Brain Response Associated With Parent-based Treatment for Childhood Anxiety Disorders
Brain Response Associated With Parent-based Treatment for Childhood Anxiety Disorders
This study aims to investigate whether a parent-based treatment for childhood anxiety disorders engages child brain circuitry implicated in children's reliance on parents to reduce anxiety (R61), and whether change in child brain circuitry is associated with reduction in child anxiety (R33).
Specific Aims: Anxiety disorders impact up to one-third of children, cause tremendous suffering, increase risk for psychiatric and medical morbidity, impair school and social functioning, and cost billions of dollars each year. Data consistently show that child anxiety is characterized by amygdala hyperactivity and deficits in prefrontal control of the amygdala. Emerging data link these disruptions to anxious children's over-reliance on parents for amygdala-medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) engagement and anxiety reduction.
In the first phase of this study we aim to demonstrate that an entirely parent-based psychosocial treatment with no child involvement, Supportive Parenting for Anxious Childhood Emotions (SPACE), engages an amygdala-mPFC target in anxious children, lessening child reliance on parents to reduce amygdala reactivity.
Cross-species neurobiological evidence indicates that parental presence reduces amygdala reactivity and activates the mPFC to reduce offspring anxiety. In humans we recently demonstrated parental presence increases functional connectivity between their child's mPFC and amygdala, reducing the child's amygdala reactivity and anxiety. In a healthy sample, parental engagement of child amygdala-mPFC connectivity was linked to the child's reliance on parents for help with anxiety. Data from clinically anxious children likewise show parental presence engages child mPFC, and data we collected since our previous submission demonstrate that parental presence reduces amygdala reactivity in clinically anxious children.
Offspring's natural reliance on parents for anxiety reduction is magnified in clinically anxious children. Parents become deeply enmeshed in their child's symptoms through the process of family accommodation, defined as change in parents' behavior to help the child avoid or alleviate anxiety. In clinically anxious children, 90% report depending on parents to reduce their anxiety, and 97% of parents report accommodating their anxious child's symptoms. These cross-generational patterns of parental entanglement in their child's anxiety symptoms contribute to the immense burden, distress, and costs of pediatric anxiety (e.g., parents missing work to be with their anxious child). Anxious children's reliance on parents for anxiety reduction may disrupt the child's ability to independently reduce amygdala reactivity and anxiety.
We developed SPACE to translate these neurobiological and clinical research findings into a manualized parent-based treatment focused on reducing family accommodation in parents of anxious children. Preliminary data from a randomized clinical trial show that after 12 weeks of parents receiving SPACE (N=29), with no therapist-child contact, family accommodation and child anxiety were significantly reduced. We propose that SPACE engages anxious children's amygdala-mPFC circuitry, lessening their reliance on parents to reduce amygdala reactivity.
The first phase of the study will examine clinically anxious children's amygdala-mPFC response to fear faces when (A) the child's parent is beside them holding their hand during the fMRI scan (Parent-Present), and (B) the child is alone during the scan (Parent-Absent) (within-subjects design). Children with primary separation, social, or generalized anxiety disorder diagnoses, the most common childhood anxiety disorders, will serve as participants. Children will complete Parent-Present and Parent-Absent scans PRE- and POST-SPACE, or PRE- and POST-Parent Educational Support (PES), the comparator treatment that controls for treatment duration and therapist-parent contact. We expect SPACE will lessen child reliance on parental presence to engage amygdala-mPFC circuitry and reduce child amygdala reactivity. Aim 1: Demonstrate SPACE lessens children's reliance on parents to reduce amygdala reactivity (target engagement). Hyp 1: Child reliance on parental presence to reduce amygdala reactivity, (i.e., the difference between child amygdala reactivity in the Parent-Present and Parent-Absent scan), will decrease significantly from PRE- to POST-SPACE, as compared with PRE- to POST-PES. If Hyp 1 is confirmed we will proceed to the the second phase of the study.
The second phase of the study will be performed to re-demonstrate target engagement in SPACE, compared to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT); demonstrate target engagement is associated with symptom reduction in SPACE; and demonstrate SPACE's acceptability/feasibility. The second phase will enroll clinically anxious children (7-10 yrs), randomly assigned to SPACE or CBT. Aim 1: Re-demonstrate target engagement in SPACE. Hyp 1: Child reliance on parental presence to reduce amygdala reactivity will decrease significantly from PRE- to POST-SPACE, as compared with PRE- to POST-CBT. Aim 2: Demonstrate target engagement is associated with symptom reduction in SPACE. Hyp 2: Reduction in child anxiety from PRE- to POST-SPACE will be significantly associated with reduction in child reliance on parental presence to reduce amygdala reactivity. Aim 3: Establish acceptability and feasibility of SPACE. Hyp 3: SPACE will be acceptable and feasible to administer, and comparable to CBT. The second phase will also provide insight into the relative efficacy of SPACE, to inform future research and development of SPACE.
This study has the potential to provide groundbreaking results, with major public health impact, on how parent-based treatments can target disrupted neurobiological processes in children with psychopathology. These novel data will inform decision-making about a large-scale study (R01) to confirm the efficacy of SPACE and examine personalized treatment strategies.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: