Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17-6226 | Other Identifier | UHN CAPCR Related ID |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Mechanical ventilation can cause damage by overstretching the lungs, especially when the lungs are collapsed or edematous. Raising ventilator pressures can reduce lung collapse and this can prevent overstretching from mechanical ventilation. It remains uncertain how much pressure (PEEP - positive end-expiratory pressure) should be used on the ventilator and how to identify patients who will benefit from higher ventilator pressures vs. lower ventilator pressures. The investigators are using a unique new imaging technology, electrical impedance tomography (EIT), to study this problem and to determine the safest and most effective ventilator pressure level. The results of this study will inform future trials of higher vs. lower PEEP strategies in mechanically ventilated patients.
Patients participating in this physiological cross-over randomized trial will undergo a series of PEEP maneuvers designed to assess lung recruitability, PEEP responsiveness, and optimal PEEP. EIT imaging and esophageal manometry will be employed throughout the protocol to quantify the effect of PEEP on lung function. Patients will be randomized to be ventilated at PEEP levels supplied by the ExPRESS strategy or by the EIT hyperdistention/collapse algorithm. The biological response will be assessed by measuring serum cytokines.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| EIT algorithm | Experimental | Patients randomized to this arm will be ventilated at the PEEP level selected by the EIT algorithm, which selects a PEEP at which both collapse and hyperdistention are minimized. |
|
| ExPRESS algorithm | Active Comparator | Patients randomized to this arm will be ventilated at the PEEP level selected by the ExPRESS algorithm, which is a method that targets a tidal volume of 6 ml/kg predicted body weight and then titrates PEEP until plateau airway pressure reaches 28 cm H2O. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electrical Impedance Tomography | Device | Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a new technique that enables real-time visualization of the distribution of ventilation at the bedside. This technique allows clinicians and investigators to immediately determine how applying higher or lower PEEP levels affect stress and strain in the lung. The investigators propose to apply this new technique to test a strategy for finding the optimal level of PEEP that prevents lung injury and improves outcomes in critically ill patients. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Intratidal ventilation heterogeneity | A measure of variation in the distribution of ventilation throughout the lung as detected by electrical impedance tomography | Assessed after completion of 3 hours on randomized strategy (EIT vs ExPRESS) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Difference in the optimal PEEP levels identified by several different PEEP titration strategies | Compare the relative degree of agreement or disparity between PEEP levels recommended by different PEEP titration strategies | Assessed immediately after completion of decremental PEEP titration procedure |
| Change in ratio of partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) to inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2) ratio following a standardized increased in PEEP |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ewan Goligher, MD, PhD | University Health Network, Toronto | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Health Network | Toronto | Ontario | M5G 2N2 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33784416 | Derived | Santa Cruz R, Villarejo F, Irrazabal C, Ciapponi A. High versus low positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels for mechanically ventilated adult patients with acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 30;3(3):CD009098. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009098.pub3. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| ExPRESS-derived PEEP level | Other | The ExPRESS algorithm is a traditional approach to selecting PEEP based on respiratory mechanics. |
|
Measurement of changes in oxygenation by PaO2/FiO2 ratio due to PEEP |
| Assessed 10 minutes after step PEEP increase from 6-8 to 16-18 cm H2O |
| Respiratory mechanics (transpulmonary driving pressure) | The swing in transpulmonary pressure during inspiration, a measure of dynamic lung stress | Assessed after completing 3 hours on the randomized PEEP strategy (EIT vs ExPRESS) |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012128 | Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
| D012131 | Respiratory Insufficiency |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided