strategies.
Candidates for refractive surgery above 18 years with myopic astigmatism and no previous ocular surgery.
Sample size 60 eyes. surgery:
Postoperatively, the patients will be examined at 1 week, 1 month and 3 months. All postoperative follow-up visits included measurement of UDVA, CDVA (if indicated) and refraction, besides full ophthalmological examination and performing pentacam and topolyzer after 3 months
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group A: Manifest | Experimental | 20 eyes will be treated using Contoura, topography guided ablation vision with the standard manifest refraction. |
|
| Group B: partial TMR | Experimental | 20 eyes will be treated with Contoura vision, topography guided ablation using the topographic astigmatic power and axis and without change in the spherical power (using the same spherical power as the manifest refraction). |
|
| Group C: Full TMR | Experimental | 20 eyes will be treated with Contoura vision, topography guided ablation using the topographic astigmatic power and axis and modifying the spherical power to obtain the same spherical equivalent as the manifest refraction. This is done by subtracting half of the difference between topographic astigmatic power and the manifest astigmatic power from the spherical power (topography-modified treatment refraction). |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| topography guided ablation | Procedure | using the data obtained from the topolyzer for correction of refractive errors specially astigmatism we use 3 different treatment protocols |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| post operative residual astigmatism | measuring the post operative residual astigmatism and comparison between the 3 group to reach to the most accurate protocol. | 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| measurement of the postoperative unaided visual acuity | measurement of the postoperative unaided visual acuity and comparison between the 3 group to reach to the most accurate protocol. | 3 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mohmed Hosny, MD | Cairo University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kasr Alainy | Cairo | 11562 | Egypt |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001251 | Astigmatism |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012030 | Refractive Errors |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
A prospective, randomized and comparative interventional study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| manifest refraction | Procedure | using for ablation the exact manifest refraction |
|
| full topography modified refraction | Procedure | full topography modified refraction means changing both sphere and cylinder power in the ablation profile |
|
| partial topography modified refraction | Procedure | partial topography modified refraction means changing only cylinder power and axis in the ablation profile |
|