Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Philip Morris Products S.A. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a 12-weeks, open label, non-inferiority trial comparing HTPs vs ECs in terms of efficacy, adoption rate and acceptability, tolerability, and tobacco harm reduction in 220 healthy smokers, not motivated to quit, randomized (1:1) to switch to one of these products. The duration of the study, from the enrollment to the study close out for all the patients at week 24 (follow-up), will be approximately 12 months. Enrollment period will last about 6 months with the support of a multi-channel advertising method. This will include location-based advertising on social networks, advertising in local media, information days organized within the city.
Before the baseline visit, a face to face screening (V0) for pre-eligibility checks will be conducted. Subjects will be asked to practice with the step test for 10-15 minand will be instructed how to collect and store their morning urine before bringing it to the hospital on their Baseline visit (V1). This study will consist of a baseline visit (V1) and 6 follow-up study visits (V2-V7). At baseline (V1), participants will be randomized in two separate study groups. The randomization sequence will be computer generated by using blocks size of 5, with an allocation ratio of 1:1 for each of the study products (IQOS, JustFog-EC). Subjects will use and familiarize with their allocated product, as per randomization. They will be trained and counseled on the use of their allocated study product; oral explanation and practical demonstration will be followed by product trial during which participants will also have the option to try and choose their preferred flavour (either from a selection of 3 e-liquids or 3 tobacco sticks, depending on the allocated arm). Participants randomized in the IQOS arm will receive one iQOS kit and a full 1 week supply of tobacco sticks of their choice (they will receive a number of tobacco sticks/day corresponding to the number of cigarettes smoked at baseline); those randomized in the JustFog-EC arm of the study will receive one JustFog Starter Kit and a full 1 week supply of e-liquids of their choice (they will receive 4, 10 mls refill containers).Free products will be supplied at each subsequent visit throughout the study. No supply of tobacco stick or e-liquid will be given at week-12, but users will be offered to keep using their products to minimize the risk of relapsing back to cigarette smoking. A prospective evaluation of cigarette consumption, adoption rates, acceptability and tolerability will be recorded throughout the study.
Visit 2 (V2):This will be scheduled 1 week after V1 (with a tolerance of +/- 3 days). Cigarette/day, eCO, AEs, BP, HR will be measured and product use recorded. Full 1 week supply of the chosen product will be provided.
Visit 3 (V3):This will be scheduled 2 weeks after V1 (with a tolerance of +/- 3 days). Cigarette/day, eCO, AEs, BP, HR will be measured and product use recorded. Participants will be instructed on how to collect and store their second urine sample before bringing it to the hospital at V4. Full 2 weeks supply of the chosen product will be provided.
Visit 4 (V4):This will be scheduled 4 weeks after V1 (with a tolerance of +/- 3 days). Cigarette/day, eCO, AEs, BP, HR will be measured, questionnaires completed and product use recorded. Step test will be carried out. Second urine sample will be collected, aliquotted and stored. Full 4 weeks supply of the chosen product will be provided.
Visit 5 (V5):This will be scheduled 8 weeks after V1 (with a tolerance of +/- 7 days). Cigarette/day, eCO, AEs, BP, HR will be measured, questionnaires completed and product use recorded. Full 4 weeks supply of the chosen product will be provided.
Visit 6 (V6):This will be scheduled 12 weeks after V1 (with a tolerance of +/- 7 days). Cigarette/day, eCO, AEs, BP, HR, weight, height will be measured, questionnaires completed and product use recorded. Step test will be carried out. No more products will be dispensed.
Follow-up Visit (V7):This final visit will be scheduled 24 weeks after V1 (with a tolerance of +/- 7 days)to review product usage and smoking behavior under naturalistic condition of use. Cigarette/day, eCO, AEs, BP, HR, weight, height will be measured, questionnaires completed and product use recorded. Step test will be carried out.
Data will be recorded from every subject on an electronic CRF, provided by a CRO, GCP compliant, 21 CFR Part 11 FDA compliant, listed in AIFA list of operating CRO. Urine samples will be collected at baseline and wk 4, and sent to an external laboratory for analytical assessment of selected Biomarkers of Exposure (BoE).
The study will be conducted at the University of Catania, Catania, Italy.
Participants Healthy smokers, not motivated to quit, will be randomized in two intervention groups in a 1:1 ratio to compare HTPs vs ECs in terms of reductions in cigarette consumption, adoption rate and acceptability, tolerability, and tobacco harm reduction. Sample size determination (better detailed below, in the relevant section) for no-inferiority testing is based on the assumptions that 1) expected quit rates based on most recent EC literature is about 20-25% and 2) that differences in quit rates between products under investigation should not exceed 10-15% (as per non-inferiority definition). According to these hypotheses the required number of participants per study arm is 104. Hence investigators intend to include 220 participants, 110 per group.
Study Products Tested
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| IQOS | Experimental | HEAT NOT BURN REDUCED RISK PRODUCT |
|
| E-CIG | Active Comparator | ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE REDUCED RISK PRODUCT |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IQOS | Device | IQOS USE FOR 12 WEEKS |
| |
| E-CIG |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Smoking Cessation | to compare the efficacy of HTP and EC, in terms of quit rates at week 12, by self-reporting abstinence from classic cigarette [validated by an Exhaled breath Carbon monoxide (eCO) measurement ≤10ppm)] | 12 WEEK |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Smoking Reduction | To compare the smoking reduction derived from the use of HTP and EC, intended as a 50% reduction in the number of conventional cigarette/day at week 12, defined through self-reporting; | Week 12 |
| Adoption Rate |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects must meet all of the following inclusion criteria to be eligible for enrolment into the study:
Exclusion Criteria:
The presence of any of the following will exclude a subject from study enrolment:
Use of smokeless tobacco, or any other tobacco products (including e-cigarettes, cigars, chewing tobacco, snus, etc.) within the last 3 months, at baseline and during the whole study.
Use of nicotine replacement therapy or other smoking cessation therapies within the last 3 months and at baseline.
Self-reported pregnancy, planned pregnancy or breastfeeding.
Tobacco industry employees and 1st degree relatives will be excluded in order to safeguard independence of the study
-
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Catania, Italy | Catania | Italy |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37014673 | Derived | Caponnetto P, Campagna D, Maglia M, Benfatto F, Emma R, Caruso M, Caci G, Busa B, Pennisi A, Ceracchi M, Migliore M, Signorelli M. Comparing the Effectiveness, Tolerability, and Acceptability of Heated Tobacco Products and Refillable Electronic Cigarettes for Cigarette Substitution (CEASEFIRE): Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Apr 4;9:e42628. doi: 10.2196/42628. | |
| 31956726 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | IQOS | HEAT NOT BURN REDUCED RISK PRODUCT IQOS: IQOS USE FOR 12 WEEKS |
| FG001 | E-CIG | ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE REDUCED RISK PRODUCT E-CIG: ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE FOR 12 WEEKS |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | IQOS | HEAT NOT BURN REDUCED RISK PRODUCT IQOS: IQOS USE FOR 12 WEEKS |
| BG001 | E-CIG | ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE REDUCED RISK PRODUCT E-CIG: ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE FOR 12 WEEKS |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Smoking Cessation | to compare the efficacy of HTP and EC, in terms of quit rates at week 12, by self-reporting abstinence from classic cigarette [validated by an Exhaled breath Carbon monoxide (eCO) measurement ≤10ppm)] | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 12 WEEK |
|
3 months
Any participants showed/reported signs and symptoms considered serious by the medical investigators with absence of all-cause of mortality
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | IQOS | HEAT NOT BURN REDUCED RISK PRODUCT IQOS: IQOS USE FOR 12 WEEKS | 0 |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maria Signorelli | University of Catania | 095.378.2636/794 | maria.signorelli@unict.it |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | Sep 26, 2017 | Nov 27, 2020 | Prot_000.pdf |
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jul 8, 2020 | Nov 27, 2020 | SAP_001.pdf |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000073865 | Cigarette Smoking |
| D012907 | Smoking |
| D040261 | Harm Reduction |
| D000072137 | Vaping |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000073869 | Tobacco Smoking |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D064424 | Tobacco Use |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Device |
ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE FOR 12 WEEKS |
|
To compare the adoption rate to product use [by collecting (empty) refill bottles and used heathsticks on a daily basis, verified by a study diary filled daily by the subject];
| Week 12 |
| Acceptability | To compare the acceptability derived from the use of HTP and EC by the modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire (mCEQ). It is a self-administered questionnaire that contains 12 items covering both reinforcing and aversive effects of smoking. The items are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 not at all to 7 extremely The total mCEQ score range from min 12 to max 84. Higher scores for the total mCEQ reflect a better outcome. There are also the following 5 subscales:
| Week 12 |
| Number of Participants With Product-related Adverse Events | To compare number of participants with adverse events derived from the use of HTP and EC as assessed by CTCAE v4.0 | Week 12 |
| Changes in Biomarkers of Biological Effects (BoBE) | changes in Biomarkers of Biological Effects (BoBE) such as: eCO in the exhaled breath (i.e. eCO), step test values | Week 12 |
| Reliability | To compare the reliability of HTP and EC, in terms of incidence and kind of malfunctioning events, through self-reporting. | Baseline visit, Week 12 |
| Derived |
| Caponnetto P, Caruso M, Maglia M, Emma R, Saitta D, Busa B, Polosa R, Prosperini U, Pennisi A, Benfatto F, Sartorio C, Guastella M, Mondati E. Non-inferiority trial comparing cigarette consumption, adoption rates, acceptability, tolerability, and tobacco harm reduction potential in smokers switching to Heated Tobacco Products or electronic cigarettes: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jan 8;17:100518. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100518. eCollection 2020 Mar. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Smoking Reduction | To compare the smoking reduction derived from the use of HTP and EC, intended as a 50% reduction in the number of conventional cigarette/day at week 12, defined through self-reporting; | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Adoption Rate | To compare the adoption rate to product use [by collecting (empty) refill bottles and used heathsticks on a daily basis, verified by a study diary filled daily by the subject]; | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 12 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Acceptability | To compare the acceptability derived from the use of HTP and EC by the modified Cigarette Evaluation Questionnaire (mCEQ). It is a self-administered questionnaire that contains 12 items covering both reinforcing and aversive effects of smoking. The items are rated on a 7-point scale from 1 not at all to 7 extremely The total mCEQ score range from min 12 to max 84. Higher scores for the total mCEQ reflect a better outcome. There are also the following 5 subscales:
| Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Week 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Product-related Adverse Events | To compare number of participants with adverse events derived from the use of HTP and EC as assessed by CTCAE v4.0 | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Changes in Biomarkers of Biological Effects (BoBE) | changes in Biomarkers of Biological Effects (BoBE) such as: eCO in the exhaled breath (i.e. eCO), step test values | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | ppm | Week 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Reliability | To compare the reliability of HTP and EC, in terms of incidence and kind of malfunctioning events, through self-reporting. | Not Posted | Baseline visit, Week 12 | Participants |
| 110 |
| 0 |
| 110 |
| 65 |
| 110 |
| EG001 | E-CIG | ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE REDUCED RISK PRODUCT E-CIG: ELECTRONIC CIGARETTE FOR 12 WEEKS | 0 | 110 | 0 | 110 | 56 | 110 |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Oropharyngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Palpitations | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Catarrh | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 21.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided