Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Kemin Foods LC | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study seeks to observe the effects of a proprietary spearmint extract and green tea blend on sleep quality and duration. The study observes the effect of the supplement regarding sleep quality, and mental health.
Sleep disturbance is common in adults and when it persists may result in chronic disease, excess health care utilization, mental disorders, health-risk behaviors, limitations of daily functioning, lost productivity, injury, and mortality (IOM 2006). An estimated 50-70 million adults in the United States have chronic sleep and wakefulness disorders (IOM 2006; Ram 2010) and many more adults report insufficient or deprived sleep. Data from 2014 indicates that approximately 35% of the US population is receiving insufficient sleep (Liu et al., 2016). This is alarming, since insufficient sleep is associated with cardiometabolic disease risk factors including weight gain, obesity, hypertension, diabetes, and inflammation (Grandner et al., 2016), as well as poor daytime functioning and many other outcomes (Grandner, 2017). Cognitive deficits are routinely seen in the laboratory, especially on the Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) (Lim and Dinges, 2010). The National Institutes of Health suggests that adults aim for 7-8 h of sleep per night; however, approximately 28% of adults in the United States reported sleeping 6 h or less based on data from 2008 to 2010 (Schoenborn 2010).
A number of strategies are recommended to promote sleep quality and quantity, including a series of behavioral recommendations, such as keeping to a routine sleeping schedule, the timing of eating and physical activity in relation to bedtime, avoidance of stimulants, and maintaining a bedroom environment conducive to sleep (National Sleep Foundation 2015). Although, pharmacologic options are available to treat sleep disturbances, there is consumer interest in natural sleep remedies due to concerns with side effects, dependency, and the safety of prescription medications. The current study seeks observe the effects of a new proprietary blend containing spearmint and green tea extract. It will be the first randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial observing the effects of 30 days of 500 mg of a blend containing Spearmint extract and green tea on sleep when administered 30 minutes before bed. This study will utilize Fit-bit (San Francisco, California) (a tool whose use for evaluation of sleep is growing) for daily evaluation of sleep throughout the study in addition to polysomnography, considered by many researchers to be the gold standard for evaluation of sleep outcomes, at chosen timepoints.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Spearmint Extract Blend | Active Comparator | Subjects randomized into the active treatment group will be asked to consume 500 mg/day of the Proprietary Spearmint Extract Blend blend by mouth every night 30 mins before bed, complete a sleep diary upon waking and wear a Fitbit Charge 2 device for sleep monitoring for 30 days. A subset of this group will undergo 2 overnight polysomnography studies |
|
| Control | Placebo Comparator | Subjects randomized into the active treatment group will be asked to consume 500 mg/day of the excipient, microcrystalline cellulose by mouth every night 30 mins before bed, complete a sleep diary upon waking and wear a Fitbit Charge 2 device for sleep monitoring for 30 days. A subset of this group will undergo 2 overnight polysomnography studies |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proprietary Spearmint Extract Blend | Dietary Supplement | Water extracted spearmint extract and green tea blend |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sleep Diary- Sleep Latency | Time it takes to fall asleep after the lights have been turned off in minutes (Weekly averages) | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Fitbit - Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep | Change in Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep in minutes (Weekly averages) | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sleep Diary -Total Sleep Time | Total Sleep Time in minutes | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Sleep Diary-Wake After Sleep Onset | Number of awakenings after sleep onset |
Not provided
INCLUSION CRITERIA
To be included in the study, patients must:
EXCLUSION CRITERIA
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Grandner, PhD | University of Arizona | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Arizona Dept of Psychiatry Research facilities | Tucson | Arizona | 85724 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33809544 | Derived | Tubbs AS, Kennedy KER, Alfonso-Miller P, Wills CCA, Grandner MA. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of a Polyphenol Botanical Blend on Sleep and Daytime Functioning. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 16;18(6):3044. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18063044. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Recruitment occurred by self-referral, social media, and flyer advertising in Tucson, Arizona, USA.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Proprietary Spearmint Extract Blend | Subjects randomized into the active treatment group will be asked to consume 500 mg/day of the Proprietary Spearmint Extract Blend blend by mouth every night 30 mins before bed, complete a sleep diary upon waking and wear a Fitbit Charge 2 device for sleep monitoring for 30 days. A subset of this group will undergo 2 overnight polysomnography studies Proprietary Spearmint Extract Blend: Water extracted spearmint extract and green tea blend |
| FG001 | Control | Subjects randomized into the active treatment group will be asked to consume 500 mg/day of the excipient, microcrystalline cellulose by mouth every night 30 mins before bed, complete a sleep diary upon waking and wear a Fitbit Charge 2 device for sleep monitoring for 30 days. A subset of this group will undergo 2 overnight polysomnography studies Control: Placebo |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Proprietary Spearmint Extract Blend | Subjects randomized into the active treatment group will be asked to consume 500 mg/day of the Proprietary Spearmint Extract Blend blend by mouth every night 30 mins before bed, complete a sleep diary upon waking and wear a Fitbit Charge 2 device for sleep monitoring for 30 days. A subset of this group will undergo 2 overnight polysomnography studies Proprietary Spearmint Extract Blend: Water extracted spearmint extract and green tea blend |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Sleep Diary- Sleep Latency | Time it takes to fall asleep after the lights have been turned off in minutes (Weekly averages) | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | minutes | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
Adverse event data were collected for approximately 1 month for each participant, as the duration of participation for any given participant was approximately 1 month.
Any events of discomfort, pain, or abnormalities occurring during the course of the study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Proprietary Spearmint Extract Blend | Subjects randomized into the active treatment group will be asked to consume 500 mg/day of the Proprietary Spearmint Extract Blend blend by mouth every night 30 mins before bed, complete a sleep diary upon waking and wear a Fitbit Charge 2 device for sleep monitoring for 30 days. A subset of this group will undergo 2 overnight polysomnography studies Proprietary Spearmint Extract Blend: Water extracted spearmint extract and green tea blend |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stomach Discomfort | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Stomach discomfort symptoms. |
Models were not adjusted for baseline differences in race/ethnicity and REM sleep. Also, there is a lack of polysomnography data, which is the gold standard for evaluating sleep architecture, severely limits inferences on the effects of PBB on REM sleep. A further limitation is that neurocognitive testing was not conducted at a consistent time of day across individuals, meaning the results of neurocognitive testing could have been influenced by time-of-day testing effects.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr Michael Grandner | The University of Arizona | 15206266346 | grandner@email.arizona.edu |
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot | Yes | No | No | Study Protocol | May 16, 2019 | Aug 6, 2021 | Prot_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Control | Other | Placebo |
|
| Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Sleep Diary- Sleep Efficiency | ratio of the total time spent asleep (total sleep time) in a night compared to the total amount of time spent in bed (percentage) | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Sleep Diary - Objective Sleep Quality | Sleep Quality (units on a visual analogue scale from 0-10, 0 being the worst outcome, 10 being the best outcome) | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Fitbit- Light Sleep | Change in Light Sleep in minutes (Weekly averages) | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Fitbit - Total Sleep Time | Total sleep time in minutes | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Fitbit- Sleep Efficiency | ratio of the total time spent asleep (total sleep time) in a night compared to the total amount of time spent in bed (percentage) | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Fitbit- Deep Sleep | Change in Deep Sleep in minutes (Weekly averages) | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) | The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI): Total Score. Self-report rating scale assessing the severity of insomnia symptoms. Range 0-28 with higher scores indicating a more severe insomnia. | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Sustained Attention | Attentional lapses (failure to respond to stimuli within 500 ms) using the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Profile of Mood States (POMS) | Profile of Mood States (POMS): Mood scores. The Profile of Mood States (POMS) is a psychological rating scale used to assess transient, distinct mood states. 65 adjectives rated on 5-point scale 0= not at all; 1=a little; 2=moderately; 3=quite a bit; 4=extremely. Factor analysis: 6 subscales tension-anxiety (9 items, score range: 0-36) depression (15 items, range 0-60) anger-hostility (12 items, range 0-48) vigor-activity (8 items, range 0-32) fatigue (7 items, range 0-28) confusion-bewilderment (7 items, range 0-28) Total mood disturbance (TMD) (range 0-200): TMD = (Tension + Depression + Anger + Fatigue + Confusion) - Vigour | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) | Perceived Stress Scale (PSS): Total Score. The PSS is comprised of 14 items intended to measure how unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded individuals find their life circumstances.Participants rate items on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 - "Never" to 4 - "Very often." Scores range from 0-56 higher scores indicate greater perceived stress. | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD) | The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CESD) Total score. Possible range of scores is zero to 60, with the higher scores indicating the presence of more symptomatology. | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) | Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI): Total Score. The PSQI is a validated self-rating instrument assessing aspects of sleep quality.Minimum score 0 (better); maximum score 21 (worse) < or = 5 associated with good sleep quality; > 5 associated with poor sleep quality. | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Sustained Attention | Mean reaction time to stimuli using the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
| Adverse Event |
|
| Protocol Violation |
|
| BG001 | Control | Subjects randomized into the active treatment group will be asked to consume 500 mg/day of the excipient, microcrystalline cellulose by mouth every night 30 mins before bed, complete a sleep diary upon waking and wear a Fitbit Charge 2 device for sleep monitoring for 30 days. A subset of this group will undergo 2 overnight polysomnography studies Control: Placebo |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Control | Subjects randomized into the active treatment group will be asked to consume 500 mg/day of the excipient, microcrystalline cellulose by mouth every night 30 mins before bed, complete a sleep diary upon waking and wear a Fitbit Charge 2 device for sleep monitoring for 30 days. A subset of this group will undergo 2 overnight polysomnography studies Control: Placebo |
|
|
|
| Primary | Fitbit - Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep | Change in Rapid Eye Movement (REM) Sleep in minutes (Weekly averages) | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | minutes | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Sleep Diary -Total Sleep Time | Total Sleep Time in minutes | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | minutes | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Sleep Diary-Wake After Sleep Onset | Number of awakenings after sleep onset | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | awakenings | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Sleep Diary- Sleep Efficiency | ratio of the total time spent asleep (total sleep time) in a night compared to the total amount of time spent in bed (percentage) | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | percent | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Sleep Diary - Objective Sleep Quality | Sleep Quality (units on a visual analogue scale from 0-10, 0 being the worst outcome, 10 being the best outcome) | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | units on a scale | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Fitbit- Light Sleep | Change in Light Sleep in minutes (Weekly averages) | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | minutes | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Fitbit - Total Sleep Time | Total sleep time in minutes | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | minutes | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Fitbit- Sleep Efficiency | ratio of the total time spent asleep (total sleep time) in a night compared to the total amount of time spent in bed (percentage) | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | percent | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Fitbit- Deep Sleep | Change in Deep Sleep in minutes (Weekly averages) | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | minutes | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) | The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI): Total Score. Self-report rating scale assessing the severity of insomnia symptoms. Range 0-28 with higher scores indicating a more severe insomnia. | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Sustained Attention | Attentional lapses (failure to respond to stimuli within 500 ms) using the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | number of lapses | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Profile of Mood States (POMS) | Profile of Mood States (POMS): Mood scores. The Profile of Mood States (POMS) is a psychological rating scale used to assess transient, distinct mood states. 65 adjectives rated on 5-point scale 0= not at all; 1=a little; 2=moderately; 3=quite a bit; 4=extremely. Factor analysis: 6 subscales tension-anxiety (9 items, score range: 0-36) depression (15 items, range 0-60) anger-hostility (12 items, range 0-48) vigor-activity (8 items, range 0-32) fatigue (7 items, range 0-28) confusion-bewilderment (7 items, range 0-28) Total mood disturbance (TMD) (range 0-200): TMD = (Tension + Depression + Anger + Fatigue + Confusion) - Vigour | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) | Perceived Stress Scale (PSS): Total Score. The PSS is comprised of 14 items intended to measure how unpredictable, uncontrollable, and overloaded individuals find their life circumstances.Participants rate items on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 - "Never" to 4 - "Very often." Scores range from 0-56 higher scores indicate greater perceived stress. | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CESD) | The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale (CESD) Total score. Possible range of scores is zero to 60, with the higher scores indicating the presence of more symptomatology. | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) | Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI): Total Score. The PSQI is a validated self-rating instrument assessing aspects of sleep quality.Minimum score 0 (better); maximum score 21 (worse) < or = 5 associated with good sleep quality; > 5 associated with poor sleep quality. | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | score on a scale | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Sustained Attention | Mean reaction time to stimuli using the psychomotor vigilance test (PVT) | Final analyses included only 43 participants (4 excluded) in the active group, and 46 participants (3 excluded), due to missing data. | Posted | Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | milliseconds | Change from baseline after 30 days supplementation |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 53 |
| 0 |
| 53 |
| 6 |
| 53 |
| EG001 | Control | Subjects randomized into the active treatment group will be asked to consume 500 mg/day of the excipient, microcrystalline cellulose by mouth every night 30 mins before bed, complete a sleep diary upon waking and wear a Fitbit Charge 2 device for sleep monitoring for 30 days. A subset of this group will undergo 2 overnight polysomnography studies Control: Placebo | 0 | 52 | 0 | 52 | 9 | 52 |
|
| Muscle pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Muscle pain or injury |
|
| Headache/migraine | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Migraine/Headache |
|
| Sore throat | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Sore or itchy throat |
|
| Tooth pain | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Tooth pain or sensitivity |
|
| Ear ache | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Ear ache |
|
| Sinus congestion | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Sinus congestion |
|
| Fever | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | low-grade fever. |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment | Weakness/fatigue |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| 1.58 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.77 |
| 3.94 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| 20.08 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.64 |
| 40.8 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| -3.0 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -8.1 |
| 2.1 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| 4.66 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 1.19 |
| 8.12 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| 0.45 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.08 |
| 0.81 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| -0.2 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -6.23 |
| 5.82 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| 9.84 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -15.63 |
| 35.31 |
| Equivalence |
p<0.05 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| -0.11 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.04 |
| 0.83 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| -.24 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -3.35 |
| 2.86 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| 0.96 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.5 |
| 2.42 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |
| 0.5242 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| 0.41 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.88 |
| 1.71 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |
| depression |
|
| anger-hostility |
|
| vigor-activity |
|
| fatigue |
|
| confusion-bewilderment |
|
| 0.1427 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| 3.87 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.35 |
| 9.09 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |
| POMS-Tension | Paired T-test | 0.9344 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.05 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.11 | 1.21 | Equivalence | P<0.05 |
| POMS-Tension | Paired T-test | 0.0092 | Mean Difference (Net) | 1.54 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.40 | 2.69 | Equivalence | P<0.05 |
| POMS-Depression | Paired T-test | 0.755 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.29 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.55 | 2.12 | Equivalence | P<0.05 |
| POMS-Depression | Paired T-test | 0.2131 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.74 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.44 | 1.92 | Equivalence | P<0.05 |
| POMS-Anger | Paired T-test | 0.06 | Mean Difference (Net) | 1.19 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.05 | 2.43 | Equivalence | P<0.05 |
| POMS-Anger | Paired T-test | 0.4117 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.24 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.34 | 0.82 | Equivalence | P<0.05 |
| POMS-Fatigue | Paired T-test | 0.9548 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.05 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.64 | 1.73 | Equivalence | P<0.05 |
| POMS-Fatigue | Paired T-test | 0.4649 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.48 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.83 | 1.79 | Equivalence | P<0.05 |
| POMS-Confusion | Paired T-test | 0.5656 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.26 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.65 | 1.18 | Equivalence | P<0.05 |
| POMS-Confusion | Paired T-test | 0.4307 | Mean Difference (Net) | 0.33 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.5 | 1.15 | Equivalence | P<0.05 |
| POMS-Vigor | Paired T-test | 0.2651 | Mean Difference (Net) | 1.17 | 2-Sided | 95 | -0.92 | 3.25 | Equivalence | P<0.05 |
| POMS-Vigor | Paired T-test | 0.5992 | Mean Difference (Net) | -0.54 | 2-Sided | 95 | -2.61 | 1.53 | Equivalence | P<0.05 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| 1.39 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.65 |
| 3.43 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| 0.63 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.9 |
| 2.16 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| 0.11 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -0.77 |
| 0.99 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |
| .8241 |
| Mean Difference (Net) |
| -2.01 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -20.13 |
| 16.11 |
| Equivalence |
P<0.05 |